Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T17:51:41.719Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Welfare Aspects of the Commercial Slaughter of Whales

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2023

S C Kestin*
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Veterinary Science, University of Bristol, Langford, Bristol, Avon BS18 7DY, UK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Recently, the method by which Japanese and Norwegian whalers kill minke whales has come under scrutiny on welfare grounds. Whales are still caught with a grenade tipped harpoon fired from a cannon. The harpoon is targeted to strike the animal in the thorax, though the pattern of harpoon strikes is variable and some can even be struck in the tail. Once the whale is harpooned, it is winched to the ship and if not dead, attempts are made to kill it either by electrocution or with rifles. Some studies indicate that less than 30 per cent of animals are killed instantaneously, though best practice can achieve 50 per cent of animals killed instantaneously but with wounded animals surviving for up to one hour. To kill any wild animal humanely, immediate insensibility must be induced. Whilst in principle the methods used on whales could induce immediate insensibility, there are indications that neither harpooning nor the secondary killing processes, like electrocution or rifle bullets, are achieving this in an acceptable proportion of the animals taken. Comparison of the killing processes used on minke whales with killing processes used on other animals, indicated that there are several areas where improvements could increase the proportion of whales killed instantaneously and reduce the suffering of wounded animals. Whilst harpooning may remain the favoured method of taking whales, and some improvements have been made in the number of whales killed instantaneously, the equipment has evolved little from that originally developed by the Norwegians in the Nineteenth Century. As currently practised few people would consider the current methods employed by the whaling industry to be humane.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1995 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

References

Anil, M H 1991 Studies on the return of physical reflexes in pigs following electrical stunning. Meat Science 30: 1321CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anon 1980 Report of the workshop on humane killing techniques for whales. Proceedings International Whaling Commission. IWC/33/15Google Scholar
Anon 1992 Report on the workshop on whale killing methods. Proceedings International Whaling Commission. IWC/44/REPHKGoogle Scholar
Best, P 1993 The external locations of harpoon wounds on minke whales taken in Antarctic commercial whaling operations 1978/79 seasons. Proceedings International Whaling Commission. IWC/45/HK3Google Scholar
Blackmore, D K 1992 The slaughter of cetaceans: a comparative review. Proceedings International Whaling Commission. IWC/44/HKW11Google Scholar
Blackmore, D K, Nutman, A, Barnes, G R G, Madie, P, Davies, A S, Bowling, M C, Donoghue, M and Kırk, E J 1994 Preliminary investigations of techniques for killing whales. Proceedings International Whaling Commission. IWC/46/HK4Google Scholar
Daly, C C and Whittington, P E 1986 Concussive methods of preslaughter stunning in sheep: effects of captive bolt stunning in the poll position on brain function. Research in Veterinary Science 41: 353355CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Government of Japan 1984 Report on humane method of catching whales in 1983/84 Antarctic season and experiment in 1983 coastal minke whaling season. Proceedings International Whaling Commission. IWC/TC/36/HK9Google Scholar
Government of Japan 1992 Development of penthrite explosive harpoons. Proceedings International Whaling Commission. IWC/44/HKW13Google Scholar
Government of Japan 1993a Factors contributing to the accuracy of the strike. Proceedings International Whaling Commission. IWC/45/HK7Google Scholar
Government of Japan 1993b The time-to-death of whales captured from 1984 to 1987 in Japan small type coastal whaling. Proceedings International Whaling Commission IWC/45/HK12Google Scholar
Government of Japan 1993c The time-to-death of whales captured in the 1984/1985, 1985/1986 and 1986/1987 Antarctic season. Proceedings International Whaling Commission. IWC/45/HK6Google Scholar
Government of Norway 1993 The minke whale catch 1993: summary of the contents of the inspectors’ reports and catching exercise and inspection. Sea Mammal Programme 8.10.93Google Scholar
Hasui, S 1980 Research and development on whaling methods. Proceedings International Whaling Commission. IWC/32/32Google Scholar
Hayashi, Y 1980 Report on method of catching minke whales: assessment made mainly from the viewpoint of humane killing. Proceedings International Whaling Commission. IWC/SC/32/024Google Scholar
Jordan, W J 1992 Killing of whales. Proceedings International Whaling Commission. IWC/44/HKW 10Google Scholar
Kano, H and Hasui, S 1982 Japan’s experiments on humane method of catching whales during the 1981/82 season. Proceedings International Whaling Commission. IWC/SC/34/18Google Scholar
Lambertsen, R H and Moore, M J 1983 Behavioural and post-mortem observations on fin whales killed with explosive harpoons with preliminary conclusions concerning killing efficiency. Proceedings International Whaling Commission. IWC/TC/36/HK3Google Scholar
Metveit, T B 1992 Report on key aspects of the theme commercial whaling, is it humane? Proceedings International Whaling Commission. IWC/44/HKW10 annex BGoogle Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food 1992 John Gummer’s speech at the opening of the IWC. News Release 208/92. Ministry of Agriculture Fisheries and Food: LondonGoogle Scholar
Øen E O 1992a The Norwegian hunt of minke whales: description and analysis of the minke whale hunt with cold harpoons in the 1981, 1982 and 1983 seasons. Proceedings International Whaling Commission. IWC44/HKW2Google Scholar
Øen, E O 1992b The Norwegian hunt of minke whales: a Norwegian penthrite grenade for minke whaling model description and development work. Proceedings International Whaling Commission. IWC/44/HKW4Google Scholar
Øen E O 1992c Norwegian penthrite grenade for minke whales: hunting trials with prototypes of penthrite grenades in 1984 and results from the 1984, 1985 and 1986 seasons. Proceedings International Whaling Commission. IWC/44/HKW5Google Scholar
Øen, E O 1992d The Norwegian hunt of minke whales: hunting trials using 20mm highvelocity projectiles in 1982. Proceedings International Whaling Commission. IWC/44/HKW3Google Scholar
Øen, E O 1993 Hunting methods for minke whales in Norway: report from the 1992 scientific catch. Proceedings International Whaling Commission. IWC/45/HK1Google Scholar