Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T05:38:51.541Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sensory development in puppies (Canis lupus f. familiaris): implications for improving canine welfare

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2023

AC Jones
AC Jones*
Affiliation:
The University of Texas at Austin, Department of Psychology, I University Station A8000, Austin, TX 78712-0187, USA
*
Email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Despite an auspicious start from which lasting theories were generated (eg critical periods hypothesis, Scott & Marston 1950), and despite recent modern technology enabling biological investigations of sensory development (eg EEG, fMRI), in the last fifty years little attention has been devoted to the development of puppies’ (Canis lupus f. familiaris) sensory abilities. Attention to puppies’ sensory development is needed for both theoretical and applied purposes, because understanding puppies’ early experiences depends on understanding their perceptual world. This paper reviews the chronology of sensory development in puppies, looking at each sense individually. It then examines the relationships among phases of sensory and neural development and the critical periods proposed by Scott and Marston (1950). With improved knowledge and awareness of canine sensory development, researchers and other practitioners that work with puppies can better assess and improve puppies’ welfare. Therefore, this review should be of interest not only to researchers, but should also be of use to others that interact with dogs (eg shelter workers, dog breeders). By knowing what puppies are able to see, practitioners can visually enrich puppies’ environments. By knowing what puppies are able to taste and smell, practitioners can better predict the preference-related impact of introducing dietary variation to puppies. Knowing when puppies are first, and best, able to hear, see, and otherwise sense people and other animals, practitioners can design and customise programmes of socialisation and systematic exposure of young puppies.

Keywords

animal welfareCanis lupus f. familiariscritical periodspuppysensory developmentsocialisation
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 16 , Issue 3 , August 2007 , pp. 319 - 329
Copyright
© 2007 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

References

Ames, LB and llg, FL 1964 The developmental point of view with special reference to the principle of reciprocal neuromotor interweaving. Journal of Genetic Psychology 105: 195–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anohkin, PK 1964 Systemogenesis as a general regulator of brain development. In: Himwich, WA and Himwich, HE (eds) The developing brain, progress in brain research, volume 9 pp 54–86. Elsevier: Amsterdam, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
Bear, MF, Connors, BW and Paradiso, MA 2001 Neuroscience: Exploring the Brain, 2nd edition. Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins: Baltimore, MD, USAGoogle Scholar
Braezile, JE 1978 Neurological and behavioral development in the puppy. Veterinary Clinic of North America 8: 31–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charles, MS and Fuller, JL 1956 Developmental study of the electroencephalogram of the dog. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology Supplies 8: 645–652CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dugatkin, LA 2004 Principles of animal behaviour. Norton: New York, NY, USAGoogle Scholar
Fox, MW 1964 The ontogeny of behaviour and neurologic responses in the dog. Animal Behaviour 12: 301–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, MW 1966 Neuro-behavioural ontogeny. A synthesis of ethological and neurophysiological concepts. Brain Research 2: 3–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, MW 1969 Behavioural effects of rearing dogs with cats during the critical period of socialization. Behaviour 35: 273–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, MW 1970 Overview and critique of stages and periods in canine development. Developmental Psychobiology 4: 37–54Google Scholar
Fox, MW and Stelzner, D 1967 The effects of early experience on the development of inter and intraspecies social relationships in the dog. Animal Behaviour 15: 377–386CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Freedman, DG, King, JA and Elliot, O 1961 Critical periods in social development in dogs. Science 133: 1016–1017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuller, JL 1967 Experiential deprivation and later behaviour. Science 158: 1645–1652CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuller, JL and Clark, LD 1966 Effects of rearing with specific stimuli upon postisolation behaviour in dogs. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology 61: 258–263CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fuller, JL, Easler, CA and Banks, EM 1950 Formation of conditioned avoidance responses in young puppies. American Journal of Physiology 160: 462–466CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goddard, ME and Beilharz, RG 1984 A factor analysis of fearfulness in potential guide dogs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 12: 253–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gosling, SD 2001 From mice to men: What can we learn about personality from animal research? Psychological Bulletin 127: 45–86CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lorenz, K 1965 Evolution and Modification of Behaviour. University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL, USAGoogle Scholar
Menzel, R and Menzel, R 1937 Welpe und Umwelt. Kleintier und Pelztier 13: 1–65. [Title translation: Pup and environment]Google Scholar
Parry, HB 1953 Degeneration of dog retina: structure and development of retina of normal dog. British Journal of Ophthalmology 37: 385–404CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Poncelet, LC, Coppens, AG and Deltenre, PF 2002 Audiograms estimated from brainstem tone-evoked potentials in dogs from 10 days to 1.5 months of age. Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine 16: 674–679CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scott, JP 1958 Critical periods in the development of social behaviour in puppies. Psychosomatic Medicine 20: 42–54CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scott, JP 1962 Critical periods in behavioural development. Science 138: 949–958CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, JP 1963 The process of primary socialization in canine and human infants. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 28: 1–47CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scott, JP and Marston, M 1950 Critical periods affecting the development of normal and mal-adjustive social behaviour in puppies. Pedagogical Seminary and the Journal of Genetic Psychology 77: 25–60CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scott, JP, Fredericson, E and Fuller, JL 1951 Experimental exploration of the critical period hypothesis. Personality 1: 162–183Google Scholar
Scott, JP and Fuller, JL 1965 Genetics and the social behaviour of the dog. University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL, USAGoogle Scholar
Scott, JP, Stewart, JM and de Ghett, VJ 1974 Critical periods in the organization of systems. Developmental Psychobiology 7: 489–513CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Slabbert, JM and Rasa, OAE 1993 The effect of early separation from the mother on pups in bonding to humans and pup health. Journal of the South African Veterinary Association 64: 4–8Google ScholarPubMed
Stanley, WC, Cornwell, AC, Poggiani, C, and Trattner, A 1963 Conditioning in the neonatal puppy. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology 56: 211–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strain, GM, Jackson, RM and Tedford, BL 1991a Postnatal development of the visual-evoked potential in dogs. American Journal of Veterinary Research 52: 231–235Google ScholarPubMed
Strain, GM, Tedford, BL and Jackson, RM 1991b Postnatal development of the brain stem auditory-evoked potential in dogs. American Journal of Veterinary Research 52: 410–415Google ScholarPubMed