Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T13:38:14.891Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Nociceptors in the Legs of Poultry: Implications for Potential Pain in Pre-Slaughter Shackling

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2023

M J Gentle*
Affiliation:
Roslin Institute (Edinburgh), Roslin, Midlothian, EH25 9PS, UK
V L Tilston
Affiliation:
Roslin Institute (Edinburgh), Roslin, Midlothian, EH25 9PS, UK
*
Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Shackling of commercial poultry involves the insertion of each leg into parallel metal slots and holding the bird inverted for a period of time before stunning and slaughter. Nociceptors signalling noxious stimulation of the skin have been identified in the beak and feathered skin but not in the scaly skin of the leg. The physiological properties of the C-fibre mechanothermal (CMT) nociceptors in the skin over the tarsometatarsus in the lower leg were studied in response to quantitative mechanical stimulation. The electrical activity was recorded from single C-fibres dissected from the parafibular nerve in anaesthetized animals. The receptive fields of these receptors were small and spot-like, measuring in the region of 1-3 mm in diameter. The threshold to mechanical stimuli ranged from 0.8-15 g using von Frey filaments, and from 3-33 g using a 0.5mm probe mounted on a feedback-controlled stimulator. Stimulus response curves using a ramp-and-hold stimulus were recorded for a number of fibres. After comparing these threshold measurements and the stimulus response data with previous measurements of the force applied to the legs during shackling, it was concluded that shackling is likely to be a very painful procedure.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2000 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

References

Breward, J 1985 An Electrophysiological Investigation of the Effects of Beak Trimming in the Domestic Fowl (Gallus gallus domesticus). Unpublished PhD Thesis, University of Edinburgh: Edinburgh, UKGoogle Scholar
Breward, J and Gentle, M J 1985 Neuroma formation and abnormal afferent nerve discharges after partial beak amputation (beak trimming) in poultry. Experientia 41: 11321134CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
GB Parliament 1967 The Slaughter of Poultry Act 1967. Her Majesty's Stationery Office: London, UKGoogle Scholar
GB Parliament 1984a The Slaughter of Poultry (Humane Conditions) Regulations 1984. Statutory Instrument 1984 No 2056. Her Majesty's Stationery Office: London, UKGoogle Scholar
GB Parliament 1984b Animal Health and Welfare Act 1984. Her Majesty's Stationery Office: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Gentle, M J 1989 Cutaneous sensory afferents recorded from the nervus intramandibularis of Gallus gallus var domesticus. Journal of Comparative Physiology A 164: 763774Google Scholar
Gentle, M J 1992 Ankle joint (Artc. intertarsalis) receptors in the domestic fowl. Neuroscience 49: 9911000CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gentle, M J 1997 Sodium urate arthritis: effects on the sensory properties of articular afferents in the chicken. Pain 70: 245251CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gentle, M J and Corr, S A 1995 Endogenous analgesia in the chicken. Neuroscience Letters 201: 211215CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gentle, M J, Hunter, L N and Waddington, D 1991 The onset of pain related behaviours following partial beak amputation in the chicken. Neuroscience Letters 128: 113116CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gentle, M J and Thorp, B H 1994 Sensory properties of ankle joint capsule mechanoreceptors in acute monoarthritic chickens. Pain 57: 361374CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gentle, M J, Waddington, D, Hunter, L N and Jones, R B 1990 Behavioural evidence for persistent pain following partial beak amputation in chickens. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 27: 149157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregory, N G, Austin, S D and Wilkins, L J 1989 Relationship between wing flapping at shackling and red wingtips in chicken carcases. Veterinary Record 124: 62CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gregory, N G and Bell, J C 1987 Duration of wing flapping in chickens shackled before slaughter. Veterinary Record 121: 567569Google ScholarPubMed
Gregory, N G and Wilkins, L J 1990 Broken bones in chickens: effects of stunning and processing in broilers. British Poultry Science 31: 5358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Handwerker, H O and Kobal, G 1993 Psychophysiology of experimentally induced pain. Physiological Reviews 73: 639671CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jones, R B, Satterlee, D G and Cadd, G G 1998 Struggling responses of broiler chickens shackled in groups on a moving line: effects of light intensity, hoods, and ‘curtains’. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 58: 341352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kestin, S C, Knowles, T G, Tinch, A E and Gregory, N G 1992 Prevalence of leg weakness in broiler chickens and its relationship with genotype. Veterinary Record 131: 190194CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MAFF 1991 Code of Practice on the Welfare of Poultry at Slaughter. Her Majesty's Stationery Office: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Necker, R and Reiner, B 1980 Temperature-sensitive mechanoreceptors, thermoreceptors, and heat nociceptors in the feathered skin of pigeons. Journal of Comparative Physiology A 135: 201207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, C J, Torebjörk, H E and LaMotte, R H 1983 Psychophysical detection and pain ratings of incremental thermal stimuli: a comparison with nociceptor responses in humans. Brain Research 274: 87106CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sparrey, J 1994 Aspects in the Design and Operation of Shackle Lines for the Slaughter of Poultry. Unpublished MPhil thesis, University of Newcastle upon Tyne: Newcastle upon Tyne, UKGoogle Scholar
Sparrey, J M and Kettlewell, P J 1994 Shackling of poultry: is it a welfare problem World's Poultry Science Journal 50: 167176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torebjörk, H E, LaMotte, R H and Robinson, C J 1984 Peripheral neural correlates of the magnitude of cutaneous pain and hyperalgesia: simultaneous recordings in humans of sensory judgments of pain and evoked responses in nociceptors with C-fibers. Journal of Neurophysiology 51: 325339CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Torebjörk, H E, Schmelz, M and Handwerker, H O 1996 Functional properties of human cutaneous nociceptors and their role in pain and hyperalgesia. In: Belmonte, C and Cervero, F (eds) Neurobiology of Nociceptors pp 349369. Oxford University Press: Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
Van Hees, J and Gybels, J 1981 C nociceptor activity in human nerve during painful and non-painful skin stimulation. Jouranl of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 44: 600607CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed