Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T17:04:00.597Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Using the Piglet Scream Test to enhance piglet survival on farms: data from outdoor sows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2023

S Held ,
G Mason  and
M Mendl
S Held*
Affiliation:
Centre for Behavioural Biology, Department of Clinical Veterinary Science, University of Bristol, Langford, BS40 5DU, UK
G Mason
Affiliation:
Department of Animal & Poultry Science, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1, Canada
M Mendl
Affiliation:
Centre for Behavioural Biology, Department of Clinical Veterinary Science, University of Bristol, Langford, BS40 5DU, UK
*
* Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The point of the Piglet Scream Test is to identify those sows that increase the survival of their piglets through good maternal behaviour. For this to work, sows must be shown to differ in their test responsiveness, for differences to be consistent across parities and for responsiveness to be associated with piglet survival. Our data provide some first evidence that outdoor sows, kept under commercial production conditions, differ consistently from each other in their test responsiveness across parities. However, there was no evidence that this was associated with the survival of their litters. This, together with the lack of consistent evidence from other studies for a relationship between Piglet Scream Test responsiveness and piglet survival and concerns about its possible causes, cautions against the use of the test to enhance piglet survival on farms without further study. The paper highlights lack of standardisation of the test and pseudoreplication as concerns.

Keywords

animal welfarematernal behaviouroutdoor sowspiglet mortalityPiglet Scream TestPlayback Test
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 16 , Issue 2: Special Issue: Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on the Assessment of Animal Welfare at Farm and Group Level , May 2007 , pp. 267 - 271
Copyright
© 2007 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

References

Andersen, IL, Berg, S and Bøe, KE 2005 Crushing of piglets by the mother sow (Sus scrofa) – purely accidental or a poor mother. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 93: 229–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cronin, GM and Cropley, JA 1991 The effect of piglet stimuli on the posture changing behaviour of recently farrowed sows. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 30: 167–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, SA 2002 Perinatal mortality in the pig: environmental or physiological solutions? Livestock Production Science 78: 3–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleming, AS, Morgan, HD and Walsh, C 1996 Experiential factors in postpartum regulation of maternal care. Advances in the Study of Behaviour 25: 295–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grandinson, K, Rydhmer, L, Strandberg, E and Thodberg, K 2003 Genetic analysis of on-farm tests of maternal behaviour in sows. Livestock Production Science 83: 141–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Held, S, Mason, G and Mendl, M 2006 Maternal responsiveness of outdoor sows from first to fourth parities. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 98: 216–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutson, GD, Wilkinson, JL and Luxford, BG 1991 The response of lactating sows to tactile, visual and auditory stimuli associated with a model piglet. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 32: 129–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutson, GD, Price, EO and Dickenson, LG 1993 The effect of playback volume and duration on the response of sows to piglet distress calls. Applied Animal Behavioural Science 37: 31–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGregor, PK 2000 Playback experiments: design and analysis. Acta Ethologica 3: 3–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pitts, AD, Weary, DM, Fraser, D, Pajor, EA and Kramer, DL 2002 Alternative housing for sows and litters; Part 5 Individual difference in the maternal behaviour of sows. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 76: 291–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Signoret, JP, Baldwin, BA, Fraser, D and Hafez, ESE 1975 The behaviour of swine In: Hafez ESE (ed) The Behaviour of Domestic Animals pp 295–329. Balliere Tindall: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Špinka, M, Illmann, G, de Jonge, F, Andersson, M, Schuurman, T and Jensen, P 2000 Dimensions of maternal behaviour characteristics in domestic and wild × domestic crossbred sows. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 70: 99–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wechsler, B and Hegglin, D 1997 Individual difference in the behaviour of sows at the nest-site and crushing of piglets. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 51: 39–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar