Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T01:19:04.778Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Taking Lambs to the Slaughter: Marketing Channels, Journey Structures and Possible Consequences for Welfare

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2023

K C Murray
Affiliation:
Seale-Hayne Faculty of Agriculture, Food and Land Use, University of Plymouth, Newton Abbot, Devon TQ12 6NQ, UK
D H Davies
Affiliation:
Seale-Hayne Faculty of Agriculture, Food and Land Use, University of Plymouth, Newton Abbot, Devon TQ12 6NQ, UK
S L Cullinane
Affiliation:
Seale-Hayne Faculty of Agriculture, Food and Land Use, University of Plymouth, Newton Abbot, Devon TQ12 6NQ, UK
J C Eddison*
Affiliation:
Seale-Hayne Faculty of Agriculture, Food and Land Use, University of Plymouth, Newton Abbot, Devon TQ12 6NQ, UK
J A Kirk
Affiliation:
Seale-Hayne Faculty of Agriculture, Food and Land Use, University of Plymouth, Newton Abbot, Devon TQ12 6NQ, UK
*
Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Consumers now demand evidence of welfare assurance at all stages of animal production, marketing, transport and slaughter. In response, retailers have increasingly adopted preferred supply chain relationships which preclude sourcing animals via livestock auction markets. One of the criteria dictating this action is a perceived improvement in animal welfare resulting from direct transport from farm to abattoir.

A survey of complete journey structures of 18 393 slaughterweight lambs from farm to abattoir was conducted between April and July 1997. Journeys were characterized in terms of distances travelled, duration and the number of discrete components within a whole journey which comprised: transport; trans-shipping (when animals were transferred from one vehicle to another); multiple pickups from a number of farms; and holding at either assembly points, lairages or auction markets. The results identified that journeys in the livestock distribution system are diverse and range in complexity, irrespective of marketing channel. Journey complexity was found to be positively related to distance travelled.

The study demonstrates that discussions concerning welfare of livestock in transit should consider the journey structure and not just the marketing channel per se. Furthermore, it also shows that changes taking place in the infrastructure of the marketing and meat processing sectors may result in a reduction in animal welfare.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2000 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

References

Agra Europe 1991 UK Supermarkets want Meat Husbandry Warranty. Report No. 1439, N/5. Agra Europe (London) Ltd: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Baskerville, A 1996 Members’ resolution on sale of farm animals through livestock markets. National Trust Annual General Meeting pp 1113. National Trust: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Bradshaw, R H, Hall, S G J and Broom, D M 1996 Behavioural and Cortisol response of pigs and sheep during transport. The Veterinary Record 138: 233234CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Broom, D M, Goode, J A, Hall, S G J, Lloyd, D M and Parrott, R F 1996 Hormonal and physiological effects of a 15 hour road journey in sheep: comparison with response to loading, handling and penning in the absence of transport. British Veterinary Journal 152: 593604CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buchenauer, D 1997 Untersuchungen zum Platzbedarf von Schafen beim Transport. Deutsche Tierärztliche Wochenschrift 104: 135139Google ScholarPubMed
Cockram, M S, Kent, J E, Goddard, P J, Waran, N K, McGilp, I M, Jackson, R E, Muwanga, G M and Prytherch, S 1996 Effect of space allowance during transport on the behavioural and physiological responses of lambs during and after transport. Animal Science 62: 461477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cockram, M S and Lee, RA 1991 Some preslaughter factors affecting the occurrence of bruising in sheep. British Veterinary Journal 147: 120125CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Devine, C E, Graafhuis, A E, Muir, P D and Crystall, B B 1993 The effect of growth rate and ultimate pH on meat quality of lambs. Meat Science 35: 6377CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Evans, D G, Sains, A G, Corlett, I K and Kilkenny, J B 1987 A note on the effect of marketing route on weight loss in lambs sent for slaughter. Animal Production 45: 145148Google Scholar
Everitt, A 1967 The marketing of agricultural produce. In: Thirsk J The Agrarian History of England and Wales 1500-1640 volume 4 ρ 919. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
GB Parliament 1990 The Food Safety Act 1990. HMSO: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Graham, I 1997 Electronic Livestock Auctions in the UK. Available from: http://omni.bus.ed.ac.uk/ehja36/papers/auction/livestok.html. University of Edinburgh, UKGoogle Scholar
Grandin, T 1990 Design of loading facilities and handling pens. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 28: 187201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grega, L and Ray, D 1992 Electronic marketing of livestock in the UK. Farm Management 8: 113124Google Scholar
Gregory, N G 1994 Preslaughter handling, stunning and slaughter. Meat Science 36: 4556CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gregory, N G 1998 Animal Welfare and Meat Science. CABI Publishing: Wallingford, UKGoogle Scholar
Jarvis, A M and Cockram, M S 1994 Effects of handling and transport on bruising of sheep sent directly from farms to slaughter. The Veterinary Record 135: 523527CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jarvis, A M and Cockram, M S 1995 Handling of sheep at markets and the incidence of bruising. The Veterinary Record 136: 582585CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jarvis, A M, Cockram, M S and McGilp, I M 1995 Effect of source and distance travelled on bruising and blood chemistry at slaughter. World Sheep and Wool Congress Conference Proceedings. Royal Agricultural Society of England: Malvern, UKGoogle Scholar
Jones, J V H and Steele, J 1995 An assessment of the factors behind the rationalisation of livestock auction markets. Farm Management 9: 6675Google Scholar
Kenny, F J and Tarrant, P V 1987 The reaction of young bulls to short-haul road transport. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 17: 209227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knowles, T G, Brown, S N, Warriss, P D, Phillips, A J, Dolan, S K, Hunt, P, Ford, J E, Edwards, J E and Watkins, P E 1995 Effects on sheep of transport by road for up to 24 hours. The Veterinary Record 136: 431438CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knowles, T G, Maunder, D H L and Warriss, P D 1994a Factors affecting the incidence of bruising in lambs arriving at one slaughterhouse. The Veterinary Record 134: 4445CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knowles, T G, Maunder, D H L, Warriss, P D and Jones, T W H 1994b Factors affecting the mortality of lambs in transit to or in lairage at a slaughterhouse, and reasons for carcase condemnations. The Veterinary Record 135: 109111CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Livestock Auctioneers’ Association and the Institute of Auctioneers and Appraisers in Scotland 1993 A Directory of Livestock Auction Markets in England, Wales and Scotland. Livestock Auctioneers’ Association and the Institute of Auctioneers and Appraisers in Scotland: Coventry, UKGoogle Scholar
Livestock Auctioneers’ Association and the Institute of Auctioneers and Appraisers in Scotland 1998 A Directory of Livestock Auction Markets in England, Wales and Scotland. Livestock Auctioneers’ Association and the Institute of Auctioneers and Appraisers in Scotland: Coventry, UKGoogle Scholar
Loader, R and Hobbs, J E 1996 The hidden costs and benefits of BSE. British Food Journal 98: 2635CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MAFF 1998 Licensed Red Meat Slaughterhouses (England). MAFF: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Manteca, X 1996 The effect of road conditions on the welfare and meat quality of 20-22 kg lambs. The Welfare of Sheep During Transport Conference Proceedings. Occasional Publication of St Catherine's College: Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
McNally, P W 1997 Prevalence of carcase bruising and stick-marking in cattle bought from different auction markets. The Veterinary Record 140: 231232CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McNally, P W and Warriss, P D 1996 Recent bruising in cattle at abattoirs. The Veterinary Record 138: 126128CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MLC 1994 The Abattoir Industry in Great Britain. MLC: Milton Keynes, UKGoogle Scholar
MLC 1998a A Pocketful of Meat Facts. MLC: Milton Keynes, UKGoogle Scholar
MLC 1998b Meat Demand Trends Report No. 98/1. MLC: Milton Keynes, UKGoogle Scholar
Murray, K C, Eddison, J C, Cullinane, S L, Brooks, P H and Kirk, J A 1996 The effect of origin, pre-slaughter handling and time from farm to slaughter on the welfare and meat quality of lambs. In: Duncan I J H, Widowski T M and Haley D B Proceedings of the 30th International Congress of the International Society for Applied Ethology p 124. The Colonel K L Campbell Centre for the Study of Animal Welfare: Guelph, CanadaGoogle Scholar
Randall, J M 1993 Environmental parameters necessary to define comfort for pigs, cattle and sheep in livestock transporters. Animal Production 52: 299307Google Scholar
RSPCA 1996a Freedom Food: The RSPCA Welfare Standards for Beef Cattle. Rep. No. Version 5. RSPCA: Horsham, UKGoogle Scholar
RSPCA 1996b Freedom Food: The RSPCA Welfare Standards for Pigs. Rep. No. Version 2. RSPCA: Horsham, UKGoogle Scholar
RSPCA. 1996c Freedom Food: The RSPCA Welfare Standards for Sheep. Rep. No. Version 4. RSPCA: Horsham, UKGoogle Scholar
Scottish Office Agriculture, Environment and Fisheries Department 1998 Licensed Premises - (Red Meat). Scottish Office Agriculture, Environment and Fisheries Department: Edinburgh, UKGoogle Scholar
Tarrant, P V 1990 Transportation of cattle by road. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 28: 153170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warriss, P D 1990 The handling of cattle pre-slaughter and its effects on carcass and meat quality. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 28: 171 -186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welsh Office Agriculture Department 1998 List of Licensed Red Meat Slaughterhouses in Wales. Welsh Office Agriculture Department: Cardiff, UKGoogle Scholar
Zar, J H 1996 Biostatistical Analysis, 3rd edition. Prentice-Hall Inc: Upper Saddle River, USAGoogle Scholar