Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T17:56:52.809Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Adaptive response to Eimeriaacervulina in rearing hens is affected by suboptimal incubation temperature and heat exposure in later life

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 August 2011

I. Walstra ,
J. ten Napel ,
B. Kemp  and
H. van den Brand
I. Walstra*
Affiliation:
Adaptation Physiology Group, Wageningen University, P.O. Box 338, 6700 AH Wageningen, The Netherlands Wageningen UR Livestock Research, Animal Breeding and Genomics Centre, P.O. Box 135, 6700 AC Wageningen, The Netherlands
J. ten Napel
Affiliation:
Wageningen UR Livestock Research, Animal Breeding and Genomics Centre, P.O. Box 135, 6700 AC Wageningen, The Netherlands
B. Kemp
Affiliation:
Adaptation Physiology Group, Wageningen University, P.O. Box 338, 6700 AH Wageningen, The Netherlands
H. van den Brand
Affiliation:
Adaptation Physiology Group, Wageningen University, P.O. Box 338, 6700 AH Wageningen, The Netherlands
*
†E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate whether suboptimal incubation (SI) temperature in weeks 1 and 3 of layer embryo incubation affects their development and post-hatch adaptive capacity during infectious challenges, by using Eimeria as a model infection under normal and immediately after more challenging environmental conditions of 72 h heat exposure. Eggs (n = 160 per treatment) were incubated at optimal (OI = 37.8°C continuously) or suboptimal eggshell temperature (36.7°C, 37.8°C and 38.9°C in weeks 1, 2 and 3, respectively). At day 33 of age, half the chickens of each incubation treatment were exposed to 72 h heat (35°C), whereas the other half remained under control conditions (21°C). At day 36 of age, all chickens were inoculated with 1 ml of a phosphate buffer saline solution containing 25 000 sporulated Eimeria acervulina oocysts/ml. The adaptive response to E. acervulina was measured by BW gain and FI from days 0 to 3 post infection (p.i.), days 3 to 5 p.i. and days 5 to 7 p.i., and by oocyst production (days 4 and 7 p.i.) and lesion scores in the duodenum (day 3, 4 and 7 p.i.). Our results demonstrated that SI temperatures in weeks 1 and 3 of incubation resulted in a reduction in yolk-free BW, chick length and navel condition. Moreover, SI temperature appeared to reduce the adaptive capacity to E. acervulina. This was demonstrated by tendencies to lower FI (P = 0.07) and BW gain (P = 0.08), more duodenal lesions (P = 0.09) and higher oocyst production (P = 0.02) after inoculation of E. acervulina. Higher lesion scores and faecal oocyst numbers were especially found when suboptimal incubation was combined with heat exposure preceding the infection. In conclusion, SI layer chickens tend to be less able to cope with an infectious challenge post hatch.

Keywords

layersincubation temperatureadaptive capacityheat exposureEimeria
Type
Full Paper
Information
animal , Volume 6 , Issue 1 , January 2012 , pp. 137 - 144
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Braastad, BO 1998. Effects of prenatal stress on behaviour of offspring of laboratory and farmed mammals. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 61, 159–180.Google Scholar
Chapman, HD, Rayavarapu, S 2007. Acquisition of immunity to Eimeria maxima in newly hatched chickens reared on new or reused litter. Avian Pathology 36, 319–323.Google Scholar
Dalloul, RA, Lillehoj, HS 2005. Recent advances in immunomodulation and vaccination strategies against coccidiosis. Avian Diseases 49, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dalloul, RA, Lillehoj, HS, Shellem, TA, Doerr, JA 2003. Enhanced mucosal immunity against Eimeria acervulina in broilers fed a Lactobacillus-based probiotic. Poultry Science 82, 62–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Darras, VM, Visser, TJ, Berghman, LR, Kuhn, ER 1992. Ontogeny of type-I and type-III deiodinase activities in embryonic and posthatch chickens – relationship with changes in plasma triiodothyronine and growth-hormone levels. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A: Molecular & Integrative Physiology 103, 31–136.Google Scholar
Decuypere, E 1979. Effect of incubation temperature patterns on morphological, physiological and reproduction criteria in Rhode Island Red Bords. Agricultura 27, 65–68.Google Scholar
Decuypere, E, Michels, H 1992. Incubation temperature as a management tool – a review. Worlds Poultry Science Journal 48, 28–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deeming, DC, Ferguson, MWJ 1991. Physiological effects of incubation temperature on embryonic development in reptiles and birds In Egg incubation (ed. DC Deeming and MJW Ferguson), pp. 147–172. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dorner, G 1974. Environment-dependent brain differentiation and fundamental processes of life. Acta Biologica et Medica Germanica 33, 129–148.Google Scholar
Fasenko, GM, O'Dea, EE 2008. Evaluating broiler growth and mortality in chickens with minor navel conditions at hatching. Poultry Science 87, 594–597.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
French, NA 1997. Modeling incubation temperature: the effects of incubator design, embryonic development, and egg size. Poultry Science 76, 124–133.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hill, D 2001. Chick length uniformity profiles as a field measurement of chick quality? Avian Poultry Biology Reviews 12, 188.Google Scholar
Hulet, R, Gladys, G, Hill, D, Meijerhof, R, El-Shiekh, T 2007. Influence of egg shell embryonic incubation temperature and broiler breeder flock age on posthatch growth performance and carcass characteristics. Poultry Science 86, 408–412.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jones, RB, Mills, AD, Faure, JM, Williams, JB 1994. Restraint, fear and distress in Japanese quail genetically selected for long or short tonic immobility reactions. Physiology and Behaviour 56, 529–534.Google Scholar
Klecha, AJ, Genaro, AM, Gorelik, G, Barreiro Arcos, ML, Magalí Silberman, D, Schuman, M, Garcia, SI, Pirola, C, Cremaschi, GA 2006. Integrative study of hypothalamus–pituitary–thyroid–immune system interaction: thyroid hormone-mediated modulation of lymphocyte activity through the protein kinase C signaling pathway. Journal of Endocrinology 189, 45–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lillehoj, HS, Trout, JM 1996. Avian gut associated lymphoid tissues and intestinal immune response to Eimeria parasites. Clinical Microbiology Reviews 9, 349–360.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lin, H, de Vos, D, Decuypere, E, Buyse, J 2008. Dynamic changes in parameters of redox balance after mild heat stress in aged laying hens (Gallus gallus domesticus). Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part C: Toxicology & Pharmacology 147, 30–35.Google ScholarPubMed
Long, PL, Rowell, JG 1975. Sampling broiler house litter for coccidial oocysts. British Poultry Science 16, 583–592.Google Scholar
Lourens, A, Van den Brand, H, Meijerhof, R, Kemp, B 2005. Effect of eggshell temperature during incubation on embryo development, hatchability, and posthatch development. Poultry Science 84, 914–920.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martins, TLF, Roberts, ML, Giblin, I, Huxham, R, Evans, MR 2007. Speed of exploration and risk-taking behavior are linked to corticosterone titres in zebra finches. Hormones and Behavior 52, 445–453.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moberg, GP 2000. Biological response to stress: implications for animal welfare. In The biology of animal stress (ed. GP Moberg and JA Mench), pp. 1–21. CAB International, Wallingford, UK.Google Scholar
Molenaar, R, Reijrink, IAM, Meijerhof, R, Van den Brand, H 2008. Relationship between hatchling length and weight on later productive performance in broilers. Worlds Poultry Science Journal 64, 599–603.Google Scholar
Molenaar, R, De Vries, S, Van den Anker, I, Meijerhof, R, Kemp, B, Van den Brand, H 2010. Effect of eggshell temperature and a hole in the air cell on the perinatal development and physiology of layer hatchlings. Poultry Science 89, 1716–1723.Google Scholar
Myhre, K, Cabanac, M, Myhre, G 1975. Thermoregulatory behavior and body temperature in chickens of willow grouse (Lagopus lagopus lagopus). Poultry Science 54, 1174–1179.Google Scholar
Reid, WM, Johnson, J 1970. Pathogenicity of Eimeria acervulina in light and heavy infections. Avian Diseases 14, 166–171.Google Scholar
Romanoff, AL 1972. Assimilation of avian yolk and albumen under normal and extreme incubating temperatures in pathogenesis of the avian embryo. Wiley-Interscience, New York, NY.Google Scholar
Rose, ME 1996. Immunity to coccidia. In Poultry immunology (ed. TF Davison, TR Morris and LN Payne), pp. 265–299. Carfax Publishing Company, Oxfordshire, UK.Google Scholar
Shafey, TM 2004. Effect of lighted incubation on embryonic growth and hatchability performance on two strains of layer breeder eggs. British Poultry Science 45, 223–229.Google Scholar
Star, L 2008. Robustness in laying hens; influence of genetic background, environment and early-life experiences. PhD, Wageningen University, library.wur.nl/wda/dissertations/dis4495.pdfGoogle Scholar
Verstegen, MWA, Van der Hel, W, Brandsma, HA, Henken, AM, Bransen, AM 1987. The Wageningen respiration unit for animal production research: a description of the equipment and its possibilities. In Energy metabolism in farm animals: effects of housing, stress and disease (ed. MWA Verstegen), pp. 21–48. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht, the Netherlands.Google Scholar
Walstra, I, Ten Napel, J, Kemp, B, Schipper, H, Van den Brand, H 2010. Early life conditions affect the adaptive capacity of rearing hens during infectious challenges. Animal 4, 1688–1696.Google Scholar
Wilson, HR 1991. Physiological requirements of the developing embryo: temperature and turning In Avian incubation (ed. SG Tullett), pp. 145–156. Butterworth-Heinemann, London, UK.Google Scholar
Wolanski, NJ, Luiten, EJ, Meijerhof, R, Vereijken, ALJ 2004. Yolk utilisation and chick length as parameters for embryo development. Avian and Poultry Biology Reviews 15, 233–234.Google Scholar