Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T17:52:32.615Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Transport of Deer: A Review with Particular Relevance to Red Deer (Cervus Elaphus)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2023

C A Weeks
C A Weeks*
Affiliation:
Division of Food Animal Science, Department of Clinical Veterinary Science University of Bristol, Langford, Bristol BS40 5DU, UK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Farmed deer, of which the predominant species is the red deer (Cervus elaphus), are increasingly transported to abattoirs for slaughter rather than being shot at pasture. In order to satisfy meat hygiene and marketing requirements, the welfare of deer is often reduced because all farmed animals are stressed by commercial transportation. Several recent experimental studies (reviewed here) have found the magnitude of behavioural and physiological responses of deer to many aspects of handling and transport to be similar to those measured in other farm species, particularly ruminants. Thus, their welfare appears not to be unduly compromised despite their comparatively recent domestication. Deer are, however, particularly flighty and require specialized handling facilities and equipment, the key features of which are summarized.

Legislation covering transport of deer is already operative in many countries with the aim of safeguarding deer welfare. However, the responses of deer to commercial transportation have not yet been measured scientifically. This primary information is needed before a full assessment of the effects of transport on the welfare of deer can be made. Thermal conditions during transit are of importance for deer welfare and these have not been measured, either under experimental conditions or during commercial journeys.

Keywords

animal welfarefarmed animalshandlinglegislationreddeertransport
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 9 , Issue 1 , February 2000 , pp. 63 - 74
Copyright
© 2000 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

References

Abeyesinghe, S M, Goddard, P J and Cockram, M S 1997 The behavioural and physiological responses of farmed red deer (Cervus elaphus) penned adjacent to other species. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 55: 163–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, G L and Segiura, T 1990 Pasture dry matter and drinking water intake of grazing red deer stags and steers. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 50: 55–58Google Scholar
Baldock, N M and Sibly, R M 1990 Effects of handling and transportation on the heart rate and behaviour of sheep. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 28: 15–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrell, G K and Topp, D F 1989 Water intake of red deer stags consuming dryland pasture or indoors on concentrated feeds. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 49: 21–24Google Scholar
Bracke, M 1992 Can animals have a preference not to be killed? Observations on red deer, laying hens and mice which were exposed to conspeciflcs being killed. Unpublished MSc dissertation, University of Edinburgh School of Agriculture, Edinburgh, UKGoogle Scholar
Bruning Fann, C S, Shank, K L and Kanceene, J B 1997 Descriptive epidemiology of captive cervid herds in Michigan, USA. Veterinary Research 28: 295–302Google ScholarPubMed
Canadian Agri-Food Research Council 1996 Canadian Recommended Code of Practice for the Care and Handling of Farmed Deer. Canadian Agri-Food Research Council: Ottawa, CanadaGoogle Scholar
Carragher, J F, Ingram, J R and Matthews, L R 1997 Effects of yarding and handling procedures on stress responses of red deer stags (Cervus elaphus). Applied Animal Behaviour Science 51: 143–158Google Scholar
Clutton-Brock, T H, Guinness, F E and Albon, SD 1982 Red deer: Behaviour and Ecology of the Two Sexes. Edinburgh University Press: Edinburgh, UKGoogle Scholar
Diverio, S, Goddard, P J, Gordon, IJ and Elston, D A 1993 The effect of management practices on stress in farmed red deer (Cervus elaphus) and its modulation by long-acting neuroleptics: behavioural responses. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 36: 363–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farm Animal Welfare Council 1985 Report on the Welfare of Farmed Deer. Farm Animal Welfare Council: Tolworth, UKGoogle Scholar
Fletcher, T J 1988 The transport of deer. In: Reid, H W (ed) The Management and Health of Farmed Deer pp 181–190. Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, The NetherlandsCrossRefGoogle Scholar
GB Parliament 1982 The Welfare of Livestock (Prohibited Operations) Regulations 1982. Statutory Instrument 1982/1884. HMSO: London, UKGoogle Scholar
GB Parliament 1997 The Welfare of Animals (Transport) Order 1997. Statutory Instrument 1997/1480. HMSO: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Grandin, T (ed) 1993 Livestock Handling and Transport. CAB International: Wallingford, UKGoogle Scholar
Grigor, P N, Goddard, P J and Littlewood, C A 1997a The movement of farmed red deer through raceways. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 52: 171–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grigor, P N, Goddard, P J, Cockram, M S, Rennie, S C and MacDonald, A J 1997b The effects of some factors associated with transportation on the behavioural and physiological reactions of farmed red deer. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 52: 179–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grigor, P N, Goddard, P J, MacDonald, A J, Brown, S N, Fawcett, A R, Deakin, D W and Warriss, P D 1997c Effects of the duration of lairage following transportation on the behaviour and physiology of farmed red deer. Veterinary Record 140: 8–12CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grigor, P N, Goddard, P J and Littlewood, C A 1998a The behavioural and physiological reactions of farmed red deer to transport: effects of sex, group size, space allowance and vehicular motion. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 56: 281–295Google Scholar
Grigor, P N, Goddard, P J, Littlewood, C A and MacDonald, A J 1998b The behavioural and physiological reactions of farmed red deer to transport: effects of road type and journey time. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 56: 263–279Google Scholar
Grigor, P N, Goddard, P J and Littlewood, C A 1998c The relative aversiveness to farmed red deer of transport, physical restraint, human proximity and social isolation. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 56: 255–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grigor, P N, Goddard, P J, Littlewood, C A and Deakin, D W 1998d Pre-transport loading of farmed red deer: effects of previous overnight housing environment, vehicle illumination and shape of loading race. Veterinary Record 142: 265–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, W J 1994 Portable handling system for red deer. Farm Buildings Progress 1: 25–31Google Scholar
Hargreaves, A L and Matthews, L R 1995 The effect of water deprivation and subsequent access to water on plasma electrolytes, haematocrit and behaviour in red deer. Livestock Production Science 42: 73–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jago, J G, Harcourt, R G and Matthews, L R 1997 The effect of road type and distance transported on behaviour, physiology and carcass quality of farmed red deer (Cervus elaphus). Applied Animal Behaviour Science 52: 129–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jago, J G, Hargreaves, A L, Harcourt, R G and Matthews, L R 1996 Risk factors associated with bruising in red deer at a commercial slaughter plant. Meat Science 44: 181–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jago, J G, Matthews, L R, Hargreaves, A L and Van Eeken, F 1993 Preslaughter handling of red deer: implications for welfare and carcass quality. In: Proceedings of a Deer Course for Veterinarians No 10 pp 27–39. New Zealand Veterinary Association Deer Branch: Palmerston North, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
Knowles, T G 1998 A review of the road transport of slaughter sheep. Veterinary Record 143: 212–219CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knowles, T G 1999 A review of the road transport of cattle. Veterinary Record 144: 197–201CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Langridge, M 1992 Establishing a deer farm: basic principles. In: Asher, G W and Langridge, M (eds) Progressive Fallow Deer Farming: Farm Development and Management Guide pp 17–28. Ruakura Agricultural Centre: Ruakura, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
MacDougall, D B, Shaw, B G, Nute, G R and Rhodes, DN 1979 Effect of pre-slaughter handling on the quality and microbiology of venison from farmed young red deer. Journal of Science Food Agriculture 30: 1160–1167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthews, L R 1993 Deer handling and transport. In: Grandin, T (ed) Livestock Handling and Transport pp 253–272. CAB International: Wallingford, UKGoogle Scholar
Matthews, L R, Carragher, J F and Ingram, J R 1994 Post-velveting stress in free-ranging red deer. Proceedings of a Deer Course for Veterinarians No 4 pp 138–146. New Zealand Veterinary Association Deer Branch: Palmerston North, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food 1985 Code of Welfare Practice on Abattoir Slaughter of Farmed Deer. MAFF: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food 1989a Guidelines for the Transport of Farmed Deer. MAFF: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food 1989b Codes of Recommendations for the Welfare of Livestock: Farmed Deer. MAFF: London, UKGoogle Scholar
New Zealand Animal Welfare Advisory Committee 1994 Code of Recommendations and Minimum Standards for the Welfare of Animals Transported Within New Zealand. Code of Animal Welfare No 15. Ministry of Agriculture: Wellington, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
New Zealand Animal Welfare Advisory Committee 1996 Amendments to the Code of Recommendations and Minimum Standards for the Welfare of Animals Transported Within New Zealand. Code of Animal Welfare No 15. Ministry of Agriculture: Wellington, New Zealand New Zealand Game Industry Board 1993-4 DeerQA Transport Quality Assurance Programme. New Zealand Game Industry Board: Wellington, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
Pollard, J C 1993 Behavioural quantification of welfare in farmed red deer. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 53: 183–188Google Scholar
Pollard, J C and Littlejohn, R P 1994 Behavioural effects of light conditions on red deer in a holding pen. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 41: 127–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollard, J C, Littlejohn, R P and Suttie, J M 1993 Effects of social isolation and mixing of social groups on heart rate and behaviour of red deer stags. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 38: 311–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollard, J C, Littlejohn, R P and Suttie, J M 1994 Responses of red deer to restraint in a Y-maze. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 39: 63–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, S, Sibly, R M and Davies, M H 1993 Effects of behaviour and handling on heart rate in farmed red deer. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 37: 111–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selwyn, P and Hathaway, S 1990 A study of the prevalence and economic significance of diseases and defects of slaughtered farmed deer. New Zealand Veterinary Journal 38: 94–97CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Selwyn, P and Hathaway, S 1992 Proceedings of a Deer Course for Veterinarians No 9. New Zealand Veterinary Association Deer Branch: Palmerston North, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
Smith, R F and Dobson, H 1990 Effects of preslaughter experience on behaviour, plasma Cortisol and muscle pH in farmed red deer. Veterinary Record 126: 155–158Google ScholarPubMed
Tarrant, P V 1990 Transportation of cattle by road. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 28: 153–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vigh-Larsen, F 1988 Deer farming in Denmark, with special emphasis on the management and handling of fallow deer. In: H W Reid (ed) The Management and Health of Farmed Deer pp 61–69. Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, The NetherlandsCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waas, J R, Ingram, J R and Matthews, L R 1997 Physiological responses of red deer (Cervus elaphus) to conditions experienced during road transport. Physiology & Behavior 61: 931–938CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warriss, P D 1995 The welfare of animals during transport. In: M-E Raw and T S Parkinson (eds) The Veterinary Annual, No 35 pp 73–85. Blackwell Science Ltd: Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
Warriss, P D, Bevis, E A, Brown, S N and Edwards, J E 1992 Longer journeys to processing plants are associated with higher mortality in broiler chickens. British Poultry Science 33: 201–206CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed