Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T00:50:26.821Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of dietary chitosan on growth rate, small intestinal morphology, nutrients apparent utilization and digestive enzyme activities of growing Huoyan geese

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 June 2020

Z. Miao Open the ORCID record for Z. Miao [Opens in a new window] ,
Y. Liu ,
L. Guo ,
W. Zhao  and
J. Zhang
Z. Miao
Affiliation:
College of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Henan Institute of Science and Technology, Xinxiang, Henan453003, People’s Republic of China
Y. Liu
Affiliation:
College of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Henan Institute of Science and Technology, Xinxiang, Henan453003, People’s Republic of China
L. Guo
Affiliation:
School of Food Science and Technology, Henan Institute of Science and Technology, Xinxiang, Henan453003, People’s Republic of China
W. Zhao
Affiliation:
College of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Henan Institute of Science and Technology, Xinxiang, Henan453003, People’s Republic of China
J. Zhang*
Affiliation:
College of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Henan Institute of Science and Technology, Xinxiang, Henan453003, People’s Republic of China
*
†E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Dietary chitosan (CS) supplementation could improve the growth rate, small intestinal morphology, nutrients apparent digestibility and digestive enzyme activities in pigs, broiler chickens, rats and fish, whereas no data has been reported about the effect of CS on the growing Huoyan geese. Therefore, this study was designed to investigate the effects of CS on growth rate, small intestinal morphology, nutrients apparent utilization and digestive enzyme activities of growing Huoyan geese. Three hundred and twenty (28 days of age, gender balance) Huoyan geese were randomly divided into control, CS100, CS200 and CS400 groups (based on BW) with 20 geese per pen and 4 replicates pen per group, and the feeding experiment lasted for 4 weeks. The 4 diets contained 0, 100, 200 and 400 mg CS per kg feed, respectively. The results showed that CS200 groups had higher average daily gain, final BW, apparent utilization of DM and CP, and lower feed/gain ratio compared with the control group (P < 0.05). Meanwhile, CS100 and CS200 groups had higher villus height, villus height/crypt depth ratio and lower crypt depth in duodenum and jejunum than those in the control group (P < 0.05). The geese in CS100 and CS200 groups had higher villus height, villus height/crypt depth ratio and lower crypt depth of ileum compared with those in control and CS400 groups (P < 0.05). In addition, compared with the control group, CS200 group has higher trypsin activities and lower lipase activities in duodenal, jejunal and ileal contents (P < 0.05). The results suggested that addition of 200 mg/kg CS had positive effects on growth rate, small intestinal morphology, nutrients apparent utilization and digestive enzyme activities of growing Huoyan geese.

Keywords

chitosangoosegrowth ratetrypsinlipase
Type
Research Article
Information
animal , Volume 14 , Issue 12 , December 2020 , pp. 2635 - 2641
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Animal Consortium

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

These two first authors contributed equally to this work.

References

Abou-Kassem, DE, Ashour, EA, Alagawany, M, Mahrose, KM, Rehman, ZU and Ding, C 2019. Effect of feed form and dietary protein level on growth performance and carcass characteristics of growing geese. Poultry Science 98, 761–770. doi: 10.3382/ps/pey445.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Association of Official Analytical Chemists 2003. Official methods of analysis, 17th edition. AOAC, Arlington, VA, USA.Google Scholar
Brazier, F, Delcenserie, R and Dupas, JL 2001. Physiology of intestinal absorption. La Revue Du Praticien 51, 945–952.Google ScholarPubMed
Cha, SH, Lee, JS, Song, CB, Lee, KJ and Jeon, YJ 2008. Effects of chitosan-coated diet on improving water quality and innate immunity in the olive flounder, Paralichthys olivaceus. Aquaculture 278, 110–118. doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2008.01.025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, YJ, Kim, IH, Cho, JH, Yoo, JS, Wang, Y and Huang, Y 2009. Effects of chitooligosaccharide supplementation on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, blood characteristics and immune responses after lipopolysaccharide challenge in weanling pigs. Livestock Science 124, 255–260. doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2009.02.006.Google Scholar
Chen, Y and Zhou, HQ 2005. Effect of three kinds of polysaccharide on protease activity, amylase activity in intestine and hepatopancreas of allogynogenetic silver crucian carp. Journal of Shanghai Fisheries University 14, 468–471 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
Chiu, CY, Feng, SA, Liu, SH and Chiang, MT 2017. Functional comparison for lipid metabolism and intestinal and fecal microflora enzyme activities between low molecular weight chitosan and chitosan oligosaccharide in high-fat-diet-fed rats. Marine Drugs 15, pii, E234. doi: 10.3390/md15070234.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chou, TC, Fu, E and Shen, EC 2003. Chitosan inhibits prostaglandin E2 formation and cyclooxygenase-2 induction in lipopolysaccharide-treated RAW 264.7 macrophages. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 308, 403–407. doi: 10.1016/s0006-291x(03)01407-4.Google ScholarPubMed
Egan, ÁM, Sweeney, T, Hayes, M and O’Doherty, JV 2015. Prawn shell chitosan has anti-obesogenic properties, influencing both nutrient digestibility and microbial populations in a pig model. PLoS ONE 10, e0144127. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0144127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gopalakannan, A and Arul, V 2006. Immunomodulatory effects of dietary intake of chitin, chitosan and levamisole on the immune system of Cyprinus carpio and control of Aeromonas hydrophila infection in ponds. Aquaculture 255, 179–187. doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2006.01.012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hampson, DJ 1986. Alterations in piglet small intestinal structure at weaning. Research in Veterinary Science 40, 32–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
He, LW, Meng, QX, Li, DY, Zhang, YW and Ren, LP 2015. Influence of feeding alternative fiber sources on the gastrointestinal fermentation, digestive enzyme activities and mucosa morphology of growing Greylag geese. Poultry Science 94, 2464–2471. doi: 10.3382/ps/pev237.Google ScholarPubMed
Hu, SL, Wang, Y, Wen, XL, Wang, L, Jiang, Z and Zheng, C 2018. Effects of low-molecular-weight chitosan on the growth performance, intestinal morphology, barrier function, cytokine expression and antioxidant system of weaned piglets. BMC Veterinary Research 14, 215. doi: 10.1186/s12917-018-1543-8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hua, XM, Zhou, HQ and Zhang, YF 2005. Effect of dietary supplemental chitosan and probiotics on growth and some digestive enzyme activities in juvenile Fugu obscurus. Acta. Hydrobiologica Sinica 29, 299–305 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
Huo, QL and Gao, QS 2001. Chitosan and medicine. Shanghai Science Technology Press, Shanghai, China.Google Scholar
Kamali Najafabad, M, Imanpoor, MR, Taghizadeh, V and Alishahi, A 2016. Effect of dietary chitosan on growth performance, hematological parameters, intestinal histology and stress resistance of Caspian kutum (Rutilus frisii kutum Kamenskii, 1901) fingerlings. Fish Physiology and Biochemistry 42, 1063–1071. doi: 10.1007/s10695-016-0197-3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chackrit, N and Kris, A 2018. Efficacy of dietary chitosan on growth performance, haematological parameters and gut function in broilers. Italian Journal of Animal Science 17, 428–435. doi: 10.1080/1808251x.2017.1373609.Google Scholar
Kim, SK and Rajapakse, N 2005. Enzymatic production and biological activities of chitosan oligosaccharides (COS): a review. Carbohydrate Polymers 62, 357–368. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2005.08.012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knaul, JZ, Hudson, SM and Creber, KA 1999. Crosslinking of chitosan fibers with dialdehydes: proposal of a new reaction mechanism. Journal of Polymer Science Part B Polymer Physics 37, 1079–1094.3.0.CO;2-O>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, P, Piao, XS, Kim, SW, Wang, L, Shen, YB, Lee, HS and Li, SY 2008. Effects of chitooligosaccharide supplementation on the growth performance, nutrient digestibility, intestinal morphology, and fecal shedding of Escherichia coli and lactobacillus in weaning pigs. Journal of Animal Science 86, 2609–2618. doi: 10.2527/jas.2007-0668.Google Scholar
Liu, SH, Chiu, CY, Shi, CM and Chiang, MT 2018. Functional comparison of high and low molecular weight chitosan on lipid metabolism and signals in high-fat diet-fed rats. Marine Drugs 16, E251. doi: 10.3390/md16080251.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lu, J, Kong, XL, Wang, ZY, Yang, HM, Zhang, KN and Zou, JM 2011. Influence of whole corn feeding on the performance, digestive tract development, and nutrient retention of geese. Poultry Science 90, 587–594. doi: 10.3382/ps.2010-01054.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ma, Z, Garrido-Maestu, A and Jeong, KC 2017. Application, mode of action, and in vivo activity of chitosan and its micro- and nanoparticles as antimicrobial agents: A review. Carbohydrate Polymers 176, 257–265. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.08.082.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miao, ZG, Zhao, WX, Guo, LP, Wang, S and Zhang, JZ 2020. Effects of dietary supplementation of chitosan on immune function in growing Huoyan geese. Poultry Science 99, 95–100. doi: 10.3382/ps/pez565.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
National Research Council (NRC) 1994. Nutrient requirements of poultry. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Qian, LC, Yue, XJ, Hu, LS, Ma, Y and Han, X 2016. Changes in diarrhea, nutrients apparent digestibility, digestive enzyme activities of weaned piglets in response to chitosan-zinc chelate. Animal Science Journal 87, 564–569. doi: 10.1111/asj.12460.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Razdan, A, Pettersson, D and Pettersson, J 1997. Broiler chicken body weights, feed intakes, plasma lipid and small-intestinal bile acid concentrations in response to feeding of chitosan and pectin. The British Journal of Nutrition 78, 283–291. doi: 10.1079/bjn19970146.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shi, BL, Li, DF, Piao, XS and Yan, SM 2005. Effects of chitosan on growth performance and energy and protein utilisation in broiler chickens. British Poultry Science 46, 516–519. doi: 10.1080/00071660500190785.Google ScholarPubMed
Shiau, SY and Yu, YP 1998. Chitin but not chitosan supplementation enhances growth of grass shrimp, Penaeus monodon. The Journal of Nutrition 128, 908–912. doi: 10.1093/jn/128.5.908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shih, BL and Hsu, JC 2006. Development of the activities of pancreatic and caecal enzymes in White Roman goslings. British Poultry Science 47, 95–102. doi: 10.1080/00071660500475079.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thanou, M, Verhoef, JC and Junginger, HE 2001. Chitosan and its derivatives as intestinal absorption enhancers. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews 50, 91–101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tsai, GJ, Zhang, SL and Shieh, PL 2004. Antimicrobial activity of a low-molecular-weight chitosan obtained from cellulase digestion of chitosan. Journal of Food Protection 67, 396–398. doi: 10.4315/0362-028x-67.2.396.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walsh, AM, Sweeney, T, Bahar, B, Flynn, B and O’Doherty, JV 2012. The effect of chitooligosaccharide supplementation on intestinal morphology, selected microbial populations, volatile fatty acid concentrations and immune gene expression in the weaned pig. Animal 6, 1620–1626. doi: 10.1017/S1751731112000481.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walsh, AM, Sweeney, T, Bahar, B, Flynn, B and O’Doherty, JV 2013a. The effects of supplementing varying molecular weights of chitooligosaccharide on performance, selected microbial populations and nutrient digestibility in the weaned pig. Animal 7, 571–579. doi: 10.1017/S1751731112001759.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walsh, AM, Sweeney, T, Bahar, B and O’Doherty, JV 2013b. Multifunctional roles of chitosan as a potential protective agent against obesity. PLoS ONE 8, e53828. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0053828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu, Y, Shi, B, Yan, S, Li, J, Li, T and Guo, Y 2014. Effects of chitosan supplementation on the growth performance, nutrient digestibility, and digestive enzyme activity in weaned pigs. Czech Journal of Animal Science 59, 156–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yan, J, Guo, C, Dawood, MAO and Gao, J 2017. Effects of dietary chitosan on growth, lipid metabolism, immune response and antioxidant-related gene expression in Misgurnus anguillicaudatus. Beneficial Microbes 8, 439–449. doi: 10.3920/BM2016.0177.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yan, JS, Zhou, B, Xi, YM, Huan, H, Li, M, Yu, J, Zhu, H, Dai, Z, Ying, S, Zhou, W and Shi, Z 2019. Fermented feed regulates growth performance and the cecal microbiota community in geese. Poultry Science 98, 4673–4684. doi: 10.3382/ps/pez169.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yang, CM, Ferket, PR, Hong, QH, Zhou, J, Cao, GT, Zhou, L and Chen, AG 2012. Effect of chito-oligosaccharide on growth performance, intestinal barrier function, intestinal morphology and cecal microflora in weaned pigs. Journal of Animal Science 90, 2671–2676. doi: 10.2527/jas.2011-4699.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yang, J, Yang, L, Wang, YC, Zhai, S, Wang, S, Yang, Z and Wang, W 2017. Effects of dietary protein and energy levels on digestive enzyme activities and electrolyte composition in the small intestinal fluid of geese. Animal Science Journal 88, 294–299. doi: 10.1111/asj.12557.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yu, J, Wang, ZY, Yang, HM, Xu, L and Wan, XL 2019. Effects of cottonseed meal on growth performance, small intestinal morphology, digestive enzyme activities, and serum biochemical parameters of geese. Poultry Science 98, 2066–2071. doi: 10.3382/ps/pey553.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yuan, SB and Chen, H 2012. Effects of dietary supplementation of chitosan on growth performance and immune index in ducks. African Journal of Biotechnology 11, 3490–3495. doi: 10.5897/ajb11.1648.Google Scholar
Zhang, B 2019. Dietary chitosan oligosaccharides modulate the growth, intestine digestive enzymes, body composition and nonspecific immunity of loach Paramisgurnus dabryanus. Fish Shellfish Immunology 88, 359–363.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed