Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T09:43:45.080Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comparative fibre-degrading capacity in foals at immediate and late post-weaning periods

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2017

C. Faubladier ,
V. Julliand ,
L. Beuneiche  and
C. Philippeau
C. Faubladier
Affiliation:
AgroSup Dijon, URANIE – USC INRA Nutrition du cheval athlète, 21079 Dijon, France
V. Julliand
Affiliation:
AgroSup Dijon, URANIE – USC INRA Nutrition du cheval athlète, 21079 Dijon, France
L. Beuneiche
Affiliation:
AgroSup Dijon, URANIE – USC INRA Nutrition du cheval athlète, 21079 Dijon, France
C. Philippeau*
Affiliation:
AgroSup Dijon, URANIE – USC INRA Nutrition du cheval athlète, 21079 Dijon, France
*
†E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Total tract apparent digestibility of dietary fibrous components and parameters of the faecal digestive ecosystem were compared at immediate and late post-weaning periods using five foals. The foals were abruptly weaned (day 0) from their mares at 6 months of age. Immediately (day 0 to day 14) and later (day 131 to day 194) after weaning, foals received the same basal diet consisting of hay and pellets. Pellets were fed at 0.36% BW. Hay was offered ad libitum and corresponded to 120% of the average voluntary hay intake measured individually during the immediate (days 1 to 4) and late (days 180 to 183) post-weaning periods. Total feed intake was measured during the two post-weaning periods (from days 7 to 10 and from days 187 to 190). Total tract apparent digestibility of DM, organic matter (OM), NDF and ADF was assessed using a 4-day partial collection of faeces (from days 8 to 11 and from days 188 to 191). Major bacterial groups in faeces, Fibrobacter succinogenes, DM, pH and volatile fatty acids were quantified at days −1, 1, 3, 7, 14 and 180. During the post-weaning period, minor changes were observed in the composition and activity of the faecal microbiota. The amylolytic count in faeces decreased immediately after weaning (between days 1 and 7) (P<0.05). Later (from days 14 to 180), the molar proportion of propionate decreased (P=0.03). The limited alteration seen in the hindgut ecosystem was probably due to the fact that the foals had undergone a gradual dietary transition from milk to solid feed before weaning. Such conclusions have also been reported in other animal species. Between the immediate and late post-weaning periods, the average daily feed intake and the digestibility coefficients of DM, OM, NDF and ADF increased (P<0.05). These results could suggest an increase in the fibre-degrading capacity of foals after weaning.

Keywords

foalspost-weaningfaecal ecosystemdigestibilityfibre
Type
Research Article
Information
animal , Volume 11 , Issue 9 , September 2017 , pp. 1497 - 1504
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aiken, GE, Potter, GD, Conrad, BE and Evans, JW 1989. Growth performance of yearling horses grazing bermudagrass pastures at different grazing pressures. Journal of Animal Science 67, 2692–2697.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Argenzio, RA, Southworth, M and Stevens, CE 1974. Sites of organic acid production and absorption in the equine gastrointestinal tract. American Journal of Physiology 226, 1043–1050.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bryant, MP and Burkey, LA 1953. Cultural methods and some characteristics of some of the more numerous groups of bacteria in the bovine rumen. Journal of Dairy Science 36, 205–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, KR and Owens, NJP 1983. A simple and versatile micro-computer program for the determination of ‘Most Probable Number’. Journal of Microbiological Methods 1, 133–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Combes, S, Michelland, RJ, Monteils, V, Cauquil, L, Soulié, V, Tran, NU, Gidenne, T and Fortun-Lamothe, L 2011. Postnatal development of the rabbit caceal microbiota composition and activity. FEMS Microbiology Ecology 77, 680–689.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crowell-Davis, S, Houpt, K and Carnevale, J 1985. Feeding and drinking behavior of mares and foals with free access to pasture and water. Journal of Animal Science 60, 883–889.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cymbaluk, NF 1990. Cold housing effects on growth and nutrient demand of young horses. Journal of Animal Science 68, 3152–3162.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cymbaluk, NF, Christison, GI and Leach, DH 1989. Energy uptake and utilization by limit- and ad libitum-fed growing horses. Journal of Animal Science 67, 403–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daly, K, Proudman, CJ, Duncan, SH, Flint, HJ, Dyer, J and Shirazi-Beechey, SP 2012. Alterations in microbiota and fermentation products in equine large intestine in response to dietary variation and intestinal disease. British Journal of Nutrition 107, 989–995.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Denman, S and McSweeney, C 2006. Development of a real-time PCR assay for monitoring anaerobic fungal and cellulolytic bacterial populations within the rumen. FEMS Microbiology Ecology 58, 572–582.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Earing, JE, Hayes, SH, Brummer, M, McCown, SM, Parks, AG and Lawrence, LM 2010. In vivo digestibility and mean retention time estimates of young and mature horses receiving the same diet. Journal of Animal Science 88, 639.Google Scholar
Earing, JE, Lawrence, LM, Hayes, SH, Brummer, M and Vanzant, E 2013. Digestive capacity in weanling and mature horses. Journal of Animal Science 91, 2151–2157.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Faubladier, C, Julliand, V, Danel, J and Philippeau, C 2013. Bacterial carbohydrate-degrading capacity in foal faeces: changes from birth to pre-weaning and the impact of maternal supplementation with fermented feed products. British Journal of Nutrition 110, 1040–1052.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goachet, AG, Philippeau, C, Varloud, M and Julliand, V 2009. Adaptations to standard approaches for measuring total tract apparent digestibility and gastro-intestinal retention time in horses in training. Animal Feed Science and Technology 152, 141–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goachet, AG, Varloud, M and Julliand, V 2012. Repeatability and reproductibility measurements in horses fed forage based diets. In Forages and grazing in horses nutrition (ed. M Saastamoinen, MJ Fradinho, AS Santos and N Miraglia), pp. 97–100. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, The Netherlands. EAAP publication 132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goachet, AG, Varloud, M, Philippeau, C and Julliand, V 2010. Long‐term effects of endurance training on total tract apparent digestibility, total mean retention time and faecal microbial ecosystem in competing Arabian horses. Equine Veterinary Journal 42, 387–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halliwell, G and Bryant, M 1963. The cellulolytic activity of pure culture strains of bacteria from the rumen of cattle. Journal of General Microbiology 32, 441–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hastie, PM, Mitchell, K and Murray, JA 2008. Semi-quantitative analysis of Ruminococcus flavefaciens, Fibrobacter succinogenes and Streptococcus bovis in the equine large intestine using real-time polymerase chain reaction. British Journal of Nutrition 100, 561–568.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jouany, JP 1982. Volatile fatty acid and alcohol determination in digestive contents, silage juices, bacterial cultures and anaerobic fermentor contents. Science des Aliments 2, 131–144.Google Scholar
Julliand, V, De Fombelle, A, Drogoul, C and Jacotot, E 2001. Feeding and microbial disorders in horses: Part 3 – effects of three hay:grain ratios on microbial profile and activities. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science 21, 543–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Julliand, V, de Vaux, A, Millet, L and Fonty, G 1999. Identification of Ruminococcus flavefaciens as the predominant cellulolytic bacterial species of the equine cecum. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 65, 3738–3741.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Julliand, V, de Vaux, A, Villaro, L and Richard, Y 1996. Preliminary studies on the bacterial flora of faeces taken from foals, from birth to twelve weeks. Effect of the oral administration of a commercial colostrum replacer. Pferdeheilkunde 12, 209–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Julliand, V and Grimm, P 2016. HORSE SPECIES SYMPOSIUM: The microbiome of the horse hindgut: History and current knowledge. Journal of Animal Science 94, 2262–2274.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leedle, J and Hespell, R 1980. Differential carbohydrate media and anaerobic replica plating techniques in delineating carbohydrate-utilizing subgroups in rumen bacteria populations. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 34, 709–719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackie, R and Heath, AB 1979. Enumeration and isolation of lactate utilizing bacteria from the rumen of sheep. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 38, 416–421.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Magne, F, Hachelaf, W, Suau, A, Boudraa, G, Mangin, I, Touhami, M, Bouziane-Nedjadi, K and Pochart, PA 2006. Longitudinal study of infant faecal microbiota during weaning. FEMS Microbiology Ecology 58, 563–571.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martin-Rosset, W 2005. Growth and development in the equine. In The growing horse: nutrition and prevention of growth disorders (ed. V Julliand and W Martin-Rosset), pp. 15–50. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, The Netherlands. EAAP publication 114.Google Scholar
Martin-Rosset, W and Younge, B 2006. Energy and protein requirements and feeding of the suckling foal. In Nutrition and feeding the broodmare (ed. N Miraglia and W Martin-Rosset), pp. 221–244. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, The Netherlands. EAAP publication 120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montagne, L, Boudry, G, Favier, C, Le Huëron-Luron, I, Lallès, JP and Sève, B 2007. Main intestinal markers associated with the changes in gut architecture and function in piglets after weaning. British Journal of Nutrition 97, 45–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
National Research Council (NRC) 2007. Nutrient requirements of horses, 6th revised edition. National Academies Press, Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
Ringler, JE and Lawrence, LM 2008. Comparison of thoroughbred growth data to body weights predicted by the NRC. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science 28, 97–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sales, J 2012. A review on the use of indigestible dietary markers to determine total tract apparent digestibility of nutrients in horses. Animal Feed Science and Technology 174, 119–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silva, VP, Rezende, D, Saliba, S, Costa, D, Lima, M and Pereira, G 2012. Intake and digestibility of concentrate and legume hay diets fed to foals. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 41, 655–661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smyth, GB 1988. Effects of age, sex, and post mortem interval on intestinal lengths of horses during development. Equine Veterinary Journal 20, 104–108.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Swanson, CA, Kronfeld, DS, Hoffman, RM and Splan, RK 2003. Effects of diet and probiotic supplementation on stress during weaning in Thoroughbred foals. Proceedings of the 18th Equine Nutrition and Physiology Society Symposium, 4–7 June 2003, East Lansing, Michigan, USA, p. 243.Google Scholar
Van Soest, PJ, Robertson, JB and Lewis, BA 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fibre, and non-starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science 74, 3583–3597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varloud, M 2006. Implication des micro-organismes de l’estomac dans la digestion de l’amidon chez le cheval. Postgraduate thesis, Doctoral School ABIES, Paris, France.Google Scholar
Warren, LK, Lawrene, LM, Parker, AL, Barnes, T and Griffin, AS 1998. The effect of weaning age on foal growth and radiographic bone density. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science 18, 335–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xiao, H, Zhang, L, Tuohut, A, Shi, G and Li, H 2015. Effect of weaning age on stress-related behavior in foals (Equus Caballus) by Abrupt-Group Weaning Method. Phylogenetics & Evolutionary Biology 3, 151.Google Scholar
Yu, B and Chiou, PW 1997. The morphological changes of intestinal mucosa in growing rabbits. Laboratory Animals 31, 254–263.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yu, Z and Morrison, M 2004. Improved extraction of PCR-quality community DNA from digesta and fecal samples. Biotechniques 36, 808–812.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed