Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T10:36:57.245Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A field assessment of the effect of pre-slaughter conditions and genetic-stress susceptibility on blood welfare indicators in pigs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

MD Guàrdia ,
J Estany ,
J Álvarez-Rodríguez ,
X Manteca ,
M Tor ,
MA Oliver ,
M Gispert  and
A Diestre
MD Guàrdia*
Affiliation:
IRTA, Centre de Tecnologia dels Aliments, Finca Camps i Armet, 17121 Monells, Spain
J Estany
Affiliation:
Departament de Producció Animal, Universitat de Lleida, Rovira Roure 191, 25198 Lleida, Spain
J Álvarez-Rodríguez
Affiliation:
Departament de Producció Animal, Universitat de Lleida, Rovira Roure 191, 25198 Lleida, Spain
X Manteca
Affiliation:
Unitat de Fisiologia Veterinària, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain
M Tor
Affiliation:
Departament de Producció Animal, Universitat de Lleida, Rovira Roure 191, 25198 Lleida, Spain
MA Oliver
Affiliation:
IRTA, Centre de Tecnologia dels Aliments, Finca Camps i Armet, 17121 Monells, Spain
M Gispert
Affiliation:
IRTA, Centre de Tecnologia dels Aliments, Finca Camps i Armet, 17121 Monells, Spain
A Diestre
Affiliation:
Pig Improvement Company, Avd Argüll 80, 08190 Sant Cugat del Vallés, Spain
*
* Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The effect of pre-slaughter handling conditions and the RYR1 gene on blood Cortisol, lactate and creatine Phosphokinase (CPK) levels at exsanguination were assessed using 2,923 surveyed pigs from 106 deliveries to five Spanish abattoirs across two seasons. The relationship between blood parameters, carcase skin damage and pork quality traits was also assessed. The season influenced blood cortisol, lactate and CPK values. Females always showed higher concentrations of cortisol, lactate, and CPK than males. Pigs carrying the recessive allele of the RYR1 gene exhibited increased lactate and CPK concentrations but not cortisol. The cortisol concentration decreased in lean pigs that were slaughtered in winter after short lairage periods. The lactate concentration decreased with loading time and increased in summer with lairage time and carcase lean content. The CPK concentration increased with lairage time, carcase weight, and carcase lean content, and with the duration of winter transports. Each truck delivery only explained approximately 10% of the variance in blood parameters. Lairage time is the most influential pre-slaughter handling practice on the assessed welfare indicators. In addition, different optimal lairage times might be appropriate depending on season. Blood cortisol, lactate, and CPK concentrations increased concomitantly with skin damage score. Blood parameters were weakly correlated and they also showed low association with pork quality traits.

Keywords

animal welfareblood constituentspre-slaughterRYR1 geneskin damageswine
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 21 , Issue 4 , November 2012 , pp. 517 - 526
Copyright
© 2012 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

References

Averós, X, Herranz, A, Sanchez, R, Comella, JX and Gosalvez, LF 2007 Serum stress parameters in pigs transported to slaughter under commercial conditions in different seasons. Veterinarni Medicina 52(88): 333–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, BA and Stephens, DB 1973 The effects of conditioned behaviour and environmental factors on plasma corticosteroid levels in pigs. Physiology and Behaviour 10: 267–274. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0031-9384(73)90309-0CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barton-Gade, P and Baltzer, M 1991 Relationship between halothane status and meat quality in Landrace and Large White pigs. Proceedings of the 37th International Congress of Meat Science and Technology pp 33–36. 1-6 September 1991, Kulmbach, GermanyGoogle Scholar
Barton-Gade, P and Christensen, L 1998 Effect of different stocking densities during transport on welfare and meat quality in Danish slaughter pigs. Meat Science 48: 237–247. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(97)00098-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barton-Gade, P, Christensen, L, Baltzer, M and Valentin Petersen, JV 2007 Causes of pre-slaughter mortality in Danish slaughter pigs with special emphasis on transport. Animal Welfare 16: 459–470Google Scholar
Brown, SN, Knowles, TG, Wilkins, LJ, Chadd, SA and Warriss, PD 2005 The response of pigs to being loaded or unloaded onto commercial animal transporters using three systems. The Veterinary Journal 170: 91–100. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2004.05.003CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cassens, RG, Marple, DN and Eikelenboom, G 1975 Animal physiology and meat quality. Advances in Food Research 21: 71–155. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2628(08)60090-7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Correa, JA, Torrey, S, Devillers, N, Laforest, JP, Gonyou, HW and Faucitano, L 2010 Effects of different moving devices at loading on stress response and meat quality in pigs. Journal of Animal Science 88: 4086–4093. http://dx.doi.org/10.2527/jas.2010-2833CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
D’Eath, RB, Turner, SP, Kurt, E, Evans, G, Thölking, L, Looft, H, Wimmers, K, Murani, E, Klont, R, Foury, A, Ison, SH, Lawrence, AB and Mormède, P 2010 Pigs’ aggressive temperament affects pre-slaughter mixing aggression, stress and meat quality. Animal 4: 604–616CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Edwards, LN, Grandin, T, Engle, TE, Porter, SP, Ritter, MJ, Sosnicki, AA and Anderson, DB 2010 Use of exsanguination blood lactate to assess the quality of pre-slaughter pig handling. Meat Science 86: 384–390. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. meatsci.2010.05.022CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eikelenboom, G, Minkema, D, Van Eldik, P and Sybesma, W 1978 Production characteristics of Dutch Landrace pigs as related to their susceptibility for the halothane-induced malignant hyperthermia syndrome. Livestock Production Science 5: 277–284. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0301-6226(78)90055-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elbers, ARW 1991 The use of slaughterhouse information in monitoring systems for herd health control in pigs. Thesis, University of Utrecht, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Fàbrega, E, Manteca, X, Font, J, Gispert, M, Carrión, D, Velarde, A, Ruiz-de-la-Torre, JL and Diestre, A 2002 Effect of halothane gene and pre-slaughter treatment on meat quality and welfare from two pig crosses. Meat Science 64: 463–472. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(02)00040-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fàbrega, E, Manteca, X, Font, J, Gispert, M, Carrión, D, Velarde, A, Ruiz-de-la-Torre, JL and Diestre, A 2004 A comparison of halothane homozygous negative and positive Pietrain sire lines in relation to carcass and meat quality, and welfare traits. Meat Science 66: 777–787. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(03)00128-1CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Faucitano, L, Marquardt, L, Oliveira, MS, Sebastiany Coelho, H and Terra, N 1998 The effects of two handling and slaughter systems on skin damage, meat acidification and color in pigs. Meat Science 50: 13–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(98)00008-4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fisher, P, Mellet, FD and Hoffman, LC 2000 Halothane genotype and pork quality 1. Carcass and meat quality characteristics of three halothane genotypes. Meat Science 54: 97–105. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(99)00077-7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fortin, A 1989 Pre-slaughter management of pigs and its influence on the quality (PSE/DFD) of pork. Proceedings of 35th International Congress of Meat Science and Technology pp 981–986. 20-25 August 1989, Copenhagen, DenmarkGoogle Scholar
Foury, A, Devillers, N, Sánchez, MP, Griffon, H, Le Roy, P and Mormède, P 2005 Stress hormones, carcass composition and meat quality in Large White x Duroc pigs. Meat Science 69: 703–707. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2004.11.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fujii, J, Otsu, K, Zorzato, F, De León, S, Khanna, VK, We il we, J, O’Brien, PJ and MacLennan, DH 1991 Identification of a mutation in the porcine ryanodine receptor that is associated with malignant hyperthermia. Science 253: 448–451. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1862346CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Geers, R 2007 Lying behaviour (location, posture and duration). In: Velarde, A and Geers, R (eds) On-farm Monitoring of Pig Welfare pp 19–20. Wageningen Academic Publishers: Wageningen, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
Gispert, M, Faucitano, L, Oliver, MA, Guàrdia, MD, Coll, C, Siggens, K, Harvey, K and Diestre, A 2000 A survey of pre-slaughter conditions halothane gene frequency in five Spanish pig commercial abattoirs. Meat Science 55: 97–106. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(99)00130-8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grandin, T and Deesing, MJ 1998 Genetics and behaviour during handling, restraint and herding. In: Grandin, T (ed) Genetics and the Behaviour of Domestic Animals pp 113–145. Academic Press: San Diego, USAGoogle Scholar
Gregory, NG and Wotton, SB 1981 Autonomic and non-autonomic control of cardiovascular function in stress-sensitivity pigs. Journal of Veterinary Pharmacology and Therapeutics 4: 183–191. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2885.1981.tb00729.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guàrdia, MD, Gispert, M and Diestre, A 1996 Mortality rates during transport and lairage in pigs for slaughter. Meat Focus International 10: 362–366Google Scholar
Guàrdia, MD, Estany, J, Balasch, S, Oliver, MA, Gispert, M and Diestre, A 2004 Risk assessment of PSE condition due to pre-slaughter conditions and RYR1 gene in pigs. Meat Science 67: 471–478. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2003.11.020CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guàrdia, MD, Estany, J, Balasch, S, Oliver, MA, Gispert, M and Diestre, A 2005 Risk assessment of DFD condition due to pre-slaughter conditions and RYR1 gene in pigs. Meat Science 70: 709–716. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2005.03.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guàrdia, MD, Estany, J, Balasch, S, Oliver, MA, Gispert, M and Diestre, A 2009 Risk assessment of skin damage due to pre-slaughter conditions and RYR1 gene in pigs. Meat Science 81: 745–751. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2008.11.020CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guise, HJ 1991 Humane animal management. The benefits of improved systems for pig production, transport and slaughter. In: Carruthers, SP (ed) Farm Animals: It Pays to be Humane pp 50–58. Centre for Agricultural Strategy: Reading, UKGoogle Scholar
Hambrecht, E, Eissen, JJ, Nooijen, RIJ, Ducro, BJ, Smits, CHM, Den Hartog, LA and Verstegen, MWA 2004 Preslaughter stress and muscle energy largely determine pork quality at two commercial processing plants. Journal of Animal Science 82: 1401–1409CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hambrecht, E, Eissen, JJ, Newman, DJ, Smits, CHM, Den Hartog, LA and Verstegen, MWA 2005 Negative effects of stress immediately before slaughter on pork quality are aggravated by suboptimal transport and lairage conditions. Journal of Animal Science 83: 440–448CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hicks, TA, McGlone, JJ, Whisnant, CS, Kattesh, HG and Norman, RL 1998 Behavioral, endocrine, immune, and performance measures for pigs exposed to acute stress. Journal of Animal Science 76: 474–483CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Honkavaara, M 1989 Influence of selection phase, fasting and transport on porcine stress and on the development of PSE pork. Journal of Agricultural Science in Finland 61: 415–423Google Scholar
Knowles, TG and Warriss, PD 2000 Stress physiology of animals during transport. In: Grandin, T (ed) Livestock Handling and Transport, Second Edition pp 385–407. CABI Publishing: Wallingford, UK. http://dx.doi.org/10.1079/9780851994093.0385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawrie, RE 1966 Metabolic stress which affect muscle. In: Briskey, EJ, Cassens, RG and Trautman, JC (eds) The Physiology and Biochemistry of Muscle as a Food pp 137–164. University of Wisconsin Press: Madison, WI, USAGoogle Scholar
McGlone, JJ, McPherson, RL and Anderson, DL 2004 Moving devices for finishing pigs: efficacy of electric prod, board, paddle, or flag. The Professional Animal Scientist 20: 518–523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meat and Livestock Commission (MLC) 1985 Rindside Damage Scale. Reference 2031M8/85. MLC: Milton Keynes, Bletchley, UK.Google Scholar
Mitchell, MA, Kettlewell, PJ and Maxwell, MH 1992 Indicators of physiological stress in broiler chickens during road transportation. Animal Welfare 1: 91–104Google Scholar
Mormède, P, Foury, A, Geverink, NA, Gispert, M, Hortós, M, Font i Furnols, M, Carrión, D, Cairns, M, Davey, G, Tilley, R, Delday, M, Maltin, C, Klont, R, Sosnicki, AA, Plastow, GS and Blott, SC 2004 Réponses neuroendocriniennes de stress et caractéristiques de carcasse, comparaison de cinq races de porcs. Données préliminaires obtenues dans le Project Européen Quality PorkGenes. Journées de la Recherche Porcine en France 36: 259–264. [Title translation: Neuroendocrine stress responses and carcase characteristics, a comparison among five genetic lines]Google Scholar
Morrow-Tesch, JL, McGlone, JJ and Salak-Johnson, JL 1994 Heat and social stress effects on pig immune measures. Journal of Animal Science 72: 2599–2609CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murray, AC and Johnson, CP 1998 Impact of the halothane gene on muscle quality and pre-slaughter deaths in Western Canadian pigs. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 78: 543–548. http://dx.doi.org/10.4141/A97-122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nanni Costa, L, Lo Fiego, DP, Dall’Olio, S, Davoli, R and Russo, V 1999 Influence of loading method and stocking density during transport on meat and dry-cured ham quality in pigs with different halothane genotypes. Meat Science 51: 391–399. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(98)00160-0CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pérez, MP, Palacio, J, Santolaria, MP, Aceña, MC, Chacón, G, Gascón, M, Calvo, JH, Zaragoza, P, Beltrán, JA and García-Belenguer, S 2002a Effect of transport time on welfare and meat quality in pigs. Meat Science 61: 425–433CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pérez, MP, Palacio, J, Santolaria, MP, Aceña, MC, Chacón, G, Verde, MT, Calvo, JH, Zaragoza, P, Gascón, M and García-Belenguer, S 2002b Influence of lairage time on some welfare and meat quality parameters in pigs. Veterinary Research 33: 239–250. http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/vetres:2002012CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rundgren, M, Lundtröm, K, Edfords-Lilja, I and Juneja, RK 1990 A within-litter comparison of the three halothane genotypes 1. Piglet performance and effects of transportation and amperozide treatment at 12 weeks of age. Livestock Production Science 26: 137–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, FD and Tume, RK 1992 The assessment of pre-slaughter and slaughter treatments of livestock by measurement of plasma constituents: a review of recent work. Meat Science 32: 311–329. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0309-1740(92)90095-LCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Solomon, MB 1987 Comparison of methods used for measuring pH in muscle tissue. Journal of Food Science 5: 1428–1429. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1987.tb14099.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terlouw, EMC and Rybarczyk, P 2008 Explaining and predicting differences in meat quality through stress reaction at slaughter: the case of Large White and Duroc pigs. Meat Science 79: 795–805.1150. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2007.11.013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terlouw, EMC, Arnould, C, Auperin, B, Berri, C, Le Bihan-Duval, E, Deiss, V, Lefève, F, Lensink, BJ and Mounier, L 2008 Pre-slaughter conditions, animal stress and welfare: current status and possible future research. Animal 2(10): 1501–1517CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tor, M, Estany, J, Villalba, D, Cubiló, D, Tibau, J, Soler, J, Sánchez, A and Noguera, JL 2001 A within-breed comparison of RYR1 pig genotypes for performance, feeding behaviour, and carcass, meat and fat quality trait. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 118: 417–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van der Meulen, JH, Kuipers, H and Drukker, J 1991 Relationship between exercise-induced muscle damage and enzyme release in rats. Journal of Applied Physiology 71: 999–1004CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van der Wal, PG, Engel, B and Reimert, HGM 1999 The effect of stress, applied immediately before stunning, on pork quality. Meat Science 53: 101–106. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(99)00039-XCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walstra, P, Buiting, GAJ and Mateman, G 1971 1 De invloed van castratie en voedermethode op groei, voederconversie en slachtkwaliteit. IVO-Report B-128. [Title translation: The influence of castration and feeding method on growth, feed conversion and carcase quality]Google Scholar
Warriss, PD 1996 The consequences of fighting between mixed groups of unfamiliar pigs before slaughter. Meat Focus International 4: 89–92Google Scholar
Warriss, PD 2003 Optimal lairage times and conditions for slaughter pigs: a review. The Veterinary Record 153: 70–176. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/vr.153.6.170CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Warriss, PD, Bevis, EA, Edwards, JE, Brown, SN and Knowles, TG 1991 Effect of the angle of slope on the ease with which pigs negotiate loading ramps. Veterinary Record 128: 419–421. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/vr.128.18.419CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Warriss, PD, Brown, SN, Barton-Gade, P, Santos, C, Nanny Costa, L, Lamboiij, E and Geers, R 1998a An analysis of data relating to pig carcass quality and indices of stress collected in the European Union. Meat Science 49: 137–144. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(97)00133-2CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Warriss, PD, Brown, SN, Edwards, JE and Knowles, TG 1998 b Effect of lairage time on level of stress and meat quality. Animal Science 66: 255–261. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1357729800009036CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warriss, PD, Brown, SN, Knowles, TG, Edwards, JE, Kettlewell, PJ and Guise, HJ 1998c The effect of stocking density in transit on the carcass quality and welfare of slaughter pigs: 2. Results from the analysis of blood and meat samples. Meat Science 50: 447–456. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(98)00057-6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yu, H, Bao, ED, Zhao, RQ, and Lv, QX 2007 Effect of transportation stress on heat shock protein 70 concentration and mRNA expression in heart and kidney tissues and serum enzyme activities and hormone concentrations of pigs. American Journal of Veterinary Research 68: 1145–1150. http://dx.doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.68.11.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar