Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T12:20:12.615Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Some Comments on the Review of Nimon and Broom on the Welfare of Farmed Mink

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2023

C M Vinke
C M Vinke*
Affiliation:
Department of Animals and Society, Utrecht University, Yalelaan 17, 3584 CL Utrecht, The Netherlands
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Fur-farming is a politically sensitive issue today. Therefore, discussions on the welfare situation of commercially farmed fur animals may be particularly valuable. The aim of this Short Communication is to address some issues, in addition to those covered in the review of Nimon and Broom on the welfare of farmed mink (Animal Welfare 1999, 8: 205-228), that may have received too little attention. This Short Communication addresses domestication and animal welfare, indispensable resources and behaviours of farmed mink, and the use of negative and positive indicators of welfare in research on farmed mink.

Keywords

animal welfaredomesticationessential needsmink
Type
Short Communication
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 10 , Issue 3 , August 2001 , pp. 315 - 323
Copyright
© 2001 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

References

Bakken, M 1998 The effect of an improved man-animal relationship on sex ratio in litters and on growth and behaviour in cubs among farmed silver fox (Vulpes vulpes). Applied Animal Behaviour Science 56: 309–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belyaev, D K 1979 Destabilizing selection as a factor in domestication. Journal of Heredity 70: 301 -308CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bildsøe, M, Heller, K E and Jepessen, L L 1990a Stereotypies in adult ranch mink. Scientifur 14: 169–177Google Scholar
Bildsøe, M, Heller, K E and Jepessen, L L 1990b Stereotypies in female ranch mink: seasonal and diurnal variations. Scientifur 14: 243–247Google Scholar
Bildsøe, M, Heller, K E and Jepessen, LL 1991 Effects of immobility stress and food restriction on stereotypies in low and high stereotyping female ranch mink. Behavioural Processes 25: 179–189CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boissy, A 1998 Fear and fearfulness in determining behavior. In: Grandin, T (ed) Genetics and the Behavior of Domestic Animals pp 67–111. Academic Press: San Diego, USAGoogle Scholar
Broom, D M and Johnson, K G 1993 Stress and Animal Welfare. Animal Behaviour Series; Chapman & Hall: London, UKCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, J J and Mason, G J 1997 The effect of cost of access on consumption of environmental resources in mink. In: Forbes, J M, Lawrence, T L J, Rodway, R G and Varley, M A (eds) Animal Choices pp 129–130. (Occasional Publication No 20) British Society of Animal Science: Edinburgh, UKGoogle Scholar
Cooper, J J and Mason, G 1999 Assessing the behavioural needs of mink (Mustela vison) using three methodologies from human microeconomics. In: Bøe K E, Bakken M and Braastad B O (eds) Proceedings of the 33rd International Congress of the International Society for Applied Ethology, Lillehammer, Norway, 17-21 August pp 82. Ås-Trykk AS: Ås, NorwayGoogle Scholar
Dawkins, M S 1983 Battery hens name their price: consumer demand theory and the measurement of ethological ‘needs’. Animal Behaviour 31: 1195–1205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawkins, M S 1988 Behavioural deprivation: a central problem in animal welfare. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 20: 209–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawkins, M S 1990 From an animal's point of view: motivation, fitness, and animal welfare. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13: 1–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Jonge, G 1997 Angst, nieuwsgierigheid en agressie zijn deels aangeboren. De Pelsdierenhouder 47: 136–138 [Title translation: Anxiety, curiosity and aggression are partly innate.]Google Scholar
de Jonge, G and Carlstead, K 1987 Abnormal behaviour in farm mink. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 17: 375 (Abstract)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunstone, N 1993 The Mink. T & A D Poyser Ltd: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Erlebach, S 1994 Effects of environment on the behaviour of mink. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 40: 77 (Abstract)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, A F 1968 Behavior disorders in domestic animals. In: Fox, M W (ed) Abnormal Behavior In Animals pp 179–187. W B Saunders Company: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Gerell, R 1970 Home ranges and movements of the mink Mustela vison Schreber in southern Sweden. Oikos 21: 160–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grandin, T and Deesing, M J 1998 Genetics and animal welfare. In: Grandin, T (ed) Genetics and the Behavior of Domestic Animals pp 319–346. Academic Press: San Diego, USAGoogle Scholar
Hansen, S W 1996 Selection for behavioural traits in farm mink. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 49: 137148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hediger, H 1964 Wild Animals in Captivity. An Outline of the Biology of Zoological Gardens. Dover Publications Inc.: New York, USAGoogle Scholar
Heller, K E 1991 Stress and stereotypies in farmed mink. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 30: 179 (Abstract)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hemsworth, P H 1999 Human-animal interactions in livestock production. In: Bøe K E, Bakken M and Braastad B 0 (eds) Proceedings of the 33rd International Congress of the International Society for Applied Ethology, Lillehammer, Norway, 17-21 August pp 32. Ås-Trykk AS: Ås, NorwayGoogle Scholar
Hughes, B O and Duncan, I J H 1988 The notion of ethological ‘need’, models of motivational and animal welfare. Animal Behaviour 36: 1696–1707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jonasen, B 1987 Ontogeny of mink pups. Scientifur 11: 109–110Google Scholar
Kuby, F 1982 Über die Verhaltensontogenese von Farmnerzen (Mustela vison f_dom) in Großgehegen. Inaugural dissertation, Tierärztliche Hochschule Hannover [Title translation: The ontogenic behaviours of farmed mink (Mustela vison f_dom) in large cage environments.]: The ontogenic behaviours of farmed mink (Mustela vison f_dom) in large cage environments.]Google Scholar
Malmkvist, J and Hansen, S W 1999 Effects of serotonergic drugs on approach behaviour in farm mink. In: Bøe K E, Bakken M and Braastad, B 0 (eds) Proceedings of the 33rd International Congress of the International Society for Applied Ethology, Lillehammer, Norway, 17-21 August pp 71. Ås-Trykk AS: Ås, NorwayGoogle Scholar
Markowitz, H 1982 Behavioural Enrichment in the Zoo. Van Nostrand Reinold: New York, USAGoogle Scholar
Martin, G 1979 Zur Käfighaltung von Legehennen. Eine Stellungnahme aus der Sicht der Verhaltenswissenschaft. In: Yeutsch, G M, von Loeper, E, Martin, G and Müller, J (eds) Intensivhaltung von Nutztieren aus ethischer, rechtlicher und ethologischer Sicht pp 101–122. Birkhäuser: Basel, Switzerland [Title translation: Keeping laying-hens in battery-cages. A position from the view of cage-environmental science.]Google Scholar
Mason, G J 1991a Stereotypies and suffering. Behavioural Processes 25: 103–115CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mason, G J 1991b Stereotypies: a critical review. Animal Behaviour 41: 1015–1037CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, G J 1993 Age and context affect the stereotypies of caged mink. Behaviour 127: 191–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, G J 1994 Tail-biting in mink (Mustela vison) is influenced by age at removal from the mother. Animal Welfare 3: 305–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, G J 1996 Early weaning enhances the later development of stereotypy in mink. In: Duncan I J H, Widowski T M and Haley D B (eds) Proceedings of the 30th International Congress of the International Society for Applied Ethology, Guelph, Canada, 14-17 August pp 16Google Scholar
Mason, G J and Turner, M A 1993 Mechanisms involved in the development and control of stereotypies. In: Bateson, PPG, Klopfer, P H and Thompson, N S (eds) Perspectives in Ethology 10: Behaviour and Evolution pp 53–85. Plenum Press: New York, USAGoogle Scholar
Mason, G J and Mendl, M 1997 Do the stereotypies of pigs, chickens and mink reflect adaptive species differences in the control of foraging? Applied Animal Behaviour Science 53: 45–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, G, Cooper, J and Garner, J 1997 Models of motivational decision-making and how they affect the experimental assessment of motivational priorities. In: Forbes, J M, Lawrence, T L J, Rodway, R G and Varley, M A (eds) Animal Choices pp 9–17. (Occasional Publication No 20) British Society of Animal Science: Edinburgh, UKGoogle Scholar
Mason, G, Clareborough, C and Cooper, J 1999 Drink or swim? Using substitutability and physiological responses to frustration to assess the importance of swimming-water for mink. In: Bøe K E, Bakken M, Braastad B O (eds) Proceedings of the 33rd International Congress of the International Society for Applied Ethology, Lillehammer, Norway, 17-21 August pp 83. Ås-Trykk AS: Ås, NorwayGoogle Scholar
Mason, G J, Cooper, J, Clarebrough, C 2001 Frustrations of fur-farmed mink. Mink may thrive in captivity but they miss having water to romp about in. Nature 410: 35–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nimon, A J and Broom, D M 1999 The welfare of farmed mink (Mustela vison) in relation to housing and management: a review. Animal Welfare 8: 205–228Google Scholar
Owen, C 1984 Ferret. In: Mason, I L (ed) Evolution of Domesticated Animals pp 225–228. Longman: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Poole, T B 1992 The nature and evolution of behavioural needs in mammals. Animal Welfare I: 203–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, E O 1999 Behavioural development in animals undergoing domestication. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 65: 245–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rekilä, R, Mononen, L, Nurminen, L, Sepponen, J and Harri, M 1999 Selection against fear in farmed blue foxes, ln: Bøe K E, Bakken M and Braastad B 0 (eds) Proceedings of the 33rd International Congress of the International Society for Applied Ethology, Lillehammer, Norway, 17-21 August pp 93. Ås-Trykk AS: Ås, NorwayGoogle Scholar
Rollin, B E 1995 Farm Animal Welfare. Social, Bioethical, and Research Issues. Iowa State University Press: Ames, Iowa, USAGoogle Scholar
Rushen, J, Taylor, A A and de Passillé, A M 1999 Domestic animals’ fear of humans and its effect on their welfare. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 65: 285–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savory, C J and Maros, K 1993 Influence of degree of food restriction, age, and time of day on behaviour of broiler breeder chickens. Behavioral Processes 29: 179–190CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seksel, K, Mazurski, E J and Taylor, A 1999 Puppy socialisation programs: short and long term behavioural effects. Applied Animal Behavioural Science 62: 335–349Google Scholar
Shackelford, R M 1984 American mink. In: Mason, I L (ed) Evolution of Domesticated Animals pp 229–234. Longman: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Shepherdson, D 1988 Environmental enrichment in the zoo. In: UFAW 24 pp 45–53Google Scholar
Spruijt, B M and Drabbe, Kunzel von Frijtag, J 1999 How is welfare represented in the brain? In: Bøe, K E, Bakken, M, Braastad, B O (eds) Proceedings of the 33rd International Congress of the International Society for Applied Ethology, Lillehammer, Norway, 17-21 August pp 36–37. Ås-Trykk AS: Ås, NorwayGoogle Scholar
Spruijt, B M, van Hooff, J A R A M and Gispen, W H 1992 Ethology and neurobiology of grooming behavior. Physiological Reviews 72: 825–852CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spruijt, B M, van der Bos, R and Pijlman, F T A 2001 A concept of welfare based on how the brain evaluates its own activity: anticipation as an indicator for the state of reward systems. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 72: 145–171Google Scholar
Steiger, A 1998 Problems with animal welfare, disease and behavioural abnormalities of extreme breed types in pet animals. In: Veissier I and Boissy A (eds) Proceedings of the 32nd Congress of the International Society for Applied Ethology, Clermont-Ferrand, France, 21-25 July pp 91Google Scholar
Terlouw, EMC, Lawrence, A B and Illius, AW 1991 Influences of feeding level and physical restriction on development of stereotypies in sows. Animal Behaviour 42: 981–991CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorpe, W H 1965 The assessment of pain and distress in animals. In: Report of the Technical Committee to Enquire into the Welfare of Animals kept under Intensive Livestock Systems. Command paper 2836, pp 125-134. HMSO: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Trut, L N 1999 Early canid domestication: the farm-fox experiment. American Science 87: 160–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Liere, D W and Wiepkema, P R 1992 Effects of long term deprivation of sand on dustbathing behaviour in laying hens. Animal Behaviour 43: 549–558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veasey, J S, Waran, N K and Young, R J 1996 On comparing the behaviour of zoo housed animals with wild conspecifics as a welfare indicator. Animal Welfare 5: 13–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vestergaard, K S, Skadhauge, E and Lawson, L G 1997 The stress of not being able to perform dustbathing in laying hens. Physiology and Behavior 62: 413–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Frijtag, J C, Reijmers, L G J E, van der Harst, J E, Leus, I E, van der Bos, R and Spruijt, B M 2000 Defeat followed by individual housing results in long-term impaired reward- and cognition-related behaviors in rats. Behavioral Brain Research 117: 137–146CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Waring, G H 1983 Horse Behaviour. The Behavioral Traits and Adaptations of Domestic and Wild Horses, Including Ponies. Noyes Publications: New Jersey, USAGoogle Scholar