Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T17:53:35.323Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Survival rates of cat-attacked birds admitted to RSPCA wildlife centres in the UK: implications for cat owners and wildlife rehabilitators

Part of: AWF Wild Animal Welfare

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

PJ Baker ,
R Thompson  and
A Grogan
PJ Baker*
Affiliation:
Harborne Building, School of Biological Sciences, University of Reading, Whiteknights, Reading, Berkshire RG6 6AS, UK
R Thompson
Affiliation:
Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, Wildlife Department, Horsham, West Sussex RH13 9RS, UK
A Grogan
Affiliation:
Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, Wildlife Department, Horsham, West Sussex RH13 9RS, UK
*
∗ Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Free-ranging pet cats (Felis catus) frequently kill wildlife but also return live prey to their owners. This raises welfare concerns if live animals released by cat owners subsequently die, since this is preventable, eg through prompt euthanasia. To estimate the mortality rate of birds released alive by cat owners, we examined the fates of 3,597 cat-attacked individuals submitted to four RSPCA wildlife centres in the UK. Individuals from 64 species were received but most cases (77%) involved just seven species commonly found in urban areas. The overall mortality rate (based on all individuals received at centres, ie including those which perished in transport, those which were euthanased on arrival and those which were admitted for care after having been triaged) was 78%; the post-admittance mortality rate (n = 2,070 birds admitted for care) was 62%. On average, individuals that perished (n = 2,798) survived for 3.0 days before dying or being euthanased. Juveniles were more likely to survive to release than adults, possibly because their small size means they are less likely to receive injuries that are ultimately fatal. Extrapolating from the limited data currently available, and applying conservative estimates at each stage, we estimate that a minimum of 0.3 million birds are released annually by cat owners but subsequently die. Substantial welfare improvements could be achieved if owners were more prepared to adopt strategies to limit hunting behaviour (eg fitting cats with collars and bells) and if owners and rehabilitators were able to effectively identify individuals with fatal injuries. The latter will require studies that quantify the effects of identifiable physical injuries on the likelihood of survival to release, in order to establish effective triage criteria.

Keywords

animal welfaredepredationdomestic catFelis catushunting behaviourwildlife rehabilitation
Type
Articles
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 27 , Issue 4 , November 2018 , pp. 305 - 318
Copyright
© 2018 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

References

Abrahamian, FM and Goldstein, EJC 2011 Microbiology of animal bite wound infections. Clinical Microbiology Reviews 24: 231–246. https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.00041-10CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aegerter, J, Fouracre, D and Smith, GC 2017 A first estimate of the structure and density of the populations of pet cats and dogs across Great Britain. PLoS ONE 12: e0174709. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174709CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anonymous 2013 Annual Statistics of Scientific Procedures on Living Animals. Great Britain 2012. The Stationery Office: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Baker, PJ, Bentley, AJ, Ansell, RJ and Harris, S 2005 Impact of predation by domestic cats Felis catus in an urban area. Mammal Review 35: 302–312. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2907.2005.00071.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, PJ, Molony, SE, Stone, E, Cuthill, IC and Harris, S 2008 Cats about town: is predation by free-ranging pet cats Felis catus likely to affect urban bird populations? Ibis 150: 86–99. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1474-919X.2008.00836.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, PJ, Soulsbury, CD, Iossa, G and Harris, S 2010 Domestic cat (Felis catus) and domestic dog (Canis familiaris). In: Gehrt, SD, Riley, SPD and Cypher, BL (eds) Urban Carnivores: Ecology, Conflict and Conservation pp 157–171. Johns Hopkins University Press: Baltimore, USAGoogle Scholar
Balogh, AL, Ryder, TB and Marra, PP 2011 Population demog-raphy of Gray Catbirds in the suburban matrix: sources, sinks and domestic cats. Journal of Ornithology 152: 717–726. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-011-0648-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barratt, DG 1997 Predation by house cats, Felis catus (L), in Canberra, Australia 1 Prey composition and preference. Wildlife Research 24: 263–277. https://doi.org/10.1071/WR96020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barratt, DG 1998 Predation by house cats, Felis catus (L), in Canberra, Australia II. Factors affecting the amount of prey caught and estimates of the impact on wildlife. Wildlife Research 25: 475–487. https://doi.org/10.1071/WR97026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonnington, C, Gaston, KJ and Evans, KL 2013 Fearing the feline: domestic cats reduce avian fecundity through trait-mediat-ed indirect effects that increase nest predation by other species. Journal of Applied Ecology 50: 15–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12025Google Scholar
Bourne, FJ, Donnelly, CA, Cox, DR, Gettinby, G, McInerney, J, Morrison, I and Woodroffe, R 2007 Bovine TB: the scientific evi-dence. Final report of the independent scientific group on cattle TB. Defra: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Bradshaw, J 2013 Cat sense. Allen Lane: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Burns, Lord, Edwards, V, Marsh, J, Soulsby, Lord and Winter, M 2000 Report of the Committee of Inquiry into Hunting with Dogs in England and Wales. HMSO: Norwich, UKGoogle Scholar
Calver, MC, Adams, G, Clark, W and Pollock, KH 2013 Assessing the safety of collars used to attach predation deterrent devices and ID tags to pet cats. Animal Welfare 22: 95–105. https://doi.org/10.7120/09627286.22.1.095CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calver, MC, Grayson, J, Lilith, M and Dickman, CR 2011 Applying the precautionary principle to the issue of impacts by pet cats on urban wildlife. Biological Conservation 144: 1895–1901. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2011.04.015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calver, M, Thomas, S, Bradley, S and McCutcheon, H 2007 Reducing the rate of predation on wildlife by pet cats: the effica-cy and practicability of collar-mounted pounce protectors. Biological Conservation 137: 341–348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bio-con.2007.02.015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crooks, KR and Soulé, ME 1999 Mesopredator release and avi-faunal extinctions in a fragmented system. Nature 400: 563–566. https://doi.org/10.1038/23028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickens, MJ and Romero, LM 2009 Wild European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris) adjust to captivity with sustained sympathetic nervous system drive and a reduced fight-or-flight response. Physiological and Biochemical Zoology 82: 603–610. https://doi.org/10.1086/603633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eaton, MA, Brown, AF, Noble, DG, Musgrove, AJ, Hearn, RD, Aebischer, NJ, Gibbons, DW, Evans, A and Gregory, RD 2009 The population status of birds in the United Kingdom, Channel Islands and Isle of Man. British Birds 102: 296–341Google Scholar
Field, A 2009 Discovering Statistics Using SPSS. Third Edition. Sage Publications: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Fitzgerald, BM and Turner, DC 2000 Hunting behaviour of domestic cats and their impact on prey populations. In: Turner, DC and Bateson, P (eds) The Domestic Cat, Second Edition pp 151–175. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
Fox, NC, Blay, N, Greenwood, AG, Wise, DR and Potapov, E 2003 Wounding rates in shooting foxes (Vulpes vulpes). Animal Welfare 14: 93–102Google Scholar
Gillies, C and Clout, M 2003 The prey of domestic cats (Felis catus) in two suburbs of Auckland City, New Zealand. Journal of Zoology 259: 309–315. https://doi.org/10.1017/S095283690200328XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, JK, Matthaei, C and van Heezik, Y 2010 Belled col-lars reduce catch of domestic cats in New Zealand by half. Wildlife Research 37: 372–378. https://doi.org/10.1071/WR09127Google Scholar
Hall, CM, Adams, NA, Bradley, JS, Bryant, KA, Davis, AA, Dickman, CR, Fujita, T, Kobayashi, S, Lepczyk, CA, McBride, EA, Pollock, KH, Styles, IM, van Heezik, Y, Wang, F and Calver, MC 2017 Community attitudes and practices of urban residents regarding predation by pet cats on wildlife: an international comparison. PLoS ONE 12: e0174709.Google Scholar
Hall, CM, Fontaine, JB, Bryant, KA and Calver, CM 2015 Assessing the effectiveness of the Birdsbesafe® anti-predation collar cover in reducing predation on wildlife by pet cats in Western Australia. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 173: 40–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2015.01.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kays, RW and DeWan, AA 2004 Ecological impact of inside/outside house cats around a suburban nature preserve. Animal Conservation 7: 273–283. https://doi.org/10.1017/S 1367943004001489Google Scholar
Kelly, A, Halstead, C, Hunter, D, Leighton, K, Grogan, A and Harris, M 2011 Factors affecting the likelihood of release of injured and orphaned woodpigeons (Columba palumbus). Animal Welfare 20: 523–534Google Scholar
International Companion Animal Management Coalition 2011 Humane cat population management guidance. http://www.icam-coa-lition.org/downloads/ICAM-Humane%20cat%20population.PDFGoogle Scholar
Lepczyk, CA, Mertig, AG and Liu, JG 2004 Landowners and cat predation across rural-to-urban landscapes. Biological Conservation 115: 191–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3207(03)00107-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lilith, M, Calver, M and Garkaklis, M 2010 Do cat restrictions lead to increased species diversity or abundance of small and medium-sized mammals in remnant urban bushland? Pacific Conservation Biology 16: 162–172. https://doi.org/10.1071/PC100162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, JL 2003 Introduced Mammals of the World: Their History, Distribution and Influence. CSIRO Publishing: Victoria, AustraliaCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loss, SR, Will, T and Marra, PP 2013 The impact of free-ranging domestic cats on wildlife of the United States. Nature Communications 4(1396). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms2380Google ScholarPubMed
Loyd, KAT, Hernandez, SM, Carroll, JP, Abernathy, KJ and Marshall, GK 2013 Quantifying free-roaming domestic cat predation using animal-borne video cameras. Biological Conservation 160:183–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2013.01.008Google Scholar
Loyd, KAT, Hernandez, SM and McRuer, DL 2017 The role of domestic cats in the admission of injured wildlife at rehabilitation and rescue centers. Wildlife Society Bulletin 41: 55–61. https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.737CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maclean, M 2007 Impact of domestic cat predation on bird and small mammal populations. PhD Thesis, University of Exeter, UKGoogle Scholar
Martin, P and Bateson, P 1988 Behavioural development in the cat. In: Turner, DC and Bateson, P (eds) The Domestic Cat pp 9–22. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
McDonald, JL, Maclean, M, Evans, MR and Hodgson, DJ 2015 Reconciling actual and perceived rates of predation by domestic cats. Ecology and Evolution 5: 2745–2753. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1553CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Medina, FM, Bonnaud, E, Vidal, E and Nogales, M 2014 Underlying impacts of invasive cats on islands: not only a question of predation. Biodiversity & Conservation 23: 327–342. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-013-0603-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Medina, FM, Bonnaud, E, Vidal, E, Tershy, BR, Zavaleta, ES, Donlan, CJ, Keitt, BS, Le Corre, M, Horwarth, SV and Nogales, M 2011 A global review of the impacts of invasive cats on island endangered vertebrates. Global Change Biology 17: 199–219. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02464.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Metsers, EM, Seddon, PJ and van Heezik, YM 2010 Cat-exclusion zones in rural and urban-fringe landscapes: how large would they have to be? Wildlife Research 37: 47–56. https://doi.org/10.1071/WR09070CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Møller, AP and Erritzøe, J 2000 Predation against birds with low immunocompetence. Oecologia 122: 500–504. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004420050972Google ScholarPubMed
Møller, AP, Erritzøe, J and Nielsen, JT 2010 Causes of inter-specific variation in susceptibility to cat predation on birds. Chinese Birds 1: 97–111. https://doi.org/10.5122/cbirds.2010.0001Google Scholar
Møller, AP, Nielsen, JT and Garamzegi, LZ 2008 Risk taking by singing males. Behavioral Ecology 19: 41–53. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arm098Google Scholar
Molony, SE, Baker, PJ, Garland, L, Cuthill, IC and Harris, S 2007 Factors that can be used to predict release rates for wildlife casualties. Animal Welfare 16: 361–367Google Scholar
Morgan, SA, Hansen, CM, Ross, JG, Hickling, GJ, Ogilvie, SC and Paterson, AM 2009 Urban cat (Felis catus) movement and predation activity associated with a wetland reserve in New Zealand. Wildlife Research 36: 574–580. https://doi.org/10.1071/WR09023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, D 1986 Catwatching. Jonathan Cape: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Murray, DL and Fuller, MR 2000 A critical review of the effects of marking on the biology of vertebrates. In: Boitani, L and Fuller, TK (eds) Research Techniques in Animals Ecology: Controversies and Consequences pp 15–64. Columbia University Press: New York, USAGoogle Scholar
Murray, JK, Browne, WJ, Roberts, MA, Whitmarsh, A and Gruffydd-Jones, TJ 2010 Number and ownership profiles of cats and dogs in the UK. Veterinary Record 166: 163–168. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.b4712CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nelson, SH, Evans, AD and Bradbury, RB 2005 The efficacy of collar-mounted devices in reducing the rate of predation of wildlife by domestic cats. Applied Animal Behavioural Science 94:273–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2005.04.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newson, SE, Evans, KL, Noble, DG, Greenwood, JJD and Gaston, KJ 2008 Use of distance sampling to improve estimates of national population sizes for common and widespread breeding birds in the UK. Journal of Applied Ecology 45: 1330–1338. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2008.01480.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nogales, M, Martin, A, Tershy, BR, Donlan, CJ, Witch, D, Puerta, N, Wood, B and Alonso, J 2004 A review of feral cat eradication on islands. Conservation Biology 18: 310–319. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.00442.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redfern, CPF and Clark, JA 2001 BTO Ringers’ Manual. British Trust for Ornithology: Thetford, UKGoogle Scholar
Ruxton, GD, Thomas, S and Wright, JW 2002 Bells reduce predation of wildlife by domestic cats (Felis catus). Journal of Zoology 256: 81–83. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0952836902000109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schenk, AN and Souza, MJ 2014 Major anthropogenic causes for and outcomes of wild animal presentation to a wildlife clinic in east Tennessee, USA, 2000-2011. PLoS ONE 9: e93517. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0093517Google Scholar
Shaw, LM, Chamberlain, D and Evans, M 2008 The house sparrow Passer domesticus in urban areas: reviewing a possible link between post-decline distribution and human socioeconomic status. Journal of Ornithology 149: 193–199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-008-0285-yCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sims, V, Evans, KL, Newson, SE, Tratalos, JA and Gaston, KJ 2008 Avian assemblage structure and domestic cat densities in urban environments. Diversity and Distributions 14: 387–399. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2007.00444.xGoogle Scholar
Smit, T, Moraal, LG and Bakhuizen, T 1980 Pasteurella multo-cida infections in birds following cat bites. Tijdschr Diergeneesksd 105: 327–329Google ScholarPubMed
Thomas, RL, Fellowes, MDE and Baker, PJ 2012 Spatio-tem-poral variation in predation by urban domestic cats (Felis catus) and the acceptability of possible management actions in the UK. PLoS ONE 7(11): e49369. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0049369CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tratalos, J, Fuller, RA, Evans, KL, Davies, RG, Newson, SE, Greenwood, JJD and Gaston, KJ 2007 Bird densities are asso-ciated with household densities. Global Change Biology 13: 1685–1695. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2007.01390.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tschanz, B, Hegglin, D, Gloor, S and Bontadina, F 2011 Hunters and non-hunters: skewed predation rate by domestic cats in a rural village. European Journal of Wildlife Research 57: 597–602. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-010-0470-1Google Scholar
Turner, DC and Meister, O 1988 Hunting behaviour of the domestic cat cat. In: Turner, DC and Bateson, P (eds) The Domestic Cat pp 111–121. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
van Heezik, Y 2010 Pussyfooting around the issue of cat predation in urban areas. Oryx 44: 153–154. https://doi.org/10.1017/S003060531000027XGoogle Scholar
van Heezik, Y, Smyth, A, Adams, A and Gordon, J 2010 Do domestic cats impose an unsustainable harvest on urban bird pop-ulations? Biological Conservation 143: 121–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2009.09.013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willson, SK, Okunlola, IA and Novak, JA 2015 Birds be safe: Can a novel cat collar reduce avian mortality by domestic cats (Felis catus)? Global Ecology & Conservation 3: 359–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2015.01.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woinarski, JCZ, Murphy, BP, Legge, SM, Garnett, ST, Lawes, MJ, Comer, S, Dickman, CR, Doherty, TS, Edwards, G, Nankivell, A, Paton, D, Palmer, R and Woolley, LA 2017 How many birds are killed by cats in Australia? Biological Conservation 214:76–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2017.08.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woods, M, McDonald, RA and Harris, S 2003 Predation of wildlife by domestic cats Felis catus in Great Britain. Mammal Review 33: 174–188. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2907.2003.00017.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar