Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T05:59:18.650Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of sire breed on carcass characteristics and meat and fat quality of heavy pigs reared outdoor and intended for dry-cured meat production

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 2009

M. A. Latorre ,
F. Iguácel ,
L. Sanjoaquín  and
R. Revilla
M. A. Latorre*
Affiliation:
Centro de Investigación y Tecnología Agroalimentaria de Aragón (CITA), Avda. Montañana 930, 50059 Zaragoza, Spain
F. Iguácel
Affiliation:
Centro de Técnicas Agrarias de Aragón (CTA), Montañana 176, 50080 Zaragoza, Spain
L. Sanjoaquín
Affiliation:
Sociedad Cooperativa Limitada Agropecuaria del Sobrarbe (SCLAS), 22330 Aínsa, Huesca, Spain
R. Revilla
Affiliation:
Centro de Técnicas Agrarias de Aragón (CTA), Montañana 176, 50080 Zaragoza, Spain
*
E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

A trial was conducted to study the effect of sire line (Duroc (DU) and Pietrain (PI)) on carcass, meat and fat quality of pigs reared outdoor and destined to dry-cured meat production. No differences between sire genotypes were detected in carcass fat thickness (P > 0.10) but carcasses from DU-sired pigs were longer (P < 0.05) and tended to have a higher yield of trimmed shoulders (P = 0.07) and hams (P = 0.06) than carcasses from PI-sired pigs. Loins from DU-sired genotype showed higher (P < 0.05) L* value and lower (P < 0.01) a* value than loins from PI-sired genotype. Pork from DU-sired offspring tended to have higher (P = 0.09) intramuscular fat (IMF) percentage and lower (P < 0.05) moisture proportion than meat from PI-sired offspring. Also, loins from DU-sired pigs had lower (P < 0.001) thawing losses than loins from PI-sired pigs. The subcutaneous fat from the DU-sired line tended to show lower (P = 0.08) percentage of total polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) than that from the PI-sire line, mostly due to the higher proportion of C18:2 (P = 0.09) and C20:3 (P < 0.01). However, no effect of crossbreed was detected on the total proportion of saturated, monounsaturated fatty acid (MUFAs) or PUFAs of IMF (P > 0.10). We conclude that both sire lines can be used successfully under outdoor conditions but DU boars are more adequate than PI boars for the production of heavy pigs intended for the dry-cured meat industry.

Keywords

pigsoutdoor productioncarcass and meat qualityfatty acid profile
Type
Full Paper
Information
animal , Volume 3 , Issue 3 , March 2009 , pp. 461 - 467
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Association of Official Analytical Chemists 2000. Official methods of analysis, 17th edition. AOAC, Arlington, VA, USA.Google Scholar
Barton-Gade, PA 1987. Meat and fat quality in boars, castrates and gilts. Livestock Production Science 16, 187–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boletín Oficial Estado 2005. Real Decreto Español 1201/2005, de 10 de octubre, sobre protección de los animales utilizados para experimentación y otros fines científicos. Boletín Oficial Estado 252, 34367–34391.Google Scholar
Branscheid, W, Dobrowolski, A, Sack, E 1990. Simplification of the EC-reference method for the full dissection of pig carcasses. Fleischwirtschaft 70, 550–553.Google Scholar
Cava, R, Ruiz, J, López-Bote, C, Martín, L, García, C, Ventanas, J, Antequera, T 1997. Influence of finishing diet on fatty acid profiles of intramuscular lipids, triglycerides and phospholipids in muscles of the Iberian pig. Meat Science 45, 263–270.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Commission International de l’Eclairage 1976. International Commission on Illumination, Colorimetry: Official Recommendations of the International Commission on Illumination. Publication CIE No. 15 (E-1.3.1). Bareau Central de la CIE, Paris, France.Google Scholar
Edwards, DB, Bates, RO, Osburn, WN 2003. Evaluation of Duroc- v. Pietrain-sired pigs for carcass and meat quality measures. Journal of Animal Sciences 81, 1895–1899.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, M, Webb, AJ, Avery, PJ, Brown, I 1996. The influence of terminal sire genotype, sex, slaughter weight, feeding regime and slaughter-house on growth performance and carcass and meat quality in pigs and on the organoleptic properties of fresh pork. Animal Science 62, 521–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enfält, AC, Lundström, K, Hansson, I, Lundeheim, N, Nyström, PE 1997. Effects of outdoor rearing and sire breed (Duroc or Yorkshire) on carcass composition and sensory and technological meat quality. Meat Science 45, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Enser, M 2000. Producing meat for healthy eating. In Proceedings of the 46th International Congress of Meat Science and Technology (ed. PT Garcia) pp. 124–129. National Institute of Agricultural Technology (INTA), Buenos Aires, Argentina.Google Scholar
García-Macías, JA, Gispert, M, Oliver, MA, Diestre, A, Alonso, P, MuñozLuna, A, Siggens, K, CuthbertHeavens, D 1996. The effects of cross, slaughter weight and halothane genotype on leanness and meat and fat quality in pig carcasses. Animal Science 63, 487–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glodek, P, Kratz, R, Schulz, E, Flachowsky, G 2004. Effect of sire breeds in commercial pig crosses on growth, carcass composition, meat and fat quality. Archiv fur Tierzucht 47, 59–74.Google Scholar
Högberg, A, Pickova, J, Stern, S, Lündstrom, K, Bylund, AC 2004. Fatty acid composition and tocopherol concentrations in muscle of entire male, castrated male and female pigs, reared in an indoor or outdoor housing system. Meat Science 68, 659–665.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Honikel, KO 1998. Reference methods for the assessment of physical characteristics of meat. Meat Science 49, 447–457.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huff-Lonergan, E, Bass, TJ, Malek, M, Dekkers, JCM, Prusa, K, Rothschild, MF 2002. Correlations among selected pork quality traits. Journal of Animal Science 80, 617–627.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jacyno, E, Pietruszka, A, Kolodziej, A, Czarnecki, R 2002. Content of lipid components in M. longissimus dorsi of progeny of the boars descending from reciprocal crossing of the Pietrain and Duroc breeds. Archiv fur Tierzucht 45, 237–245.Google Scholar
Kernmeyer, R 1993. Farm products: an opportunity and a challenge in the European market. Förderungsdienst 41, 4–6.Google Scholar
Latorre, MA, Lázaro, R, Gracia, MI, Nieto, M, Mateos, GG 2003a. Effect of sex and terminal sire genotype on performance, carcass characteristics, and meat quality of pigs slaughtered at 117 kg body weight. Meat Science 65, 1369–1377.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Latorre, MA, Medel, P, Fuentetaja, A, Lázaro, R, Mateos, GG 2003b. Effect of gender, terminal sire line and age at slaughter on performance, carcass characteristics and meat quality of heavy pigs. Animal Science 77, 33–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latorre, MA, García-Belenguer, E, Ariño, L, López-Bote, CJ 2007. Efecto del sexo y el peso al sacrificio sobre la composición del tejido adiposo subcutáneo del Jamón DOP Teruel. Proc. 4th Inter. Congr. Ham, Salamanca, Spain, pp. 455–457.Google Scholar
Latorre, MA, García-Belenguer, E, Ariño, L 2008a. The effects of gender and slaughter weight on growth performance and carcass traits of pigs intended for dry-cured hams from Teruel (Spain). Journal of Animal Science 86, 1933–1942.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Latorre, MA, Pomar, C, Faucitano, L, Gariépy, C, Méthot, S 2008b. The relationship within and between production performance and meat quality characteristics in pigs from three different genetic lines. Livestock Science 115, 258–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lebret, B, Massabie, P, Granier, R, Juin, H, Mourot, J, Chevillon, P 2002. Influence of outdoor rearing and indoor temperature on growth performance, carcass, adipose tissue and muscle traits in pigs, and on the technological and eating quality of dry-cured hams. Meat Science 62, 447–455.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lonergan, SM, Huff-Lonergan, E, Rowe, LJ, Kuhlers, DL, Jungst, SB 2001. Selection for lean growth efficiency in Duroc pigs influences pork quality. Journal of Animal Science 79, 2075–2085.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
National Research Council 1998. Nutrient requirements of swine. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
Nieuwhof, GJ, Kanis, E, Van der Hel, W, Vestergen, MWA, Huisman, J, Van der Wal, P 1991. Effect of recombinant porcine somatotropin on body composition and meat quality in growing pigs; interactions with genotype, sex and slaughter weight. Meat Science 30, 265–278.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oliver, MA, Gispert, M, Diestre, A 1993. The effects of breed and halothane sensitivity on pig meat quality. Meat Science 35, 105–118.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pugliese, C, Calagna, G, Chiofalo, V, Moretti, VM, Margiotta, S, Franci, O, Gandini, G 2004. Comparison of the performances of Nero Siciliano pigs reared indoors and outdoors. 2. Joints composition, meat and fat traits. Meat Science 68, 523–528.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pugliese, C, Bozzi, R, Campodoni, G, Acciaioli, A, Franci, O, Gandini, G 2005. Performance of Cinta Senese pigs reared outdoors and indoors. 1. Meat and subcutaneous fat characteristics. Meat Science 69, 459–464.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raj, S, Skiba, G, Weremko, D, Fandejewski, H, Migdal, W, Borowiec, F 2005. Influence of breed and body weight of pigs on the fatty acid profile of Musculus longissimus dorsi. Journal of Animal and Feed Sciences 14 (suppl. 1), 389–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rey, AI, Daza, A, López-Carrasco, C, López-Bote, CJ 2006. Feeding Iberian pigs with acorns and grass in Esther free-range or confinement affects the carcass characteristics and fatty acids and tocopherols accumulation in Longissimus dorsi muscle and backfat. Meat Science 73, 66–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ruiz-Carrascal, J, Ventanas, J, Cava, R, Andrés, AI, García, C 2000. Texture and appearance of dry-cured hams as affected by fat content and fatty acid composition. Food Research International 33, 91–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sans, P, Andrade, MJ, Ventanas, S, Ruiz, J 2004. Quality characteristics of fresh meat from pigs of the Gascon breed. Food Science and Technology International 10, 29–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Statistical Analysis Systems Institute 1990. SAS user’s guide: statistics. Version 6, 4th edition. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC, USA.Google Scholar
Suzuki, K, Kadowaki, H, Shibata, T, Uchida, H, Nishida, A 2005. Selection for daily gain, loin-eye area, backfat thickness and intramuscular fat based on desired gains over seven generations of Duroc pigs. Livestock Production Science 97, 193–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ventanas, S, Ventanas, J, Jurado, A, Estévez, M 2006. Quality traits in muscle biceps femoris and back-fat from purebred Iberian and reciprocal Iberian × Duroc crossbred pigs. Meat Science 73, 651–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warnants, N, Van Oeckel, MJ, Boucqué, ChV 1996. Incorporation of dietary polyunsaturated fatty acids in pork tissues and its implications for the quality of the end products. Meat Science 44, 125–144.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wood, JD, Enser, M, Fisher, AV, Nute, GR, Sheard, PR, Richardson, RI, Hughes, SI, Whittington, FM 2008. Fat deposition, fatty acid composition and meat quality: a review. Meat Science 78, 343–358.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wyszcecki, G, Stiles, WS 1982. Color science. Concepts and methods: quantitative data and formula, 2nd edition. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar