Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T06:10:58.991Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A hypothetical strategy for the objective evaluation of animal well-being and quality of life using a dog model

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2023

DB Morton
DB Morton*
Affiliation:
School of Biosciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
*
Correspondence: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In this paper I describe a hypothetical strategy for assessing poor and good welfare with the aim of making a judgement about an animal's quality of life. The concepts discussed here may also contribute to the notion of what makes ‘a life worth living’. The strategy involves attributing scores to positive and negative aspects of an animal's well-being, using predefined categories and a simple scoring rote, and then summating these scores into an overall welfare score. The strategy incorporates a mathematical calculation that has certain mathematical biases to help ensure that any animal suffering is not excessive. I draw attention to some limitations of the proposed strategy and stress that such mathematical scoring systems cannot be used simplistically. Nevertheless, the proposed strategy could be refined, tested and validated to assist decision-making by those with a duty of care to the animal concerned.

Keywords

animal needsanimal wantsanimal welfareassessmentquality of life
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 16 , Issue S1: Quality of Life: the heart of the matter: Proceedings of the UFAW/BVA Ethics Committee International Symposium, The Royal Society, London, 13-14 September 2006. , May 2007 , pp. 75 - 81
Copyright
© 2007 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

References

Berdoy, M 2003 http://www.ratlife.org (accessed March 2007)Google Scholar
Broom, DM 1986 Indicators of poor welfare. British Veterinary Journal 142: 524–526CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carr, AJ, Gibson, B and Robinson, PG 2001 Is quality of life determined by expectations or experience? British Medical Journal 322: 1240–1243CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cook, WR, Strasser, H and de Beukalaer, ERJM 2007 Compliance with physiology as the foundation for animal welfare guidelines: exemplified by the physiological rehabilitation of the horse's foot and mouth. (Poster presentation.) Animal Welfare 16 (S): 166Google Scholar
Dawkins, MS 1980 Animal Suffering: The Science of Animal Welfare. Chapman and Hall: London, UKCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawkins, MS 1990 From an animal's point of view: motivation, fitness and animal welfare. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13: 1–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncan, IJH 1993 Welfare is to do with what animals feel. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 6(Suppl 2): 8–14Google Scholar
Duncan, IJH 1996 Animal welfare defined in terms of feelings. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section A — Animal Science (Suppl) 27: 29–35Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, M 1997 Neurobiology of foetal and neonatal pain. In: Wall, P and Melzack, R (eds) Textbook of Pain (3rd Edition) pp 153–163. Churchill Livingstone: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Fitzgerald, M and Anand, KJS 1993 Developmental neuroanatomy and neurophysiology of pain. In: Schecter, NL, Berde, CB and Yaster, M (eds) Pain in Infants, Children and Adolescents pp 11–32. Williams and Wilkins: Baltimore, USAGoogle Scholar
Fitzgerald, M and Koltzenburg, M 1996 The functional development of descending inhibitory pathways in the dorsolateral funiculus of the newborn rat spinal cord. Developmental Brain Research 24: 261–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, D 1995 Science, values and animal welfare: exploring the ‘inextricable connection’. Animal Welfare 4: 103–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gentle, MJ 1986 Neuroma formation following partial beak amputation (beak trimming) in the chicken. Research in Veterinary Science 41: 383–385CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McMillan, FD and Lance, K 2004 Unlocking the Animal Mind. Rodale: Emmaus, PA, USAGoogle Scholar
Mellor, DJ and Molony, V 1995 Castration and/or tail docking of lambs. Veterinary Record 137: 227CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mellor, DJ and Stafford, KJ 1999 Assessing and minimising the distress caused by painful husbandry procedures. In Practice 21: 436–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morton, DB and Griffiths, PHM 1985 Guidelines on the recognition of pain, distress and discomfort in experimental animals and an hypothesis for assessment. Veterinary Record 116: 431–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spruijt, BM, van den Bos, R and Pijlman, FTA 2001 A concept of welfare based on reward evaluating mechanisms in the brain: anticipatory behaviour as an indicator for the state of reward systems. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 72: 145–171CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taddio, A, Goldbach, M, Ipp, M, Stevens, B and Koren, G 1995 Effect of neonatal circumcision on pain responses during vaccination in boys. Lancet 345: 291–292CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wiepkema, PR 1985 Abnormal behaviours in farm animals: ethological implications. The Netherlands Journal of Zoology 35: 279–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiseman, ML, Nolan, AM, Reid, J and Scott, EM 2001 Preliminary study on owner-reported behaviour changes associated with chronic pain in dogs. Veterinary Record 149: 423–424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiseman-Orr, ML, Nolan, AM, Reid, J and Scott, EM 2004 Development of a questionnaire to measure the effects of chronic pain on health-related quality of life in dogs. American Journal of Veterinary Research 65: 1077–1084CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed