Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T05:31:19.564Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Estimation of milk leakage into the rumen of milk-fed calves through an indirect and repeatable method

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 July 2014

E. Labussière*
Affiliation:
INRA–UMR 1348 Pegase, F-35590 Saint-Gilles, France Agrocampus Ouest–UMR 1348 Pegase, F-35590 Saint-Gilles, France
H. Berends
Affiliation:
Animal Nutrition Group, Wageningen University, PO Box 338, 6700 AH Wageningen, The Netherlands
M. S. Gilbert
Affiliation:
Animal Nutrition Group, Wageningen University, PO Box 338, 6700 AH Wageningen, The Netherlands
J. J. G. C. van den Borne
Affiliation:
Animal Nutrition Group, Wageningen University, PO Box 338, 6700 AH Wageningen, The Netherlands
W. J .J. Gerrits
Affiliation:
Animal Nutrition Group, Wageningen University, PO Box 338, 6700 AH Wageningen, The Netherlands
*
E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

In milk-fed calves, quantification of the milk that enters the rumen (ruminal milk volume, RMV) because of malfunction of the esophageal groove reflex may explain part of the variability observed between animals in their growth performance. The RMV can directly be quantified by adding an indigestible marker to the diet and measuring its recovery in the rumen at slaughter, but this technique cannot be repeated in time in the same animal. The objective of the study was to evaluate three indirect methods for estimating RMV. The first method was based on the assumption that ruminal drinking delays and limits acetaminophen appearance in blood after ingestion of milk supplemented with acetaminophen. The second method was based on a negative linear relationship between RMV and urinary recovery of non-metabolizable monosaccharides (3-O-methylglucose, l-rhamnose and d-xylose) added to the milk, owing to rumen fermentation. In the third method, RMV was calculated as the difference between total milk intake and the increase in abomasal milk volume (AMV) at feeding, measured through ultrasonography shortly after feeding, or estimated from the mathematical extrapolation of AMV to feeding time, based on consecutive measurements. These methods were tested in three experiments where calves (n=22, 10 and 13) were bucket fed or partly tube fed (i.e. by inserting milk replacer into the rumen via a tube to mimic ruminal drinking). In addition, Co-EDTA and Cr-EDTA were used as an indigestible marker in one experiment to trace bucket-fed or tube-fed milk replacer, respectively, to measure RMV. The relationship between AMV measured by ultrasonography and AMV measured at slaughter improved when kinetics of AMV were extrapolated to the time of slaughter by mathematical modeling (error between predicted and measured AMV equaled 0.49 l). With this technique, RMV during feeding averaged 17% and 24% of intake in Experiments 2 and 3, respectively. Plasma acetaminophen kinetics and recovery of non-metabolizable monosaccharides in urine were partly associated with ruminal drinking, but these techniques are not considered quantitatively accurate without further information of rumen degradation and absorption. The recovery of indigestible marker measured at slaughter gave a quantitative estimate of RMV (2% in Experiment 3), but improper measurement of emptying rate of fluid from the rumen may lead to underestimation. In conclusion, measuring changes in AMV by ultrasonography, in response to milk feeding, was the most promising indirect method to quantify RMV in veal calves.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Armstrong, DG 1969. Cell bioenergetics and energy metabolism. In Handbuch der Tierernährung (ed. W Lenkeit, K Breirem and E Crasemann), pp. 385414. Verlag P. Parey, Hamburg, Germany.Google Scholar
Aschenbach, JR, Bhatia, SK, Pfannkuche, H and Gäbel, G 2000. Glucose is absorbed in a sodium-dependent manner form forestomach contents of sheep. The Journal of Nutrition 130, 27972801.Google Scholar
Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC) 1990. Official methods of analysis, 15th edition. AOAC, Arlington, VA, USA.Google Scholar
Berends, H, Van Reenen, CG, Stockhofe-Zurwieden, N and Gerrits, WJJ 2012. Effects of early rumen development and solid feed composition on growth performance and abomasal health in veal calves. Journal of Dairy Science 95, 31903199.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bjarnason, I, Macpherson, A and Hollander, D 1995. Intestinal permeability: an overview. Gastroenterology 108, 15661581.Google Scholar
Braun, U and Gautschi, A 2013. Ultrasonographic examination of the forestomachs and the abomasum in ruminal drinker calves. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica 55, 1.Google Scholar
Breukink, HJ, Wensing, T, van Weeren-Keverlink, A, van Bruinessen-Kapsenberg, EG and de Visser, NAPC 1988. Consequences of failure of the reticular groove reflex in veal calves fed milk replacer. The Veterinary Quarterly 10, 126135.Google Scholar
Gentile, A, Sconza, S, Lorenz, IOG, Rademacher, G, Famigli-Bergamini, P and Klee, W 2004. D-lactic acidosis in calves as a consequence of experimentally induced ruminal acidosis. Journal of Veterinary Medicine. A, Physiology, Pathology, Clinical Medicine 51, 6470.Google Scholar
Guilhermet, R, Mathieu, CM and Toullec, R 1975. Transit des aliments liquides au niveau de la gouttière oesophagienne chez le veau préruminant et ruminant. Annales De Zootechnie 24, 6979.Google Scholar
Herrli-Gygi, M, Hammon, HM, Zbinden, Y, Steiner, A and Blum, JW 2006. Ruminal drinkers: endocrine and metabolic status and effects of suckling from a nipple instead of drinking from a bucket. Journal of Veterinary Medicine. A, Physiology, Pathology, Clinical Medicine 53, 215224.Google Scholar
Herrli-Gygi, M, Steiner, A, Doherr, MG, Blum, JW, Kirchhofer, M and Zanolari, P 2008. Digestive processes in ruminal drinkers characterized by means of the acetaminophen absorption test. The Veterinary Journal 176, 369377.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Husson, F, Josse, J and , S 2008. FactoMineR: an R package for multivariate analysis. Journal of Statistical Software 25, 118.Google Scholar
Jansen, G, Muskiet, FA, Schierbeek, H, Berger, R and van der Slik, W 1986. Capillary gas chromatographic profiling of urinary, plasma and erythrocyte sugars and polyols as their trimethylsilyl derivatives, preceded by a simple and rapid prepurification method. Clinica Chimica Acta 157, 277293.Google Scholar
Lallès, JP, Toullec, R, Pardal, PB and Sissons, JW 1995. Hydrolyzed soy protein isolate sustains high nutritional performance in veal calves. Journal of Dairy Science 78, 194204.Google Scholar
Lopez, S, France, J, Gerrits, WJ, Dhanoa, MS, Humphries, DJ and Dijkstra, J 2000. A generalized Michaelis-Menten equation for the analysis of growth. Journal of Animal Science 78, 18161828.Google Scholar
Nelder, JA and Mead, R 1965. A simplex method for function minimization. Computer Journal 7, 308313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SAS 2004. SAS/STAT® 9.1 user’s guide. SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC, USA.Google Scholar
Schaer, S, Herrli-Gygi, M, Kosmeas, N, Boschung, H and Steiner, A 2005. Characteristics of acetaminophen absorption in healthy unweaned calves as an indirect measurement of the oroduaodenal transit rate of liquid meals. Journal of Veterinary Medicine. A, Physiology, Pathology, Clinical Medicine 52, 325332.Google Scholar
Seo, S, Lanzas, C, Tedeschi, LO and Fox, DG 2007. Development of a mechanistic model to represent the dynamics of liquid flow out of the rumen and to predict the rate of passage of liquid in dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 90, 840855.Google Scholar
Sharifi, K, Gründberg, W, Soroori, S, Mohri, M and Ahrari-Khafi, MS 2009. Assessment of the acetaminophen absorption test as a diagnostic tool for the evaluation of the reticular groove reflex in lambs. American Journal of Veterinary Research 70, 820825.Google Scholar
Soetaert, K, Petzoldt, T and Setzer, RW 2010. Solving differential equations in R: package deSolve. Journal of Statistical Software 33, 125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suárez, BJ, Van Reenen, CG, Stockhofe, N, Dijkstra, J and Gerrits, WJJ 2007. Effect of roughage source and roughage to concentrate ratio on animal performance and rumen development in veal calves. Journal of Dairy Science 90, 23902403.Google Scholar
Toullec, R, Thivend, P and Mathieu, CM 1971. Utilisation des protéines du lactosérum par le veau préruminant à l'engrais. 1. Vidange stomacale comparée du lait entier et de deux laits de remplacement ne contenant que des protéines de lactosérum comme source de matières azotées. Annales De Biologie Animale Biochimie Biophysique 11, 435453.Google Scholar
Wijtten, PJA, Verstijnen, JJ, van Kempen, TATG, Perdok, HB, Gort, G and Verstegen, MWA 2011. Lactulose as a marker of intestinal barrier function in pigs after weaning. Journal of Animal Science 89, 13471357.Google Scholar
Williams, CH, David, DJ and Lismaa, O 1962. The determination of chromic oxide in faeces samples by atomic absorption spectrophotometry. Journal of Dairy Science 59, 381385.Google Scholar
Wittek, T, Constable, PD, Marshall, TS and Crochik, SS 2005. Ultrasonographic measurement of abomasal volume, location and emptying rate in calves. American Journal of Veterinary Research 66, 537544.Google Scholar