Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T04:35:20.245Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Response to Tolo, Christensen, Martoft and Forslid's letter ‘CO2-stunning in pigs’

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

A Velarde*
Affiliation:
IRTA, Finca Camps i Armet, E-17121 Monells (Girona), Spain
X Manteca
Affiliation:
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain
E Weber
Affiliation:
Morpheus Medical Ed, Spain
*
* Contact for correspondence: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Letters
Copyright
© 2010 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

References

Dalmau, A, Llonch, P, Rodriguez, P, Ruiz-de-la-Torre, JL, Manteca, X and Velarde, A 2010 Stunning pigs with different gas mixtures: gas stability. Animal Welfare 19: 315323Google Scholar
EFSA 2004 Welfare aspects of animal stunning and killing method. Scientific report of the Scientific Panel of Animal Health and Welfare on a request from the Commission. Question. Adopted on the 15th of June 2004. Brussels. http://www.efsa.eu.int/science/ahaw/ahaw_opinions/495/opinion_ahaw_02_ej45_stunning_report_v2_en1.pdfCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holst, S 2001 CO2 stunning of pigs for slaughter, practical guidelines for good animal welfare. 47th International Congress of Meat Science and Technology. 27-31 August 2001, Krakow, PolandGoogle Scholar
Martoft, L, Jensen, EW, Rodriguez, BE, Jorgensen, PF, Forslid, A and Pedersen, HD 2001 Middle-latency auditory evoked potentials during induction of thiopentone anaesthesia in pigs. Laboratory Animals 35(4): 353363CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martoft, L, Lomholt, L, Kolthoff, C, Rodríguez, BE, Jensen, EW, Jorgensen, PF, Pedersen, HD and Forslid, A 2002 Effects of CO2 anaesthesia on central nervous system activity in swine. Laboratory Animals 36(2): 115126CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raj, ABM and Gregory, NG 1995 Welfare implications of the gas stunning of pigs 1. Determination of aversion to the initial inhalation of carbon dioxide or argon. Animal Welfare 4: 273280Google Scholar
Raj, ABM and Gregory, NG 1996 Welfare implications of the gas stunning of pigs 2. Stress of induction of anaesthesia. Animal Welfare 5: 7178Google Scholar