Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T16:37:27.800Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cross-validation analysis for genetic evaluation models for ranking in endurance horses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 June 2017

S. García-Ballesteros ,
L. Varona ,
M. Valera ,
J. P. Gutiérrez  and
I. Cervantes
S. García-Ballesteros
Affiliation:
Departamento de Producción Animal, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Avda. Puerta de Hierro s/n, E-28040 Madrid, Spain
L. Varona
Affiliation:
Unidad de Genética Cuantitativa y Mejora Animal, Universidad de Zaragoza, E-50013 Zaragoza, Spain
M. Valera
Affiliation:
Departamento de Ciencias Agro-Forestales, Universidad de Sevilla, Ctra. Utrera km 1, 41013 Sevilla, Spain
J. P. Gutiérrez
Affiliation:
Departamento de Producción Animal, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Avda. Puerta de Hierro s/n, E-28040 Madrid, Spain
I. Cervantes*
Affiliation:
Departamento de Producción Animal, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Avda. Puerta de Hierro s/n, E-28040 Madrid, Spain
*
†E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Ranking trait was used as a selection criterion for competition horses to estimate racing performance. In the literature the most common approaches to estimate breeding values are the linear or threshold statistical models. However, recent studies have shown that a Thurstonian approach was able to fix the race effect (competitive level of the horses that participate in the same race), thus suggesting a better prediction accuracy of breeding values for ranking trait. The aim of this study was to compare the predictability of linear, threshold and Thurstonian approaches for genetic evaluation of ranking in endurance horses. For this purpose, eight genetic models were used for each approach with different combinations of random effects: rider, rider–horse interaction and environmental permanent effect. All genetic models included gender, age and race as systematic effects. The database that was used contained 4065 ranking records from 966 horses and that for the pedigree contained 8733 animals (47% Arabian horses), with an estimated heritability around 0.10 for the ranking trait. The prediction ability of the models for racing performance was evaluated using a cross-validation approach. The average correlation between real and predicted performances across genetic models was around 0.25 for threshold, 0.58 for linear and 0.60 for Thurstonian approaches. Although no significant differences were found between models within approaches, the best genetic model included: the rider and rider–horse random effects for threshold, only rider and environmental permanent effects for linear approach and all random effects for Thurstonian approach. The absolute correlations of predicted breeding values among models were higher between threshold and Thurstonian: 0.90, 0.91 and 0.88 for all animals, top 20% and top 5% best animals. For rank correlations these figures were 0.85, 0.84 and 0.86. The lower values were those between linear and threshold approaches (0.65, 0.62 and 0.51). In conclusion, the Thurstonian approach is recommended for the routine genetic evaluations for ranking in endurance horses.

