Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T15:00:42.991Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Hatch rate of laying hen strains provided a photoperiod during incubation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2019

W. A. Hannah ,
T. Astatkie  and
B. M. Rathgeber Open the ORCID record for B. M. Rathgeber [Opens in a new window]
W. A. Hannah
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science and Aquaculture, Faculty of Agriculture, Dalhousie University, Truro, NS, B2N 5E3, Canada
T. Astatkie
Affiliation:
Department of Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, Dalhousie University, Truro, NS, B2N 5E3, Canada
B. M. Rathgeber*
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science and Aquaculture, Faculty of Agriculture, Dalhousie University, Truro, NS, B2N 5E3, Canada
*
†E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Implementing a photoperiod during incubation has been shown to be a potential next step to removing one more stressor for newly hatched poultry species. The distribution of hatch over time is a parameter that may be influenced by photoperiod that could benefit from a photoperiod but has not been studied at this time and is the objective of this paper. The impact on hatch rate for three strains of chicken, Barred Plymouth Rock (BR), Lohmann Brown (LB) and Lohmann Lite (LL), was measured following the provision of a 12L : 12D (12 h light : 12 h dark) photoperiod starting at 0, 9 or 17 days of incubation and compared with incubation in the dark. The cumulative number of chicks hatched eggs at four points in time (489, 498, 507 and 516 h of incubation) was analysed using repeated measures analysis in a 3 × 4 factorial arrangement of treatments. Repeated measures analysis was done to determine the main and interaction effects of photoperiod and bird strain, and a regression analysis was used to determine how these effects evolved over time. Lohmann Brown embryos provided a 12L : 12D photoperiod throughout incubation were first to reach 50% of total chicks hatched and rate of hatch from 50% to 75% of total chicks hatched as well. As the LB chicks did not begin to hatch earlier or finish later, the LB strain was the most synchronised when provided a 12L : 12D photoperiod from the beginning of incubation. Similar results were found for LL, but no difference on the percentage hatched over time was found when provided the 12L : 12D photoperiod at the beginning of incubation or at day 9. The BR strain only showed a significant difference in hatch window synchronisation when provided a 12L : 12D photoperiod at day 9 of incubation. These results indicate that the strain of chicken impacts the hatch window, and each strain responds to a photoperiod during incubation differently. This information could be useful for hatchery managers to deal with different strains of chicken for incubation.

Keywords

chickenincubationlightday lengthgenetic background
Type
Research Article
Information
animal , Volume 14 , Issue 2 , February 2020 , pp. 353 - 359
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Archer, GS and Mench, JA 2013. The effects of light stimulation during incubation on indicators of stress susceptibility in broilers. Poultry Science 92, 3103–3108.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Archer, GS and Mench, JA 2014a. Natural incubation patterns and the effects of exposing eggs to light at various times during incubation on post-hatch fear and stress responses in broiler (meat) chickens. Applied Animal Behavior Science 152, 44–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Archer, GS and Mench, JA 2014b. The effects of the duration and onset of light stimulation during incubation on the behavior, plasma melatonin levels, and productivity of broiler chickens. Journal of Animal Science 92, 1753–1759.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Archer, GS, Shivaprasad, HL and Mench, JA 2009. Effect of providing light during incubation on the health, productivity, and behavior of broiler chickens. Poultry Science 88, 29–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bates, DM and Watts, DG 2007. Nonlinear regression and its applications. Wiley, New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
Bergoug, H, Burel, C, Guinebretière, M, Tong, Q, Roulston, N, Romanini, CEB, Exadaktylos, V, McGonnell, IM, Demmers, TGM, Verhelst, R, Bahr, C, Berckmans, D and Eterradossi, N 2013. Effect of pre-incubation and incubation conditions on hatchability, hatch time and hatch window, and effect of post-hatch handling on chick quality at placement. World’s Poultry Science Journal 69, 313–334.10.1017/S0043933913000329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergoug, H, Guinbretiere, M, Roulston, N, Tong, Q, Romanini, CEB, Exadaktylos, V, Mcgonnell, IM, Demmers, T, Garain, P, Bahr, C, Berckmans, D, Eterradossi, N and Michel, V 2015. Relationships between hatch time and egg weight, embryo sex, chick quality, body weight and pododermatitis severity during broiler rearing. European Poultry Science 79, 1–10.Google Scholar
Bohren, BB and Siegel, PB 1975. Light effects during incubation on line of White Leghorns selected for fast and slow hatching. Poultry Science 54, 1372–1374.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Canadian Council of Animal Care. 1993. Guide to the care and use of experimental animals. CCAC, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.Google Scholar
Careghi, C, Tona, K, Onagbesan, O, Buyse, J, Decuypere, E and Bruggeman, V 2005. The effects of the spread of hatch and interaction with delayed feed access after hatch on broiler performance until seven days of age. Poultry Science 84, 1314–1320.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Csernus, V, Becher, P and Mess, B 1999. Wavelength dependency of light-induced changes in rhythmic melatonin secretion from chicken pineal gland in vitro. Neuroendocrinology Letters 20, 299–304.Google ScholarPubMed
Csernus, V and Mess, B 2003. Biorhythms and pineal gland. Neuroendocrinology Letters 24, 404–411.Google ScholarPubMed
Li, Y and Cassone, VM 2015. Clock-controlled regulation of the acute effects of norepinephrine on chick pineal melatonin rhythms. Journal of Biological Rhythms 30, 519–532.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Littell, RC, Henry, PR and Ammerman, CB 1998. Statistical analysis of repeated measures data using SAS procedures. Journal of Animal Science 76, 1216–1231.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lourens, A, Molenaar, R, van den Brand, H, Heetkamp, MJW, Meijerhof, R and Kemp, B 2006. Effect of egg size on heat production and the transition of energy from egg to hatchling. Poultry Science 85, 770–776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matsushita, M, Noguchi, H, Lu, YF, Tomizawa, K, Michiue, H, Li, ST, Hirose, K, Bonner-Weir, S and Matsui, H 2004. Photo-acceleration of protein release from endosome in the protein transduction system. FEBS Letters 572, 221–226.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maurer, G, Portugal, SJ and Cassey, P 2011. Review: an embryo’s eye view of avian eggshell pigmentation. Journal of Avian Biology 42, 494–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maurer, G, Portugal, SJ, Hauber, ME, Mikšík, I, Russell, DGD and Cassey, P 2015. First light for avian embryos: eggshell thickness and pigmentation mediate variation in development and UV exposure in wild bird eggs. Functional Ecology 29, 209–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Møller, A, Sanotra, G and Vestergaard, K 1995. Developmental stability in relation to population density and breed of chickens. Poultry Science 74, 1761–1771.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Montgomery, DC 2013. Design and analysis of experiments. 8th edition. Wiley, New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
Muir, WI and Groves, PJ 2019. The leg strength of two commercial strains of meat chicken subjected to different incubation profiles. Animal 13, 1489–1497.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Özkan, S, Yalçın, S, Babacanoğlu, E, Kozanoğlu, H, Karadaş, F and Uysal, S 2012a. Photoperiodic lighting (16 hours of light: 8 hours of dark) programs during incubation: 1. Effects on growth and circadian physiological traits of embryos and early stress response of broiler chickens. Poultry Science 91, 2912–2921.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Özkan, S, Yalçın, S, Babacanoğlu, E, Uysal, S, Karadaş, F and Kozanoğlu, H 2012b. Photoperiodic lighting (16 hours of light:8 hours of dark) programs during incubation: 2. Effects on early posthatching growth, blood physiology, and production performance in broiler chickens in relation to posthatching lighting programs. Poultry Science 91, 2922–2930.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parvin, R, Mushtaq, MMH, Kim, MJ and Choi, HC 2014. Light emitting diode (LED) as a source of monochromatic light: a novel lighting approach for immunity and meat quality of poultry. World’s Poultry Science Journal 70, 557–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, JJ, Vanderahe, AR and Powers, TH 1958. Electrical studies of function and development of the eye and optic lobes in the chick embryo. Journal of Experimental Zoololgy 139, 459–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romanini, CEB, Exadaktylos, V, Tong, Q, McGonnel, I, Demmers, TGM, Bergoug, H, Eterradossi, N, Roulston, N, Garain, P, Bahr, C and Berckmans, D 2013. Monitoring the hatch time of individual chicken embryos. Poultry Science 92, 303–309.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rozenboim, I, El Halawani, ME, Kashash, Y, Piestun, Y and Halevy, O 2013. The effect of monochromatic photostimulation on growth and development of broiler birds. General and Comparative Endocrinology 190, 214–219.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rozenboim, I, Huisinga, R, Halevy, O and El Halawani, ME 2003. Effect of embryonic photostimulation on the posthatch growth of turkey poults. Poultry Science 82, 1181–1187.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
SAS Institute Inc. 2014. SAS/STAT 9.4 user’s guide. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA.Google Scholar
Schwean-Lardner, K, Fancher, BI, Laarveld, B and Classen, HL 2014. Effect of day length on flock behavioural patterns and melatonin rhythms in broilers. British Poultry Science 55, 21–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shafey, TM, Al-Batshan, HA, Ghannam, MM and Al-Ayed, MS 2005. Effect of intensity of eggshell pigment and illuminated incubation on hatchability of brown eggs. British Poultry Science 46, 190–198.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sharp, PJ 1993. Photoperiodic control of reproduction in the domestic hen. Poultry Science 72, 897–905.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shutze, JV, Lauber, JK, Kato, M and Wison, WO 1962. Influence of incandescent and coloured light on chicken embryos during incubation. Nature 196, 594–595.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Silversides, FG, Korver, DR and Budgell, KL 2006. Effect of strain of layer and age at photostimulation on egg production, egg quality, and bone strength. Poultry Science 85, 1136–1144.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Srinivasan, V, Maestroni, GJM, Cardinali, DP, Esquifino, AI, Perumal, SRP and Miller, SC 2005. Melatonin, immune function and aging. Immunity and Ageing 2, 17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tong, Q, McGonnell, IM, Demmers, TGM, Roulston, N, Bergoug, H, Romanini, CE, Verhelst, R, Guinebretiere, M, Eterradossi, N, Berckmans, D and Exadaktylos, V 2018. Effect of a photoperiodic green light programme during incubation on embryo development and hatch process. Animal 12, 765–773.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walter, JH and Voitle, RA 1972. Effects of photoperiod during incubation on embryonic and post-embryoninc development of broilers. Poultry Science 51, 1122–1126.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Willemsen, H, Debonne, M, Swennen, Q, Everaert, N, Careghi, C, Han, H, Bruggeman, V, Tona, K and Decuypere, E 2010. Delay in feed access and spread of hatch: importance of early nutrition. World’s Poultry Science Journal 66, 177–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, HR 1991. Inter-relationships of egg size, chick size, posthatching growth, and hatchability. World’s Poultry Science Journal 47, 5–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Hannah et al. supplementary material

Figures S1-S2

Download Hannah et al. supplementary material(File)
File 14.9 KB