Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T12:16:01.126Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Veterinary certificates for emergency or casualty slaughter bovine animals in the Republic of Ireland: are the welfare needs of certified animals adequately protected?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

M Cullinane ,
E O’Sullivan ,
G Collins ,
DM Collins  and
SJ More
M Cullinane*
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine, District Veterinary Office Cork Nth, Hibernian House, South Mall, Cork, Ireland
E O’Sullivan
Affiliation:
The Veterinary Department of Cork County Council, County Hall, Cork, Ireland
G Collins
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine, VPH, Connolly Hall, Cork, Ireland
DM Collins
Affiliation:
Centre for Veterinary Epidemiology and Risk Analysis, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland
SJ More
Affiliation:
Centre for Veterinary Epidemiology and Risk Analysis, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland UCD School of Veterinary Medicine, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland
*
* Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

All emergency and casualty bovines in the Republic of Ireland that are deemed to be fit for human consumption must be accompanied to the slaughterhouse by an official veterinary certificate (VC). Cullinane et al (2010) conducted a review of bovine cases consigned under veterinary certification to emergency (ES) and casualty (CS) slaughter in the Republic of Ireland during 2006 to 2008. The current paper further evaluates these results, with emphasis on the period of validity, transport distance and transport conditions, and considers whether the current VC adequately protects welfare. Of 1,255 veterinary certificates, the median time between certification and slaughter was 1 (minimum 0, maximum 452) day, with one-fifth in excess of three days. The median straight-line distance between farm and slaughterhouse was 22 km; 82 and 98% study animals were transported distances of no more than 40 and 100 km, respectively. In 27% of VCs, no slaughterhouse was designated; hence the transport distance was not limited. In 77% of all cases, the disability/injury was related to the locomotor system, including 35% with limb fractures. Veterinary certification of the latter as being fit for transport appears to have been in contravention of animal transport and welfare legislation. The welfare of animals would be improved if each VC included a certified period of validity. In future, veterinary certificates should state clearly a maximum period of validity between certification and slaughter, a maximum distance that the animal should be transported and a minimum level of comfort under which the animal must be transported. Historically, in the Republic of Ireland, there was no suitable non-transport alternative available to cattle producers wanting to salvage an otherwise healthy animal that had suffered an accident or injury resulting in acute pain. An alternative is now available, with the introduction of an on-farm emergency slaughter policy.

Keywords

animal welfarebovinecertificateemergencyIrelandslaughter
Type
Papers
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 21 , Issue S2: Proceedings of the HSA Centenary International Symposium ‘Recent Advances in the Welfare of Livestock at Slaughter’ Historic Dockyard, Portsmouth, UK, 2011 , June 2012 , pp. 61 - 67
Copyright
© 2012 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

References

Broom, DM 2000 Welfare assessment and welfare problem areas during handling and transport. In: Grandin, T (ed) Livestock Handling and Transport, Second Edition pp 43–61. CABI Publishing: Oxon, UK. http://dx.doi.org/10.1079/9780851994093.0043CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BCVA 2010 Guidance for veterinary surgeons and farmers on the slaughter of cattle which are injured or showing signs of abnormalities. British Cattle Veterinary Association Office: Gloucestershire, UKGoogle Scholar
Bonafos, L 2009 Addressing a workshop during the FVE General Assembly. 13-14 November 2009. Federation of Veterinarians of Europe Newsletter, December 2009. Available at http://www.fve.org/news/newsletters/2009_5_newdletter.pdfGoogle Scholar
Council Directive 91/628/EEC 1991 On the protection of animals during transport and amending Directives 90/425/EEC and 91/496/EEC. Official Journal of the European Union L340, 17–27. Available at http://europa.eu/egislation_summaries/other/I12052_en.htmGoogle Scholar
Council Directive 93/119/EC 1993 On the protection of animals at the time of slaughter or killing. Official Journal of the European Union L340, 0021-0034. Available at http://eurlex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:31993L0119:EN:HTMLGoogle Scholar
Council Regulation (EC) 854/2004 2004 Laying down specific rules for the organisation of official controls on products of animal origin intended for human consumption. Official Journal of the European Union L155/206. Available at http://eurlex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2004:139:0206:0320:EN:PDFGoogle Scholar
Council Regulation (EC) 1/2005 2005 On the protection of animals during transport and related operations and amending Directives 64/432/EEC and 93/119/EC and Regulation (EC) No 1255/97. Official Journal of the European Union L003, 1-44. Available at http://eurlex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2005:003:0001:0044:EN:PDFGoogle Scholar
Cullinane, M, O’Sullivan, E, Collins, G, Collins, DM and More, SJ 2010 A review of bovine cases consigned under veterinary certification to emergency and casualty slaughter in Ireland during 2006 to 2008. Irish Veterinary Journal 63: 568–577CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
FAWAC 2009 Animal welfare guidelines for managing acutely injured animals on farm. Farm Animal Welfare Advisory Council: London, UK. Available at http://www.fawac.ieGoogle Scholar
Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine 2009 AIM Bovine Statistics Report 2008. Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine (formerly Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food. Available at http://www.agriculture.gov.ie/animalhealth-welfare/animalidentificationmovement/cattle/Google Scholar
DG, SANCO 2008 Report on a specific audit carried out in Ireland from 08/09/2008 to 12/09/2008. To evaluate the implementation of controls for animal welfare on farms, during transport and at the time of slaughter. Part B: sector specific issues. DG(SANCO)/2008-7768-Final. Available at http://ec.europa.eu/food/fvo/ir_search_en.cfmGoogle Scholar
European Council Directive 98/58/EC 1998 Concerning the protection of animals kept for farming purposes. Official Journal of the European Union L221, 23-27. Available at http://europa.eu/legislation_summaries/food_safety/animal_welfare/l12100_en.htmGoogle Scholar
Grandin, T 2000 Perspectives on transportation issues: the importance of having physically fit cattle and pigs. Journal of Animal Science 79: E201–E207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horgan, R and Gavinelli, A 2006 The expanding role of animal welfare within EU legislation and beyond. Livestock Science 103: 303–307. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.livs-ci.2006.05.019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SI No 114/1995 1995 European Communities (Protection of Animals at Time of Slaughter) Regulation 1995. Available at http://www.irishstatutebook.ie/1995/en/si/0114.htmlGoogle Scholar
SI No 311/2010 2010 European Communities (Welfare of farmed animals) Regulations 2010.Available at http://www.irishstatute-book.ie/2010/en/si/0311.htmlGoogle Scholar
Tarrant, V and Grandin, T 2000 Cattle transport. In: Grandin, T (ed) Livestock Handling and Transport, Second Edition pp 151–173. CABI Publishing: Oxon, UK. http://dx.doi.org/10.1079/9780851994093.0151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, J 2005 Animals for food: cattle and other ruminants. In: Webster, J (ed) Animal Welfare Limping Towards Eden, Second Edition pp 130–156. Blackwell Publishing: UKCrossRefGoogle Scholar