Keywords

racing performancebreeding valueThurstonian approachriderequine
Type
Research Article
Information
animal , Volume 12 , Issue 1 , January 2018 , pp. 20 - 27
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aldridge, LI, Kelleher, DL, Reilly, M and Brophy, PO 2000. Estimation of the genetic correlation between performances at different levels of show jumping competitions in Ireland. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 117, 65–72.Google Scholar
Bartolomé, E, Menéndez‐Buxadera, A, Valera, M, Cervantes, I and Molina, A 2013. Genetic (co)variance components across age for Show Jumping performance as an estimation of phenotypic plasticity ability in Spanish horses. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 130, 190–198.Google Scholar
Bokor, Á, Blouin, C, Langlois, B and Stefler, J 2005. Genetic parameters of racing merit of Thoroughbred horses in steeplechase races. Italian Journal of Animal Science 4, 43–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bugislaus, AE, Roehe, R and Kalm, E 2005. Comparison of two different statistical models considering individual races or racetracks for evaluation of German trotters. Livestock Production Science 92, 69–76.Google Scholar
Bugislaus, AE, Stamer, E and Reinsch, N 2011. The use of a Tobit-like-classification in genetic evaluation of German Trotters. Paper presented at 62nd Annual Meeting of the European Federation for Animal Science, 29 August–2 September 2011, Stavanger, Norway, pp. 132.Google Scholar
da Gama, M, Aspilcueta Borquis, R, de Araújo Neto, F, de Oliveira, H, Fernandes, G and da Mota, M 2016. Genetic parameters for racing performance of Thoroughbred horses using Bayesian linear and Thurstonian models. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science 42, 39–43.Google Scholar
Efron, B and Tibshirani, RJ 1993. Cross-validation and other estimates of prediction error. An introduction to the Bootstrap. Chapman & Hall, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ekiz, B and Kocak, O 2005. Phenotypic and genetic parameter estimates for racing traits of Arabian horses in Turkey. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 122, 349–356.Google Scholar
Gianola, D 1982. Theory and analysis of threshold characters. Journal of Animal Science 54, 1079–1096.Google Scholar
Gianola, D and Foulley, JL 1983. Sire evaluation for ordered categorical data. Genetic Selection Evolution 15, 201–223.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gianola, D and Simianer, H 2006. A Thurstonian model for quantitative genetic analysis of ranks: a Bayesian approach. Genetics 174, 1613–1624.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gómez, MD, Cervantes, I, Bartolomé, E, Molina, A and Valera, M 2006. Genetic evaluation of show jumping performance in young Spanish Sport Horse Breed. In Book of abstracts of the 57th Annual Meeting of the EAAP, 17–20 September 2006 (ed. Y van der Honing), pp. 351. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Antalya, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Gómez, MD, Varona, L, Molina, A and Valera, M 2011. Genetic evaluation of racing performance in trotter horses by competitive models. Livestock Science 140, 155–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gutiérrez, JP and Goyache, F 2005. A note on ENDOG: a computer program for analysing pedigree information. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 122, 172–176.Google Scholar
Hausberger, M, Roche, H, Henry, S and Visser, EK 2008. A review of the human–horse relationship. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 109, 1–24.Google Scholar
Janssens, S, Geysen, D and Vandepitte, W 1997. Genetic parameters for show jumping in Belgian sporthorses. In Book of abstracts of the 48th Annual Meeting of the EAAP, 25–28 August 1997 (ed. Arendonk, J A M Van), p. 5. Wageningen Publishers, Vienna, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Kearsley, CGS, Woolliams, JA, Coffey, MP and Brotherstone, S 2008. Use of competition data for genetic evaluations of eventing horses in Britain: analysis of the dressage, showjumping and cross country phases of eventing competition. Livestock Science 118, 72–81.Google Scholar
Legarra, A, Varona, L and Lopez de Maturana, E 2008. TM Threshold model. Retrieved on 26 October 2008 from http://snp.toulouse.inra.fr/~alegarra/manualtm.pdf.Google Scholar
Lührs-Behnke, H, Röhe, R and Kalm, E 2006. Genetic analyses of riding test and their connections with traits of stallion performance and breeding mare tests. Züchtungskunde 78, 119–128.Google Scholar
McLean, AN and McGreevy, PD 2010. Ethical equitation: capping the price horses pay for human glory. Journal of Veterinary Behavior: Clinical Applications and Research 5, 203–209.Google Scholar
Olsen, HF, Klemetsdal, G, Ødegård, J and Árnason, T 2012. Validation of alternative models in genetic evaluation of racing performance in North Swedish and Norwegian cold‐blooded trotters. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 129, 164–170.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ricard, A and Chanu, I 2001. Genetic parameters of eventing horse competition in France. Genetics Selection Evolution 33, 175–190.Google Scholar
Ricard, A and Legarra, A 2010. Validation of models for analysis of ranks in horse breeding evaluation. Genetics Selection Evolution 42, 3–10.Google Scholar
Ricard, A and Touvais, M 2007. Genetic parameters of performance traits in horse endurance races. Livestock Science 110, 118–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roehe, R, Savas, T, Brka, M, Willms, F and Kalm, E 2001. Multiple-trait genetic analyses of racing performances of German trotters with disentanglement of genetic and driver effects. Archiv Tierzucht 44, 579–587.Google Scholar
Rovere, G, Ducro, BJ, van Arendonk, JAM, Norberg, E and Madsen, P 2016. Analysis of competition performance in dressage and show jumping of Dutch Warmblood horses. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 133, 503–512.Google Scholar
Ruhlmann, C, Janssens, S, Philipsson, J, Thorén-Hellsten, E, Crolly, H, Quinn, K, Manfredi, E and Ricard, A 2009. Genetic correlations between horse show jumping competition traits in five European countries. Livestock Science 122, 234–240.Google Scholar
Sánchez-Guerrero, MJ, Cervantes, I, Valera, M and Gutiérrez, JP 2014. Modelling genetic evaluation for dressage in Pura Raza Español horses with focus on the rider effect. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 131, 395–402.Google Scholar
Snell, EJ 1964. A scaling procedure for ordered categorical data. Biometrics 20, 592–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sobczynska, M and Lukaszewicz, M 2004. Genetic parameters of racing merit of thoroughbred horses in Poland. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 121, 302–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sorensen, D and Gianola, D 2002. Likelihood, Bayesian, and MCMC methods in quantitative genetics. Springer, New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
Tavernier, A 1991. Genetic evaluation of horses based on ranks in competitions. Genetics Selection Evolution 23, 159–173.Google Scholar
Viklund, Å, Braam, Å, Näsholm, A, Strandberg, E and Philipsson, J 2010. Genetic variation in competition traits at different ages and time periods and correlations with traits at field tests of 4-year-old Swedish Warmblood horses. Animal 4, 682–691.Google Scholar
Visser, EK, Van Reenen, CG, Blokhuis, MZ, Morgan, EKM, Hassmén, P, Rundgren, TMM and Blokhuis, HJ 2008. Does horse temperament influence horse-rider cooperation? Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science 11, 267–284.Google Scholar