Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T04:31:39.315Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Using the Mesh Ceiling as a Food Puzzle to Encourage Foraging Behaviour in Caged Rhesus Macaques (Macaca Mulatta)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2023

V Reinhardt
V Reinhardt*
Affiliation:
Wisconsin Regional Primate Research Center, 1223 Capitol Court, Madison, WI 53715, USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

An attempt was made to encourage more foraging behaviour in eight pair-housed adult rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta). No special device and no special food were used Daily commercial dry food rations (238g per animal) consisting of 33 bar-shaped or 16 star-shaped biscuits per animal were placed on the mesh ceiling of the cages instead of in the feed-boxes. This induced an 80-fold increase (17.0 vs 1362.9s) and 289-fold increase (12.3 vs 3551.4s), respectively, in foraging time. The animals spent on average 9.6 per cent and 24.7 per cent respectively, of four-hour observation sessions foraging for biscuits from the mesh ceiling. Working for their food did not discourage them from eating all left-overs in the course of a day regardless of the shape of the biscuits.

It was concluded that the new feeding procedure enhanced the animals’ behavioural well-being by encouraging foraging activities thereby helping to counteract understimulation.

Keywords

animal welfarebehavioural well-beingforaginghousingrhesus macaques
Type
Short Communication
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 2 , Issue 2 , May 1993 , pp. 165 - 172
Copyright
© 1993 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

References

Bayne, K, Mainzer, H, Dexter, S, Campbell, G, Yamada, F and Suomi, S 1991 The reduction of abnormal behavior in individually housed rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) with a foraging/grooming board. American Journal of Primatology 23: 23–35CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bayne, K, Dexter, S, Mainzer, H, McCully, C, Campbell, G and Yamada, F 1992 The use of artificial turf as a foraging substrate for individually housed rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta). Animal Welfare 1: 39–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloom, K R and Cook, M 1989 Environmental enrichment: behavioral responses of rhesus to puzzle feeders. Lab Animal 18(5): 25–31Google Scholar
Evans, H L, Taylor, J D, Ernst, J and Gracfe, J F 1989 Methods to evaluate the well-being of laboratory primates: comparisons of macaques and tamarins. Laboratory Animal Science 39: 318–323Google ScholarPubMed
Ferguson, G A 1966 Statistical Analysis in Psychology and Education. McGraw Hill: New YorkGoogle Scholar
Gilloux, I, Gurnell, J and Shepherdson, D 1992 An enrichment device for great apes. Animal Welfare 1: 279–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gullekson, R, Bench, L, Harrigan, K and Pyle, K 1991 Seed-feeder as a foraging device for singly housed cynomolgus monkeys (Macaca fascicularis). Lab Animal 20 (6): 44–46Google Scholar
Heath, S, Shimoji, M, Tumanguil, J and Crockett, C 1992 Peanut puzzle solvers quickly demonstrate aptitude. Laboratory Primate Newsletter 31(1): 12–13Google Scholar
Lam, K, Rupniak, N M J and Iversen, S D 1991 Use of a grooming and foraging substrate to reduce stereotypies in macaques. Journal of Medical Primatology 20: 104–109CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Line, S W and Houghton, P 1987 Influence of an environmental enrichment device on general behavior and appetite in rhesus macaques. Laboratory Animal Science 37: 508 (Abstract)Google Scholar
Line, S W and Morgan, K N 1991 The effects of two novel objects on the behavior of singly caged adult rhesus macaques. Laboratory Animal Science 41: 365–369Google ScholarPubMed
Line, S W, Markowitz, H, Morgan, K N and Strong, S 1989 Evaluation of attempts to enrich the environment of single-caged nonhuman primates. In Driscoll J W (ed) Animal Care and Use in Behavioral Research: Regulations, Issues and Applications pp 103-117. National Agricultural Libraiy: Beltsville Malik 11986 Time budgets and activity patterns in free-ranging rhesus monkeys. In Else J G and Lee P C (eds) Primate Ecology and Conservation ppl05-114. Cambridge University Press: CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Malik, I and Southwick, C 1988 Feeding behavior and activity patterns of rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) at Tughlaqabad, India. In Fa, J E and Southwick, C (eds) Ecology and Behavior of Food-Enhanced Primate Groups pp 95–111. Alan R Liss: New YorkGoogle Scholar
Markowitz, H and Line, S 1989 Primate research models and environmental enrichment. In Segal, E F (ed) Housing, Care and Psychological Well-Being of Captive and Laboratory Primates pp 202–212. Noyes Publications: Park RidgeGoogle Scholar
Marriott, B M 1988 Time budgets of rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) in a forest habitat in Nepal and on Cayo Santiago. In Fa J E and Southwick C (eds) Ecology and Behavior of Food-Enhanced Primate Groups ppl25-149. Alan R liss: New YorkGoogle Scholar
Meunier, L D, Duktig, J T and Landi, M S 1989 Modification of stereotypic behavior in rhesus monkeys using videotapes, puzzlefeeders, and foraging boxes. Laboratory Animal Science 39: 479 (Abstract)Google Scholar
Moazed, T C and Wolff, A V 1988 The raisin board as an environmental enrichment tool for laboratory primates. Laboratory Primate Newsletter 27(1): 16Google Scholar
Murchison, M A 1991 PVC-pipe food puzzle for singly caged primates. Laboratory Primate Newsletter 30(3): 12–14Google Scholar
Murchison, M A 1992 Task-oriented feeding device for singly caged primates. Laboratory Primate Newsletter 31(1): 9–11Google Scholar
O’Kccffe, R T and Lifshitz, K 1985 A behavioral profile for stumptail macaques (Macaca arctoides). Primates 26: 143–160Google Scholar
O’Neill, P 1988 Developing effective social and environmental enrichment strategies for macaques in captive groups. Lab Animal 17(4): 23–36Google Scholar
Preilowski, B, Reger, M and Engele, H 1988 Combining scientific experimentation with conventional housing: a pilot study with rhesus monkeys. American Journal of Primatology 14: 223–234CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reinhardt, V 1992 Foraging for commercial chow. Laboratory Primate Newsletter 31(2): 10Google Scholar
Seth, P K and Seth, S 1986 Ecology and behaviour of rhesus monkeys in India. In Else, J G and Lee, P C (eds) Primate Ecology and Conservation pp 89–103. Cambridge University Press: CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Teas, H, Richie, T, Taylor, H and Southwick, C 1980 Population patterns and behavioral ecology of rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) in Nepal. In Lindburg, D G (ed) The Macaques: Studies in Ecology, Behavior and Evolution pp 247–262. Van Nostrand Reinhold: New YorkGoogle Scholar
The Random House Dictionary of the English Language, 2nd Edition 1987 Random House: New YorkGoogle Scholar
US Department of Agriculture 1991 Animal Welfare, Standards, Final Rule. Federal Register 56: 6426–6505Google Scholar