Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T05:17:21.572Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The greenhouse gas abatement potential of productivity improving measures applied to cattle systems in a developing region

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 September 2017

G. R. Salmon ,
K. Marshall ,
S. F. Tebug ,
A. Missohou ,
T. P. Robinson  and
M. MacLeod
G. R. Salmon*
Affiliation:
Scotland’s Rural College (SRUC), West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JG, UK School of GeoSciences, University of Edinburgh, King’s Buildings, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JN, UK
K. Marshall
Affiliation:
The International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), PO 30709, Nairobi 00100, Kenya
S. F. Tebug
Affiliation:
The International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), PO 30709, Nairobi 00100, Kenya
A. Missohou
Affiliation:
Inter-State School of Veterinary Science and Medicine (EISMV), Dakar, Senegal
T. P. Robinson
Affiliation:
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Animal Production and Health Division, Viale delle Terme di Caracalla, 00153 Rome, Italy
M. MacLeod
Affiliation:
Scotland’s Rural College (SRUC), West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JG, UK
*
†E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Developing countries are experiencing an increase in total demand for livestock commodities, as populations and per capita demands increase. Increased production is therefore required to meet this demand and maintain food security. Production increases will lead to proportionate increases in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions unless offset by reductions in the emissions intensity (Ei) (i.e. the amount of GHG emitted per kg of commodity produced) of livestock production. It is therefore important to identify measures that can increase production whilst reducing Ei cost-effectively. This paper seeks to do this for smallholder agro-pastoral cattle systems in Senegal; ranging from low input to semi-intensified, they are representative of a large proportion of the national cattle production. Specifically, it identifies a shortlist of mitigation measures with potential for application to the various herd systems and estimates their GHG emissions abatement potential (using the Global Livestock Environmental Assessment Model) and cost-effectiveness. Limitations and future requirements are identified and discussed. This paper demonstrates that the Ei of meat and milk from livestock systems in a developing region can be reduced through measures that would also benefit food security, many of which are likely to be cost-beneficial. The ability to make such quantification can assist future sustainable development efforts.

Keywords

greenhouse gasesruminantproductivitymitigationSenegal
Type
Research Article
Information
animal , Volume 12 , Issue 4 , April 2018 , pp. 844 - 852
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abutarbush, SM, Ababneh, MM, Al Zoubi, IG, Al Sheyab, OM, Al Zoubi, MG, Alekish, MO and Al Gharabat, RJ 2015. Lumpy skin disease in Jordan: disease emergence, clinical signs, complications and preliminary-associated economic losses. Transboundary and Emerging Diseases 62, 549–554.Google Scholar
Ayelet, G, Abate, Y, Sisay, T, Nigussie, H, Gelaye, E, Jemberie, S and Asmare, K 2013. Lumpy skin disease: preliminary vaccine efficacy assessment and overview on outbreak impact in dairy cattle at Debre Zeit, central Ethiopia. Antiviral Research 98, 261–265.Google Scholar
Bayissa, B, Ayelet, G, Kyule, M, Jibril, Y and Gelaye, E 2011. Study on seroprevalence, risk factors, and economic impact of foot-and-mouth disease in Borena pastoral and agro-pastoral system, southern Ethiopia. Tropical Animal Health and Production 43, 759–766.Google Scholar
Blowey, R and Weaver, A 2003. Color atlas of diseases and disorders of cattle, 2nd edition. Mosby Elsevier Science Ltd, Edinburgh, UK.Google Scholar
Bouyer, F, Seck, MT, Dicko, AH, Sall, B, Lo, M, Vreysen, MJB, Chia, E, Bouyer, J and Wane, A 2014. Ex-ante benefit-cost analysis of the elimination of a Glossina palpalis gambiensis population in the Niayes of Senegal. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases 8, 1–12.Google Scholar
Bryan, E, Ringler, C, Okoba, B, Koo, J, Herrero, M and Silvestri, S 2013. Can agriculture support climate change adaptation, greenhouse gas mitigation and rural livelihoods? Insights from Kenya. Climatic Change 118, 151–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chenost, M and Kayouli, C 1997. IV. Urea treatment. Retrieved on 22 September 2016 from http://www.fao.org/docrep/003/w4988e/w4988e04.htm Google Scholar
Daher, I 1994. La maladie nodulaire cutanee des bovins et ses incidences economiques dans les elevages laitiers des Niayes (Senegal). Diploma thesis, Inter-State School of Veterinary Science and Medicine (EISMV), Dakar, Senegal.Google Scholar
Dong, H, Mangino, J, McAllister, TA, Hatfield, JL, Johnson, DE, Lassey, KR, Aparecida de Lima, M and Romanovskaya, A 2006. Chapter 10: Emissions from livestock and manure management. In 2006 IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories volume 4: agriculture, forestry and other land use (ed. HS Eggleston, L Buendia, K Miwa, T Ngara and K Tanabe), pp. 10.1–10.87. Institute for Global Environmental Strategies, Kanagawa, Japan.Google Scholar
Feyissa, F, Prasad, S, Assefa, G, Bediye, S and Kitaw, G 2014. Dynamics in nutritional characteristics of natural pasture hay as affected by harvesting stage, storage method and storage duration in the cooler tropical highlands. African Journal of Agricultural Research 9, 3233–3244.Google Scholar
Gari, G, Bonnet, P, Roger, F and Waret-Szkuta, A 2011. Epidemiological aspects and financial impact of lumpy skin disease in Ethiopia. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 102, 274–283.Google Scholar
Gerber, PJ, Steinfeld, H, Henderson, B, Mottet, A, Opio, C, Dijkman, J, Falcucci, A and Tempio, G 2013. Tackling climate change through livestock: a global assessment of emissions and mitigation opportunities. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Rome, Italy.Google Scholar
Hailu, B, Gari, G, Tolosa, T, Beyene, B and Teklue, T 2015. Study on the epidemiological and financial impacts of clinical lumpy skin disease in selected districts of Tigray and Afar regional states, North Eastern Ethiopia. International Journal of Current Research 7, 17415–17425.Google Scholar
Jarrige, R 1989. Ruminant nutrition: recommended allowances and feed tables. INRA, Paris, France.Google Scholar
Jemberu, WT, Mourits, MCM, Woldehanna, T and Hogeveen, H 2014. Economic impact of foot and mouth disease outbreaks on smallholder farmers in Ethiopia. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 116, 26–36.Google Scholar
Knight-Jones, TJD and Rushton, J 2013. The economic impacts of foot and mouth disease – what are they, how big are they and where do they occur? Preventive Veterinary Medicine 112, 162–173.Google Scholar
Lukuyu, B, Gachuiri, CK, Lukuyu, M, Lusweti, C and Mwendia, S 2012. Feeding dairy cattle in East Africa. East Africa Dairy Development Project, Nairobi, Kenya.Google Scholar
Lyons, NA, Alexander, N, Stärk, KDC, Dulu, TD, Sumption, KJ, James, AD, Rushton, J and Fine, PEM 2015. Impact of foot-and-mouth disease on milk production on a large-scale dairy farm in Kenya. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 120, 177–186.Google Scholar
Marshall, K, Tebug, S, Juga, J, Tapio, M and Missohou, A 2016. Better dairy cattle breeds and better management can improve the livelihoods of the rural poor in Senegal. ILRI Research Brief 65. International Livestock Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya.Google Scholar
Ministère de l'élevage 2013. Direction des services veterinaires: rapport annuel d’activites 2012. Ministère de l'élevage, Dakar, Senegal.Google Scholar
Ministère de l'élevage et des productions animales 2014. Rapport d’activites 2014. Ministère de l'élevage et des productions animales, Dakar, Senegal.Google Scholar
Ministère du Commerce 2013. Commercialisation du lait local: restructurer les chaînes d’approvisionnement. Retrieved on 8 February 2017 from http://www.commerce.gouv.sn/article.php3?id_article=285#sthash.qzA8ID8Z. qg4D7rA9.dpbs Google Scholar
Onono, JO, Wieland, B and Rushton, J 2013. Constraints to cattle production in a semiarid pastoral system in Kenya. Tropical Animal Health and Production 45, 1415–1422.Google Scholar
Opio, C, Gerber, PJ, Mottet, A, Falcucci, A, Tempio, G, MacLeod, M, Vellinga, T, Henderson, B and Steinfeld, H 2013. Greenhouse gas emissions from ruminant supply chains – a global life cycle assessment. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy.Google Scholar
Roland-Holst, D and Otte, J 2007. Livestock and livelihoods: development goals and indicators applied to Senegal. African Journal of Agricultural Research 2, 240–251.Google Scholar
Rufael, T, Catley, A, Bogale, A, Sahle, M and Shiferaw, Y 2008. Foot and mouth disease in the Borana pastoral system, southern Ethiopia and implications for livelihoods and international trade. Tropical Animal Health and Production 40, 29–38.Google Scholar
Salib, FA and Osman, AH 2011. Incidence of lumpy skin disease among Egyptian cattle in Giza Governorate, Egypt. Veterinary World 4, 162–167.Google Scholar
Salmon, GR, Marshall, K, Tebug, SF, Missohou, A, Sabi, SS and MacLeod, M 2016. Farmer attitudes to the improvement of productivity in Senegalese low input cattle systems. LEES Working Papers 2016. Scotland’s Rural College, Edinburgh, UK.Google Scholar
Şentürk, B and Yalçin, C 2008. Production losses due to endemic foot-and-mouth disease in cattle in Turkey. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences 32, 433–440.Google Scholar
Shaw, A, Hendrick, G, Gilbert, M, Mattioli, R, Codjia, V, Dao, B, Diall, O, Mahama, C, Sidibé, I and Wint, W 2006. Mapping the benefits: a new decision tool for tsetse and trypanosomiasis interventions. Department for International Development, Animal Health Programme, Centre for Tropical Veterinary Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.Google Scholar
Shaw, A, Torr, S, Waiswa, C, Cecchi, G, Wint, W, Mattioli, R and Robinson, T 2013. Estimating the costs of tsetse control options: an example for Uganda. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 110, 290–303.Google Scholar
Tebug, SF, Kamga-Waladjo, AR, Ema, PJN, Muyeneza, C, Kane, O, Seck, A, Ly, MT and Lo, M 2015. Cattle farmer awareness and behavior regarding prevention of zoonotic disease transmission in Senegal. Journal of Agromedicine 20, 217–224.Google Scholar
Udo, H, Weiler, V, Modupeore, O, Viets, T and Oosting, S 2016. Intensification to reduce the carbon footprint of smallholder milk production: fact or fiction? Outlook on Agriculture 45, 33–38.Google Scholar
Weiler, V, Udo, HM, Viets, T, Crane, T and De Boer, IJ 2014. Handling multi-functionality of livestock in a life cycle assessment: the case of smallholder dairying in Kenya. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 8, 29–38.Google Scholar
Young, JR, Suon, S, Andrews, CJ, Henry, LA and Windsor, PA 2013. Assessment of financial impact of foot and mouth disease on smallholder cattle farmers in Southern Cambodia. Transboundary and Emerging Diseases 60, 166–174.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: File

Salmon et al supplementary material

Salmon et al supplementary material 1

Download Salmon et al supplementary material(File)
File 112 KB