Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-31T15:56:28.218Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Harmonising the definition of refinement

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2023

HM Buchanan-Smith ,
AE Rennie ,
A Vitale ,
S Pollo ,
MJ Prescott  and
DB Morton
HM Buchanan-Smith*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Stirling, Stirling FK9 4LA, UK
AE Rennie
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Stirling, Stirling FK9 4LA, UK
A Vitale
Affiliation:
Section of Behavioural Neuroscience, Department of Cell Biology and Neuroscience, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Viale Regina Elena, 299, 00161 Rome, Italy
S Pollo
Affiliation:
Section of Behavioural Neuroscience, Department of Cell Biology and Neuroscience, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Viale Regina Elena, 299, 00161 Rome, Italy
MJ Prescott
Affiliation:
National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research (NC3Rs), 20 Park Crescent, London W1B 1AL, UK
DB Morton
Affiliation:
Director Biomedical Services Unit, Medical School, Vincent Drive, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
*
* Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Russell and Burch's Three Rs (replacement, reduction and refinement) remain the cornerstone for principles guiding humane experimental research. However, the concept of refinement has evolved considerably since its first inception and there have been numerous interpretations, some of which are regressive from the original definition. In this paper we examine the interpretations of refinement, and propose a harmonised progressive definition that is in line with changes in animal ethics and animal welfare science. Our definition should be applied to all aspects of refinement: those related to housing, husbandry and care, techniques used in scientific procedures, periprocedural care, health and welfare monitoring, and experimental design. We argue not only that the concept should include the avoidance or minimisation of adverse effects experienced at any time during the life of an animal destined for use in a laboratory, but also that it should be applied to the founder animals. Furthermore, we take a proactive stance and argue that refinement should include enhancing well-being through environmental enrichment. The acceptance and application of this new definition by legislative authorities and in guidelines would represent a significant step forward for animal welfare.

Keywords

animal welfarehousing and husbandrylaboratory animalsrefinementscientific proceduresThree Rs
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 14 , Issue 4 , November 2005 , pp. 379 - 384
Copyright
© 2005 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

References

Animals Procedures Committee 2003 Review of cost-benefit assessment in the use of animals in research. http://www.apc.gov.uk/reference/costbenefit.pdf (accessed 6 October 2005)Google Scholar
Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986 http://www.archive.official-documents.co.uk/document/hoc/321/321-xa.htm (accessed 6 October 2005)Google Scholar
Animal Welfare Institute http://www.awionline.org/lab_animals/ (accessed 6 October 2005)Google Scholar
Bahr, NI, Palme, R, Moehle, U, Hodges, JK and Heistermann, M 2000 Comparative aspects of the metabolism and excretion of cortisol in three individual nonhuman primates. General and Comparative Endocrinology 117: 427–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balls, M, Goldberg, AM, Fentem, JH, Broadhead, CL, Burch, RL, Festing, MFW, Frazier, JM, Hendriksen, CFM, Jennings, M, van der Kamp, MDO, Morton, DB, Rowan, AN, Russell, C, Russell, WMS, Spielmann, H, Stephens, ML, Stokes, WS, Straughan, DW, Yager, JD, Zurlo, J and van Zutphen, BFM 1995 The Three Rs: the way forward. Alternatives to Laboratory Animals 23: 838–866CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bassett, L, Buchanan-Smith, HM, McKinley, J and Smith, TE 2003 Effects of training on stress-related behavior of the common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus) in relation to coping with routine husbandry procedures. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science 6: 221–233CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bohannon, J 2002 Can a mouse be standardized? Science 298: 2320–2321CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chilcott, RP, Stubbs, B and Ashley, Z 2001 Habituating pigs for in-pen, non-invasive biophysical skin analysis. Laboratory Animals 35: 30–35CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Council Directive 86/609/EEC on the approximation of laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States regarding the protection of animals used for experimental and other scientific purposes. http://europa.eu.int/comm/food/fs/aw/aw_legislation/scientific/86-609-eec_en.pdf (accessed 6 October 2005)Google Scholar
Database on Refinement of Housing and Handling Conditions and Environmental Enrichment for Laboratory Animals http://www.awionline.org/lab_animals/biblio/refine.htm (accessed 6 October 2005)Google Scholar
de Boo, J, Rennie, AE, Buchanan-Smith, HM and Hendriksen, CFM 2005 The interplay between replacement, reduction and refinement alternatives; considerations in situations where the Three Rs interact. Animal Welfare 14: 327–332Google Scholar
Draper, WA and Bernstein, IS 1963 Stereotyped behavior and cage size. Perceptual and Motor Skills 16: 231–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flecknell, PA 1994 Refinement of animal use — assessment and alleviation of pain and distress. Laboratory Animals 28: 222–231CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Foundation for Biomedical Research Three Rs. http://www.fbresearch.org/education/3rs.htm (accessed 6 October 2005)Google Scholar
Fraser, AF and Broom, DM 1990 Farm Animal Behaviour and Welfare, 3rd Edition. Baillière Tindal: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Fund for the Replacement of Animals in Medical Experiments (FRAME) http://www.frame.org.uk/3rs/refinement.htm (accessed 6 October 2005)Google Scholar
Garner, JP and Mason, GJ 2002 Evidence for a relationship between cage stereotypies and behavioural disinhibition in laboratory rodents. Behavioural Brain Research 136: 83–92Google ScholarPubMed
Gentle, MJ and Corr, SA 1995 Endogenous analgesia in the chicken. Neuroscience Letters 201: 211–214CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gentle, MJ and Tilston, VL 1999 Reduction in peripheral inflammation by changes in attention. Physiology & Behaviour 66: 289–292CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hansen, B 2002 The three Rs in the policy context. State of the art of research on the Three Rs. Quality of Life and Management of Living Resources. 9–10 July 2002. Brussels, Belgium. http://europa.eu.int/comm/research/info/conferences/rrr/ppt/hansen.pdf (accessed 6 October 2005)Google Scholar
Johnson, SR and Patterson-Kane, EG 2003 Foraging as environmental enrichment for laboratory rats: a theoretical review. Animal Technology and Welfare 2: 13–22Google Scholar
Kingston, SG and Hoffman-Goetz, L 1996 Effect of environmental enrichment and housing density on immune system reactivity to acute exercise stress. Physiology & Behavior 60: 145–150CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lidfors, L 1997 Behavioural effects of environmental enrichment for individually caged rabbits. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 52: 157–169Google Scholar
Lindburg, DG 1998 Enrichment of captive mammals through provisioning. In: Shepherdson, DL, Mellen, JD and Hutchins, M (eds) Second Nature: Environmental Enrichment for Captive Animals pp 262–276. Smithsonian Institute Press: Washington DC, USAGoogle Scholar
McKinley, J, Buchanan-Smith, HM, Bassett, L and Morris, K 2003 Training common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus) to cooperate during routine laboratory procedures: ease of training and time investment. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science 6: 209–220CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morton, DB 1995 Advances in refinement in animal experimentation over the past 25 years. Alternatives to Laboratory Animals 23: 812–822CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morton, DB 1997 Ethical and refinement aspects of animal experimentation. In: Pastoret, P-P, Blancou, J, Vannier, P and Verscheuren, C (eds) Veterinary Vaccinology pp 763–785. Elsevier Science: Amsterdam, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research (NC3Rs) http://www.nc3rs.org.uk/3rs.htm (accessed 6 October 2005)Google Scholar
Neigh, GN, Bowers, SL, Korman, B and Nelson, RJ 2005 Housing environment alters delayed-type hypersensivity and corticosterone concentrations of individually housed male C57BL/6 mice. Animal Welfare 14: 249–257Google Scholar
Novak, MA 2003 Self-injurious behaviour in rhesus monkeys: new insights into its etiology, physiology, and treatment. American Journal of Primatology 59: 3–19CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Poole, T 1997 Happy animals make good science. Laboratory Animals 31: 116–124CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prescott, MJ and Jennings, M 2004 Ethical and welfare implications of the acquisition and transport of non-human primates for use in research and testing. Alternatives to Laboratory Animals 32, Suppl 1: 323–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reinhardt, V 2003 Working with rather than against macaques during blood collection. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science 6: 189–197CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reinhardt, V, Liss, C and Stevens, C 1995 Restraint methods of laboratory non-human primates: a critical review. Animal Welfare 4: 221–238Google Scholar
Research Defence Society The 3 Rs. http://www.rdsonline.org.uk/pages/page.asp?i_ToolbarID=4&i_PageID=45 (accessed 6 October 2005)Google Scholar
Richmond, J 1998 Criteria for humane endpoints. In: Hendriksen, CFM and Morton, DB (eds) Proceedings of the International Conference pp 26–32. RSM Press: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Richmond, J 2000 The Three Rs: a journey or a destination? Alternatives to Laboratory Animals 28: 761–773CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Richmond, J 2002 Refinement, reduction and replacement of animal use for regulatory testing; future improvements and implementation within the regulatory framework. Institute for Laboratory Animal Research Journal 43, Suppl: S63-S68Google Scholar
Rivier, C and Rivest, S 1991 Effect of stress on the activity of the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis — peripheral and central mechanisms. Biology of Reproduction 45: 523–532CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robinson, V, Morton, DB, Anderson, D, Carver, JFA, Francis, RJ, Hubrecht, R, Jenkins, E, Mathers, KE, Raymond, R, Rosewell, I, Wallace, J and Wells, DJ 2003 Refinement and reduction in production of genetically modified mice: sixth report of the BVA(AWF)/FRAME/RSPCA/UFAW Joint Working Group on Refinement. Laboratory Animals 37, Suppl 1: S1–S51Google Scholar
Russell, WMS 1957 The increase of humanity in experimentation: replacement, reduction and refinement. Laboratory Animals Bureau, Collected Papers 6: 23–25Google Scholar
Russell, WMS and Burch, RL 1959 (reprinted 1992) The Principles of Humane Experimental Technique. Universities Federation for Animal Welfare: Wheathampstead, UKGoogle Scholar
Schnell, CR and Gerber, P 1997 Training and remote monitoring of cardiovascular parameters in non-human primates. Primate Report 49: 61–70Google Scholar
Scott, L, Pearce, P, Fairhall, S, Muggleton, N and Smith, J 2003 Training nonhuman primates to cooperate with scientific procedures in applied biomedical research. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science 6: 199–208Google ScholarPubMed
Smaje, LH, Smith, JA, Combes, RD, Ewbank, R, Gregory, JE, Jennings, M, Moore, GJ and Morton, DB 1998 Advancing refinement of laboratory animal use. Laboratory Animals 32: 137–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, J and Jennings, M 2003 A Resource Book for Lay Members of Local Ethical Review Processes. Royal Society for the Protection of Animals (RSPCA): Horsham, UKGoogle Scholar
Smith, TE, McGreer-Whitworth, B and French, JA 1998 Close proximity of the heterosexual partner reduces the physiological and behavioral consequences of novel-cage housing in black tufted-ear marmosets (Callithrix kuhli). Hormones and Behavior 34: 211–222CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Terlouw, EMC, Schouten, WGP and Ladewig, J 1997 Physiology. In: Appleby, MC and Hughes, BO (eds) Animal Welfare pp 143–158. CAB International Publications: Wallingford, UKGoogle Scholar
Wemelsfelder, F 1994 Animal boredom — a model of chronic suffering in captive animals and its consequences for environmental enrichment. Humane Innovations and Alternatives in Animal Experimentation 8: 587–591Google Scholar
Wright, N 2003 Why I'm not ashamed to experiment on animals. http://www.guardian.co.uk/life/lastword/story/0,13228,941948,00.html (accessed 6 October 2005)Google Scholar