Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T03:26:10.580Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Is the rotarod test an objective alternative to the gait score for evaluating walking ability in chickens?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

J Malchow ,
A Dudde ,
J Berk ,
ET Krause ,
O Sanders ,
B Puppe  and
L Schrader
J Malchow*
Affiliation:
Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Institute for Animal Welfare and Animal Husbandry, Dörnbergstrasse 25/27, 29223 Celle, Germany
A Dudde
Affiliation:
Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Institute for Animal Welfare and Animal Husbandry, Dörnbergstrasse 25/27, 29223 Celle, Germany Department of Animal Behaviour, University of Bielefeld, Bielefeld, Germany
J Berk
Affiliation:
Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Institute for Animal Welfare and Animal Husbandry, Dörnbergstrasse 25/27, 29223 Celle, Germany
ET Krause
Affiliation:
Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Institute for Animal Welfare and Animal Husbandry, Dörnbergstrasse 25/27, 29223 Celle, Germany
O Sanders
Affiliation:
Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Institute for Animal Welfare and Animal Husbandry, Dörnbergstrasse 25/27, 29223 Celle, Germany
B Puppe
Affiliation:
Institute of Behavioural Physiology, Leibniz Institute for Farm Animal Biology, Dummerstorf, Germany Behavioural Sciences, Faculty of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany
L Schrader
Affiliation:
Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Institute for Animal Welfare and Animal Husbandry, Dörnbergstrasse 25/27, 29223 Celle, Germany
*
* Contact for correspondence: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Walking ability is related to motor co-ordination which, in rodents, can be assessed by an established test in pharmacological studies — the rotarod test. The purpose of this study was to evaluate a modified rotarod test for chickens and its relation to the often-used gait score system. At the end of their rearing period, we tested 138 male chickens (Gallus gallus domesticus) from three differing growth performance strains: Ross 308 (fast-growing; n = 46), Lohmann Dual (medium-growing; n = 46) and Lohmann Brown Plus (slow-growing; n = 46). First, the chickens’ gait scores were assessed and, immediately following this, they were placed gently onto a steady rod. The velocity of the rotating rod gradually increased, and the latency to leave the rod was recorded. By using a linear mixed model, we were able to show that the latency to leave the rotating rod was significantly predicted by the gait score. Fast-growing chickens had shorter durations on the rotating rod, and these durations were associated with gait score. We conclude that the rotarod test provides an objective alternative method for assessing walking ability in chickens without the need for intense observer training or the risk of observer biases and propose that this novel methodology has the potential to function as a precise, objective indicator of animal welfare.

Keywords

animal welfarebroilerdomestic fowlgait scoremotor co-ordinationwalking ability
Type
Articles
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 28 , Issue 3 , August 2019 , pp. 261 - 269
Copyright
© 2019 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

References

Aydin, A, Cangar, O, Ozcan, SE, Bahr, C and Berckmans, D 2010 Application of a fully automatic analysis tool to assess the activity of broiler chickens with different gait scores. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 73: 194–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2010.05.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berg, C and Sanotra, G 2003 Can a modified latency-to-lie test be used to validate gait-scoring results in commercial broiler flocks? Animal Welfare 12: 655–659CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bessei, W 2006 Welfare of broilers: a review. World's Poultry Science Journal 62: 455–466. https://doi.org/10.1079/WPS2005108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butterworth, A, Knowles, T, Whittington, P, Matthews, L, Rogers, A and Bagshaw, C 2007 Validation of broiler chicken gait scoring training in Thailand, Brazil and New Zealand. Animal Welfare 16: 177–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caplen, G, Colborne, G, Hothersall, B, Nicol, C, Waterman-Pearson, A, Weeks, C and Murrell, J 2013 Lame broiler chickens respond to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs with objective changes in gait function: a controlled clinical trial. The Veterinary Journal 196: 477–482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2012.12.007CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caplen, G, Hothersall, B, Murrell, JC, Nicol, CJ, Waterman-Pearson, AE, Weeks, CA and Colborne, GR 2012 Kinematic analysis quantifies gait abnormalities associated with lameness in broiler chickens and identifies evolutionary gait differences. PLoS One 7: e40800. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0040800CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cavagna, GA, Heglund, NC and Taylor, CR 1977 Mechanical work in terrestrial locomotion: two basic mechanisms for mini-mizing energy expenditure. American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology 233: R243–R261. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpregu.1977.233.5.R243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corr, S, Gentle, M, McCorquodale, C and Bennett, D 2003 The effect of morphology on the musculoskeletal system of the modern broiler. Animal Welfare 12: 145–157Google Scholar
Corr, S, McCorquodale, C and Gentle, M 1998 Gait analysis of poultry. Research in Veterinary Science 65: 233–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-5288(98)90149-7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Djukic, M 2007 Die Bedeutung der Laufaktivität und der Gewichtsentwicklung bei der Entstehung von Beinschäden beim Mastgeflügel. http://opus.uni-hohenheim.de/volltexte/2007/164.[Title translation: The effect of locomotor activity and weight load on bone problems in fast and slow growing chickens]Google Scholar
Dudde, A, Schrader, L, Weigend, S, Matthews, LR and Krause, ET 2018 More eggs but less social and more fearful? Differences in behavioral traits in relation to the phylogenetic background and productivity level in laying hens. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 209: 65–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appla-nim.2018.08.017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duggan, BM, Rae, AM, Clements, DN and Hocking, PM 2017 Higher heritabilities for gait components than for overall gait scores may improve mobility in ducks. Genetics Selection Evolution 49: 42. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12711-017-0317-2CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Galton, PM and Shepherd, JD 2012 Experimental analysis of perching in the European starling (Sturnus vulgaris: Passeriformes; Passeres), and the automatic perching mechanism of birds. Journal of Experimental Zoology Part A: Ecological Genetics and Physiology 317: 205–215. https://doi.org/10.1002/jez.1714CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garner, JP, Falcone, C, Wakenell, P, Martin, M and Mench, JA 2002 Reliability and validity of a modified gait scoring system and its use in assessing tibial dyschondroplasia in broilers. British Poultry Science 43: 355–363. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071660120103620CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hamm, RJ, Pike, BR, O’Dell, DM, Lyeth, BG and Jenkins, LW 1994 The rotarod test: an evaluation of its effectiveness in assessing motor deficits following traumatic brain injury. Journal of Neurotrauma 11: 187–196. https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.1994.11.187CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keppler, C, Brenninkmeyer, C, Vogt-Kaute, W, Döring, S, Günther, M, Thiede, M, Gorniak, T and Knierim, U 2009 Eignung unterschiedlicher Herkünfte für die ökologische Haltung von Masthähnchen-Feldprüfung. http://orgprints.org/17257/Google Scholar
Kestin, S, Gordon, S, Su, G and Sørensen, P 2001 Relationships in broiler chickens between lameness, liveweight, growth rate and age. The Veterinary Record 148: 195–197. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.148.7.195CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kestin, S, Knowles, T, Tinch, A and Gregory, N 1992 Prevalence of leg weakness in broiler chickens and its relationship with genotype. Veterinary Record 131: 190–194. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.131.9.190CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knowles, TG, Kestin, SC, Haslam, SM, Brown, SN, Green, LE, Butterworth, A, Pope, SJ, Pfeiffer, D and Nicol, CJ 2008 Leg disorders in broiler chickens: prevalence, risk factors and pre-vention. PLoS One 3: e1545. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0001545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lalonde, R, Bensoula, A and Filali, M 1995 Rotorod sensori-motor learning in cerebellar mutant mice. Neuroscience Research 22: 423–426. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-0102(95)00916-HCrossRefGoogle Scholar
LeBlanc, S, Tobalske, B, Quinton, M, Springthorpe, D, Szkotnicki, B, Wuerbel, H and Harlander-Matauschek, A 2016 Physical health problems and environmental challenges influ-ence balancing behaviour in laying hens. PLoS One 11: e0153477. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0153477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynch, J and Mittelstadt, S 2017 Rat strain differences observed in the rotarod test. Journal of Pharmacological and Toxicological Methods 88: 193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vascn.2017.09.081CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malchow, J, Berk, J, Puppe, B and Schrader, L 2018 Perches or grids? What do rearing chickens differing in growth perform-ance prefer for roosting? Poultry Science 98: 29–38. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pey320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martrenchar, A, Huonnic, D, Cotte, J, Boilletot, E and Morisse, J 1999 Influence of stocking density on behavioural, health and pro-ductivity traits of turkeys in large flocks. British Poultry Science 40: 323–331. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071669987403CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Monville, C, Torres, EM and Dunnett, SB 2006 Comparison of incremental and accelerating protocols of the rotarod test for the assessment of motor deficits in the 6-OHDA model. Journal of Neuroscience Methods 158: 219–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneu-meth.2006.06.001CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mueller, S, Kreuzer, M, Siegrist, M, Mannale, K, Messikommer, RE and Gangnat, IDM 2018 Carcass and meat quality of dual-purpose chickens (Lohmann Dual, Belgian Malines, Schweizerhuhn) in comparison to broiler and layer chicken types. Poultry Science 97: 3325–3336. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pey172CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pinheiro, J, Bates, D, DebRoy, S and Sarkar, D 2017 nlme: Linear and Nonlinear Mixed Effects Models. R package version 3.1-131. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=nlmeGoogle Scholar
R Core Team 2016 R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria. https//www.R-project.org/Google Scholar
Reiter, K and Bessei, W 2009 Einfluss der Laufaktivität auf die Beinschäden beim Mastgeflügel. Berliner und Münchener Tierärztliche Wochenschrift 122: 264–270. [Title translation: Effect of locomotor activity on leg disorders in fattening chickens]Google Scholar
Sandilands, V, Brocklehurst, S, Sparks, N, Baker, L, McGovern, R, Thorp, B and Pearson, D 2011 Assessing leg health in chickens using a force plate and gait scoring: how many birds is enough? The Veterinary Record 168: 77. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.c5978CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanotra, GS, Lund, J, Ersbøll, A, Petersen, J and Vestergaard, K 2001 Monitoring leg problems in broilers: a sur-vey of commercial broiler production in Denmark. World's Poultry Science Journal 57: 55–69. https://doi.org/10.1079/WPS20010006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shiotsuki, H, Yoshimi, K, Shimo, Y, Funayama, M, Takamatsu, Y, Ikeda, K, Takahashi, R, Kitazawa, S and Hattori, N 2010 A rotarod test for evaluation of motor skill learning. Journal of Neuroscience Methods 189: 180–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2010.03.026CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Su, G, Sørensen, P and Kestin, S 1999 Meal feeding is more effective than early feed restriction at reducing the prevalence of leg weakness in broiler chickens. Poultry Science 78: 949–955. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/78.7.949CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sustaita, D, Pouydebat, E, Manzano, A, Abdala, V, Hertel, F and Herrel, A 2013 Getting a grip on tetrapod grasping: form, function, and evolution. Biological Reviews 88: 380–405. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12010CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tuyttens, FAM, de Graaf, S, Heerkens, JLT, Jacobs, L, Nalon, E, Ott, S, Stadig, L, Van Laer, E and Ampe, B 2014 Observer bias in animal behaviour research: can we believe what we score, if we score what we believe? Animal Behaviour 90: 273–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2014.02.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, A, Fairchild, B, Cummings, T and Stayer, P 2008 Validation of a three-point gait-scoring system for field assessment of walking ability of commercial broilers. Journal of Applied Poultry Research 17: 529–539. https://doi.org/10.3382/japr.2008-00013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weeks, CA, Danbury, TD, Davies, HC, Hunt, P and Kestin, SC 2000 The behaviour of broiler chickens and its modification by lameness. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 67: 111–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(99)00102-1CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Welfare Quality® 2009 Welfare Quality® assessment protocol for poultry (broilers, laying hens). Welfare Quality® Consortium: Lelystad, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar