Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T02:42:15.409Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Pets and pests: vervet monkey intake at a specialist South African rehabilitation centre

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

A Healy  and
V Nijman
A Healy*
Affiliation:
Department of Social Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, Gipsy Lane, Oxford OX3 0BP, UK
V Nijman
Affiliation:
Department of Social Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, Gipsy Lane, Oxford OX3 0BP, UK
*
* Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Vervet monkeys (Chlorocebus pygerythrus) encounter a plethora of anthropogenic risks as a result of their ability to exploit humanaltered environments. A systematic assessment of these risks has not been carried out to date. Here, we aim to begin addressing this gap in our understanding of human-vervet conflict in South Africa. We present a descriptive analysis of the intake of the Vervet Monkey Foundation (VMF) — a specialist vervet monkey rehabilitation centre and sanctuary in the Limpopo Province. Between October 2003 and March 2012 almost 200 vervet monkeys arrived at the VMF. At least 161 infants arrived with a steady decrease in annual intake over time, most probably due to the increasing number of other centres in the province. Detailed data for all age classes were available from March 2009 to March 2012. Of the 50 monkeys that arrived during this period, more young monkeys (infants and juveniles) than adults arrived and more infants than juveniles. Intake of injured and uninjured monkeys was equal. The majority of injuries were caused by cars and the majority of uninjured arrivals were ex-pets handed over voluntarily. A distinct temporal pattern of arrival, peaking in the austral summer, coincides with the birthing season of vervet monkeys in South Africa. The merits of publishing such records and the welfare implications of the perceptions of and objections to these ‘pest’ primates are discussed.

Keywords

animal welfareChlorocebus/Cercopithecushuman-wildlife conflictpest primatesprimate rehabilitationvervet monkey
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 23 , Issue 3 , August 2014 , pp. 353 - 360
Copyright
© 2014 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

References

Admassu, M 2007 Damage caused by large mammals in Wonji-Shoa sugarcane plantation, Central Ethiopia. Masters Degree Thesis, Addis Ababa University, EthiopiaGoogle Scholar
Barnett, J and Westcott, S 2001 Distribution, demographics and survivorship of grey seal pups (Halichoerus grypus) rehabilitat-ed in southwest England. Mammalia 65(3): 349–361. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/mamm.2001.65.3.349Google Scholar
Bennett, J 1992 A glut of gibbons in Sarawak – is rehabilitation the answer? Oryx 26(31): 157–164. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0030605300023590CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolter, DR and Zihlman, AL 2003 Morphometric analysis of growth and development in wild-collected vervet monkeys (Cercopithecus aethiops), with implications of growth patterns in Old World monkeys, apes and humans. Journal of Zoology 260: 99–110. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0952836903003522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheney, DL, Seyfarth, RM, Andelman, SJ and Lee, PC 1988 Reproductive success in vervet monkeys. In: Clutton-Brock, TH (ed) Reproductive Success: Studies of Individual Variation in Constrasting Breeding Systems pp 384–402. University of Chicago: Chicago, USAGoogle Scholar
Cheyne, SM, Campbell, CO and Payne, KL 2012 Proposed guidelines for in situ gibbon rescue, rehabilitation and reintroduction. International Zoo Yearbook 46: 1–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-1090.2011.00149.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deem, SL, Terrell, SP and Forrester, DJ 1998 A retrospective study of morbidity and mortality of raptors in Florida: 1988-1994. Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine 29(2): 160–164Google ScholarPubMed
Drake, A and Fraser, D 2008 Admission trends and mortality correlates for mallard ducklings at wildlife rehabilitation facilities. Journal of Wildlife Rehabilitation 29(1): 4–14Google Scholar
Dubois, S and Fraser, D 2013 Rating harms to wildlife: a survey showing convergence between conservation and animal welfare views. Animal Welfare 22(1): 49–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.7120/09627286.22.1.049CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Du Toit, J 1999 A helping hand. Africa Birds and Birding 4(3): 60–63Google Scholar
Du Toit, J 2012 Public perception of vervet monkeys, the reality. VMF Newsletter July - August 2012. www.vervet.za.org/news/july_Aug_12.htmGoogle Scholar
Else, JG and Lee, PC 1986 Primate-human conflict. In: Else, JG and Lee, PC (eds) Primate Ecology and Conservation pp 213–214. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
Estes, RD 1992 The Behavior Guide to African Mammals: Including Hoofed Mammals, Carnivores, Primates. University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles, California, USAGoogle Scholar
Farmer, KH 2002 Pan-African sanctuary alliance: status and range of activities for great ape conservation. American Journal of Primatology 58(3): 117–132. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ajp.10054CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Farmer, KH and Courage, A 2008 Sanctuaries and reintroduction: a role in gorilla conservation? In: Stoinski, TS, Steklis, HD and Mehlman, PT (eds) Conservation in the 21st Century: Gorillas as a Case Study pp 79–106. Springer: New York, USA. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-70721-1_3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faust, LJ, Cress, D, Farmer, KH, Ross, SR and Beck, BB 2011 Predicting capacity demand on sanctuaries for African chim-panzees (Pan troglodytes). International Journal of Primatology 32(4): 849–864. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10764-011-9505-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuentes, A 2006 Human-nonhuman primate interconnections and their relevance to anthropology. Ecological and Environmental Anthropology 2(2): 1–11Google Scholar
Ghobrial, L, Lankester, F, Kiyang, JA, Akih, AE, de Vries, S, Fosto, R, Gadcby, EL, Jenkins, PD Jr and Gonder, MK 2010 Tracing the origins of rescued chimpanzees reveals widespread chimpanzee hunting in Cameroon. BMC Ecology 10(2). http:10.1186/1472-6785-10-2CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gillingham, S and Lee, PC 1999 The impact of wildlife-related benefits on the conservation attitudes of local people around the Selous Game Reserve, Tanzania. Environmental Conservation 26(3): 218–228. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0376892999000302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffith, JE, Dhand, NK, Krockenberger, MB and Higgins, DP 2013 A retrospective study of admission trends of koalas to a rehabilitation facility over 30 years. Journal of Wildlife Diseases 49(1): 18–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.7589/2012-05-135Google ScholarPubMed
Grobler, P, Jacquier, M, deNyse, H, Blair, M, Whitten, PL and Turner, TR 2006 Primate sanctuaries, taxonomy and sur-vival: a case study from South Africa. Ecological and Environmental Anthropology 2(2): 12–16Google Scholar
Gruesen, P 2007 A case study of the rehabilitation of a troop of captive yellow baboons (Papio cynocephalus) after release into a protected area in Zambia. MSc Dissertation, State University of New York, USAGoogle Scholar
Guy, AJ, Curnoe, D and Banks, PB 2013 A survey of current mam-mal rehabilitation and release practices. Biodiversity and Conservation 22(4): 825–837. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10531-013-0452-1Google Scholar
Guy, AJ, Stone, OML and Curnoe, D 2011 Assessment of the release of rehabilitated vervet monkeys into the Ntendeka Wilderness Area, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa: a case study. Primates 53(2): 171–179. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10329-011-0292-0Google Scholar
Guy, AJ, Stone, OML and Curnoe, D 2012 Animal welfare con-siderations in primate rehabilitation: an assessment of three vervet monkey (Chlorocebus aethiops) releases in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Animal Welfare 21: 511–515. http://dx.doi.org/10.7120/09627286.21.4.511Google Scholar
Harden, J, Dickerman, RW and Elliston, EP 2006 Collection, value, and use of wildlife rehabilitation data. Journal of Wildlife Rehabilitation 28(1): 10–28Google Scholar
Harrison, MJS 1985 Time budget of the green monkey, Cercopithecus sabaeus: some optimal strategies. International Journal of Primatology 6(4): 351–376. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02736383Google Scholar
Hartter, J 2009 Attitudes of rural communities toward wetlands and forest fragments around Kibale National Park, Uganda. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 14: 433–447. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10871200902911834CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henzi, SP 1979 The vervet crisis. African Wildlife 33: 8–10Google Scholar
Hill, CM 2002 Primate conservation and local communities: ethi-cal issues and debates. American Anthropologist 104(4): 1184–1194. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/aa.2002.104.4.1184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, CM and Webber, AD 2010 Perceptions of non-human pri-mates in human-wildlife conflict scenarios. American journal of Primatology 72(10): 919–924. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ajp.20845CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horwich, RH, Koontz, F, Saqui, E, Saqui, H and Glander, K 1993 A reintroduction program for the conservation of the black howler monkey in Belize. Endangered Species Update 10(6): 1–6Google Scholar
Hughes, N, Rosen, N, Gretsky, N and Sommer, V 2011 Will the Nigeria-Cameroon Chimpanzee go extinct? Models derived from intake rates of ape sanctuaries. In: Sommer, V and Ross, C (eds) Primates of Gashaka: Socioecology and Conservation in Nigeria's Biodiversity Hotspot pp 493–523. Springer: UK. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7403-7_14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humle, T, Colin, C, Laurans, M and Raballand, E 2010 Group release of sanctuary chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) in the Haut Niger National Park, Guinea, West Africa: ranging patterns and lessons so far. International Journal of Primatology 32: 456–473. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10764-010-9482-7Google Scholar
Kavanagh, M 1980 Invasion of the forest by an African Savannah monkey: behavioural adaptations. Behaviour 73: 238–260. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/156853980X00258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kavanagh, M 1981 Variable territoriality among tantalus mon-keys in Cameroon. Folia Primatologica 36: 76–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000156009CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kelly, TR and Sleeman, JM 2003 Morbidity and mortality of red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) and gray foxes (Urocyon cinereoargenteus) admitted to the Wildlife Center of Virginia, 1993-2001. Journal of Wildlife Diseases 39(2): 467–469. http://dx.doi.org/10.7589/0090-3558-39.2.467Google Scholar
King, FA and Lee, PC 1986 A brief survey of human attitudes to a pest species of primate – Cercopithecus aethiops. Primate Conservation 8: 82–84Google Scholar
King, T, Chamberlan, C and Courage, A 2014 Assessing rein-troduction success in long-lived primates through population via-bility analysis: western lowland gorillas (Gorrila gorilla gorilla) in Central Africa. Oryx, in press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0030605312001391Google Scholar
Kingdon, J, Gippoliti, S, Butynski, TM and De Jong, Y 2008 Chlorocebus pygerythrus. In: IUCN 2012. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species Version 2012.2. www.iucnredlist.orgGoogle Scholar
Kivai, SM 2010 Are the endemic and endangered Tana River pri-mates culprits of crop raiding? Evaluating human – nonhuman primate conflict status around Tana River Primate Reserve, in Kenya. Unpublished report to Rutherford Foundation, Nairobi, KenyaGoogle Scholar
Lee, PC 1984 Ecological constraints on the social-development of vervet monkeys. Behaviour 91: 245–262. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/156853984X00092CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, PC and Priston, NEC 2005 Perceptions of pests: human attitudes to primates, conflict and consequences for conservation. In: Paterson, JD and Wallis, J (eds) Commensalism and Conflict: the Human-Primate Interface pp 1–23 American Society of Primatologists, Norman, OK, USAGoogle Scholar
Masunzu, C 1998 Assessment of crop damage and application of non lethal deterrents for crop protection east of the Selous game reserve, Tanzania. In: Siege, L and Baldus, RD (eds) Wildlife Discussion Paper NR. 24. Selous, Saadani and Katavi Rukwa Conservation Programmes. Community Wildlife Management Wildlife Division: Dar es Salaam, TanzaniaGoogle Scholar
Mazaris, AD, Mamakis, Y, Kalpakis, S, Poulopoulos, Y and Matsinos, YG 2008 Evaluating potential threats to birds in Greece: an analysis of a 10-year data set from a rehabilitation cen-tre. Oryx 42(3): 408–414. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S003060530700066XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDougall, P, Forshawa, N, Barrett, L and Henzi, SP 2010 Leaving home: responses to water depletion by vervets. Journal of Arid Environments 74: 924–927. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jari-denv.2010.04.003Google Scholar
McLennan, MR and Hill, CM 2012 Troublesome neighbours: changing attitudes towards chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) in a human-dominated landscape in Uganda. Journal for Nature conser-vation 20(4): 219–227. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2012.03.002Google Scholar
Molina-Lopez, RA, Casal, J and Darwich, L 2011 Causes of morbidity in wild raptor populations admitted at a wildlife reha-bilitation centre in Spain from 1995-2007: a long term retrospective study. PLOS ONE 6(9): e24603. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0024603Google Scholar
Nampindo, S and Plumptre, AJ 2004 A socio-economic assess-ment of community livelihoods in areas adjacent to corridors linking Queen Elizabeth National Park to other protected areas in western Uganda. Unpublished Wildlife Conservation Society report to Conservation International, New York, USAGoogle Scholar
Ongman, L, Colin, C, Raballand, E and Humle, T 2013 The “super chimpanzee”: The ecological dimensions of rehabilitation of orphan chimpanzees in Guinea, West Africa. Animals 3: 109–126. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani3010109Google ScholarPubMed
Parry, D and Campbell, B 1992 Attitudes of rural communities to animal wildlife and its utilization in Chobe enclave and Madabe depression, Botswana. Environmental Conservation 19(3): 245–252. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0376892900031040CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pirta, RS, Madhav, G and Kharshikar, AV 1997 Management of the Rhesus Monkey Macaca mulatta and Hanuman Langur Presbytis entellus in Himachal Pradesh, India. Biological Conservation 79: 97–106. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0006-3207(95)00131-XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quirin, C 2005 Crop raiding by wild vertebrates in the Illubabor Zone, Ethiopia. Diploma Thesis, Dunedin, University of Otago, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
Randall, NJ, Blitvich, BJ and Blanchong, JA 2012 Efficacy of wildlife rehabilitation centers in surveillance and monitoring of pathogenic activity: a case study of the West Nile virus. Journal of Wildlife Diseases 48(3): 646–653. http://dx.doi.org/10.7589/0090-3558-48.3.646CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reeve, NJ and Huijser, MP 1999 Mortality factors affecting wild hedgehogs: a study of records from wildlife rescue centers. Lutra 42: 6–24Google Scholar
Rhind, SG and Lawes, MJ 1998 A descriptive assessment of the rehabilitation and reintroduction to the wild of captive vervet monkeys (Chlorocebus aethiops). Forest Biodiversity Programme Report No 3. Pietermaritzburg, Department of Botany and Zoology, University of NatalGoogle Scholar
Saj, TL, Sicotte, P and Paterson, JD 2001 The conflict between vervet monkeys and farmers at the forest edge in Entebbe, Uganda. African Journal of Ecology 39: 195–199. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.0141-6707.2000.00299.xGoogle Scholar
Schoene, CUR and Brend, SA 2002 Primate sanctuaries: a del-icate conservation approach. South African Journal of Wildlife Research 32(2): 109–113Google Scholar
Serangeli, MT, Cistrone, L, Ancillotto, L, Tomassini, A and Russo, D 2012 The post-release fate of hand-reared orphaned bats: survival and habitat selection. Animal Welfare 21(1): 9–18Google Scholar
Sharwood Smith, A 2006 Optimalising the role of animal res-cue centres by researching the source of the problem. In: Zgrabcyńska, E, Ćwiertnia, P and Ziomek, J (eds) Animals, Zoos, and Conservation pp 111–117. Poznan Zoological Garden: PolandGoogle Scholar
Souza, CSA, Teixeira, CP and Young, RJ 2012 The welfare of an unwanted guest in an urban environment: the case of the white-eared opossum (Didelphis albiventris). Animal Welfare 21(2): 177–183. http://dx.doi.org/10.7120/09627286.21.2.177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Streicher, U 2004 Pygmy lorises re-introduction study in Vietnam: preliminary results, January 2003. Reintro Redeux 1: 5–10Google Scholar
Strum, SC 1994 Prospects for management of primate pests. Revue Ecologie (Terre Vie) 49: 295–306Google Scholar
Suarez, CE, Gamboa, EM, Claver, P and Nasser-Montoya, F 2001 Survival and adaptation of a released group of confiscated capuchin monkeys. Animal Welfare 10(2): 191–203Google Scholar
Trayford, HR and Farmer, KH 2013 Putting the spotlight on internally displaced animals (IDAs): a survey of primate sanctuaries in Africa, Asia, and the Americas. American Journal of Primatology 75(2): 116–134. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ajp.22090CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wallace, GE and Hill, CM 2012 Crop damage by primates: quantifying the key parameters of crop-raiding events. PLOS ONE 7(10): e46636. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0046636CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ware, D 2001 Gibbon rehabilitation and reintroduction: the problems along the road before use as a viable conservation tool. The Apes: Challenges for the 21st Century. Conference Proceedings Chicago Zoological Society pp 259–261. May 2000, Brookfield Zoo, Chicago, IL, USAGoogle Scholar
Whittaker, D 2013 Chlorocebus: species accounts. In: Mittermeier, RA, Rylands, AB and Wilson, DE (eds) Handbook of the Mammals of the World, Volume 3. Primates pp 672–675. Lynx Edicions: Barcelona, SpainGoogle Scholar
Wimberger, K and Downs, CT 2010 Annual intake trends of a large urban animal rehabilitation centre in South Africa: a case study. Animal Welfare 19: 501–513Google Scholar
Wimberger, K, Downs, CT and Boyes, RS 2010 A survey of wildlife rehabilitation in South Africa: is there a need for improved management? Animal Welfare 19: 481–499Google Scholar
Wrangham, RW 1981 Drinking competition in vervets. Animal Behaviour 29: 904–910. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(81)80027-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar