Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T18:03:23.590Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Space Requirement Stipulations for Caged Non-Human Primates in the United States: A Critical Review

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2023

V Reinhardt ,
C Liss  and
C Stevens
V Reinhardt*
Affiliation:
Animal Welfare Institute, PO Box 3650, Washington, DC 20007, USA
C Liss
Affiliation:
Animal Welfare Institute, PO Box 3650, Washington, DC 20007, USA
C Stevens
Affiliation:
Animal Welfare Institute, PO Box 3650, Washington, DC 20007, USA
*
† Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints: 4605 Crescent Road, Madison WI 53711, USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Cage space requirements for non-human primates in the United States of America are less than those in European countries. Studies in support of the assumption that the US legal minimum cage size provides adequate space have limited value because they only tested cages without structural enhancement. It is not surprising that non-human primates cannot be animated to be more active or to behave in more species-typical manners by only providing them with extra barren space. Explicitly stipulating that all cages have to be equipped with properly installed, elevated structures appropriate to each species and age category would make the US standards more adequate. Such structures would no longer restrict the caged primate to an unnatural, permanent terrestrial lifestyle but would allow the animal to make use of the arboreal, ‘safe’ dimension to which she/he is biologically adapted. Minimal height requirements will have to be upgraded in the US to accommodate these ethological considerations.

Keywords

animal welfarenon-human primatesquality of cage spaceregulations
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 5 , Issue 4 , November 1996 , pp. 361 - 372
Copyright
© 1996 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

References

American Medical Association 1992 White Paper: Use of Animals in Biomedical Research, The Challenge and Response. Group on Science and Technology American Medical Association: Chicago, USAGoogle Scholar
Anderson, J R and Visalberghi, E 1990 Towards better conditions for captive primates: routines, requirements, and research. In: Alleva, E and Laviola, G (eds) Biomedical Experimentation and Laboratory Animals: Hot Behavioural Issues pp 1–11. Istisan Reports: Rome, ItalyGoogle Scholar
Bayne, K A L 1989 Resolving issues of psychological well-being and management of laboratory nonhuman primates. In: Segal, EF (ed) Housing, Care and Psychological Weil-Being of Captive and Laboratory Primates pp 27–39. Noyes Publications: Park Ridge, USAGoogle Scholar
Bayne, K A L, Hurst, J K and Dexter, S L 1992a Evaluation of the preference to and behavioral effects of an enriched environment on male rhesus monkeys. Laboratory Animal Science 42: 38–45Google ScholarPubMed
Bayne, K A L and McCully, C 1989 The effect of cage size on the behavior of individually housed rhesus monkeys. Lab Animal 18(1): 25–28Google Scholar
Bayne, K, Dexter, S, Mainzer, H, McCully, C, Campbell, G and Yamada, F 1992b The use of artificial turf as a foraging substrate for individually housed rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta). Animal Welfare 1: 39–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bayne, K, Mainzer, H, Dexter, S, Campbell, G, Yamada, F and Suomi, S 1991 The reduction of abnormal behaviors in individually housed rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) with a foraging/grooming board. American Journal of Primatology 23: 23–35CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Benn, D M 1995 Innovations in research animal care. Journal of the American Veterinary Medicine Association 205: 465–468Google Scholar
Berkson, G 1968 Development of abnormal stereotyped behaviors. Developmental Psychobiology 1: 118–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berkson, G, Mason, W A and Saxon, S U 1963 Situation and stimulus effect on stereotyped behaviors of chimpanzees. Journal of Comparative Physiological Psychology 56: 786–792CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, I and Mason, W 1963 Activity patterns of rhesus monkeys in a social group. Animal Behaviour 12: 338–342Google Scholar
Boinski, S, Noon, C, Stans, S, Samudio, R, Sammarco, P and Hayes, A 1994 The behavioral profile and environmental enrichment of a squirrel monkey colony. Laboratory Primate Newsletter 33(4): 1–4Google Scholar
Boot, R, Leussink, A B and Vlug, R F 1985 Influence of housing conditions on pregnancy outcome in cynomolgus monkeys (Macaca fascicularis). Laboratory Animals 19: 42–47 .CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bowden, D M 1988 Primate research and “psychological well-being”. Science 240: 12CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brent, L 1992 The effects of cage size and pair housing on the behavior of captive chimpanzees. American Journal of Primatology 27: 20 (Abstract)Google Scholar
Brent, L, Lee, D R and Eichberg, J W 1989 Evaluation of two environmental enrichment devices for singly caged chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). American Journal of Primatology Supplement 1: 65–70Google Scholar
Brent, L and Long, K E 1995 The behavioral response of individually caged baboons to feeding enrichment and the standard diet: a preliminary report. Contemporary Topics 34(2): 65–69Google Scholar
Burt, D A and Plant, M 1990 Observations on a caging system for housing stump-tailed macaques. Animal Technology 41: 175–179Google Scholar
Canadian Council on Animal Care 1993 Guide to the Care and Use of Experimental Animals, Volume 1. CCAC: Ottawa, CanadaGoogle Scholar
Chamove, A S 1989 Environmental enrichment: a review. Animal Technology 40: 155–178Google Scholar
Chamove, A S and Anderson, J R 1989 Examining environmental enrichment. In: Segal, E F (ed) Housing, Care and Psychological Weil-Being of Captive and Laboratory Animals pp 183–202. Noyes Publications: Park Ridge, USAGoogle Scholar
Chopra, P K, Seth, P K and Seth, P K 1992 Behavioural profile of free-ranging rhesus monkeys. Primate Report 32: 75–105Google Scholar
Crockett, C M 1993 Primate well-being is not promoted by suit. Laboratory Primate Newsletter 32(2): 1–2Google Scholar
Crockett, C M and Bowden, D M 1994 Challenging conventional wisdom for housing monkeys. Lab Animal 24(2): 29–33Google Scholar
Crockett, C M, Bowers, C L, Bowden, D M and Sackett, G P 1994 Sex differences in compatibility of pair-housed adult longtailed macaques. American Journal of Primatology 32: 73–94CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crockett, C M, Bowers, C L, Sackett, G P and Bowden, D M 1993a Urinary Cortisol responses of longtailed macaques to five cage sizes, tethering, sedation, and room change. American Journal of Primatology 30: 55–74CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crockett, C M, Bowers, C L, Shimoji, M, Leu, M, Bcllanca, R and Bowden, D M 1993b Appetite and urinary Cortisol responses to different cage sizes in female pigtailed macaques. American Journal of Primatology 31: 305 (Abstract)Google Scholar
Crockett, C M and Wilson, W L 1980 The ecological separation of Macaca nemestrina and M. fascicularis in Sumatra. In: Lindburg, D G (ed) The Macaques: Studies in Ecology, Behavior and Evolution pp 148–181. Van Nostrand Reinhold: New York, USAGoogle Scholar
Daschbach, N J, Schein, M W and Haines, D E 1983 Cage-size effect on locomotor, grooming and agonistic behaviors of the slow loris, Nycticebus coucang. Applied Animal Ethology 9: 317–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Der Schweizerische Bundesrat 1981 Tierschutzverordnung. Bundesrat: Bern, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
DeVore, I and Hall, K R L 1965 Baboon ecology. In: DeVore, I (ed) Primate Behavior: Field Studies of Monkeys and Apes pp 20–52. Holt, Rinehart and Winston: New York, USAGoogle Scholar
Draper, W A and Bernstein, I S 1963 Stereotyped behavior and cage size. Perceptual and Motor Skills 16: 231–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eaton, G G, Kelley, S T, Iliff-Sizemore, S A 1993 Rawhide “chew-bones” reduce abnormal behavior in individually housed adult rhesus macaques. American Journal of Primatology 30: 308 (Abstract)Google Scholar
Erwin, J 1991 Applied primate ecology: evaluation of environmental changes to promote psychological well-being. In: Novak, M A and Petto, A J (eds) Through the Looking Glass. Issues of Psychological Well-Being in Captive Nonhuman Primates pp 180–188. American Psychological Association: Washington, USACrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erwin, J and Deni, R 1979 Strangers in a strange land: abnormal behavior or abnormal environments? In: Erwin J, Maple T and Mitchell G (eds)Captivity and Behavior pp 1–28. Van Nostrand Reinhold: New York, USAGoogle Scholar
Estrada, A 1989 Comportamiento Animales. Es Caso de los Primates. La Ciencia desde México: MéxicoGoogle Scholar
European Economic Community Council 1986 Directive 86/609 on the Approximation of Laws, Regulations, and Administrative Provisions Regarding the Protection of Animals Used for Experimental and Other Scientific Purposes: Annex II. Guidelines for Accommodation and Care of Animals. Official Journal of the European Communities L358: 7–28Google Scholar
Field, K J, Denny, J and Kubicz, G 1992 Nonhuman primate socialization and environmental enrichment using a transfer tunnel. Laboratory Primate Newsletter 31(2): 5–7Google Scholar
Fittinghoff, N A, Lindburg, D G, Gomber, J and Mitchell, G 1974 Consistency and variability in the behavior of mature, isolation-reared, male rhesus macaques. Primates 15: 111–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fritz, J, Nash, L T, Alford, P L and Bowen, J A 1992 Abnormal behaviors, with special focus on rocking, and reproductive competence in a large sample of captive chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). American Journal of Primatology 27: 161–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodall, J 1965 Chimpanzees of the Gombe Stream Reserve. In: DeVore, I (ed) Primate Behavior: Field Studies of Monkeys and Apes pp 425–473. Holt, Rinehart and Winston: New York, USAGoogle Scholar
Goosen, C 1988 Developing housing facilities for rhesus monkeys: prevention of abnormal behavior. In: Beynen, A C and Solleveld, H A (eds) New Development in Biosciences: Their Implications for Laboratory Animal Science pp 67–70. Martinus Nijhoff: Dordrecht, The NetherlandsCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hediger, H 1955 Studies of the Psychology and Behaviour of Animals in Zoos and Circuses. Butterworths: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Holden, C 1988 Experts ponder simian well-being. Science 241: 1753–1755CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Home Office 1989 Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986. Code of Practice for the Housing and Care of Animals Used in Scientific Procedures. HMSO: London, UKGoogle Scholar
International Primatological Society 1993 IPS international guidelines for the acquisition, care and breeding of nonhuman primates. Primate Report 35: 3–29Google Scholar
Jay, P 1965 The common langur of North India. In: DeVore, I (ed) Primate Behavior: Field Studies of Monkeys and Apes pp 197–249. Holt, Rinehart and Winston: New York, USAGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, M L and Lobao, B J 1991 A unique housing system for rhesus macaques. Lab Animal 20(6): 48–51Google Scholar
Kerl, J and Rothe, H 1996 Influence of cage size and cage equipment on physiology and behaviour of common marmosets (Callithrix Jacchus). Laboratory Primate Newsletter 35(3): 10–13Google Scholar
Lam, K, Rupniak, N M J and Iversen, S D 1991 Use of a grooming and foraging substrate to reduce cage stereotypies in macaques. Journal of Medical Primatology 20: 104–109CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leu, M, Crockett, C M, Bowers, C L and Bowden, D M 1993 Changes in activity levels of singly housed longtailed macaques when given the opportunity to exercise in a larger cage. American Journal of Primatology 31: 327 (Abstract)Google Scholar
Line, S W 1987 Environmental enrichment for laboratory primates. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 190: 854–859Google ScholarPubMed
Line, S W, Markowitz, H, Morgan, K N and Strong, S 1989a Evaluation of attempts to enrich the environment of single-caged non-human primates. In: Driscoll, J W (ed) Animal Care and Use in Behavioral Research: Regulations, Issues, and Applications pp 103–117. Animal Welfare Information Center: Beltsville, USAGoogle Scholar
Line, S W, Markowitz, H, Morgan, K N and Strong, S 1991 Effect of cage size and environmental enrichment on behavioral and physiological responses of rhesus macaques to the stress of daily events. In: Novak, M A and Petto, A J (eds) Through the Looking Glass. Issues of Psychological Weil-Being in Captive Nonhuman Primates pp 160–179. American Psychological Association: Washington, USACrossRefGoogle Scholar
Line, S W, Morgan, K N, Markowitz, H, Roberts, J and Riddell, M 1990b Behavioral responses of female long-tailed macaques (Macaca fascicularis) to pair formation. Laboratory Primate Newsletter 29(4): 1–5Google Scholar
Line, S W, Morgan, K N, Markowitz, H and Strong, S 1989b Influence of cage size on heart rate and behavior in rhesus monkeys. American Journal of Veterinary Research 40: 1523–1526Google Scholar
Line, S W, Morgan, K N, Markowitz, H and Strong, S 1990a Increased cage size does not alter heart rate or behavior in female rhesus monkeys. American Journal of Primatology 20: 107–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, R D 1990 Primate Origins and Evolution. A Phylogenetic Reconstruction. Princeton University Press: Princeton, USAGoogle Scholar
Mason, W A 1989 Primatology and primate well-being. American Journal of Primatology Supplement 1: 1–4Google Scholar
Menzel, E W 1967 Naturalistic and experimental research on primates. Human Development 10: 170–186CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meunier, L D, Duktig, J T and Landi, M S 1989 Modification of stereotypic behavior in rhesus monkeys using videotapes, puzzlefeeders, and foraging boxes. Laboratory Animal Science 39: 479 (Abstract)Google Scholar
Nadler, R D, Herndon, J G, Metz, B, Ferrer, A C and Erwin, J 1992 Environmental enrichment by varied feeding strategies for individually caged young chimpanzees. In: Chimpanzee Conservation and Public Health: Environments for the Future pp 137–145. Diagon/Bioqual: Rockville, USAGoogle Scholar
National Institutes of Health 1985 Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. NIH Publication No 85-23: Bethesda, USAGoogle Scholar
National Institutes of Health 1991 Nonhuman Primate Management Plan. NIH: Bethesda, USAGoogle Scholar
O’Neill, P 1987 Enriching the lives of primates in captivity. Humane Innovations and Alternatives in Animal Experimentation 1: 1–5Google Scholar
O’Neill-Wagner, P 1994 When trying to get your monkeys to behave, try perches. In Touch 1(2): 6–8Google Scholar
Perkins, S E, Burnett, D E, Rice, T R, Staley, E C and Weick, B G 1992 Evaluation of the use of novel objects by adult male Macaca mulatta, singly housed in Horsfal isolators. Laboratory Primate Newsletter 31(4): 5–7Google Scholar
Phillippi-Falkenstein, K 1993 Responses of singly-housed white-crowned mangabeys (Cercocebus torquatus lunulatus) to different enrichment devices. Laboratory Primate Newsletter 32(4): 5–7Google Scholar
Poole, T B 1992 The nature and evolution of behavioural needs in mammals. Animal Welfare 1: 203–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reinhardt, V 1989 Evaluation of the long-term effectiveness of two environmental enrichment objects for singly caged rhesus macaques. Lab Animal 18(6): 31–33Google Scholar
Reinhardt, V 1990 A perch for caged macaques. Humane Innovations and Alternatives in Animal Experimentation 4: 134–135Google Scholar
Reinhardt, V 1991 Serum Cortisol concentrations of single-housed and isosexually pair-housed adult rhesus macaques. Journal of Experimental Animal Science 34: 73–76Google ScholarPubMed
Reinhardt, V 1992 Space utilization by captive rhesus macaques. Animal Technology 43: 11–17Google Scholar
Reinhardt, V 1995 Environmental Enhancement for Caged Macaques: A Photographic Documentation. Animal Welfare Institute: Washington, and Wisconsin Regional Primate Research Center: Madison, USAGoogle Scholar
Reinhardt, V, Houser, W D, Cowley, D and Champoux, M 1987a Preliminary comments on environmental enrichment with branches for individually caged rhesus monkeys. Laboratory Primate Newsletter 26(1): 1–3Google Scholar
Reinhardt, V, Houser, W D, Eisele, S G and Champoux, M 1987b Social enrichment of the environment with infants for singly caged adult rhesus monkeys. Zoo Biology 5: 365–371Google Scholar
Reinhardt, V and Smith, M D 1988 PVC pipes effectively enrich the environment of caged rhesus monkeys. Laboratory Primate Newsletter 27(3): 4–5Google Scholar
Reinhardt, V, Zweifel, D and Pape, D 1992 Improving the micro environment of caged laboratory macaques. Animal Technology 43: 179–183Google Scholar
Reynolds, V and Reynolds, F 1965 Chimpanzees of the Budongo Forest. In: DeVore, I (ed) Primate Behavior: Field Studies of Monkeys and Apes pp 368–424. Holt, Rinehart and Winston: New York, USAGoogle Scholar
Rose, M D 1974 Postural adaptations in New and Old World monkeys. In: Jenkins, F A (ed) Primate Locomotion pp 201–222. Academic Press: New York, USAGoogle Scholar
Rosenblum, L, Kaufman, I and Stynes, A 1964 Individual distances in two species of macaques. Animal Behaviour 12: 338–342Google Scholar
Riimpler, U 1992 Beschäftigungsmöglichkeiten bei Primaten im Zoo. Zeitschrift des Kölner Zoo 35(2): 47–68Google Scholar
Salzen, E A 1989 A closed colony of squirrel monkeys for laboratory studies. In: Segal, E F (ed) Housing, Care and Psychological Well-Being of Captive and Laboratory Primates pp 115–134. Noyes Publications: Park Ridge, USAGoogle Scholar
Schapiro, S J, Bloomsmith, M A, Kessel, A L and Shively, C A 1993 Effects of enrichment and housing on Cortisol response in juvenile rhesus monkeys. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 37: 251–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schapiro, S J, Brent, L, Bloomsmith, M A and Satterfield, W C 1991 Enrichment devices for nonhuman primates. Lab Animal 20(6): 22–28Google Scholar
Schmidt, E M, Dold, G M and Mcintosh, J S 1989 A perch for primate squeeze cages. Laboratory Animal Science 39: 166–167Google ScholarPubMed
Schultz, A H 1969 The Life of Primates. Universe Books: New York, USAGoogle Scholar
Shimoji, M, Bowers, C L and Crockett, C M 1993 Initial response to introduction of a PVC perch by singly caged Macaca fascicularis. Laboratory Primate Newsletter 32(4): 8–11Google Scholar
Simonds, P E 1965 The bonnet macaque of South India. In: DeVore, I (ed) Primate Behavior: Field Studies of Monkeys and Apes pp 175–196. Holt, Rinehart and Winston: New York, USAGoogle Scholar
Taff, M A and Dolhinow, P 1989 Langur monkeys (Presbytis entellus) in captivity. In: Segal, EF (ed) Housing, Care and Psychological Weil-Being of Captive and Laboratory Primates pp 291–304. Noyes Publications: Park Ridge, USAGoogle Scholar
Traylor-Holzer, K and Fritz, P 1985 Utilization of space by adult and juvenile groups of captive chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Zoo Biology 4: 115–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
United States Department of Agriculture 1991 Animal welfare; standards; final rule. Federal Register 56: 6426–6505Google Scholar
Vandenbergh, J G 1989 Issues related to “psychological well-being” in nonhuman primates. American Journal of Primatology 1: 9–15Google Scholar
Washburn, R and Hamburg, D A 1965 The implications of primate research. In: DeVore, I (ed) Primate Behavior: Field Studies of Monkeys and Apes pp 607–629. Holt, Rinehart and Winston: New YorkGoogle ScholarPubMed
Watson, D S B 1991 A built-in perch for primate squeeze cages. Laboratory Primate Newsletter 41: 378–379Google ScholarPubMed
Watson, S L and Shively, C A 1996 Effects of cage configuration on behaviour in cynomolgus macaques. International Primatological Society/American Society of Primatologists Congress. Abstract No 674Google Scholar
Weed, J L, Baker, S C, Harbaugh, S W and Erwin, J 1995 Innovative enclosures for laboratory primates: evaluation of a “breeding condominium”. Lab Animal 24(7): 28–32Google Scholar
Weld, K and Erwin, J 1990 Provision of manipulable objects to cynomolgus macaques promotes species-typical behavior. American Journal of Primatology 20: 243 (Abstract)Google Scholar
Weld, K, Metz, B and Erwin, J 1989 Experimental evaluation of environmental enrichment techniques: provision of manipulable objects to five primate species. American Journal of Primatology 18: 169 (Abstract)Google Scholar
Wemelsfelder, F 1994 Animal boredom - a model of chronic suffering in captive animals and its consequences for environmental enrichment. Humane Innovations and Alternatives 8: 587–591Google Scholar
Whitney, R A and Wickings, E J 1987 Macaques and other old world simians. In: Poole, TB (ed) The UFAW Handbook on the Care and Management of Laboratory Animals pp 599–627. Churchill Livingstone: New York, USAGoogle Scholar
Williams, L E and Abec, C R 1985 Cage design and configuration for an arboreal species of primate (genus Saimiri). Laboratory Animal Science 35: 529 (Abstract)Google Scholar
Wilson, S F 1982 Environmental influences on the activity of captive apes. Zoo Biology 1: 201–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfle, T L 1991 Psychological well-being: the billion-dollar situation. In: Novak, M A and Petto, A J (eds) Through the Looking Glass. Issues of Psychological Weil-Being in Captive Nonhuman Primates pp 119–128. American Psychological Association: Washington, USACrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodbeck, T and Reinhardt, V 1991 Perch use by Macaca mulatta in relation to cage location. Laboratory Primate Newsletter 30(4): 11–12Google Scholar
Woolverton, W L, Ator, N A, Beardsley, P M and Carroll, M E 1989 Effects of environmental condition on the psychological well-being of primates. A review of the literature. Life Sciences 44: 901–917CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed