No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Factors affecting the ability of sheep to rest during time in markets in Great Britain
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 January 2023
Abstract
Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
In Great Britain, more than eleven million animals are transported to or from livestock markets annually. Time spent at markets is considered by Defra (Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs) to be ‘neutral time’, ie potentially a rest period. However, sheep in markets are subject to many potential stressors, which may prevent them resting. Lying and ruminating behaviours were analysed from 1,638 behavioural scans of sheep in 279 pens in 23 markets across Great Britain. Likelihood of observing ≥ 1 animals lying down during a scan decreased as stocking density and activity outside the pen increased. Proportion of animals observed lying in a pen (when at least one animal was lying) increased as group size and stocking rate decreased. Likelihood of observing ≥ 1 animals ruminating increased when there was no activity around the pen, and as number of sheep in the pen increased. Proportion of animals observed ruminating in a pen (when at least one animal was ruminating) increased as stocking rate, number of sheep in the pen and activity outside the pen decreased. Proportion of sheep ruminating was greater where there was no activity, compared with where there was activity outside the pen. We suggest that in order to allow higher quality rest periods for sheep in markets, then markets should be organised so that activity around the pen is minimised, eg by filling the market from back to front so that, once penned, sheep are not passed repeatedly. Stocking densities should also be low enough to allow animals to lie if they wish, while groups sizes should not be so low as to increase fear responses.
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- © 2017 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare
References
Alexander, G 1974 Heat loss from sheep. In: Monteith, JL and Mount, LE (eds) