Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T04:21:21.212Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Light, Vision and the Welfare of Poultry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2023

N B Prescott ,
C M Wathes  and
J R Jarvis
N B Prescott*
Affiliation:
Silsoe Research Institute, Wrest Park, Silsoe, Bedfordshire MK45 4HS, UK
C M Wathes
Affiliation:
Silsoe Research Institute, Wrest Park, Silsoe, Bedfordshire MK45 4HS, UK
J R Jarvis
Affiliation:
Silsoe Research Institute, Wrest Park, Silsoe, Bedfordshire MK45 4HS, UK
*
* Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The visual system of domestic poultry evolved in natural light environments, which differ in many respects from the artificial light provided in poultry houses. Current lighting systems are designed mainly around human vision and poultry production, ignoring the requirements of poultry vision and the functional development of visual abilities during rearing. A poor correlation between the light provided and that required for effective vision may influence visually mediated behaviours such as feeding and social interaction, leading to distress and poor welfare. To understand fully the impact of the light environment on the behaviour and welfare of domestic poultry we need (i) to measure the physical properties of the light environment in a standard and relevant manner; (ii) to identify the limits of visual abilities in various light environments; (iii) to determine how light environments during rearing may disrupt the functional development of vision; and (iv) to resolve how visual abilities and lighting interact to affect visually mediated behaviour. Some conclusions can be drawn about the impact of current lighting regimes on bird welfare but there remains a pressing need to resolve various issues in this interaction. We propose, first, that dark periods should have a minimum duration of six hours; second, that bright light should be used in cases where pecking damage and cannibalism do not pose a problem; and third, that it is unlikely that the 100 Hz flicker associated with fluorescent light can be perceived by poultry. With less certainty, we can suggest that ultraviolet-supplemented lighting may have some welfare benefits, and that very dim lighting may adversely affect ocular development. We can only speculate on other issues, such as preferences and motivations for different coloured lighting or the ways in which lighting affects recognition of conspecifics. Several organisations and authorities have issued guidelines for poultry house lighting that strive to safeguard welfare and that are consistent with our current, but limited, understanding. One omission is a standard system for measuring light levels in poultry houses. Illumination with natural daylight would be an ideal solution to many lighting problems. Although some systems require artificial lighting for production purposes, we argue that it may be possible to rear birds humanely in artificial environments that contain some features of natural light. These features should be those for which poultry show some motivation, or whose exclusion would damage visual development.

Keywords

animal welfarebehaviourdomestic poultryenvironmentlightvision
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 12 , Issue 2 , May 2003 , pp. 269 - 288
Copyright
© 2003 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

References

Alsam, H and Wathes, C M 1991 Conjoint preferences of chicks for heat and light intensity. British Poultry Science 32: 899–916CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Appleby, M C, McRae, H E and Peitz, B E 1984 The effect of light on the choice of nest box by domestic hens. Applied Animal Ethology 11: 249–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashton, W L G, Pattison, M and Barnett, K C 1973 Light-induced eye abnormalities in turkeys and the turkey blindness syndrome. Research in Veterinary Science 14: 42–46CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barber, C L, Prescott, N B, Wathes, C M, LeSueur, C and Perry, G C Preferences of growing ducklings and turkey poults for illuminance. Animal Welfare: in pressGoogle Scholar
Berk, J 1995 Light-choice by broilers. In: Rutter, S M, Rushen, J, Randle, H D and Eddison, J C (eds) Proceedings of the 29th International Congress of the International Society for Applied Ethology. Universities Federation for Animal Welfare: Wheathampstead, UKGoogle Scholar
Boshouwers, F M G and Nicaise, E 1992 Responses of broiler chickens to high-frequency and low-frequency fluorescent light. British Poultry Science 33: 711–717CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bowmaker, J K and Knowles, A 1977 The visual pigments and oil droplets of the chicken retina. Vision Research 17: 755–764CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brenner, E, Spaan, J P, Wortel, J F and Nuboer, J F W 1983 Early colour deprivation in the pigeon. Behavioural Brain Research 8: 343–350CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
