Hostname: page-component-6d856f89d9-72csx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T06:15:53.387Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reply to Dematteo Et Al

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2023

K De Vleeschouwer ,
K Leus  and
L Van Elsacker
K De Vleeschouwer*
Affiliation:
Centre for Research and Conservation, Royal Zoological Society of Antwerp, K Astridplein 26, B-2018 Antwerp, Belgium
K Leus
Affiliation:
Centre for Research and Conservation, Royal Zoological Society of Antwerp, K Astridplein 26, B-2018 Antwerp, Belgium
L Van Elsacker*
Affiliation:
Centre for Research and Conservation, Royal Zoological Society of Antwerp, K Astridplein 26, B-2018 Antwerp, Belgium
*
* Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints email: [email protected]
† email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Short Communication
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 11 , Issue 3 , August 2002 , pp. 349 - 350
Copyright
© 2002 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

DeMatteo, K 1997 AZA Contraception Advisory Group Contraception Report. Part I: Primates. 1st Edition. Saint Louis Zoological Park: Saint Louis, MO, USAGoogle Scholar
De Vleeschouwer, K, Leus, K and Van Elsacker, L 2000 An evaluation of the suitability of contraceptive methods in golden-headed lion tamarins (Leontopithecus chrysomelas), with emphasis on melengestrol acetate (MGA) implants. I. Effectiveness, reversibility and medical side-effects. Animal Welfare 9: 251–271Google Scholar