Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-21T23:08:00.492Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Lack of Evidence for Stress Being Caused to Pigs by Witnessing the Slaughter of Conspecifics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2023

M H Anil*
Affiliation:
School of Veterinary Science, University of Bristol, Langford, Bristol, BS18 7DY, UK
J L McKinstry
Affiliation:
School of Veterinary Science, University of Bristol, Langford, Bristol, BS18 7DY, UK
M Field
Affiliation:
School of Veterinary Science, University of Bristol, Langford, Bristol, BS18 7DY, UK
R G Rodway
Affiliation:
School of Veterinary Science, University of Bristol, Langford, Bristol, BS18 7DY, UK Department of Animal Physiology and Nutrition, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK
*
Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The effects of witnessing the slaughter of conspecifics on the stress responses of pigs were investigated. Previously catheterized pigs were allowed to see the stunning and sticking (exsanguination) of pigs in a nearby pen. Heart rate was monitored and serial blood samples were taken to assess stress responses. Packed cell volume (PCV), Cortisol and β-endorphin were determined in the samples. In addition, behavioural observations and subjective assessments of animals’ responses were made. Although the levels of hormones, PCV and heart rate tended to be generally high due to handling, there were no specific increases in response to witnessing stunning and slaughter. These results suggest that witnessing the slaughter act does not distress pigs.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1997 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

References

Anil, M H 1991 Reflexes and loss of sensibility following electrical stunning in pigs. Meat Science 30: 13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anil, M H and McKinstry, J L 1993 Results of a Survey of Pig Abattoirs in England and Wales. Meat Hygiene Division, Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Anil, M H, McKinstry, J L, Field, M, Bracke, M and Rodway, R G 1995 Assessment of distress experienced by witnessing slaughter in pigs. Animal Science 60 (Abstract): 563Google Scholar
Anil, M H, Preston, J, McKinstry, J L, Rodway, R G and Brown, S N 1996 An assessment of stress in sheep caused by watching slaughter of other sheep. Animal Welfare 5: 435441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anil, M H, Preston, J, Warriss, P D and Rodway, R G 1991 An assessment of the stress associated with slaughter in sheep. Animal Production 52: 579580Google Scholar
Bracke, M 1993 Can Animals Have a Preference Not to Be Killed? MSc Thesis, University of Edinburgh, ScotlandGoogle Scholar
Fordham, D P, Lincoln, G A, Ssewenyana, E and Rodway, R G 1989 Plasma B-endorphin and Cortisol concentrations in lambs after handling, transport and slaughter. Animal Production 49: 103107Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food 1995 The Slaughter of Animals (Slaughter or Killing) Regulations No 731. HMSO: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Van Putten, G and Elshof, W J 1978 Observations on the effect of transport on the well-being and lean quality of slaughter pigs. Animal Regulation Studies 1: 247Google Scholar