British Standards 1985 BS 8206. Lighting for Buildings: Part 1. Code of Practice for Artificial Lighting. British Standards Institution: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Brundrett, G W 1974 Human sensitivity to flicker. Lighting Research and Technology 6: 127–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buyse, J, Simons, PCM, Boshouwers, F M G and Decuypere, E 1996 Effect of intermittent lighting, light intensity and source on the performance and welfare of broilers. World's Poultiy Science Journal 52: 121–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coren, S, Porac, C and Ward, L M 1979 Sensation and Perception. Academic Press: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Council of Europe 1995 Standing Committee of the European Convention for the Protection of Animals Kept for Farming Purposes. Recommendations Concerning Domestic Fowl. Council of EuropeGoogle Scholar
Council of Europe 2001 Standing Committee of the European Convention for the Protection of Animals Kept for Farming Purposes. Recommendations Concerning Turkeys. Council of EuropeGoogle Scholar
Dartnall, H J A, Bowmaker, J K and Mollon, J D 1983 Human visual pigments: microspectrophotometric results from the eyes of seven persons. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London: Series B 220: 115–130Google ScholarPubMed
Davis, N J, Prescott, N B, Savory, C J and Wathes, C M 1999 Preferences of growing fowls for different light intensities in relation to age strain and behaviour. Animal Welfare 8: 193–203Google Scholar
D'eath, R B and Stone, R J 1999 Chickens use visual cues in social discrimination: an experiment with coloured lighting. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 62: 233–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DEFRA 2002a Laying hens: code of recommendations for the welfare of livestock. Draft Code of Recommendations for the Welfare of Livestock. Department of the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs: London, UKGoogle Scholar
DEFRA 2002b Meat chickens and breeding chickens: code of recommendations for the welfare of livestock. Draft Code of Recommendations for the Welfare of Livestock. Department of the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs: London, UKGoogle Scholar
De Lange, H 1958 Research into the dynamic nature of the human fovea-cortex system with intermittent and modulated light. Journal of the Ophthalmological Society of America 48: 777–784CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeMello, L R, Foster, T M and Temple, W 1992 Discriminative performance of the domestic hen in a visual acuity task. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behaviour 58: 147–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehrlich, D 1981 Regional specialization of the chick retina as revealed by the size and density of neurones in the ganglion cell layer. The Journal of Comparative Neurology 195: 643–657CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Endler, J A 1993 The colour of light in forests and its implications. Ecological Monographs 63: 1–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
European Union 1998 Council Directive 98/58/EC of 20 July 1998 Concerning the Protection of Animals Kept for Farming Purposes. Document 398L0058: The Council of the European UnionGoogle Scholar
European Union 1999 Council Directive 1999/74/EC of 19 July 1999 Laying Down Minimum Standards for the Protection of Laying Hens. Document 399L0074: The Council of the European UnionGoogle Scholar
Farm Animal Welfare Council 1991 Report on the Welfare of Laying Hens in Colony Systems. Ministry for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Farm Animal Welfare Council 1992 Report on the Welfare of Broiler Chickens. Ministry for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Farm Animal Welfare Council 1995 Report on the Welfare of Turkeys. Ministry for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Farm Animal Welfare Council 1997 Report on the Welfare of Laying Hens. Ministry for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Farm Animal Welfare Council 1998 Report on the Welfare of Broiler Breeders. Ministry for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Güntürkün, O, Emmerton, J and Delius, J D 1989 Biological Signal Processing pp 122–145. VCH Publishers: Weinheim, GermanyGoogle Scholar
Hart, N S, Partridge, J C and Cuthill, I C 1999 Visual pigments, cone oil droplets, ocular media and predicted spectral sensitivity in domestic turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo). Vision Research 39: 3321–3328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
IES 1966 Lighting Handbook, Edn 4. Illuminating Engineering Society: New York, USAGoogle Scholar
Jarvis, J R, Taylor, N R, Prescott, N B, Meeks, I and Wathes, C M 2002 Measuring and modelling the photopic flicker sensitivity of the chicken (Gallus g. domesticus). Vision Research 42: 99–106CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnsen, H M 1914 Visual pattern-discrimination in the vertebrates. Journal of Animal Behaviour 6: 169–188Google Scholar
Jones, E K M, Prescott, N B, Cook, P, White, R P and Wathes, C M 2001 Ultraviolet light and mating behaviour in domestic broiler breeders. British Poultiy Science 42: 23–32CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
King-Smith, P E 1971 Special senses. In: Bell, D J and Freeman, B M (eds) Physiology and Biochemistry of the Domestic Fowl, Vol 2. Academic Press: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Kjaer, J B and Vestergaard, K S 1999 Development of feather pecking in relation to light intensity. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 62: 243–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kristensen, H H, Prescott, N B, Ladewig, J, Perry, G C, Johnsen, P F and Wathes, C M 2002 Light quality preferences of broiler chickens. Proceedings of the World's Poultry Science Association UK Spring Meeting, 9-10 April, University of York pp 32–33Google Scholar
Le Grand 1975 Measurement of the visual stimulus. In: Carterette, E C and Friedman, M P (eds) Handbook of Perception. V: Seeing. Academic Press: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Lewis, P D and Morris, T R 1998 Responses of domestic poultry to various light sources. World's Poultry Science Journal 54: 7–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, P D, Morris, T R and Perry, G C 1999 Light intensity and age at first egg in pullets. Poultry Science 78: 1227–1231CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lewis, P D and Perry, G C 1995 Effects of lighting on reproduction in poultry. In: Hunton, P (ed) World Animal Science, Vol C9. Elsevier: Amsterdam, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
Lewis, P D, Perry, G C and Sherwin, C M 2000 Effect of ultra-violet radiation on the performance of intact male turkeys. Poultry Science 79: 850–855CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, T, Troilo, D, Glasser, A and Howland, H C 1995 Constant light produces severe corneal flattening and hyperopia in chickens. Vision Research 35: 1203–1209CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MAFF 1987a Codes of Recommendations for the Welfare of Livestock: Turkeys. Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food: London, UKGoogle Scholar
MAFF 1987b Codes of Recommendations for the Welfare of Livestock: Ducks. Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Manser, C E 1996 Effects of light on the welfare of domestic poultry: a review. Animal Welfare 5: 341–360Google Scholar
Millam, J R 1987 Preference of turkey hens for nest-boxes of different levels of interior illumination. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 18: 341–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moinard, C and Sherwin, C M 1999 Turkeys prefer fluorescent light with supplementary ultraviolet radiation. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 64: 261–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moinard, C, Lewis, P D, Perry, G C and Sherwin, C M 2001 The effects of light intensity and light source on injuries due to pecking of male domestic turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo). Animal Welfare 10: 131–139Google Scholar
Morris, V B 1982 An afoveate area centralis in the chick retina. The Journal of Comparative Neurology 210: 198–203CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nickla, D L, Wildsoet, C and Wallman, J 1998 Visual influences on diurnal rhythms in ocular length and choroidal thickness in chick eyes. Experimental Eye Research 66: 163–181CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nuboer, J F W, Coemans, M A J M and Vos, J J 1992a Artificial lighting in poultry houses: are photometric units appropriate for describing illumination intensities. British Poultry Science 33: 135–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nuboer, J F W, Coemans, M A J M and Vos, J J 1992b Artificial lighting in poultry houses: do hens perceive the modulation of fluorescent lamps as flicker. British Poultry Science 33: 123–133CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nuboer, J F W, Van Nuy, W M and Van Steenbergen, J C 1983 Colour changes in a light regimen as sychronizers of circadian activity. Journal of Comparative Physiology A 151: 359–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Over, R and Moore, D 1981 Spatial acuity of the chicken. Brain Research 221: 424–426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osorio, D, Vorobyev, M and Jones, C D 1999 Colour vision of domestic chicks. Journal of Experimental Biology 202: 2951–2959CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parrish, J, Benjamin, R and Smith, R 1981 Near-ultraviolet light reception in the Mallard. Auk 9: 627–629Google Scholar
Philips 1997 Catalogue for Original Equipment Manufacturers Lamps/Gear/Controls 97/98. Philips Lighting Ltd: Croydon, UKGoogle Scholar
Prayitno, D S, Phillips, C J C and Stokes, D K 1997 The effects of colour and intensity of light on behaviour and leg disorders in broiler chickens. Poultry Science 76: 1674–1681CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prescott, N B and Wathes, C M 1999a The reflective properties of domestic fowl (Gallus g. domesticus), the fabric of their housing, and the characteristics of the light environment in environmentally controlled poultry houses. British Poultry Science 40: 185–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prescott, N B and Wathes, C M 1999b Spectral sensitivity of the domestic fowl (Gallus g. domesticus). British Poultry Science 40: 332–339CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prescott, N B and Wathes, C M 2002 Preference and motivation of laying hens to eat under different illuminances and the effect of illuminance on eating behaviour. British Poultry Science 43: 190–195CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pugh, E N 1988 Vision: physics and retinal physiology. In: Atkinson, R C, Herrnstein, R J, Lindzey, G and Luce, R D (eds) Stevens ‘ Handbook of Experimental Psychology. Volume 1: Perception and Motivation. John Wiley & Sons: New York, USAGoogle Scholar
Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals 1999a Welfare Standards for Laying Hens and Pullets. Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals: Horsham, UKGoogle Scholar
Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals 1999b Welfare Standards for Chickens. Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals: Horsham, UKGoogle Scholar
Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals 1999c Welfare Standards for Turkeys. Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals: Horsham, UKGoogle Scholar
Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals 1999d Welfare Standards for Ducks. Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals: Horsham, UKGoogle Scholar
Savory, C J and Duncan, I J H 1982/83 Voluntary regulation of lighting by domestic fowl in Skinner boxes. Applied Animal Ethology 9: 73–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaeffel, F and Howland, H C 1987 Corneal accommodation in the chick and pigeon. Journal of Comparative Physiology A 160: 375–384CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schaeffel, F, Hagel, G, Eikermann, J and Collett, T 1994 Lower-field myopia and astigmatism in amphibians and chickens. Journal of the Optical Society of America 11: 487–495CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sherwin, C M 1998 Light intensity preferences of domestic male turkeys. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 58: 121–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherwin, C M 1999 Domestic turkeys are not averse to compact fluorescent lighting. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 64: 47–55Google Scholar
Sillman, A J 1973 Avian vision. In: Farner, D S, King, J R and Parkes, K C (eds) Avian Biology, Vol III. Academic Press: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Spence, K W 1934 Visual acuity and its relation to brightness in chimpanzee and man. Journal of Comparative Physiology 18: 333–361Google Scholar
Stone, R A, Lin, T, Desai, D and Capehart, C 1995 Photoperiod, early post-natal eye growth, and visual deprivation. Vision Research 35: 1195–1202CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thompson, C E and Forbes, J M 1999 Morphology of eyes of turkeys reared under commercial lighting regimes at different light intensities. Proceedings of the World's Poultry Science Association UK Spring meeting, 24-25 March, Scarborough, L®Tpp 48–49Google Scholar
Vandenberg, C and Widowski, T M 2000 Hens’ preferences for high-intensity sodium or low-intensity incandescent lighting. Journal of Applied Poultry Research 9: 172–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wyszecki, G and Stiles, W S 1982 Colour Science: Concepts and Methods, Quantitative Data and Formulas. Wiley: New York, USAGoogle Scholar
Widowski, T M and Duncan, I J H 1996 Laying hens do not have a preference for high-frequency versus low-frequency compact fluorescent light sources. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 76: 177–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Widowski, T M, Keeling, L J and Duncan, I J H 1992 The preferences of hens for compact fluorescent over incandescent lighting. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 72: 203–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wortel, J F, Rugenbrink, H and Nuboer, J F W 1987 The photopic spectral sensitivity of the dorsal and ventral retinae of the chicken. Journal of Comparative Physiology 160: 151–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yoshizawa, T 1992 The road to colour vision: structure, evolution and function of chicken and gecko visual pigments. Photochemistry and Photobiology 56: 859–867CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed