Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-31T15:32:02.342Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Significance of Fowls' Bathing in Dust

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2023

D W van Liere
D W van Liere*
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Husbandry, Ethology Section, Agricultural University, PO Box 338, 6700 AH Wageningen, The Netherlands
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Dustbathing in fowls (eg chickens, Gallus gallus) consists of tossing the litter onto and between the fluffed feathers and subsequently enclosing it by flattening the feathers. The proximal contact between litters like sand and peat, and the integument is intensified by rubbing the body. This is not the case in wood-shavings which adhere to the distal plumage after tossing; rubbings in wood-shavings are frequently interrupted by reinitiated tossings. Lipids accumulate on the feathers and become stale during dust deprivation. Only baths in sand and peat are effective in removing excessive lipids from the proximal downy feather parts. Fluffiness of the down is highest in hens on peat, intermediate on sand and lowest on wood-shavings, while the reverse is true for the plumage surface temperature of the back Hens monitor the integumental lipid condition which becomes causally connected with bathing in the course of experiencing litter bathing effects. It is shown from the author's experimental study that hens naive of bathing in litter, and hens experienced with wood-shavings initially shifted bathing litters but finally preferred peat or sand (in that order) when peat, sand and wood-shavings were simultaneously presented Most of the hens experienced with bathing in sand did not shift to another substrate when presented with one. Recommendations are given concerning adequate dustbathing litter. A chronic deprivation of adequate litter leads to an uncontrollable condition of the lipids on the integument and an abnormal development of dustbathing. Such a deprivation therefore reduces animal welfare. Moreover, it is suggested to be costly.

Keywords

animal welfaredustbathfeatherfowllipidlitter
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 1 , Issue 3 , August 1992 , pp. 187 - 202
Copyright
© 1992 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

Footnotes

*

Present address: Groenkampen 67, 9407 RK Assen, The Netherlands

References

Abalain, J H, Amet, Y, Daniel, J Y, Floch, H H 1984 Androgen regulation of secretions in the sebaceous-like uropygial gland of the male Japanese quail. Journal of Endocrinology 103: 147–153CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ader, R, Felten, D L, Cohen, N 1991 Psychoneuroimmunology. 2nd edition. Academic Press: San DiegoGoogle Scholar
Aschenbrenner, H 1985 Rauhfusshühner. Schaper Verlag: HannoverGoogle Scholar
Baerends, G P 1976 The functional organization of behaviour. Animal Behaviour 24: 726–738CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bessei, W, Klinger, G 1982 Zum Sandbaden von Hühnern. Archiv für Geflügelk 46: 130–135Google Scholar
Black, A J, Hughes, B O 1974 Patterns of comfort behaviour and activity in domestic fowls: a comparison between cages and pens. British Veterinary Journal 130: 23–33CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blokhuis, H J 1989 The Development and Causation of Feather Pecking in the Domestic Fowl. PhD Thesis Agricultural University: WageningenGoogle Scholar
Borchelt, P L 1975 The organization of dustbathing components in Bobwhite quail (Colinus virginianus). Behaviour 53: 217–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borchelt, P L 1977 Development of dustbathing components in Bobwhite and Japanese quail. Developmental Psychobiology 10: 97–103CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Borchelt, P L, Duncan, L 1974 Dustbathing and feather lipid in Bobwhite quail (Colinus virginianus). Condor 76: 471–472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borchelt, P L, Overmann, S R 1974 Development of dustbathing in Bobwhite quail. I. Effects of age, experience, texture of dust, strain, and social facilitation. Developmental Psychobiology 7: 305–313Google ScholarPubMed
Borchelt, P L, Overmann, S R 1975 Development of dustbathing in Bobwhite quail. II. Effects of early pecking experiences. Developmental Psychobiology 8: 417–423CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Borchelt, P L, Eyer, J, McHenry, D S Jr 1973 Dustbathing in Bobwhite quail (Colinus virginianus) as a function of dust deprivation. Behavioral Biology 8: 109–114Google ScholarPubMed
Borchelt, P L, Hoffman, T, Hurrell, R M, McCarthy, R 1979 Regulation of dustbathing in Japanese Quail (Coturnix coturnix) Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology 93: 134–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braunius, W W 1987 Coccidiosis in poultry housed in various systems. In Kuit A R, Ehlhardt D A, Blokhuis H J (eds) EUR 11711 - Alternative Improved Housing Systems for Poultry. Proceedings of a CEC Seminar. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities: LuxembourgGoogle Scholar
Brush, F R, Levine, S 1989 Psychoendocrinology. Academic Press: San DiegoGoogle Scholar
Cena, K, Clark, J A, Spotila, J R 1986 Thermoregulation. In Bereiter-Hahn, J, Matoltsy, A G, Sylvia Richards, K (eds) Biology of the Integument 2. Vertebrates. Springer-Verlag: BerlinGoogle Scholar
Dow, D D 1988 Dusting and sunning by Australian brush-turkeys Emu 88: 47–48Google Scholar
Emmens, R L 1983 Bacterial odours and oviposition by Lucilia cuprina (Wiedemann) the Australian sheep blowfly. In Raadsma H W (ed) Sheep Blowfly and Flystrike in Sheep. Proceedings of the 2nd National Symposium. Department of Agriculture New South Wales: SydneyGoogle Scholar
Feiler, W, Haas, W 1988 Host-finding in Trichobilharzia ocellata cercariae: swimming and attachment to the host. Parasitology 96: 493–505CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Griffin, D R 1976 The Question of Animal Awareness. Rockefeller University Press: New YorkGoogle Scholar
Haas, W, Granzer, M, Garcia, E G 1987 Host identification by Schistosoma japonicum cercariae. Journal of Parasitology 73: 568–577CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Healy, W M, Thomas, J W 1973 Effects of dusting on plumage of Japanese quail. Wilson Bulletin 85: 442–448Google Scholar
Heinroth, O 1955 Aus dem Leben der Vögel. Springer-Verlag: BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herremans, M 1987 Het Belang van de Bevederingstoestand voor de Thermoregulatie en de Produktie-Efficiëntie bij Leghennen. PhD Thesis Catholic University: LeuvenGoogle Scholar
Hodges, R D 1974 The Histology of the Fowl. Academic Press: LondonGoogle Scholar
Hogan, J A 1973 How young chicks learn to recognize food. In Hinde, R A, Stevenson-Hinde, J (eds) Constraints on Learning. Limitations and Predispositions. Academic Press: LondonGoogle Scholar
Hogan, J A 1988 Cause and function in the development of behavior systems. In Blass, E M (ed) Handbook of Behavioral Neurobiology. Volume 9. Plenum Press: New YorkGoogle Scholar
Hogan, J A, Honrado, G I, Vestergaard, K 1991 Development of a behavior system: dustbathing in the Burmese red junglefowl (Gallus gallus spadiceus): II. Internal factors. Journal of Comparative Psychology 105: 269–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, H E 1987 Untersuchungen zum Einfluss von Tages- und Kunstlicht auf das Verhalten von Hühnern. PhD Thesis Eidgenössischen Technischen Hochschule: ZürichGoogle Scholar
Hughes, B O, Duncan, I J H 1988 The notion of ethological ‘need’ models of motivation and animal welfare. Animal Behaviour 36: 1696–1707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ishida, K, Suzuki, T, Kusuhara, S, Yamaguchi, M 1973 Influence of preen gland removal on the lipid over the plumage of roosters. Poultry Science 52: 83–87CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jacob, J, Ziswiler, V 1982 The uropygial gland. In Farner, D S, King, J R, Parkes, K C (eds) Avian Biology Volume VI. Academic Press: New YorkGoogle Scholar
Kar, A B 1947 The hormonal influence in the normal functioning of the uropygial gland in the fowl. Anatomical Records 99: 75–89CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klaus, S, Bergmann, H H, Marti, C, Müller, F, Vitovic, O A, Wiesner, J 1990 Die Birkhühner (Tetrao tetrix und T. mlokosiewiczi). Ziemsen Verlag: Wittenberg LutherstadtGoogle Scholar
