Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T08:29:55.070Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Factors Influencing Pig Deaths During Transit: An Analysis of Drivers' Reports

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2023

T A Abbott ,
H J Guise ,
E J Hunter ,
R H C Penny ,
P J Baynes  and
C Easby
H J Guise
Affiliation:
Cambac JMA Research, Lower Cadleys, South Stoke, Reading RG8 OLX, UK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A haulage company, transporting pigs for a marketing group, has monitored information about journeys and kept records of deaths in transit (DIT). These data can be used to set guidelines and they highlight those areas of pig transport that need further study.

Factors, other than genetic ones, which may contribute to the rate of DIT were considered. A strict seasonal effect was not apparent, but where conditions were hot and wet there was an increase in DIT. There was also a ‘time of day” effect, with transport in the afternoon showing a higher rate of DIT than transport in the morning. It was observed that if pigs were deemed dirty at loading then DIT were more likely. Clean pigs at loading could indicate that hygienic and environmental conditions in the finishing stage were good. Individual producers showed a wide variation in their rate of DIT, with some producers regularly experiencing a high level Routine monitoring of the rate of DIT and transport conditions could help to pinpoint the source, and possible cause, of the problem.

Information that helps in the understanding of transit deaths is important because if stress in the period from selection to slaughter can be reduced, there should be both economic as well as welfare benefits.

Keywords

animal welfarepigstransporttransit deaths
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 4 , Issue 1 , February 1995 , pp. 29 - 40
Copyright
© 1995 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

References

Abbott, C 1991 Behavioural Types of Pigs and their Relationship with Meat Quality and Welfare. Report to Sponsors. Cambac JMA Research: ReadingGoogle Scholar
Augustini, C and Fischer, K 1982 Physiological reaction of slaughter animals during transport. In: Moss, R (ed) Transport of Animals Intended for Breeding, Production and Slaughter pp 125–135. Martinus Nijhoff: The HagueCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grandin, T 1992 Handling crazy pigs. Meat and Poultry. May 1992: 64Google Scholar
Guise, H J 1990 Problems of Pigmeat Production and Processing: With Particular Reference to Pre-slaughter Handling. PhD Thesis, University of LondonGoogle Scholar
Guise, H J 1992 Open Day Booklet. Cambac JMA Research Ltd: ReadingGoogle Scholar
Lawrie, R A 1991 Meat Science, 5th edition. Pergamon Press: OxfordGoogle Scholar
Lendfers, L H 1970 Transport stress in pigs. In: Proceedings of the Symposium on Stress in the Pig pp 57–67. Beerse: BelgiumGoogle Scholar
Löhr, J 1970 Mortality in pigs due to transport. In: Proceedings of the Symposium on Stress in the Pig pp 77–82. Beerse: BelgiumGoogle Scholar
Mickwitz von, G 1982 Various transport conditions and their influence on physiological reactions. In: Moss, R (ed) Transport of Animals Intended for Breeding, Production and Slaughter pp 45–56. Martinus Nijhoff: The HagueGoogle Scholar
Putten van, G and Elshof, W J 1978 Observations on the effect of transport on the well-being and lean quality of slaughter pigs. Animal Regulation Studies 1: 247–271Google Scholar
Smith, L P and Allen, W M 1976 A study of the weather conditions related to the death of pigs during and after their transportation in England. Agricultural Meteorology 16: 115124CrossRefGoogle Scholar