Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T13:52:09.922Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of grazing on the cow welfare of dairy herds evaluated by a multidimensional welfare index

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 December 2012

E. Burow ,
T. Rousing ,
P. T. Thomsen ,
N. D. Otten  and
J. T. Sørensen
E. Burow*
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Aarhus University, Blichers Allé 20, PO Box 50, DK-8830 Tjele, Denmark
T. Rousing
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Aarhus University, Blichers Allé 20, PO Box 50, DK-8830 Tjele, Denmark
P. T. Thomsen
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Aarhus University, Blichers Allé 20, PO Box 50, DK-8830 Tjele, Denmark
N. D. Otten
Affiliation:
Department of Large Animal Sciences/Population Biology, Copenhagen University, Grønnegårdsvej 8, 1870 Frederiksberg C, Denmark
J. T. Sørensen
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Aarhus University, Blichers Allé 20, PO Box 50, DK-8830 Tjele, Denmark
*
†E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Structural development in the prime sector has led to increasing herd sizes and new barn systems, followed by less summer grazing for dairy cows in Denmark. Effects of grazing on single welfare measures in dairy cows – for example, the presence of integument alterations or mortality – have been studied under different conditions. However, the effect of grazing on welfare, conceptualised as the multidimensional physical and mental state of the animal, has not yet been studied in contemporary cubicle loose-housing systems. The aim of our study was to investigate, based on a Welfare Quality® inspired multidimensional dairy cow welfare assessment protocol, the within-herd effect of summer grazing compared with winter barn housing in Danish dairy herds with cubicle free-stall systems for the lactating cows. Our hypothesis was that cow welfare in dairy herds was better during summer grazing than during full-time winter housing. Furthermore, we expected improved welfare with an increase in daily summer grazing hours. In total, 41 herds have been visited once in the winter and once in the summer of 2010 to assess their welfare status with 17 different animal- and resource-based welfare measures. A panel of 20 experts on cattle welfare and husbandry evaluated the relative weight of the 17 welfare measures in a multidimensional assessment scheme. They estimated exact weights for a priori constituted severe compared with moderate scores of welfare impairment concerning each measure, as well as relevance of the measures in relation to each other. A welfare index (WI; possible range 0 to 5400) was calculated for each herd and season with a higher index indicating poorer welfare. The within-herd comparison of summer grazing v. winter housing considered all the 17 measures. The mean WI in summer was significantly lower (better) than in winter (mean 2926 v. 3330; paired t-test P = 0.0001) based on a better state of the integument, claw conformation and better access to water and food. Body condition and faeces consistence were worse in summer. Many daily grazing hours (range average above 3 to 9 h) turned out to be more beneficial than few daily grazing hours (range average above 9 to 21 h) for the welfare of the dairy herds. In conclusion, this study reports a positive within-herd effect of summer grazing on dairy cow welfare, where many daily grazing hours were more beneficial than few daily grazing hours.

Keywords

grazing timewelfare indexdairy cowaggregationpanel
Type
Behaviour, welfare and health
Information
animal , Volume 7 , Issue 5 , May 2013 , pp. 834 - 842
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baird, LG, O'Connell, NE, McCoy, MA, Keady, TWJ, Kilpatrick, DJ 2009. Effects of breed and production system on lameness parameters in dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 92, 2174–2182.Google Scholar
Bartussek, H 1999. A review of the animal needs index (ANI) for the assessment of animals’ well-being in the housing systems for Austrian proprietary products and legislation. Livestock Production Science 61, 179–192.Google Scholar
Boken, SL, Staples, CR, Sollenberger, LE, Jenkins, TC, Thatcher, WW 2005. Effect of grazing and fat supplement on production and reproduction of Holstein cows. Journal of Dairy Science 88, 4258–4272.Google Scholar
Bossen, D, Weisbjerg, MR, Munksgaard, L, Højsgaard, S 2009. Allocation of feed based on individual dairy cow live weight changes: I: Feed intake and live weight changes during lactation. Livestock Science 126, 252–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Botreau, R, Bonde, M, Butterworth, A, Perny, P, Bracke, BM, Capdeville, J, Veissier, I 2007a. Aggregation of measures to produce an overall assessment of animal welfare. Part 1: a review of existing methods. Animal 1, 1179–1187.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Botreau, R, Bracke, MBM, Perny, P, Butterworth, A, Capdeville, J 2007b. Aggregation of measures to produce an overall assessment of animal welfare. Part 2: analysis of constraints. Animal 1, 1188–1197.Google Scholar
Burow, E, Thomsen, PT, Sørensen, JT, Rousing, T 2011. The effect of grazing on cow mortality in Danish dairy herds. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 100, 237–241.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burow, E, Thomsen, PT, Rousing, T, Sørensen, JT 2013. Daily grazing time as a risk factor for alterations at the hock integument in dairy cows. Animal 7, 160–166.Google Scholar
Byrt, T, Bishop, J, Carlin J, B 1993. Bias, prevalence and kappa. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 46, 423–429.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cochran, WG 1977. Sampling techniques, pp. 74–76. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
Corazzin, M, Piasentier, E, Dovier, S, Bovolenta, S 2010. Effect of summer grazing on welfare of dairy cows reared in mountain tie-stall barns. Italian Journal of Animal Science 9, 304–312.Google Scholar
Dohoo, I, Wayne, M, Stryhn, H 2009. Veterinary epidemiology research, pp. 38, 2nd edition. VER Inc., Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island, Canada.Google Scholar
Ellis, KA, Billington, K, McNeil, B, McKeegan, DEF 2009. Public opinion on UK milk marketing and dairy cow welfare. Animal Welfare 18, 267–282.Google Scholar
Haskell, MJ, Rennie, LJ, Bowell, VA, Bell, MJ, Lawrence, AB 2006. Housing system, milk production, and zero-grazing effects on lameness and leg injury in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 89, 4259–4266.Google Scholar
Hernandez-Mendo, O, von Keyserlingk, MAG, Veira, DM, Weary, DM 2007. Effects of pasture on lameness in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 90, 1209–1214.Google Scholar
Horan, B, Dillon, P, Faverdin, P, Delaby, L, Buckley, F, Rath, M 2005. The interaction of strain of Holstein–Friesian cows and pasture-based feed systems on milk yield, body weight and body condition score. Journal of Dairy Science 88, 1231–1243.Google Scholar
Ingemann, R, Sandøe, P, Enemark, P, Forkman, B 2009. Conflicting goals of welfare assessment schemes: a case study. Animal Welfare 18, 487–495.Google Scholar
Keil, NM, Wiederkehr, TU, Friedli, K, Wechsler, B 2006. Effects of frequency and duration of outdoor exercise on the prevalence of hock lesions in tied Swiss dairy cows. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 74, 142–153.Google Scholar
Klewer, AM, Forbes, A, Schnieder, T, Strube, C 2012. A survey on Dictyocaulus viviparusantibodies in bulk milk of dairy herds in Northern Germany. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 103, 243–245.Google Scholar
Kristensen, T, Madsen, ML, Noe, E 2010. The use of grazing in intensive dairy production and assessment of farmers attitude towards grazing. Grassland Sciences in Europe 15, 964–966.Google Scholar
Krohn, CC, Munksgaard, L 1993. Behaviour of dairy-cows kept in extensive (loose housing pasture) or intensive (tie stall) environments. 2. Lying and lying-down behaviour. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 37, 1–16.Google Scholar
Loberg, J, Telezhenko, E, Bergsten, C, Lidfors, L 2004. Behaviour and claw health in tied dairy cows with varying access to exercise in an outdoor paddock. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 89, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Main, DCJ, Leeb, C, Whay, HR, Webster, AJF 2004. British Welfare Assurance Programme: Animal based assessment tool for farm animal welfare certification. University of Bristol, Bristol, UK. http://www.vetschool.bris.ac.uk/animalwelfare/images/BWAPweboverview.pdfGoogle Scholar
Miele, M, Veissier, I, Evans, E, Botreau, R 2011. Animal welfare: establishing a dialogue between science and society. Animal Welfare 20, 103–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, K, Wood-Gush, DGM 1991. Some effects of housing on the social behaviour of dairy cows. Animal Production 53, 271–278.Google Scholar
Munksgaard, L, Krohn, CC 2004. Combination of automatic milking and grazing taking the cows’ behaviour into consideration. In Automatic milking and grazing. Grazing strategies and their effect on animal welfare and system performance. EU project QLK5-2000-31006, pp. 15–27. Retrieved November 29, 2011, from http://www.automaticmilking.nlGoogle Scholar
Pricket, RW, Norwood, FB, Lusk, JL 2010. Consumer preferences for farm animal welfare: results from a telephone survey of US households. Animal Welfare 19, 335–347.Google Scholar
Rushen, J, de Passillé, AMB 1992. The scientific assessment of the impact of housing on animal welfare: a critical review. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 72, 721–743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rutherford, KMD, Langford, FM, Jack, MC, Sherwood, L, Lawrence, AB, Haskell, MJ 2008. Hock injury prevalence and associated risk factors on organic and nonorganic dairy farms in the United Kingdom. Journal of Dairy Science 91, 2265–2274.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rutherford, KMD, Langford, FM, Jack, MC, Sherwood, L, Lawrence, AB, Haskell, MJ 2009. Lameness prevalence and risk factors in organic and non-organic dairy herds in the United Kingdom. The Veterinary Journal 180, 95–105.Google Scholar
Smith, LA, Marion, G, Swain, DL, White, PCL, Hutchings, MR 2009. The effect of grazing management on livestock exposure to parasites via the faecal–oral route. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 91, 95–106.Google Scholar
Thomsen, PT, Kjeldsen, AM, Sørensen, JT, Houe, H, Ersbøll, AK 2006. Herd-level risk factors for the mortality of cows in Danish dairy herds. Veterinary Record 158, 622–626.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thomsen, PT, Østergaard, S, Sørensen, JT, Houe, H 2007. Loser cows in Danish dairy herds: definition, prevalence and consequences. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 79, 116–135.Google Scholar
Veissier, I, Jensen, KK, Botreau, R, Sandøe, P 2011. Highlighting ethical decisions underlying the scoring of animal welfare in the Welfare Quality® scheme. Animal Welfare 20, 89–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, JR, Stewart, M, Rogers, AR, Verkerk, GA 2008. Assessment of welfare from physiological and behavioural responses of New Zealand dairy cows exposed to cold and wet conditions. Animal Welfare 17, 19–26.Google Scholar
Welfare Quality ® (WQ®) 2009. Welfare Quality® assessment protocol for cattle; ISBN/EAN 978-90-78240-04-4.Welfare Quality® Consortium, Lelystad, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Burow Supplementary Material

Appendix

Download Burow Supplementary Material(File)
File 46.1 KB