Klinger, G 1985 Untersuchungen zum Staub-oder Sandbade Verhalten von Hühnern. PhD Thesis Hohenheim University: HohenheimGoogle Scholar
Kruijt, J P 1964 Ontogeny of social behaviour in Burmese red jungle fowl (Gallus gallus spadiceus). Behaviour, Supplement 12: 1–201Google Scholar
Levine, R L, Hunter, J E, Borchelt, P L 1974 Dustbathing as a regulatory mechanism. Bulletin of Mathematical Biology 36: 545–553Google ScholarPubMed
Liere D W van 1991 Function and Organization of Dustbathing in Laying Hens. PhD Thesis Agricultural University: WageningenGoogle Scholar
Liere D W van 1992 Dustbathing as related to proximal and distal feather lipids in laying hens. Behavioural Processes 26: 177–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liere, D W van, Bokma, S 1987 Short-term feather maintenance as a function of dustbathing in laying hens. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 18: 197–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liere, D W van, Siard, N 1991 Towards an understanding of litter bathing quality in hens. In Appleby M C, Horrell R I, Petherick J C, Rutter S M (eds) Applied Animal Behaviour: past present and future. Proceedings of a Symposium of the Society for Veterinary Ethology. Universities Federation for Animal Welfare: Potters BarGoogle Scholar
Liere, D W van, Wiepkema, P R 1992 Effects of long term deprivation of sand on dustbathing behaviour in laying hens. Animal Behaviour 43: 549–558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liere, D W van, Kooijman, J, Wiepkema, P R 1990 Dustbathing behaviour of laying hens as related to quality of dustbathing material. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 26: 127–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liere, D W van, Aggrey, S E, Brouns, F M R, Wiepkema, P R 1991 Oiling behaviour and the effect of lipids on dustbathing behaviour in laying hens (Gallus gallus domesticus). Behavioural Processes 24: 71–81CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lucas, A M, Stettenheim, D R 1972 Avian Anatomy. Part II Agricultural Handbook 362. US Government Printing Office: WashingtonGoogle Scholar
Luiting, P 1991 The Value of Feed Consumption Data for Breeding in Laying Hens. PhD Thesis Agricultural University: WageningenGoogle Scholar
Martin, G 1975 Uber Verhaltensstörungen von Legehennen im Käfig. Angewandte Ornithologie 4: 145–176Google Scholar
Nørgaard-Nielsen, G, Vestergaard, K 1981 Dustbathing behaviour of uropygial gland extirpated domestic hens. Effects of dust deprivation. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica 22: 118–128CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Petherick, J C, Duncan, I J H 1989 Behaviour of young domestic fowl directed towards different substrates. British Poultry Science 30: 229–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roessler, H P 1961 Versuche zur geruchtligen Anlockung weiblicher Stechmücken (Aedes aegypti L Culicidae). Zeitschrift für vergleichende Physiologie 44: 184–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salafsky, B, Wang, Y, Fusco, A C, Antonacci, J 1984 The role of essential fatty acids and prostaglandins in cercarial penetration (Schistosoma mansoni). Journal of Parasitology 70: 656–660CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simmons, KEL 1964 Feather maintenance. In Thompson, A L (ed) A New Dictionary of Birds. McGraw-Hill: New YorkGoogle Scholar
Toates, F, Jensen, P 1990 Ethological and psychological models of motivation - towards a synthesis. In Wilson, S, Meyer, J A (eds) Simulation of Adaptive Behavior. MIT Press: Cambridge, MassGoogle Scholar
Vestergaard, K 1980 The regulation of dustbathing and other behaviour patterns in the laying hen: a Lorenzian approach. In Moss, R (ed) The Laying Hen and its Environment. Martinus Nijhoff: The HagueGoogle Scholar
Vestergaard, K 1981 Behavioural and physiological studies of hens on wire floors and in deep litter pens. In Fölsch, D W, Vestergaard, K (eds) Das Verhalten von Hühnern. Birkhäuser Verlag: BaselGoogle Scholar
Vestergaard, K 1982 Dust-bathing in the domestic fowl; diurnal rhythm and dust-deprivation. Applied Animal Ethology 8: 487–495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vestergaard, K 1989 Environmental influences on the development of behaviour and their relation to welfare. In Faure, J M, Mills, A D (eds) Proceedings of the 3rd European Symposium on Poultry Welfare. Instaprint S A: ToursGoogle Scholar
Vestergaard, K, Hogan, J A, Kruijt, J P 1990 The development of a behaviour system: dustbathing in the Burmese red junglefowl. I. The influence of the rearing environment on the organization of dustbathing. Behaviour 112: 99–116Google Scholar
Warnes, M L 1990 Responses of Glossina morsitans morsitans Westwood and G pallidipes Austen (Diptera: Glossinidae) to the skin secretions of oxen. Bulletin of Entomological Research 80: 91–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weaver, W D, Meijerhof, R 1991 The effect of different levels of relative humidity and air movement on litter conditions, ammonia levels, growth and carcass for broiler chickens. Poultry Science 70: 746–755CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wiepkema, P R, Koolhaas, J M 1992 The emotional brain. Animal Welfare 1: 13–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiepkema, P R, Broom, D M, Duncan, I J H, van Putten, G 1983 Abnormal Behaviours in Farm Animals. CEC report. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities: LuxembourgGoogle Scholar
Wood-Gush, DGM 1971 The Behaviour of the Domestic Fowl. Heinemann Educational Books: LondonGoogle Scholar
Zeman, P 1988 Surface skin lipids of birds-a proper host kariomone and feeding inducer in the poultry red mite (Dermanyssus gallinae). Experimental and Applied Acarology 5: 163–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zibulewski, J, Fried, B, Bacha, W J 1982 Skin surface lipids of the domestic chicken and neutral lipid standards as stimuli for the penetration response of Austrobilharzia variglandis cercariae. Journal of Parasitology 68: 905–908Google Scholar