Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T20:45:14.508Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of shearing at housing, grass silage feed value and extended grazing herbage allowance on ewe and subsequent lamb performance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2009

T. W. J. Keady  and
J. P. Hanrahan
T. W. J. Keady*
Affiliation:
Teagasc, Animal Production Research Centre, Athenry, Co., Galway, Ireland
J. P. Hanrahan
Affiliation:
Teagasc, Animal Production Research Centre, Athenry, Co., Galway, Ireland
*
E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The study involved 120 crossbred ewes (sixty 1.5 years old animals and sixty 2.5 years old animals; initial liveweight 67.6 kg, condition score 3.7), that were mated in October. They were assigned to six treatments (two shearing treatments (shorn and unshorn) × two silage feed values (low and medium) and two extended grazed herbage allowances (1.0 and 1.8 kg dry matter (DM)/day)) designed to evaluate the effects of shearing at housing, grass silage feed value and extended-grazed herbage allowance on their performance and the performance of their progeny. Swards, which had silage harvested on 6 September, received fertiliser N (34 kg/ha) for extended (deferred) grazing between 19 December and lambing in mid-March. The herbage was allocated at DM allowances of 1.0 or 1.8 kg/ewe daily until 1 February. For the final 6 weeks of pregnancy, daily herbage DM allowances were 1.5, 1.6, 2.0, 2.0 and 2.0 kg for weeks 6, 5, 4, 3 and 2 to parturition, respectively. Two grass silages (low and medium feed value) were offered from housing on 19 December to lambing in mid-March. At housing, half the ewes were shorn whilst the remainder remained unshorn. Each ewe received 23.4 kg concentrate prior to lambing. For the extended-grazed herbage and the low and medium feed-value silages, DM concentrations were 132, 225 and 265 g/kg, and metabolisable energy (ME) concentrations were 10.0, 10.0 and 10.7 MJ/kg DM, respectively. Treatment did not alter (P > 0.05) litter size or number reared. Grass silage feed value did not significantly alter silage DM intake, or ewe and subsequent lamb performance. Increasing herbage allowance in mid-pregnancy decreased herbage utilisation (P < 0.05) and increased herbage intake (P < 0.05). Shearing increased silage intake (P < 0.05), lamb birth weight (P < 0.01) and tended to increase lamb weaning weight (P = 0.07). Relative to the housed shorn ewes, extended grazing did not alter (P > 0.05) ewe or subsequent lamb performance. It is concluded that shearing ewes at housing increased lamb birth weight due to increased silage intake probably associated with cold stress immediately post shearing and reduced heat stress in late pregnancy. Based on differences in lamb weight at weaning 0.8 kg of grass silage DM intake had the same feed value as a daily extended herbage DM allowance of 1.8 kg per ewe throughout the study. Neither silage feed value nor herbage allowance in mid-pregnancy affected lamb birth weight or subsequent growth rate.

Keywords

sheepextended grazingshearinggrass silagelamb growth
Type
Full Paper
Information
animal , Volume 3 , Issue 1 , January 2009 , pp. 143 - 151
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agriculture and Food Research Council 1993. Energy and protein requirements of ruminants. CAB International, Wallingford, UK.Google Scholar
Alexander, G, Williams, D 1971. Heat stress and development of the conceptus in domestic sheep. Journal of Agricultural Science 76, 53–72.Google Scholar
Bell, AW, Kennaugh, JM, Battaglia, FC, Meschia, G 1989. Uptake of amino acids and ammonia at mid gestation by the fetal lamb. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Physiology 74, 635–643.Google Scholar
Black, HJ, Chestnutt, DMB 1990a. Influence of shearing treatment on the performance of pregnant ewes offered silage on an ad-libitum or restricted basis. In New developments in sheep production (ed. CFR Slade and TLJ Lawrence), occasional publication no. 14, pp. 146–148. British Society of Animal Production, Haddington, UK.Google Scholar
Black, HJ, Chestnutt, DMB 1990b. Influence of shearing regime and grass silage quality on the performance of pregnant ewes. Animal Production 51, 573–582.Google Scholar
Carson AF, Dawson LER and Laidlaw AS 2003. Effect of herbage allowance and concentrate feed level offered to ewes in late pregnancy on ewe and lamb performance. Proceedings of the British Society of Animal Science, Midlothian, Scotland, p. 63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carson, AF, Dawson, LER, Irwin, D, Kilpatrick, DJ 2004. The effect of management systems at lambing and flock genetics on lamb output and labour requirements on lowland sheep farms. Animal Science 78, 439–450.Google Scholar
Chestnutt DMB and Kilpatrick DJ 1989. Effect of silage type and concentrate supplementation on the intake and performance of breeding ewes. 62nd Annual Report of the Agricultural Research Institute of Northern Ireland, Hillsborough, Ireland, pp. 21–30.Google Scholar
Dulphy, JP, Dermarquilly, C 1972. Effect of chopping fineness of grass silages on the feeding behaviour of sheep. Annales de Zootechnie 21, 443–449.Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, JJ 1987. Finishing store lambs on silage-based diets 4. Effects of stage of grass growth when ensiled and barley supplementation on silage intake and lamb performance. Irish Journal of Agricultural Research 26, 139–152.Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, JJ 1996. Grass silage as a basic feed for store lambs 2. Effect of harvesting system and chop length of grass silage on silage intake and performance of store lambs. Grass and Forage Science 51, 378–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flanagan, S 1994. Extending the grazing season for sheep. Irish Grassland and Animal Production Association Journal 28, 97–102.Google Scholar
Flanagan S 2003. Extended grazing by sheep as a substitute for silage and housing. Proceedings of the Agricultural Research Forum, Tullamore, Ireland, p. 79.Google Scholar
Gordon, FJ 1980. Feed input–milk output relationships in the spring-calving dairy cow. In Recent Advances in Animal Nutrition (ed. W Haresign), pp. 15–32. Butterworths, London, UK.Google Scholar
Keady TWJ 1991. Studies of the mode of action of a bacterial innoculant as a silage additive and an evaluation of its efficacy. PhD, Queen’s University, Belfast.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keady TWJ 2000. Beyond the science: what the farmer looks for in the production of silage. In Biotechnology in the feed industry (ed. TP Lyons and KA Jacques). Proceedings of the Alltech’s 16th Annual Symposium, Lexington, Kentucky, USA, pp. 439–452.Google Scholar
Keady, TWJ, Hanrahan, JP 2006. Efficient sheep production in a subsidy free environment – research from Athenry. Irish Grassland Association Journal 40, 15–27.Google Scholar
Keady TWJ and Hanrahan JP 2007a. An evaluation of grass allocation management to single and twin bearing ewes in late pregnancy on ewe and subsequent lamb performance. Proceedings of the Agricultural Research Forum, Tullamore, Ireland, p. 107.Google Scholar
Keady TWJ and Hanrahan JP 2007b. The effects of herbage allocation and concentrate supplementation on the performance of replacement ewe lambs offered extended grazed pastures. Proceedings of the British Society of Animal Science, Southport, UK, p. 140.Google Scholar
Keady, TWJ, Hanrahan, JP 2007c. Extended grazing – its potentials and limitations. Irish Grassland Association Journal 41, 81–96.Google Scholar
Keady, TWJ, Murphy, JJ 1998. The effects of ensiling and supplementation with sucrose and fishmeal on forage intake and milk production of lactating dairy cows. Animal Science 66, 9–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keady, TWJ, Mayne, CS, Marsden, M 1998. The effects of concentrate energy source on silage intake and animal performance with lactating dairy cows offered a range of grass silages. Animal Science 66, 21–33.Google Scholar
Keady, TWJ, Mayne, CS, Fitzpatrick, DA, Marsden, M 1999. The effects of energy source and level of digestible undegradable protein in concentrates on silage intake and performance of lactating dairy cows offered a range of grass silages. Animal Science 68, 763–777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keady, TWJ, Mayne, CS, Fitzpatrick, DA 2000. Prediction of silage feeding value from the analysis of the herbage at ensiling and effects of nitrogen fertilizer, date of harvest and additive treatment on grass silage composition. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 134, 353–368.Google Scholar
Keady TWJ, Kilpatrick CM, Cushnahan A and Murphy JA 2002a. The cost of producing and feeding forages. Proceedings of the XIIIth International Silage Conference, Auchincruive, Scotland, pp. 322–323.Google Scholar
Keady TWJ, Fitzgerald JJ, Murphy JJ and Byrne N 2002b. An evaluation of herbage dry matter at ensiling and concentrate type on food intake and performance. Proceedings of the Agricultural Research Forum, Tullamore, Ireland, p. 61.Google Scholar
Keady, TWJ, Hanrahan, JP, Flanagan, S 2007a. Effects of extended grazing during mid, late or throughout pregnancy, and winter shearing of housed ewes, on ewe and lamb performance. Irish Journal of Agricultural and Food Research 46, 169–180.Google Scholar
Keady, TWJ, Lively, FO, Kilpatrick, DJ, Moss, BW 2007b. The effects of grain treatment, grain feed level, and grass silage feed value on the performance of, and meat quality from finishing beef cattle. Animal 2, 149–159.Google Scholar
Keady TWJ, Hanrahan JP and Flanagan S 2008. An evaluation of two grassland based systems for mid season prime lamb production from two ewe genotypes. Irish Journal of Agricultural and Food Research (submitted for publication).Google Scholar
Kennedy, PM 1985. Influences of cold exposure on digestion of organic matter, rate of passage of digestion in the gastrointestinal tract, and feeding and rumination behavior in sheep given four forage diets in the chopped, or ground and pelleted form. British Journal of Nutrition 53, 159–173.Google Scholar
Koong, LJ, Garrett, WN, Rattray, PV 1975. A description of the dynamics of fetal growth in sheep. Journal of Animal Science 41, 1065–1068.Google Scholar
Lippert, M, Milne, JA, Russel, AJF 1983. Effect of mid pregnancy supplementation on hill-ewe performance. Animal Production 36, 543.Google Scholar
Offer, NW, Percival, DJ, Dewhurst, RJ, Thomas, C 1998. Prediction of the voluntary intake potential of grass silage by sheep and dairy cows from laboratory silage measurements. Animal Science 66, 357–368.Google Scholar
Patterson, DC, Yan, T, Gordon, FJ, Kilpatrick, DJ 1998. Effects of bacterial inoculation of unwilted and wilted grass silages. 2. Intake, performance and eating behaviour by dairy cattle. Journal of Agricultural Science 131, 113–119.Google Scholar
Porter, MG, Murray, RS 2001. The volatility of components of grass silage on oven drying and inter-relationships between dry-matter content estimated by different analytical methods. Grass and Forage Science 56, 405–411.Google Scholar
Robinson, JJ, McDonald, I, Fraser, C, Crofts, RMJ 1977. Studies on reproduction in prolific ewes 1. Growth of the products of conceptus. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 88, 539–552.Google Scholar
Robinson, JJ, Sinclair, KD, McEvoy, TG 1999. Nutritional effects on foetal growth. Animal Science 68, 315–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russel, AJF, Doney, JM, Gunn, RG 1969. Subjective assessment of body fat in live sheep. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 72, 451–454.Google Scholar
Statistical Analysis Systems Institute 2000. SAS/STAT user’s guide, version 8. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA.Google Scholar
Skelton, M, Huston, JE 1968. Effects of high temperature stress during gestation on certain aspects of reproduction in the ewe. Journal of Animal Science 27, 153–158.Google Scholar
Steen, RWJ 1987. Factors affecting the utilisation of grass silage for beef production. In Efficient beef production from grass (ed. J Frame), Occasional symposium of the British Grassland Society no. 22, pp. 129–139. British Society of Animal Production, Peebles, UK.Google Scholar
Steen, RWJ, Gordon, FJ, Dawson, LER, Park, RS, Mayne, CS, Agnew, RE, Kilpatrick, DJ, Porter, MG 1998. Factors affecting the intake of grass silage by cattle and prediction of silage intake. Animal Science 66, 115–127.Google Scholar
Symonds, ME, Bryant, MJ, Lomax, MA 1986. The effect of shearing on the energy metabolism of the pregnant ewe. British Journal of Nutrition 56, 635–643.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vipond, JE, King, ME, Inglis, DM 1987. The effect of winter shearing of housed pregnant ewes on food intake and animal performance. Animal Production 45, 211–221.Google Scholar