Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-31T19:52:42.589Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of dietary calcium and phosphorus deficiency and subsequent recovery on broiler chicken growth performance and bone characteristics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 December 2017

A. S. Valable ,
A. Narcy ,
M. J. Duclos ,
C. Pomar ,
G. Page ,
Z. Nasir ,
M. Magnin  and
M. P. Létourneau-Montminy
A. S. Valable
Affiliation:
Animal Sciences Department, Université Laval, 2425 rue de l’Agriculture, Québec, QC, Canada G1V 0A6 URA, INRA, 37380, Nouzilly, France
A. Narcy
Affiliation:
URA, INRA, 37380, Nouzilly, France
M. J. Duclos
Affiliation:
URA, INRA, 37380, Nouzilly, France
C. Pomar
Affiliation:
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Dairy and Swine Research and Development Center, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada J1M 1Z3
G. Page
Affiliation:
Trouw Nutrition Agresearch, 150 Research Lane, Guelph, ON, Canada, N1G 4T2
Z. Nasir
Affiliation:
Trouw Nutrition Agresearch, 150 Research Lane, Guelph, ON, Canada, N1G 4T2
M. Magnin
Affiliation:
MiXscience, Centre d’affaires Odyssée, ZAC Cicé Blossac, 35172 BRUZ, France
M. P. Létourneau-Montminy*
Affiliation:
Animal Sciences Department, Université Laval, 2425 rue de l’Agriculture, Québec, QC, Canada G1V 0A6
*
†E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The ability of birds to modify dietary phosphorus utilisation when fed with low-phosphorus and calcium (Ca) diets was studied using different sequences of dietary phosphorus and Ca restriction (depletion) and recovery (repletion) during the grower and the finisher phases. A total of 3600 Ross 708 broilers were randomly divided into 10 replicate pens per treatment (60 per pen, six pens per block). Chicks were fed a common starter diet from days 0 to 10, then a grower control diet (C: 0.90% Ca, 0.39% non-phytate phosphorus, nPP), mid-level diet (M: 0.71% Ca, 0.35% nPP) or low Ca and nPP diet (L: 0.60% Ca, 0.30% nPP) from days 11 to 21, followed by a finisher diet C, M or L containing, respectively, 0.85%, 0.57% or 0.48% Ca and 0.35%, 0.29% or 0.24% nPP from days 22 to 37. Six treatment sequences were tested: CC, MM, LL, ML, LC and LM. Bone mineral content by dual-energy X-ray, tibia ash, toe ash weight and tibia breaking strength were measured on days 21 and 37. No significant effect was observed on growth performance throughout the experiment. Diet L reduced bone mineral content, breaking strength, tibia and toe ash by 9%, 13%, 11% and 10%, respectively, on day 21 (compared with diet C, for linear effect, P<0.05). On day 37, bone mineral content, breaking strength, tibia and toe ash remained lower compared with control values (CC v. MM v. LL, P<0.05 for linear and quadratic effects). Mineral depletion duration (ML v. LL) did not affect bone mineral status. Replenishing with the C diet during the finisher phase (LC) restored bone mineral content, tibia ash and toe ash weight better than the M diet did, but not to control levels (CC v. LC v. LM, for linear effect, P<0.05). These results confirm that dietary Ca and nPP may be reduced in the grower phase without affecting final growth performance or breaking strength as long as the finisher diet contains sufficient Ca and nPP. The practical applications of this strategy require further study in order to optimise the depletion and repletion steps.

Keywords

broiler chickensfeeding strategycalciumphosphorusadaptation
Type
Research Article
Information
animal , Volume 12 , Issue 8 , August 2018 , pp. 1555 - 1563
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium and Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, represented by the Minister of Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada and the Minister of Health Canada 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Angel, R, Saylor, WW, Mitchell, A, Powers, W, Applegate, TJ and Dhandu, AS 2006. Effect of dietary phosphorus, phytase and 25-hydroxycholecalciferol on broiler chicken bone mineralisation, litter phosphorus, and processing yields. Poultry Science 85, 1200–1211.Google Scholar
Ashwell, CM and Angel, R 2010. Nutritional genomics: a practical approach by early life conditioning with dietary phosphorus. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 39, 268–278.Google Scholar
Applegate, TD and Angel, R 2008. Phosphorus requirements for poultry. Fact sheet for natural resources conservation service feed management 592 Practice Standard, Education Project, USDA CIG project, West Lafayette, IN, USA.Google Scholar
Bar, A 2009. Calcium transport in strongly calcifying laying birds: mechanisms and regulation. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology (Part A) 152, 447–469.Google Scholar
Bradbury, EJ, Wilkinson, SJ, Cronin, GM, Thomson, PC, Bedford, MR and Cowieson, AJ 2014. Nutritional geometry of calcium and phosphorus nutrition in broiler chicks. Growth performance, skeletal health and intake arrays. Animal 8, 1071–1079.Google Scholar
Canadian Council on Animal Care 2009. Guidelines on the care and use of farm animals in research, teaching and testing. CCAC, Ottawa, ON, Canada.Google Scholar
Centeno, VA, Diaz de Barboza, GA, Marchionattia, AN, Alisioa, AE, Dallorsob, ME, Nasif, R and Tolosa de Talamonia, NG 2004. Dietary calcium deficiency increases Ca2+ uptake and Ca2+ extrusion mechanisms in chick enterocytes. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology 139, 133–141.Google Scholar
Delezie, E, Bierman, K, Nollet, L and Maertens, L 2015. Impacts of calcium and phosphorus concentration, their ratio, and phytase supplementation level on growth performance, foot pad lesions, and hock burn of broiler chickens. Journal of Applied Poultry Research 24, 115–126.Google Scholar
Faridi, A, Gitoee, A and France, J 2015. A meta-analysis of the effects of non-phytate phosphorus on broiler performance and tibia ash concentration. Poultry Science 94, 2753–2762.Google Scholar
Hamdi, M, López-Vergé, S, Manzanilla, EG, Barroeta, AC and Pérez, JF 2015. Effect of different levels of calcium and phosphorus and their interaction on the performance of young broilers. Poultry Science 94, 2144–2151.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Larbier, M and Leclercq, B 1992. Nutrition et alimentation des volailles. Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique Editions, Paris, France.Google Scholar
Létourneau-Montminy, MP, Lescoat, P, Narcy, A, Sauvant, D, Bernier, JF, Magnin, M, Pomar, C, Nys, Y and Jondreville, C 2008. Effects of reduced dietary calcium and phytase supplementation on calcium and phosphorus utilisation in broilers with modified mineral status. British Poultry Science 49, 705–715.Google Scholar
Létourneau-Montminy, MP, Narcy, A, Dourmad, JY, Crenshaw, TD and Pomar, C 2015. Modeling the metabolic fate of dietary phosphorus and calcium and the dynamics of body ash content in growing pigs. Journal of Animal Science 93, 1200–1217.Google Scholar
Létourneau-Montminy, MP, Narcy, A, Lescoat, P, Bernier, JF, Magnin, M, Pomar, C, Nys, Y, Sauvant, D and Jondreville, C 2010. Meta-analysis of phosphorus utilisation by broilers receiving corn-soyabean meal diets: influence of dietary calcium and microbial phytase. Animal 4, 1844–1853.Google Scholar
Mitchell, AD, Rosebrough, RW and Conway, JM 1997. Body composition analysis of chickens by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. Poultry Science 76, 1746–1752.Google Scholar
Narcy, A, Rousseau, X, Même, N, Magnin, M and Nys, Y 2015. Impact of dietary phosphorus and calcium levels on their deposition in soft and bone tissues in chickens. In Proceedings of the 20th European Symposium of Poultry Nutrition, 24–27 August 2015, Prague, CZR, p. 217.Google Scholar
National Research Council (NRC) 1994. Nutrient requirements of poultry, 9th revised edition. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
Proszkowiec-Weglarz, M and Angel, R 2013. Calcium and phosphorus metabolism in broilers: effect of homeostatic mechanism on calcium and phosphorus digestibility. Journal of Applied Poultry Research 22, 609–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ravindran, V, Kornegay, ET, Potter, LM, Ogunabameru, BO, Welten, MK, Wilson, JH and Potchanakorn, M 1995. An evaluation of various response criteria in assessing biological availability of phosphorus for broilers. Poultry Science 74, 1820–1830.Google Scholar
Rousseau, X, Même, N, Magnin, M, Couty, M, Bordeau, T and Narcy, A 2013. Vers une utilisation efficace des ressources minérales. Paper presented at the 10th Journées de la Recherche Avicole et Palmipèdes à Foie Gras, 26–28 March 2013, La Rochelle, France, pp. 650–654.Google Scholar
Rousseau, X, Valable, AS, Létourneau-Montminy, MP, Même, N, Godet, E, Magnin, M, Nys, Y, Duclos, MJ and Narcy, A 2016. Adaptive response of broilers to dietary phosphorus and calcium restrictions. Poultry Science 95, 2849–2860.Google Scholar
Schreiweis, MA, Orban, JI, Ledur, MC, Moody, DE and Hester, PY 2005. Validation of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in live white leghorns. Poultry Science 84, 91–99.Google Scholar
Shafey, TM 1998. Effects of dietary calcium, phosphorus, biotin and fat on the performance and nutrient utilisation of meat chickens. Agriculture Science 10, 121–132.Google Scholar
Shahnazari, M, Lang, DH, Fosmire, GJ, Sharkey, NA, Mitchell, AD and Leach, RM 2007. Strontium administration in young chickens improves bone volume and architecture but does not enhance bone structural and material strength. Calcified Tissue International 80, 160–166.Google Scholar
Shastak, Y, Witzig, M, Hartung, K, Bessei, W and Rodehutscord, M 2012. Comparison and evaluation of bone measurements for the assessment of mineral phosphorus sources in broilers. Poultry Science 91, 2210–2220.Google Scholar
Statistical Analysis System Institute Inc 2003. SAS 9.0 user’s guide. SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC, USA.Google Scholar
Swennen, Q, Janssens, GP, Geers, R, Decuypere, E and Buyse, J 2004. Validation of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry for determining in vivo body composition of chickens. Poultry Science 83, 1348–1357.Google Scholar
Tuyttens, FA, Federici, JF, Vanderhasselt, RF, Goethals, K, Duchateau, L, Sans, ECO and Molento, CFM 2015. Assessment of welfare of Brazilian and Belgian broiler flocks using the Welfare Quality protocol. Poultry Science 94, 1758–1766.Google Scholar
Welfare Quality 2009. Welfare quality assessment protocols for poultry (broilers, laying hens). Welfare Quality Consortium, Lelystad, the Netherlands.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, SJ, Bradbury, EJ, Bedford, MR and Cowieson, AJ 2014. Effect of dietary non-phytate phosphorus and calcium concentration on calcium appetite of broiler chicks. Poultry Science 93, 1695–1703.Google Scholar
Yan, F, Angel, R, Ashwell, C, Mitchell, A and Christman, M 2005. Evaluation of the broiler’s ability to adapt to an early moderate deficiency of phosphorus and calcium. Poultry Science 84, 1232–1241.Google Scholar