Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T13:37:06.773Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Measuring the success of a farm animal welfare education event

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

J Jamieson ,
MJ Reiss ,
D Allen ,
L Asher ,
CM Wathes  and
SM Abeyesinghe
J Jamieson*
Affiliation:
Centre for Animal Welfare, The Royal Veterinary College, Hawkshead Lane, North Mymms, Hatfield, Hertfordshire AL9 7TA, UK
MJ Reiss
Affiliation:
Institute of Education, University of London, 20 Bedford Way, London WC1H 0AL, UK
D Allen
Affiliation:
Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, Wilberforce Way, Southwater, Horsham, West Sussex RH13 9RS, UK
L Asher
Affiliation:
School of Veterinary Medicine and Science, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Loughborough, Leicestershire LE12 5RD, UK
CM Wathes
Affiliation:
Centre for Animal Welfare, The Royal Veterinary College, Hawkshead Lane, North Mymms, Hatfield, Hertfordshire AL9 7TA, UK
SM Abeyesinghe
Affiliation:
Centre for Animal Welfare, The Royal Veterinary College, Hawkshead Lane, North Mymms, Hatfield, Hertfordshire AL9 7TA, UK
*
* Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Education of children about farm animal welfare could affect welfare standards, through influence on current and future purchasing of animal products, and improve general consideration for animals. Establishing success requires evaluation. Here, a farm animal educational event for 13 to 14 year-old schoolchildren, focusing on chicken biology, welfare and food labelling, was assessed. Alterations in knowledge, attitude and a proxy measure of behaviour towards animals and their welfare, key aspects expected to impact on animal welfare, were investigated using questionnaires. These key aspects were predicted to increase following event attendance and remain higher than in the non-attending control group three months later. Knowledge and positive behaviour towards specific poultry species increased significantly in attendees but, although remaining greater than pre-attendance, tended to diminish over time. Value afforded to animal life was unaffected by the event. Consideration of welfare needs was significantly greater overall in attendees than non-attendees, but appeared to be characteristic of children choosing to attend the event, rather than the event per se. Importance attributed to animal welfare followed a hierarchy from survival-relevant, eg freedom from hunger and thirst, to less critical needs, eg stimulation. The specific species under consideration had the most significant effect on attitudes; consistent with predictions based on perceptions of the animals’ ‘complexity’, cognitive ability, similarity to humans and use. Further investigation into the aetiology of attitude and potential barriers to attitude change is required to effect attitude change and determine whether attitude alteration could support maintenance of shifts in knowledge and behaviour.

Keywords

animal welfareattitudeschickenschildreneducationevaluation
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 21 , Issue 1 , February 2012 , pp. 65 - 75
Copyright
© 2012 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

References

Ahava, A and Palojoki, P 2004 Adolescent consumers: reaching them, border crossings and pedagogical challenges. International Journal of Consumer Studies 28: 371–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arbour, R, Signal, T and Taylor, N 2009 Teaching kindness: the promise of humane education. Society and Animals 17: 136–148Google Scholar
Ascione, FR 1992 Enhancing children's attitudes about the humane treatment of animals: generalization to human-directed empathy. Anthrozoos 5: 176–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Azjen, I and Fishbein, M 1980 Understanding attitudes and predicting social behaviour. Pearson Education: Edinburgh, UKGoogle Scholar
Baker, S, Apple, K and Ryback, J 2005 Student attitudes toward animals in an animal behavior class. 14th Annual International Society for Anthrozoology. 11-12 July 2005, Niagara Falls, USAGoogle Scholar
Beck, AM, Melson, GF, da Costa, PL and Liu, T 2001 The educational benefits of a ten-week home-based wild bird feeding program for children. Anthrozoos 14: 19–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bem, DJ 1970 Beliefs, attitudes and human affairs. Brooks/Cole: Belmont, CA, USAGoogle Scholar
Benn, J 2004 Consumer education between ‘consumership’ and citizenship: experiences from studies of young people. International Journal of Consumer Studies 28: 108–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, RM 1996 People's willingness to pay for farm animal welfare. Animal Welfare 5: 3–11Google Scholar
Bock, BB and Huik, MM 2007 Animal welfare: the attitudes and behaviour of European pig farmers. British Food Journal 109: 931–944CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burghardt, G and Herzog, HJ 1980 Beyond conspecifics: is Brer rabbit our brother? Bioscience 30: 763–768CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, RKK 1983 The effects of two instructional treatments on eighth-grade students’ attitudes toward animal life. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Purdue University, IN, USAGoogle Scholar
Carrington, B and Tronya, B 1988 Children and Controversial Issues. The Falmer Press: Lewes, UKGoogle Scholar
Coleman, GJ, Hall, MJ and Hay, M 2008 An evaluation of a pet ownership education program for school children. Anthrozoos 21: 271–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, GJ, Hemsworth, PH, Hay, M and Cox, M 2000 Modifying stockperson attitudes and behaviour towards pigs at a large commercial farm. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 66: 11–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, SL and Cheeke, PR 1998 Do domestic animals have minds and the ability to think? A provisional sample of opinions on the question. Journal of Animal Science 76: 2072–2079CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dawkins, MS 2000 Animal minds and animal emotions. American Zoologist 40: 883–888Google Scholar
DeRosa, B 1987 Children's attitudes toward farm animals. Children & Animals. http://hs-youth.org/research_evaluation/PDF/Childrens%20Attitudes%20Toward%20Farm%20Animals.pdf. (Accessed 28 October 2010)Google Scholar
Dettmann-Easler, D and Pease, JL 1999 Evaluating the effectiveness of residential environmental education programmes in fostering positive attitudes toward wildlife. Journal of Environmental Education 31: 33–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Driscoll, JW 1995 Attitudes towards animals: species ratings. Society and Animals 3: 139–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, C and Irvine, L 2010 Reproducing dominion: emotional apprenticeship in the 4-h youth livestock programme. Society and Animals 18: 21–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
European Commission 2005 Attitudes of consumers towards the welfare of farmed animals. Special EU barometer. http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_229_en.pdfGoogle Scholar
Evans, A and Miele, M 2007 Consumers’ views about farm animal welfare. Part 1: National reports based on focus group research. Welfare Quality Research Project: Cardiff, UKGoogle Scholar
FAWC 1979 Farm Animal Welfare Council press statement. http://www.fawc.org.uk/pdf/fivefreedoms1979.pdf. (Accessed 28 October 2010)Google Scholar
FAWC 2006 Report on Welfare Labelling. Farm Animal Welfare Council: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Festinger, L 1957 A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford University Press: Stanford, CA, USACrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitzgerald, TA 1981 Evaluating humane education: the Jefferson County study. Humane Education 5: 21–22Google Scholar
Frewer, LJ, Kole, A, Van De Kroon, SMA and De Lauwere, C 2005 Consumer attitudes towards development of animal friendly husbandry systems. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 18: 345–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glass, CA, Hutchinson, WG and Beattie, VE 2005 Measuring the value to the public of pig welfare improvements: a contingent valuation approach. Animal Welfare 14: 61–69Google Scholar
Gunnthorsdottir, A 2001 Physical attractiveness of an animal as a decision factor for its preservation. Anthrozoös 14: 204–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heleski, CR, Mertig, AG and Zanella, AJ 2004 Assessing attitudes toward farm animal welfare: a national survey of animal science faculty members. Journal of Animal Science 82: 2806–2814CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heleski, CR and Zanella, AJ 2006 Animal science student attitudes to farm animal welfare. Anthrozoös 19: 3–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hemsworth, PH 2003 Human-animal interactions in livestock production. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 81: 185–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hemsworth, PH, Coleman, GJ and Barnett, JL 1994 Improving the attitude and behaviour of stockpersons towards pigs and the consequences on the behaviour and reproductive performance of commercial pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 39: 349–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hemsworth, PH, Coleman, GJ, Barnett, JL, Borg, S and Dowling, S 2002 The effects of cognitive behavioral intervention on the attitude and behavior of stockpersons and the behavior and productivity of commercial dairy cows. Journal of Animal Science 80: 68–78CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hergovich, A, Monshi, B, Semler, G and Zielglmayer, V 2002 The effects of the presence of a dog in the classroom. Anthrozoös 15: 37–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holloway, IA, Waran, N and Austin, EJ 1999 Assessing public attitudes towards pig welfare in the UK. The Pig Journal 44: 38–51Google Scholar
John, DR 1999 Consumer socialization of children: a retrospective look at twenty five years of research. The Journal of Consumer Research 26: 183–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kauppinen, T, Vainio, A, Valros, A, Rita, H and Vesala, KM 2010 Improving animal welfare: qualitative and quantitative methodology in the study of farmers’ attitudes. Animal Welfare 19: 523–536Google Scholar
Kellert, SR 1980 Phase II: activities of the American public relating to animals. United States Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service: Washington DC, USAGoogle Scholar
Knight, S, Vrij, A, Cherryman, A and Nunkoosing, K 2004 Attitudes towards animal use and belief in animal mind. Anthrozoös 17: 43–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kotrschal, K and Ortbauer, B 2003 Behavioral effects of the presence of a dog in a classroom. Anthrozoös 16: 147–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levine, ED, Mills, DS and Houpt, KA 2005 Attitudes of veterinary students at one US college toward factors relating to farm animal welfare. Journal of Veterinary Medical Education 32: 481–490CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maurer, M, Delfour, F, Wolff, M and Adrien, JL 2010 Dogs, cats and horses: their different representations in the minds of typical and clinical populations of children. Anthrozoös 23: 383–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayfield, LE, Bennett, RM, Tranter, RB and Woolridge, MJ 2007 Consumption of welfare-friendly food products in Great Britain, Italy, Sweden, and how it may be influenced by consumer attitudes to, and behaviour towards, animal welfare attributes. International Journal of Sociology of Food and Agriculture 15: 59–73Google Scholar
Miura, A, Bradshaw, JWS and Tanida, H 2002 Childhood experiences and attitudes towards animal issues: a comparison of young adults in Japan and the UK. Animal Welfare 11: 437–448Google Scholar
Moynagh, J 2000 EU regulation and consumer demand for animal welfare. The Journal of Agrobiotechnology Management and Economics 3: 107–114Google Scholar
Muris, P 2008 A dirty animal is a scary animal! Effects of disgust-related information on fear beliefs in children. Behaviour Research and Therapy 46: 137–144CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Myers, DG 1987 Social Psychology. McGraw-Hill: New York, USAGoogle Scholar
Myers, DG 2002 Symbolic animals and the developing self. Anthrozoos 15: 19–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicoll, K, Trifone, C and Samuels, WE 2008 An in-class, humane education program can improve young students’ attitudes towards animals. Society and Animals 16: 45–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paul, ES and Serpell, JA 1993 Childhood pet keeping and humane attitudes in young adulthood. Animal Welfare 2: 321–337Google Scholar
Perkins, D 1993 Smart Schools. Simon and Schuster: New York, USAGoogle Scholar
Plous, S 1993 Psychological mechanisms in the human use of animals. Journal of Social Issues 49: 11–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, CJC and McCulloch, S 2005 Students attitudes on animal sentience and use of animals in society. Journal of Biological Education 40: 17–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prickett, RW, Norwood, FB and Lusk, JL 2010 Consumer preferences for farm animal welfare: Results from a telephone survey of us households. Animal Welfare 19: 335–347Google Scholar
Regmi, A and Gehlhar, M 2001 Consumer preferences and concerns shape global food trade. Food Review: Global Food Trade 24: 2–8Google Scholar
Rud, AG Jr and Beck, AM 2003 Companion animals in Indiana elementary schools. Anthrozoös 16: 241–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schroder, MJA and McEachern, MG 2004 Consumer value conflicts surrounding ethical food purchase decisions: a focus on animal welfare. International Journal of Consumer Studies 28: 168–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shrigley, RL 1990 Attitude and behavior are correlates. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 27: 97–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, MH, Meehan, CL, Enfield, RP and Castori, P 2005 Using drawings to assess self-animal perceptions. Anthrozoös 18: 122–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, KL and Gullone, E 2003 Promotion of empathy and prosocial behavior in children through humane education. Australian Psychologist 38: 175–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tisdell, C, Wilson, C and Swarna Nantha, H 2005 Association of public support for survival of wildlife species with their likeability. Anthrozoös 18: 160–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vockell, EL 1982 Assessing attitudes toward animal life among elementary school pupils. Science Education 66: 783–788CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vockell, EL and Hodal, EF 1980 Developing humane attitudes: What does research tell us? Humane Education 6: 19–21Google Scholar
Wallace, DS, Paulson, RM, Lord, CG and Bond, CF Jr 2005 Which behaviors do attitudes predict? Meta-analyzing the effects of social pressure and perceived difficulty. Review of General Psychology 9: 214–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar