Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T04:11:34.731Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Improving leg health in broiler chickens: a systematic review of the effect of environmental enrichment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

IJ Pedersen  and
B Forkman
IJ Pedersen*
Affiliation:
Department of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Groennegaardsvej 8, 1870 Frederiksberg C, Denmark
B Forkman
Affiliation:
Department of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Groennegaardsvej 8, 1870 Frederiksberg C, Denmark
*
* Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Leg problems are highly prevalent in modern broiler production and provision of environmental enrichment could be a strategy to improve leg health. Different types of environmental enrichment have undergone evaluation. Our objective was to conduct a systematic review of the effect of environmental enrichment on leg health in broiler chickens. The evaluation of leg health included measures of the entire leg and foot, and behavioural, pathological and physical measures. Six types of environmental enrichment were selected for inclusion: light programme, intensity of light, stocking density, perches, straw bales and separation of resources. For each type, a systematic literature search was performed. The review included 62 studies; 56 randomised trials and six cross-sectional studies. An assessment of the methodological quality of all 56 randomised trials was performed with some reporting deficits regarding occurrence of blinding, randomisation and reliability of measures. Provision of perches and increased intensity of light only displayed limited effectiveness in improving leg health and both mainly affected contact dermatitis. In contrast, there was evidence that a lowered stocking density and a dark/light schedule could improve leg health. Few studies have been carried out on the effect of straw bales and separation of resources. The few studies done have, however, shown that both types of enrichment can be effective in improving leg health. In conclusion, identifying and providing the optimal types of enrichment for broilers will reduce leg problems and increase mobility, thereby improving the welfare of the birds.

Keywords

animal welfarebroiler chickenenvironmental enrichmentleg healthlightstocking density
Type
Articles
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 28 , Issue 2 , May 2019 , pp. 215 - 230
Copyright
© 2019 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

References

Allain, V, Mirabito, L, Arnould, C, Colas, M, Le Bouquin, S, Lupo, C and Michel, V 2009 Skin lesions in broiler chickens measured at the slaughterhouse: relationships between lesions and between their prevalence and rearing factors. British Poultry Science 50: 407–417. http://doi.org/10.1080/00071660903110901CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bailie, CL, Ball, MEE and O’Connell, NE 2013 Influence of the pro-vision of natural light and straw bales on activity levels and leg health in commercial broiler chickens. International Journal of Animal Bioscience 7:618–626. https://doi.org/10.1017/1751731112002108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailie, CL and O’Connell, NE 2015 The influence of providing perches and string on activity levels, fearfulness and leg health in commercial broiler chickens. An International Journal of Animal Bioscience 9: 660–668. https://doi.org/10.1017/S 1751731114002821CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bassler, AW, Arnould, C, Butterworth, A, Colin, L, De Jong, IC, Ferrante, V, Ferrari, P, Haslam, S, Wemelsfelder, F and Blokhuis, HJ 2013 Potential risk factors associated with contact dermatitis, lameness, negative emotional state, and fear of humans in broiler chicken flocks. Poultry Science 92: 2811–2826. http://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2013-03208CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bessei, W 2006 Welfare of broilers: a review. World's Poultry Science Journal 62: 455–466. http://doi.org/10.1079/WPS2005108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birgul, OB, Mutaf, S and Alkan, S 2012 Effects of different angled perches on leg disorders in broilers. Archiv fur geflugelkunde 76: 44–48Google Scholar
Bizeray, D, Estevez, I, Leterrier, C and Faure, J 2002 Influence of increased environmental complexity on leg condition, performance, and level of fearfulness in broilers. Poultry Science 81:767–773. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/81.6.767Google ScholarPubMed
Blair, R, Newberry, R and Gardiner, E 1993 Effects of lighting pattern and dietary tryptophan supplementation on growth and mortality in broilers. Poultry Science 72: 495–502. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0720495CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blatchford, RA, Archer, GS and Mench, JA 2012 Contrast in light intensity, rather than day length, influences the behavior and health of broiler chickens. Poultry Science 91: 1768–1974. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2011-02051Google ScholarPubMed
Blatchford, RA, Klasing, KC, Shivaprasad, HL, Wakenell, PS, Archer, GS and Mench, JA 2009 The effect of light intensi-ty on the behavior, eye and leg health, and immune function of broiler chickens. Poultry Science 88: 20–28. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2008-00177CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bradshaw, RH, Kirkden, RD and Broom, DM 2002 A review of the aetiology and pathology of leg weakness in broilers in relation to welfare. Avian and Poultry Biology Reviews 13: 45–103. http://doi.org/10.3184/147020602783698421Google Scholar
Brickett, KE, Dahiya, JP, Classen, HL, Annett, CB and Gomis, S 2007 The impact of nutrient density, feed form, and photoperiod on the walking ability and skeletal quality of broiler chickens. Poultry Science 86: 2117–2125. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/86.10.2117CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buijs, S, Keeling, L, Rettenbacher, S, Van Poucke, E and Tuyttens, FAM 2009 Stocking density effects on broiler welfare: identifying sensitive ranges for different indicators. Poultry Science 88: 1536–1543. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2009-00007CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buijs, S, Van Poucke, E, Van Dongen, S, Lens, L, Baert, J and Tuyttens, FAM 2012 The influence of stocking density on broil-er chicken bone quality and fluctuating asymmetry. Poultry Science 91: 1759–1767. http://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2011-01859Google ScholarPubMed
Classen, HL and Riddell, C 1989 Photoperiodic effects on per-formance and leg abnormalities in broiler chickens. Poultry Science 68: 873–879. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0680873Google Scholar
Classen, HL, Riddell, C and Robinson, FE 1991 Effects of increasing photoperiod length on performance and health of broiler chickens. British Poultry Science 32: 21–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071669108417324CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Council Directive 2007 Council Directive 2007/43/EC of 28 June 2007 laying down minimum rules for the protection of chickens kept for meat production. Official Journal of the European Union: Brussels, BelgiumGoogle Scholar
Das, H and Lacin, E 2014 The effect of different photoperiods and stocking densities on fattening performance, carcass and some stress parameters in broilers. Israel Journal of Veterinary Medicine 69: 211–220Google Scholar
Dawkins, MS, Donnelly, CA and Jones, TA 2004 Chicken welfare is influenced more by housing conditions than by stocking density. Nature 427: 342–324. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02226Google ScholarPubMed
Deep, A, Raginski, C, Schwean-Lardner, K, Fancher, BI and Classen, HL 2013 Minimum light intensity threshold to prevent neg-ative effects on broiler production and welfare. British Poultry Science 54: 686–694. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071668.2013.847526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deep, A, Schwean-Lardner, K, Crowe, TG, Fancher, BI and Classen, HL 2010 Effect of light intensity on broiler production, processing characteristics, and welfare. Poultry Science 89: 2326–2333. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2010-00964CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dozier, W, Thaxton, J, Purswell, J, Olanrewaju, H, Branton, S and Roush, W 2006 Stocking density effects on male broilers grown to 1.8 kilograms of body weight. Poultry Science 85: 344–351. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/85.2.344CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
EFSA 2010 Application of systematic review methodology to food and feed safety assessments to support decision making. EFSA Guidance for those carrying out systematic reviews. EFSA Journal 8: 1637. http://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2010.1637Google Scholar
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations 2015 Food outlook, biannual report on global food markets. http://www.fao.org/3/a-i5003e.pdfGoogle Scholar
Garner, JP, Falcone, C, Wakenell, P, Martin, M and Mench, JA 2002 Reliability and validity of a modified gait scoring system and its use in assessing tibial dyschondroplasia in broilers. British Poultry Science 43: 355–363. http://doi.org/10.1080/00071660120103620Google ScholarPubMed
Hall, A 2001 The effect of stocking density on the welfare and behaviour of broiler chickens reared commercially. Animal Welfare 10: 23–40Google Scholar
Haslam, SM, Brown, SN, Wilkins, LJ, Kestin, SC, Warriss, PD and Nicol, CJ 2006 Preliminary study to examine the utility of using foot burn or hock burn to assess aspects of housing con-ditions for broiler chicken. British Poultry Science 47: 13–18. http://doi.org/10.1080/00071660500475046CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hongchao, J, Jiang, Y, Song, Z, Zhao, J, Wang, X and Lin, H 2013 Effect of perch type and stocking density on the behaviour and growth of broilers. Animal Production Science 54: 930–941. https://doi.org/10.1071/AN13184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, AC and Gosling, SD 2005 Temperament and personality in dogs (Canis familiaris): A review and evaluation of past research. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 95: 1–53. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2005.04.008Google Scholar
Julian, RJ 1984 Valgus-varus deformity of the intertarsal joint in broiler chickens. The Canadian Veterinary Journal 25: 254–258Google ScholarPubMed
Kells, A, Dawkins, M and Borja, M 2001 The effect of a ‘free-dom food’ enrichment on the behaviour of broilers on commer-cial farms. Animal Welfare 10: 347–356Google Scholar
Kestin, S, Knowles, T, Tinch, and Gregory, N 1992 Prevalence of leg weakness in broiler-chickens and its relationship with geno-type. Veterinary Record 131: 190–194. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.131.9.190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ketelaars, EH, Verbrugge, M, van der Hel, W, van de Linden, JM and Verstegen, WM 1986 Effect of intermittent lighting on performance and energy metabolism of broilers. Poultry Science 65: 2208–2213. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0652208CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knierim, U 2013 Effects of stocking density on the behaviour and bodily state of broilers fattened with a target liveweight of 2 kg. Berliner Und Mu?nchener Tiera?rztliche Wochenschrift 126: 149–155Google ScholarPubMed
Knowles, TG, Kestin, SC, Haslam, SM, Brown, SN, Green, LE, Butterworth, A, Pope, SJ, Pfeiffer, D and Nicol, CJ 2008 Leg disorders in broiler chickens: prevalence, risk factors and pre-vention. PloS One 3: e1545. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0001545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kristensen, HH, Perry, GC, Prescott, NB, Ladewig, J, Ersbøll, AK and Wathes, CM 2006 Leg health and performance of broiler chickens reared in different light environments. British Poultry Science 47: 257–263. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071660600753557CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kyvsgaard, NC, Jensen, HB, Ambrosen, T and Toft, N 2013 Temporal changes and risk factors for foot-pad dermatitis in Danish broilers. Poultry Science 92: 26–32. http://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2012-02433Google ScholarPubMed
Leterrier, C and Constantin, P 1996 Reducing the occurrence of varus-valgus deformations in broiler chickens with a low ener-gy diet or an increasing lighting schedule. Archiv fur Geflugelkunde 60: 181–187Google Scholar
Martrenchar, A, Boilletot, E, Huonnic, D and Pol, F 2002 Risk factors for foot-pad dermatitis in chicken and turkey broilers in France. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 52: 213–226. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-5877(01)00259-8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McLean, J, Savory, C and Sparks, N 2002 Welfare of male and female broiler chickens in relation to stocking density, as indicated by performance, health and behaviour. Animal Welfare 11: 55–73Google Scholar
Meluzzi, A, Fabbri, C, Folegatti, E and Sirri, F 2008 Effect of less intensive rearing conditions on litter characteristics, growth performance, carcase injuries and meat quality of broilers. British Poultry Science 49: 509–515. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071660802290424CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Newberry, RC 1995 Environmental enrichment: Increasing the biological relevance of captive environments. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 44: 229–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1591(95)00616-ZCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newberry, RC, Hunt, JR and Gardiner, EE 1988 Influence of light intensity on behaviour and performance of broiler chickens. Poultry Science 67: 1020–1025. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0671020Google ScholarPubMed
O’hara, A, Oyakawa, C, Yoshihara, Y, Ninomiya, S and Sato, S 2015 Effect of environmental enrichment on the behavior and welfare of Japanese broilers at a commercial Farm. The Journal of Poultry Science 52: 323–330. http://doi.org/10.2141/jpsa.0150034Google Scholar
Olanrewaju, HA, Miller, WW, Maslin, WR, Thaxton, JP, Dozier, WA, Purswell, J and Branton, SL 2007 Interactive effects of ammonia and light intensity on ocular, fear and leg health in broiler chickens. International Journal of Poultry Science 6:762–769. https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2007.762.769Google Scholar
Onbasilar, EE, Erol, H, Cantekin, Z and Kaya, U 2007 Influence of intermittent lighting on broiler performance, inci-dence of tibial dyschondroplasia, tonic immobility, some blood parameters and antibody production. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 20: 550–555. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2007.550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oviedo-Rondón, EO, Ferket, PR and Havestein, GB 2006 Nutritional factors that affect leg problems in broilers and turkeys. Avian and Poultry Biology Reviews 17: 89–103. http://doi.org/10.3184/147020606783437921CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petek, M, Sönmez, G, Yildiz, H and Baspinar, H 2005 Effects of different management factors on broiler performance and inci-dence of tibial dyschondroplasia. British Poultry Science 46: 16–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071660400023821Google Scholar
Ravindran, V, Thomas, DV, Thomas, DG and Morel, P 2006 Performance and welfare of broilers as affected by stocking den-sity and zinc bacitracin supplementation. Animal Science Journal 77:110–116. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-0029.2006.00327.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reiter, K 2004 Effect of distance between feeder and drinker on exer-cise and leg disorders in broilers. Archiv fur Geflugelkunde 68: 98–105Google Scholar
Reiter, K and Bessei, W 2009 Effect of locomotor activity on leg dis-order in fattening chicken. Berliner und Munchener Tierarztliche Wochenschrift122: 264–270. https://doi.org/10.2376/0005-9366-122-264Google Scholar
Renden, JA, Bilgili, SF and Kincaid, SA 1992 Effects of photo-schedule and strain cross on broiler performance and carcass yield. Poultry Science 71: 1417–1426. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0711417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renden, JA, Bilgili, SF, Lien, RJ and Kincaid, SA 1991 Live per-formance and yields of broilers provided various lighting sched-ules. Poultry Science 70: 2055–2062. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0702055CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renden, JA, Moran, ET and Kincaid, SA 1996 Lighting pro-grams for broilers that reduce leg problems without loss of per-formance or yield. Poultry Science 75: 1345–1350. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0751345Google ScholarPubMed
Robbins, KR, Adekunmisi, AA and Shirley, HV 1984 The effect of light regime on growth and pattern of body fat accretion of broiler chickens. Growth 48: 269–277Google ScholarPubMed
Robins, A and Phillips, CJC 2011 International approaches to the welfare of meat chickens. World's Poultry Science Journal 67: 351–369. http://doi.org/10.1017/S0043933911000341Google Scholar
Rozenboim, I, Robinzon, B and Rosenstrauch, A 1999 Effect of light source and regimen on growing broilers. British Poultry Science 40: 452–457. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071669987197Google ScholarPubMed
Ruiz-Feria, CA, Arroyo-Villegas, JJ, Pro-Martinez, A, Bautista-Ortega, J, Cortes-Cuevas, A, Narciso-Gaytan, C, Hernandez-Cazares, A and Gallegos-Sanchez, J 2014 Effects of distance and barriers between resources on bone and tendon strength and productive performance of broiler chickens. Poultry Science 93: 1608–1617. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2013-03421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanotra, GS, Lund, JD and Vestergaard, KS 2002 Influence of light-dark schedules and stocking density on behaviour, risk of leg problems and occurrence of chronic fear in broilers. British Poultry Science 43: 344–354. https://doi.org/10.1080/000716601201036023611CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schwean-Lardner, K, Fancher, BI, Gomis, S, Van Kessel, A, Dalal, S and Classen, HL 2013 Effect of day length on cause of mortality, leg health, and ocular health in broilers. Poultry Science 92: 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2011-01967CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seet, CP and Azizah, MD 1990 Kesan kepadatan stok dan tetenggek terhadap prestasi ayam pedaging. Mardi Research Journal 18: 129–131. [Title translation: Effect of stocking densities and perches on broiler performance]Google Scholar
Shepherd, EM and Fairchild, BD 2010 Footpad dermatitis in poultry. Poultry Science 89: 2043–2051. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2010-00770Google ScholarPubMed
Shim, MY, Karnuah, AB, Mitchell, AD, Anthony, NB, Pesti, GM and Aggrey, SE 2012 The effects of growth rate on leg morphology and tibia breaking strength, mineral density, mineral content, and bone ash in broilers. Poultry Science 91: 1790–1795. http://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2011-01968Google ScholarPubMed
Siddiqui, MBA, Auradkar, SK, Siddiqui, MF and Dhumal, MV 2003 Effect of intermittent light on leg abnormalities, breast blisters and mortality in broilers. Indian Journal of Poultry Science 38: 178–180Google Scholar
Škrbić, Z, Pavlovski, Z, Lukić, M, Perić, L and Milošević, N 2009 The effect of stocking density on certain broiler welfare parameters. Biotechnology in Animal Husbandry 25: 11–21. https://doi.org/10.2298/bah0902011sCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Škrbić, Z, Pavlovski, Z, Lukić, M, Petričević, V, Đukić-Stojčić, M and Žikić, D 2011 The effect of stocking density on individual broiler welfare parameters: 2 Different broiler stocking densities. Biotechnology in Animal Husbandry 27: 17–24. https://doi.org/10.2298/bah1101017sCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sørensen, P, Su, G and Kestin, S 1999 The effect of photope-riod: scotoperiod on leg weakness in broiler chickens. Poultry Science 78: 336–342. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/78.3.336Google ScholarPubMed
Sørensen, P, Su, G and Kestin, S 2000 Effects of age and stocking density on leg weakness in broiler chickens. Poultry science 79: 864–870. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/79.6.864Google ScholarPubMed
Su, G, Sørensen, P and Kestin, SC 2000 A note on the effects of perches and litter substrate on leg weakness in broiler chick-ens. Poultry Science 79: 1259–1263. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/79.9.1259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tablante, NL, Estevez, I and Russek-Cohen, E 2003 Effect of perches and stocking density on tibial dyschondroplasia and bone mineralization as measured by bone ash in broiler chickens. The Journal of Applied Poultry Research 12: 53–59. http://doi.org/10.1093/japr/12.1.53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, DG, Ravindran, V, Thomas, DV, Camden, BJ, Cottam, YH, Morel, PCH and Cook, CJ 2004 Influence of stocking density on the performance, carcass characteristics and selected welfare indicators of broiler chickens. New Zealand Veterinary Journal 52: 76–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/00480169.2004.36408CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Toscano, MJ, Nasr, MAF and Hothersall, B 2013 Correlation between broiler lameness and anatomical measurements of bone using radiographical projections with assessments of consistency across and within radiographs. Poultry Science 92: 2251–2258. http://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2012-02904CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van der Pol, CW, Molenaar, R, Buitink, CJ, van Roovert-Reijrink, IAM, Maatjens, CM, van den Brand, H and Kemp, B 2015 Lighting schedule and dimming period in early life: conse-quences for broiler chicken leg bone development. Poultry Science 94: 2980–2988. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pev276Google Scholar
Ventura, BA, Siewerdt, F and Estevez, I 2010 Effects of barri-er perches and density on broiler leg health, fear, and perform-ance. Poultry Science 89: 1574–1583. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2009-00576Google Scholar
Ventura, BA, Siewerdt, F and Estevez, I 2012 Access to bar-rier perches improves behavior repertoire in broilers. PLoS ONE 7: e29826. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0029826CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Videncentret for Landbrug 2012 Screening af slagtekyllingers gangegenskaber anno 2011. Videncentret for Landbrug, Aarhus, Denmark. [Title translation: Screening of the walking ability of broiler chickens in 2011]Google Scholar
Waldenstedt, L 2006 Nutritional factors of importance for opti-mal leg health in broilers: A review. Animal Feed Science and Technology 126: 291–307. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeed-sci.2005.08.008Google Scholar
Weeks, CA, Danbury, TD, Davies, HC, Hunt, P and Kestin, SC 2000 The behaviour of broiler chickens and its modification by lameness. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 67: 111–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0168-1591(99)00102-1CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weeks, C, Knowles, T, Gordon, R, Kerr, A, Peyton, S and Tilbrook, N 2002 New method for objectively assessing lame-ness in broiler chickens. Veterinary Record 151: 762–764. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/vr.151.25.762Google ScholarPubMed
Williams, B, Solomon, S, Waddington, D, Thorp, B and Farquharson, C 2000 Skeletal development in the meat-type chicken. British Poultry Science 4: 141–149. http://doi.org/10.1080/713654918CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, JL, Weaver, WD, Beane, WL and Cherry, JA 1984 Effects of light and feeding space on leg abnormalities in broilers. Poultry Science 63: 565–567. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0630565CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wongvalle, J, McDaniel, G, Kuhlers, D and Bartels, J 1993 Effect of lighting program and broiler line on the incidence of tib-ial dyschondroplasia at 4 and 7 weeks of age. Poultry Science 72:1855–1860. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0721855CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yildiz, H, Petek, M, Sonmez, G, Arican, I and Yilmaz, B 2009 Effects of lighting schedule and ascorbic acid on performance and tibiotarsus bone characteristics in broilers. Turkish Journal of Veterinary & Animal Sciences 33: 469–476. https://doi.org/10.3906/vet-0802-1Google Scholar
Zhao, JP, Jiao, HC, Jiang, YB, Song, ZG, Wang, XJ and Lin, H 2012 Cool perch availability improves the performance and wel-fare status of broiler chickens in hot weather. Poultry Science 91:1775–1784. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2011-02058CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhao, JP, Jiao, HC, Jiang, YB, Song, ZG, Wang, XJ and Lin, H 2013 Cool perches improve the growth performance and welfare status of broiler chickens reared at different stocking densities and high temperatures. Poultry Science92: 1962–1971. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2012-02933CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zuidhof, MJ, Schneider, BL, Carney, VL, Korver, DR and Robinson, FE 2014 Growth, efficiency, and yield of commercial broilers from 1957, 1978, and 2005. Poultry Science 93: 2970–2982. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2014-04291CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zuowei, S, Yan, L, Yuan, L, Jiao, H, Song, Z, Guo, Y and Lin, H 2011 Stocking density affects the growth performance of broil-ers in a sex-dependent fashion. Poultry Science 90: 1406–1415. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2010-01230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Pedersen and Forkman supplementary material
Download undefined(File)
File 145.9 KB
Supplementary material: File

Pedersen and Forkman supplementary material
Download undefined(File)
File 149 KB
Supplementary material: PDF

Download undefined(PDF)
PDF 145.9 KB
Supplementary material: PDF

Download undefined(PDF)
PDF 149 KB