Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T07:30:15.712Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Implementing animal welfare assessments at farm and group level: introduction and overview

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

TM Widowski*
Affiliation:
Department of Animal and Poultry Science and Campbell Centre for the Study of Animal Welfare, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada N1G 2W1
J Rushen
Affiliation:
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Pacific Agri-Food Research Centre, 6947 Hwy#7, PO Box 1000, Agassiz, BC, Canada V0M 1A0
FAM Tuyttens
Affiliation:
Institute for Agricultural and Fisheries Research, Animal Sciences Unit, Scheldeweg 68, 9090 Melle, Belgium Ghent University, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Nutrition, Genetics and Ethology, Merelbeke, Belgium
I Veissier
Affiliation:
Directrice de l’Unité Mixte de Recherche sur les Herbivores, INRA, UMR1213 Herbivores, F-63122 Saint-Genès-Champanelle, France
*
* Corresponding author: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Over the past decade there has been huge growth in the implementation of animal welfare assessments and audits in a variety of animal applications around the world. These include quality assurance programmes for meat, milk and eggs, certification for specialty brands or food-labelling programmes, accreditation of zoos, laboratories and animal shelters, and proofs of compliance with animal welfare standards required by regulatory agencies. Assessing animal welfare in such practical settings poses challenges at many levels. The animal welfare measures chosen for an assessment must be valid, repeatable and robust, and the sampling techniques must provide accurate representations of the overall welfare status of large groups of animals. Animal welfare assessors can come from a range of backgrounds with varying skill levels and experience and need to receive adequate training to ensure reliability. Although automated measures for animal welfare assessments can reduce potential for assessor error and bias, save time and reduce costs they must be sufficiently validated.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2012 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

References

Sørenson, JT and Sandøe, P 2001 Assessment of animal welfare at farm and group level. Acta Agriculturaae Scandinavica (Section A - Animal Science) Supplement 30: 34Google Scholar
Tuyttens, FAM, Maes, D, Geverink, N, Koene, P and Rodenburg, TB 2009 Assessing animal welfare at farm and group level: introduction and overview. Animal Welfare 18: 323324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, AJF 2003 Assessment of animal welfare at farm and group level: introduction and overview. Animal Welfare 12: 429431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Widowski, T, Sheppard, K and Lawlis, P 2011 Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on the Assessment of Animal Welfare at Farm and Group Level. Wageningen Academic Publishers: Wageningen, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
Winckler, C, Baumgartner, J and Waiblinger, S 2007 Perspectives of animal welfare at farm and group level: introduction and overview. Animal Welfare 16: 105CrossRefGoogle Scholar