Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T13:06:22.432Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Factors associated with mortality of broilers during transport to slaughterhouse

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 September 2010

C. Chauvin ,
S. Hillion ,
L. Balaine ,
V. Michel ,
J. Peraste ,
I. Petetin ,
C. Lupo  and
S. Le Bouquin
C. Chauvin*
Affiliation:
Agence française de sécurité sanitaire des aliments (AFSSA), Laboratoire d’études et de recherches avicoles, porcines et piscicoles, 22440 Ploufragan, France
S. Hillion
Affiliation:
Agence française de sécurité sanitaire des aliments (AFSSA), Laboratoire d’études et de recherches avicoles, porcines et piscicoles, 22440 Ploufragan, France
L. Balaine
Affiliation:
Agence française de sécurité sanitaire des aliments (AFSSA), Laboratoire d’études et de recherches avicoles, porcines et piscicoles, 22440 Ploufragan, France
V. Michel
Affiliation:
Agence française de sécurité sanitaire des aliments (AFSSA), Laboratoire d’études et de recherches avicoles, porcines et piscicoles, 22440 Ploufragan, France
J. Peraste
Affiliation:
Agence française de sécurité sanitaire des aliments (AFSSA), Laboratoire d’études et de recherches avicoles, porcines et piscicoles, 22440 Ploufragan, France
I. Petetin
Affiliation:
Agence française de sécurité sanitaire des aliments (AFSSA), Laboratoire d’études et de recherches avicoles, porcines et piscicoles, 22440 Ploufragan, France
C. Lupo
Affiliation:
Agence française de sécurité sanitaire des aliments (AFSSA), Laboratoire d’études et de recherches avicoles, porcines et piscicoles, 22440 Ploufragan, France
S. Le Bouquin
Affiliation:
Agence française de sécurité sanitaire des aliments (AFSSA), Laboratoire d’études et de recherches avicoles, porcines et piscicoles, 22440 Ploufragan, France
*
†E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

In recent years, broiler mortality during transport to the slaughterhouse has become a cause for concern because of animal welfare considerations and associated economic losses. A descriptive and analytical epidemiological study was carried out to estimate the extent of DoA in poultry broiler production in the main producing regions of France and to determine factors influencing the DoA rate. Data regarding animal characteristics and rearing, catching, transport and lairage conditions were collected on farm and at the slaughterhouse for 404 chicken broiler flocks processed during 2005. The average DoA rate was 0.18% (from 0% to 1.4%). Variables found to be associated (P < 0.05) with the DoA rate in a multivariable negative binomial model were flock cumulative mortality on farm, the catching system (mechanical being more at risk than manual), the density in crates (more space allowance being associated with less mortality) and climatic conditions (rain and wind being associated with more DoA). Mortality during transport is thus related to all production steps from the farm to the slaughterhouse. Efforts have therefore to be made by all professionals to contain mortality on farm and during catching and transportation.

Keywords

poultrydead on arrival (DoA)catchinganimal welfareprimary production
Type
Full Paper
Information
animal , Volume 5 , Issue 2 , February 2011 , pp. 287 - 293
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anonymous 2006. Le ramassage mécanisé des volailles. Résultats technico-économiques et analyse des conditions de travail. Chambres d’Agriculture Bretagne MSA, 33pp. Retrieved March 16, 2010 from http://references-sante-securite.msa.fr/files/SST/SST_1197290425994_10884-RAMASSAGE-VOLAILE.pdfGoogle Scholar
Council Directive 2007/43/EC 2007. Laying down minimum rules for the protection of chickens kept for meat production. Official Journal of the European Union L182, 19–28.Google Scholar
Council of Europe 1990. Recommendation no. R (90) 6 of the Committee of Ministers to member states on the transport of poultry.Google Scholar
Delezie, E, Swennen, Q, Buyse, J, Decuypere, E 2007. The effect of feed withdrawal and crating density in transit on metabolism and meat quality of broilers at slaughter weight. Poultry Science 86, 1414–1423.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Drain, ME, Whiting, TL, Rasali, DP, D’Angiolo, VA 2007. Warm weather transport of broiler chickens in Manitoba. I. Farm management factors associated with death loss in transit to slaughter. Canadian Veterinary Journal 48, 76–80.Google ScholarPubMed
EFSA 2004. The welfare of animals during transport. The EFSA Journal 44, 1–36.Google Scholar
Ekstrand, C 1998. An observational cohort study of the effects of catching method on carcase rejection rates in broilers. Animal Welfare 7, 87–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haslam, SM, Knowles, TG, Brown, SN, Wilkins, LJ, Kestin, SC, Warriss, PD, Nicol, CJ 2008. Prevalence and factors associated with it, of birds dead on arrival at the slaughterhouse and other rejection conditions in broiler chickens. British Poultry Science 49, 685–696.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knierim, U, Gocke, A 2003. Effect of catching broilers by hand or machine on rates of injuries and dead-on-arrivals. Animal Welfare 12, 63–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lupo, C, Chauvin, C, Balaine, L, Petetin, I, Peraste, J, Colin, P, Le Bouquin, S 2008. Postmortem condemnations of processed broiler chickens in western France. Veterinary Record 162, 709–713.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lupo, C, Le Bouquin, S, Balaine, L, Michel, V, Peraste, J, Petetin, I, Colin, P, Chauvin, C 2009. Feasibility of screening broiler chicken flocks for risk markers as an aid for meat inspection. Epidemiology and Infection 137, 1086–1098.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nijdam, E, Arens, P, Lambooij, E, Decuypere, E, Stegeman, JA 2004. Factors influencing bruises and mortality of broilers during catching, transport, and lairage. Poultry Science 83, 1610–1615.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nijdam, E, Delezie, E, Lambooij, E, Nabuurs, MJA, Decuypere, E, Stegeman, JA 2005. Comparison of bruises and mortality, stress parameters, and meat quality in manually and mechanically caught broilers. Poultry Science 84, 467–474.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Petracci, M, Bianchi, M, Cavani, C, Gaspari, P, Lavazza, A 2006. Preslaughter mortality in broiler chickens, turkeys, and spent hens under commercial slaughtering. Poultry Science 85, 1660–1664.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ritz, CW, Webster, AB, Czarick, M 2005. Evaluation of hot weather thermal environment and incidence of mortality associated with broiler live haul. Journal of Applied Poultry Research 14, 594–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terlouw, EMC, Arnould, C, Auperin, B, Berri, C, Le Bihan-Duval, E, Deiss, V, Lefevre, F, Lensink, BJ, Mounier, L 2008. Pre-slaughter conditions, animal stress and welfare: current status and possible future research. Animal 2, 1501–1517.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vecerek, K, Grbalova, S, Voslarova, E, Janackova, B, Malena, M 2006. Effects of travel distance and the season of the year on death rates of broilers transported to poultry processing plants. Poultry Science 85, 1881–1884.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vizzier-Thaxton, Y, Thaxton, JP, Shilling, MW 2006. Hand versus mechanical catching and loading of broilers. Poultry International 45, 18–24.Google Scholar
Whiting, TL, Drain, ME, Rasali, DP 2007. Warm weather transport of broiler chickens in Manitoba. II. Truck management factors associated with death loss in transit to slaughter. Canadian Veterinary Journal 48, 148–154.Google ScholarPubMed