Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T01:17:44.986Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Incorporating stakeholder perspectives into the assessment and provision of captive elephant welfare

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

CL Chadwick ,
E Williams ,
L Asher  and
L Yon
CL Chadwick
Affiliation:
Ecosystems and Environment Research Centre, School of Environment and Life Sciences, University of Salford, The Crescent, Greater Manchester M5 4WT, UK
E Williams
Affiliation:
Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine and Science, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Loughborough LE12 5RD, UK School of Animal Rural and Environmental Sciences, Nottingham Trent University, Brackenhurst Campus, Southwell, Nottinghamshire NG25 0QF, UK
L Asher*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine and Science, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Loughborough LE12 5RD, UK Centre for Behaviour and Evolution, Institute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University, Framlington Place, Newcastle NE2 4HH, UK
L Yon*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine and Science, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Loughborough LE12 5RD, UK
*
* Contacts for correspondence and requests for reprints: [email protected]/[email protected]
* Contacts for correspondence and requests for reprints: [email protected]/[email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Recent concerns over the welfare of elephants in UK zoos have implications for their future in captivity, and it is clear that improvements in welfare should be made. Evidence suggests that the knowledge of experienced stakeholders is vital to captive animal welfare assessment. However, there have been few attempts to consult with zoo personnel and other stakeholders on the assessment of elephant welfare, and much of their valuable knowledge of routine husbandry has not been captured in the published literature. As part of a research project commissioned by the Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs, open response focus groups and workshop discussions were conducted with representatives from 15 UK elephant-holding facilities, and other experts in the welfare and behaviour of captive or free-ranging elephants. Participants described three broad categories of welfare indicators: behavioural, physical and physiological. Resources perceived to be of importance to elephants included aspects of the physical environment, such as feeding opportunities and appropriate substrate, and aspects of the social environment, including group size and relatedness. The data obtained during this study can be used to develop an elephant welfare assessment strategy, informed by the knowledge and expertise of experienced stakeholders, and for consideration of potential changes to guidelines for managing elephants in captivity. Our approach to capturing the views of those who work closely with captive species could be applied elsewhere, in order to draw upon the extensive knowledge of expert stakeholders and consider ways to improve the welfare of captive animals.

Keywords

animal behaviouranimal welfareelephantstakeholder opinionwelfare assessmentzoo
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 26 , Issue 4 , November 2017 , pp. 461 - 472
Copyright
© 2017 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

References

Asher, L, Williams, E and Yon, L 2015 Developing behavioural indicators, as part of a wider set of indicators, to assess the welfare of elephants in UK zoos. Defra WC1081. Defra: Bristol, UK. http://sci-encesearch.defra.gov.uk/Document.aspx?Document=12816_Elep hantwelfarereportWC1081.pdfGoogle Scholar
Barbour, R 2008 Doing Focus Groups. Sage: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Beck, L, Trombetta, W and Share, S 1986 Using focus group sessions before decisions are made. North Carolina Medical Journal 47: 73–74Google Scholar
Braun, V and Clarke, V 2006 Using thematic analysis in psychol-ogy. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3: 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oaCrossRefGoogle Scholar
British and Irish Association of Zoos and Aquariums (BIAZA) 2010 Management Guidelines for the Welfare of Zoo Animals: Elephants, Third Edition. BIAZA: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Broom, DM 1991 Animal welfare: concepts and measurement. Journal of Animal Science 69: 4167–4175. https://doi.org/10.2527/1991.69104167xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, JL, Paris, S, Prado-Oviedo, NA, Meehan, CL, Hogan, JN, Morfeld, K and Carlstead, K 2016 Reproductive health assessment of female elephants in North American zoos and asso-ciation of husbandry practices with reproductive dysfunction in African elephants (Loxodonta africana). PLoS One 11: e0145673. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145673CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clubb, R and Mason, GJ 2002 A Review of the Welfare of Zoo Elephants in Europe. RSPCA: Horsham, UKGoogle Scholar
Clubb, R, Rowcliffe, M, Lee, P, Mar, KU, Moss, C and Mason, GJ 2008 Compromised survivorship in zoo elephants. Science 322: 1649. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1164298CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davis, N, Schaffner, CM and Wehnelt, S 2009 Patterns of injury in zoo-housed spider monkeys: a problem with males? Applied Animal Behaviour Science 116: 250–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2008.08.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawkins, MS 2004 Using behaviour to assess animal welfare. Animal Welfare 13: S3–S7Google Scholar
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) 2012 Secretary of State's Standards of Modern Zoo Practice. Defra: Bristol, UKGoogle Scholar
De Rouck, M, Kitchener, AC, Law, G and Nelissen, M 2005 A comparative study of the influence of social housing conditions on the behaviour of captive tigers (Panthera tigris). Animal Welfare 14: 229–238Google Scholar
Devitt, C, Kelly, P, Blake, M, Hanlon, A and More, SJ 2014 Dilemmas experienced by government veterinarians when responding to farm animal welfare incidents in Ireland. Veterinary Record Open 1: e0000003. https://doi.org/10.1136/vropen-2013-000003Google ScholarPubMed
Gartner, MC and Weiss, A 2013 Scottish wildcat (Felis silvestris grampia) personality and subjective well-being: implications for captive management. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 147: 261–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2012.11.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grand, AP, Kuhar, CW, Leighty, KA, Bettinger, TL and Laudenslager, ML 2012 Using personality ratings and cortisol to characterize individual differences in African elephants (Loxodonta africana). Applied Animal Behaviour Science 142: 69–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2012.09.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greco, BJ, Meehan, CL, Hogan, JN, Leighty, KA, Mellen, J, Mason, GJ and Mench, JA 2016 The days and nights of zoo ele-phants: using epidemiology to better understand stereotypic behaviour of African elephants (Loxodonta africana) and Asian ele-phants (Elephas maximus) in North American zoos. PLoS One 11: e0144276. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gurusamy, V, Tribe, A and Philips, CJC 2014 Identification of major welfare issues for captive elephant husbandry by stakehold-ers. Animal Welfare 23: 11–24. https://doi.org/10.7120/09627286.23.1.011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, M, Sherwin, C and Harris, S 2008 The Welfare, Housing and Husbandry of Elephants in UK Zoos. Defra: Bristol, UKGoogle Scholar
Haspeslagh, M, Stevens, J, De Groot, E, Dewulf, J, Kalmar, I and Moons, C 2013 A survey of foot problems, stereotypic behaviour and floor type in Asian elephants (Elephas maximus) in European zoos. Animal Welfare 22: 437–443. https://doi.org/10.7120/09627286.22.4.437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, SP and Broom, DM 2009 Measuring zoo animal welfare: theory and practice. Zoo Biology 28: 531–544. https://doi.org/10.1002/zoo.20276Google ScholarPubMed
Holdgate, MR, Meehan, CL, Hogan, JN, Miller, LJ, Rushen, J, de Passillé, AM, Soltis, J, Andrews, J and Shepherdson, DJ 2016 Recumbence behaviour in zoo elephants: determination of patterns and frequency of recumbent rest and associated environ-mental and social factors. PLoS One 11: e0153301. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0153301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horback, KM, Miller, LJ and Kuczaj II, SA 2013 Personality assessment in African elephants (Loxodonta africana): comparing the temporal stability of ethological coding versus trait rating. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 149: 55–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2013.09.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, JE and Landau, VI 2003 Can chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) happiness be estimated by human raters? Journal of Research in Personality 37: 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-6566(02)00527-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koyama, N, Ueno, Y, Eguchi, Y, Uetake, K and Tanaka, T 2012 Effects of daily management changes on behavioural patterns of a solitary female African elephant (Loxodonta africana) in a zoo. Animal Science Journal 83: 562–570. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-0929.2011.00992.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krueger, RA and Casey, MA 2009 Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research, Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research, Sage: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Laws, N, Ganswindt, A, Heistermann, M, Harris, M, Harris, S and Sherwin, C 2007 A case study: faecal corticosteroid and behaviour as indicators of welfare during relocation of an Asian elephant. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science 10: 349–358. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888700701555600CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mason, GJ 2010 Species differences in responses to captivity: stress, welfare and the comparative method. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 25: 713–721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2010.08.011CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mason, GJ and Latham, NR 2004 Can't stop, won't stop: is stereo-typy a reliable animal welfare indicator? Animal Welfare 13: S57–69Google Scholar
Mason, GJ and Veasey, JS 2010 How should the psychological well-being of zoo elephants be objectively investigated? Zoo Biology 29: 237–255. https://doi.org/10.1002/zoo.20256CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meagher, RK 2009 Observer ratings: validity and value as a tool for animal welfare research. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 119:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2009.02.026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meehan, CL, Hogan, JN, Bonaparte-Saller, MK and Mench, JA 2016 Housing and social environments of African (Loxodonta africana) and Asian (Elephas maximus) elephants in North American zoos. PLoS One 11: e0146703. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0146703CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miele, M, Veissier, I, Evans, A and Botreau, R 2011 Animal welfare: establishing a dialogue between science and society. Animal Welfare 20: 103–117Google Scholar
Morfeld, KA, Meehan, CL, Hogan, JN and Brown, JL 2016 Assessment of body condition in African (Loxodonta africana) and Asian (Elephas maximus) elephants in North American zoos and management practices associated with high body condition scores. PLoS One 11: e0155146. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0155146CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morgan, DL 1996 Focus groups. Annual Review of Sociology 22:129–152. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.22.1.129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, KN and Tromborg, CT 2007 Sources of stress in cap-tivity. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 102: 262–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2006.05.032CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moss, CJ and Poole, J 1983 Relationships and social structure in African elephants. In: Hinde, RA (ed) Primate Social Relationships: An Integrated Approach. Blackwell Science: Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
Phythian, C, Michalopolou, E, Duncan, J and Wemelsfelder, F 2013 Inter-observer reliability of Qualitative Behavioural Assessments of sheep. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 144: 73–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2012.11.011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, EE and Stoinski, TS 2007 Group size: determinants in the wild and implications for the captive housing of wild mammals in zoos. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 103: 255–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2006.05.021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rees, PA 2003 RSPCA elephant welfare recommendations would compromise zoo breeding programmes. International Zoo News 50: 86–90Google Scholar
Rees, PA 2009 Activity budgets and the relationship between feeding and stereotypic behaviours in Asian elephants (Elephas maximus) in a zoo. Zoo Biology 28: 79–97. https://doi.org/10.1002/zoo.20200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rutherford, KMD, Donald, RD, Lawrence, AB and Wemelsfelder, F 2012 Qualitative Behavioural Assessment of emotionality in pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 139: 218–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2012.04.004CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schmid, J 1995 Keeping circus elephants temporarily in pad-docks: the effects on their behaviour. Animal Welfare 4: 87–101Google Scholar
Skarstad, G, Terragni, L and Torjusen, H 2007 Animal welfare according to Norwegian consumers and producers: definitions and implications. International Journal of Sociology of Food and Agriculture 15: 74–90Google Scholar
Stockman, CA, Collins, T, Barnes, AL, Miller, D, Wickham, SL, Beatty, DT, Blache, D, Wemelsfelder, F and Fleming, PA 2011 Qualitative behavioural Assessment and quantitative physiological measurement of cattle naïve and habituated to road transport. Animal Production Science 51: 240–249. https://doi.org/10.1071/AN10122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoinski, TS, Daniel, E and Maple, TL 2000 A preliminary study of the behavioral effects of feeding enrichment on African elephants. Zoo Biology 19: 485–493. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2361(2000)19:6<485::AID-ZOO1>3.0.CO;2-53.0.CO;2-5>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sukumar, R 1994 Elephant Days and Nights: Ten Years with the Indian Elephant. Oxford University Press: New York, USAGoogle Scholar
Tetley, CL and O’Hara, SJ 2012 Keeper ratings of animal per-sonality as a tool for improving the breeding, management and welfare of zoo mammals. Animal Welfare 21: 463–476. https://doi.org/10.7120/09627286.21.4.463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veasey, J 2006 Concepts in the care and welfare of captive ele-phants. International Zoo Yearbook 40: 63–79. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-1090.2006.00063.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watters, JV and Powell, DM 2012 Measuring animal personali-ty for use in population management in zoos: suggested methods and rationale. Zoo Biology 31: 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1002/zoo.20379CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weiss, A, King, JE and Enns, RM 2002 Subjective well-being is heritable and genetically correlated with dominance in chim-panzees (Pan troglodytes). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 83: 1141–1149. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.83.5.1141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiss, A, King, JE and Perkins, L 2006 Personality and subjective well-being in orang-utans (Pongo pygmaeus and Pongo abelii). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 90: 501–511. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.3.501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wemelsfelder, F 2007 How animals communicate quality of life: the qualitative assessment of animal behaviour. Animal Welfare 16: 25–31Google Scholar
Wemmer, C, Krishnamurthy, V, Shrestha, S, Hayek, LA, Thant, M and Nanjappa, KA 2006 Assessment of body condition in Asian elephants (Elephas maximus). Zoo Biology 25: 187–200. https://doi.org/10.1002/zoo.20099CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitham, JC and Wielebnowski, N 2009 Animal-based wel-fare monitoring: using keeper ratings as an assessment tool. Zoo Biology 28: 545–560. https://doi.org/10.1002/zoo.20281Google Scholar
Wielebnowski, NC, Ziegler, K, Wildt, DE, Lukas, J and Brown, JL 2002 Impact of social management on reproductive, adrenal and behavioural activity in the cheetah (Acinonyx jubatus). Animal Conservation 5: 291–301. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1367943002004043CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkinson, S 1998 Focus group methodology: a review. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 1: 181–203. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.1998.10846874CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, E, Chadwick, CL, Asher, L and Yon, L A review of current indicators of welfare in captive elephants (Loxodonta africana and Elephas maximus). Animal Welfare, submittedGoogle Scholar
Yasui, S, Konno, A, Tanaka, M, Idani, G, Ludwig, A, Lieckfeldt, D and Inoue-Murayama, M 2013 Personality assessment and its association with genetic factors in captive Asian and African elephants. Zoo Biology 32: 70–78. https://doi.org/10.1002/zoo.21045CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zoos Forum 2010 Elephants in UK zoos: Zoos Forum review of issues in elephant husbandry in UK zoos in the light of the report by Harris et al (2008). Defra: Bristol, UKGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Chadwick et al. supplementary material
Download undefined(File)
File 135.5 KB
Supplementary material: File

Chadwick et al. supplementary material
Download undefined(File)
File 98.1 KB
Supplementary material: File

Chadwick et al. supplementary material
Download undefined(File)
File 91.9 KB