Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T07:33:21.621Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

How should the welfare of fetal and neurologically immature postnatal animals be protected?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

MLH Campbell ,
DJ Mellor  and
P SandØe
MLH Campbell*
Affiliation:
Department of Production and Population Health, The Royal Veterinary College, Hawkshead Lane, South Mymms, Herts AL9 7TA, UK
DJ Mellor
Affiliation:
Animal Welfare Science and Bioethics Centre, Institute of Veterinary, Animal and Biomedical Sciences, Massey University PN452, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand
P SandØe
Affiliation:
Department of Large Animal Sciences and Department of Food and Resource Economics, University of Copenhagen, Rolighedsvej 25, 1958 Frederiksberg C, Denmark
*
* Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Legal protection of the welfare of prenatal animals has not previously been addressed as a discrete subject within the academic literature on animal welfare, ethics and law. This paper aims to rectify this by reviewing the protections (or absence of protections) provided for fetuses by existing legislation in various jurisdictions, and considering the extent to which legal protection of animal fetuses can be justified on animal welfare grounds. Questions related to the need to protect the welfare of neurologically immature postnatal animals are also considered. We argue that there are reasons to protect animal fetuses, both in order to protect fetuses themselves against possible suffering, and in order to protect the animals which fetuses will become against negative welfare impacts that originate prenatally. We review the science on whether fetuses can suffer, and argue that extant regulations do not fully reflect current scientific understanding. Following the precautionary principle, we further argue that regulators should consider the possibility that fetuses and neurologically immature postnatal animals may suffer due to sub-cortically based ‘raw basic affects’ (ie relatively undifferentiated experiences of discomfort suggested to be generated by neural processing at levels below the cerebral cortex). Furthermore, we show that there are reasons for affording fetuses protection in order to safeguard the long-term welfare of future animals. However, it may be possible to provide such protection via rules or laws relating to the use of certain techniques and the management of pregnant animals, rather than via direct legal protection of fetuses themselves. In order to provide such protection effectively we need to know more about the relationship between maternal nutrition, stress, exercise, management and fetal health, and about the impact of the timing of a fetal insult on long-term postnatal welfare.

Keywords

animal welfarefetal protectionfetal sufferingneurological immaturitypostnatal harmsregulations
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 23 , Issue 4 , November 2014 , pp. 369 - 379
Copyright
© 2014 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

References

Animal, Health and Protection Act, RSPE 1988 http://www.gov.pe.ca/law/regulations/pdf/A&11-1-1.pdfGoogle Scholar
Animal Welfare Act s(1)(3-4) 2006 http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/45/contentsGoogle Scholar
Baars, BJ 2001 There are no known differences in brain mecha-nisms of consciousness between humans and other mammals. Animal Welfare 10: S31–S40Google Scholar
Bager, F, Braggins, TJ, Devine, CE, Graahuis, AE, Mellor, DJ, Tavener, A and Updell, MP 1992 Onset of insensibility at slaughter in calves: effects of electroplectic seizure and exsan-guination on spontaneous electrocortical activity and indices of cerebral metabolism. Research in Veterinary Science 52: 162–173. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0034-5288(92)90005-MCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barker, DJ and Thornburg, KL 2013 Placental programming of chronic diseases, cancer and lifespan: a review. Placenta 34: 841–845. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.placenta.2013.07.063CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beggs, S, Currie, G, Salter, MW, Fitzgerald, M and Walker, SM 2012 Priming of adult pain responses by neonatal pain expe-rience: maintenance by central neuroimmune activity. Brain 135:404–417. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/brain/awr288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belkacemi, L, Nelson, DM, Desai, M and Ross, MG 2010 Maternal undernutrition influences placental-fetal development. Biology of Reproduction 83: 325–331. http://dx.doi.org/10.1095/biol-reprod.110.084517CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bennett, L, Rossenrode, S, Gunning, MI, Gluckman, PD and Gunn, AJ 1999 The cardiovascular and cerebrovascular respons-es of the immature fetal sheep to acute umbilical cord occlusion. Journal of Physiology (London) 517: 247–257. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7793.1999.0247z.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bosch, L, Rivera del Alamo, MM, Andaluz, A, Monreal, L, Torrente, C, Garcia-Arnas, F and Fresno, L 2012 Effects of ovariohysterectomy on intra-abdominal pressure and abdominal perfusion pressure in cats. The Veterinary Record 171: 622. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/vr.100791CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boveroux, P, Bonhomme, V, Boly, M, Vanhaudenhuyse, A, Maquet, P and Laureys, S 2008 Brain function in physiological-ly, pharmacologically and pathologically altered states of con-sciousness. International Anesthesiology Clinics 46: 131–146. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AIA.0b013e318181a8b3Google Scholar
Brent, RL 2004 Utilization of animal studies to determine the effects and human risks of environmental toxicants (drugs, chem-icals, and physical agents). Pediatrics 113: 984–995CrossRefGoogle Scholar
British Horseracing Authority 2014 The Rules of Racing. British Horseracing Authority: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Denton, DA, McKinley, MJ, Farrell, M and Egan, GF 2009 The role of primordial emotions in the evolutionary origin of con-sciousness. Consciousness and Cognition 18: 500–514. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2008.06.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doidge, N 2008 The Brain the Changes Itself. Scribe Publications: North Carlton, Victoria, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
Eales, FA, Small, J and Macaldowie, C 2004 Practical Lambing and Lamb Care: A Veterinary Guide, 3rd Edition. Blackwell Publishing Ltd: Oxford, UK. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470698853CrossRefGoogle Scholar
EFSA 2005a Aspects of the biology and welfare of animals used for experimental and other scientific purposes. EFSA Journal 292: 1–136Google Scholar
EFSA 2005b Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Animal Health and Welfare on a request from the Commission related to Aspects of the Biology and Welfare of Animals used for Experimental and other Scientific Purposes. EFSA Journal 292: 1–46Google Scholar
Favre, D 2010 Living property: a new status for animals within the legal system. Marquette Law Review 93: 1022–1071Google Scholar
FAWC 2012 Opinion on the Welfare Implications of Breeding and Breeding Technologies in Commercial Livestock Agriculture. http://www.defra.gov.uk/fawc/files/Opinion-on-the-welfare-impli-cations-of-breeding-and-breeding-technologies-in-commercial-livestock-agriculture.pdfGoogle Scholar
Freeman, WJ 2007 Roles of allocortex and centrencephalon in intentionality and consciousness. Behavioral and Brain Science 30:92–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X07001008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gitau, R, Fisk, NM and Glover, V 2004 Human fetal and mater-nal corticotrophin releasing hormone responses to acute stress. Archives of Disease in Childhood. Fetal and Neonatal Edition 89: F29–F32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/fn.89.1.F29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopkins, SA, Baldi, JC, Cutfield, WS, McCowan, L and Hofman, PL 2010 Exercise training in pregnancy reduces off-spring size without changes in maternal insulin sensitivity. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 95: 2080–2088. http://dx.doi.org/10.1210/jc.2009-2255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopkins, SA and Cutfield, WS 2011 Exercise in pregnancy: weighing up the long-term impact on the next generation. Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews 39: 120–127. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/JES.0b013e31821a5527CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Houdebine, L-M, Dinnyés, A, Bánáti, D, Kleiner, J and Carlander, D 2008 Animal cloning for food: epigenetics, health, welfare and food safety aspects. Trends in Food Science & Technology 19(S1): S88–S95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2008.07.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, CJ, Bennett, L, Power, GG, Roelfsems, V, Blood, AB, Quaedackers, JS, George, S, Guan, J and Gunn, AJ 2003b A key neuroprotective role for endogenous adenosine A1 recep-tor activation during asphyxia in the fetal sheep. Stroke 34: 2240–2245. http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000083623.77327.CEGoogle Scholar
Hunter, CJ, Blood, AB and Power, GG 2003a Cerebral metab-olism during cord occlusion and hypoxia in fetal sheep: a novel method of continuous measurement of basal heat production. The Journal of Physiology (London) 552: 241–251. http://dx.doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2003.048082Google Scholar
Jochems, CE, van der Valk, JB, Stafleu, FR and Baumans, V 2002 The use of fetal bovine serum: ethical or scientific problem? Alternatives to Laboratory Animals 30: 219–227CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, CB, Gibson, TJ, Stafford, KJ and Mellor, DJ 2012 Pain perception at slaughter. Animal Welfare 21(S2): 113–122. http://dx.doi.org/10.7120/096272812X13353700593888CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalinka, AT and Tomancek, P 2012 The evolution of early ani-mal embryos: conservation or divergence? Trends in Ecology and Evolution 27: 385–393. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2012.03.007CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Karlen, SJ and Krubitzer, L 2007 The functional and anatomical organization of marsupial neocortex; evidence for parallel evolution in mammals. Progress in Neurobiology 82: 122–141. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pneurobio.2007.03.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kluge, AG and Strauss, RE 1985 Ontogeny and systematics. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 16: 247–268. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.16.110185.001335Google Scholar
Langley-Evans, SC and McMullen, S 2010 Developmental ori-gins of adult disease. Medical Principles and Practice 19: 87–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000273066CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liggins, GC 1994 The role of cortisol in preparing the fetus for birth. Reproduction Fertility and Development 6: 141–150. http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/RD9940141CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Low, LA and Fitzgerald, M 2012 Acute pain and a motivational pathway in adult rats: influence of early life pain experience. PLoS One 7: e34316. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0034316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mallard, EC, Gunn, AJ, Williams, CE, Johnston, BM and Gluckman, PD 1992 Transient umbilical cord occlusion causes hippocampal damage in the fetal sheep. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 167: 1423–1430. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9378(11)91728-1CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCracken, L, Waran, N, Mitchinson, S and Johnson, CB 2010 Effect of age at castration on behavioural response to subsequent tail docking in lambs. Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia 37(4): 375–381. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-2995.2010.00547.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McMillan, IC and Robinson, JS 2005 Developmental origins of the metabolic syndrome: prediction, plasticity, and programming. Physiological Reviews 85: 571–633. http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/phys-rev.00053.2003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mellor, DJ 1988 Integration of perinatal events, pathophysiologi-cal changes and consequences for the newborn lamb. British Veterinary Journal 144: 552–569. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0007-1935(88)90025-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mellor, DJ 2010 Galloping colts, fetal feelings and reassuring reg-ulations: putting farm animal welfare science into practice. Journal of Veterinary Medical Education 37: 94–102. http://dx.doi.org/10.3138/jvme.37.1.94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mellor, DJ 2012 Animal emotions, behaviour and the promotion of positive welfare states. New Zealand Vet Journal 60: 1–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00480169.2011.619047CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mellor, DJ 2013 Production animals: ethical and welfare issues raised by production-focused management of newborn livestock. In: Wathes, CM, Corr, SA, May, SA, McCulloch, SP and Whiting, MC (eds) Veterinary and Animal Ethics: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Veterinary and Animal Ethics pp 174–187. September 2011, London, UKCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mellor, DJ and Diesch, TJ 2006 Onset of sentience: the poten-tial for suffering in fetal and newborn farm animals. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 100: 48–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.applan-im.2006.04.012Google Scholar
Mellor, DJ and Diesch, TJ 2007 Birth and hatching: key events in the onset of awareness in the lamb and chick. New Zealand Veterinary Journal 55: 51–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00480169.2007.36742CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mellor, DJ, Diesch, TJ, Gunn, AJ and Bennet, L 2005 The importance of ‘awareness’ for understanding fetal pain. Brain Research Reviews 49: 455–471. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres-rev.2005.01.006CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mellor, DJ, Diesch, TJ and Johnson, CB 2010a Should mam-malian fetuses be excluded from regulations protecting animals during experiments? Alternatives to Animal Experimentation 27: 199–201Google Scholar
Mellor, DJ, Diesch, TJ and Johnson, CB 2010b When do mam-malian young become sentient? Alternatives to Animal Experimentation 27: 275–280Google Scholar
Mellor, DJ and Gregory, NG 2003 Responsiveness, behaviour-al arousal and awareness in fetal and newborn lambs: experimen-tal, practical and therapeutic implications. New Zealand Veterinary Journal 51: 2–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00480169.2003.36323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mellor, DJ, Patterson-Kane, E and Stafford, KJ 2009 The Sciences of Animal Welfare. Wiley-Blackwell: Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
Mellor, DJ and Stafford, KJ 2004 Animal welfare implications of neonatal mortality and morbidity in farm animals. The Veterinary Journal 168: 118–133. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2003.08.004CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Merker, B 2007 Consciousness without a cerebral cortex: a chal-lenge for neuroscience and medicine. Behavioural and Brain Sciences 30: 63–81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X07000891Google Scholar
Morreall, J 1991 Cuteness. British Journal of Aesthetics 31: 39–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjaesthetics/31.1.39Google Scholar
Morris, PH, Reddy, V and Bunting, RC 1995 The survival of the cutest: who's responsible for the evolution of the teddy bear? Animal Behaviour 50: 1697–1700. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0003-3472(95)80022-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
NAWAC 2011 Animal Welfare (Transport within New Zealand) Code of Welfare. National Animal Welfare Advisory Committee, Animal Welfare Standards, MPI New Zealand. NAWAC: Wellington, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
Nuffield Council of Bioethics 2005 The ethics of research involving animals. http://www.nuffieldbioethics.org/sites/default/files/The%20ethics%20of%20research%20involving%20animals%20-%20full%20report.pdfGoogle Scholar
Ousey, JC, Fowden, AL, Wilsher, S and Allen, WR 2008 The effects of maternal health and body condition on the endocrine responses of neonatal foals. Equine Veterinary Journal 40: 673–679. http://dx.doi.org/10.2746/042516408X322175Google ScholarPubMed
Panksepp, J 2007 Emotional feelings originate below the neocor-tex: toward a neurobiology of the soul. Commentary/Merker: consciousness without a cerebral cortex: a challenge for neuro-science and medicine. Behavioural Brain Sciences 30: 101–103. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X07001094CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peisker, N, Preissel, AK, Reichenbach, HD, Schuster, T and Henke, J 2010 Foetal stress responses to euthanasia of pregnant sheep. Berliner und Münchener Tierärztliche Wochenschrift 123: 2–10Google ScholarPubMed
Rawlinson, P 1996 Human sentience before birth. A Report by the Commission of Inquiry into Fetal Sentience. CARE Trust: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Renard, JP, Qi Zhou, R, LeBourhis, D, Chavatte-Palmer, P, Hue, I, Heyman, Y and Vignon, X 2001 nuclear transfer tech-nologies: between successes and doubts. Theriogenology 57: 203–222. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(01)00667-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rorden, C and Karnath, H-O 2004 Using human brain lesions to infer function: a relic from a past era in the fMRI age? Nature Reviews Neuroscience 5: 812–819. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrn1521CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists 2010 Fetal Awareness: Review of Research and Recommendations for Practice. http://www.rcog.org.uk/fetal-awareness-review-research-and-recommendations-practiceGoogle Scholar
Rutherford, K, Donald, R, Arnott, G, Rooke, J, Dixon, L, Mehers, J, Turnbull, J and Lawrence, A 2012 Farm animal wel-fare: assessing risks attributable to the prenatal environment. Animal Welfare 21: 419–429. http://dx.doi.org/10.7120/09627286.21.3.419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SandØe, P and Jensen, KK 2013 The idea of animal welfare: developments and tensions. In: Wathes, C, Corr, S, May, S, McCulloch, S and Whiting, M (eds) Veterinary and Animal Ethics: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Veterinary and Animal Ethics pp 1–9. September 2011, Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
Sarkar, P, Bergman, K, O’Connor, TG and Glover, V 2008 Maternal antenatal anxiety and amniotic fluid cortisol and testos-terone: possible implications for foetal programming. Journal of Neuroendocrinology 20: 489–496. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2826.2008.01659.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, KC, Levy, JK and Crawford, PC 2002 Characteristics of free-roaming cats evaluated in a trap-neuter-return program. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 221: 1136–1138. http://dx.doi.org/10.2460/javma.2002.221.1136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shewmon, DA, Holmes, GL and Byrne, PA 1999 Consciousness in congenitally decorticate children: developmen-tal vegetative state as self-fulfilling prophesy. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology 41: 364–374. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0012162299000821Google Scholar
Smith, KK 1997 Comparative patterns of craniofacial develop-ment in eutherian and metatherian mammals. Evolution 5: 1663–1678. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2411218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sui, Z and Dodd, JM 2013 Exercise in obese pregnant women: positive impacts and current perceptions. International Journal of Women's Health 5: 389–398Google ScholarPubMed
The Animal Welfare Act (Laboratory Animal Welfare Act) 1966 Public Law 89-544. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Animal_Welfare_Act_of_1966Google Scholar
The Law for the Humane Treatment and Management of Animals 2000 http://www.alive-net.net/english/en-law/L2-full-text.htmlGoogle Scholar
The Veterinary Surgeons Act 1966 https://www.rcvs.org.uk/docu-ment-library/veterinary-surgeons-act-1966/Google Scholar
Vander Heyden, L, Lejeune, J-P, Caudron, I, Detilleux, J, Sandersen, C, Chavatte, P, Paris, J, Deliège, B and Serteyn, D 2012 Association of breeding conditions with prevalence of osteochondrosis in foals. Veterinary Record 172(17): 456–457Google ScholarPubMed
Vega-Avelaira, D, McKelvey, R, Hathway, G and Fitzgerald, M 2012 The emergence of adolescent onset pain hypersensitivity following neonatal nerve injury. Molecular Pain 8: 30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1744-8069-8-30CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walker, SM, Franck, LS, Fitzgerald, M, Myles, J, Stocks, J and Marlow, N 2009 Long-term impact of neonatal intensive care and surgery on somatosensory perception in children born extremely preterm. Pain 141: 79–87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2008.10.012Google ScholarPubMed
Wathes, C 2010 Lives worth living? Veterinary Record 166: 468–469. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/vr.c849CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weinstock, M 2008 The long-term behavioural consequences of prenatal stress. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 32: 1073–1086. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2008.03.002Google ScholarPubMed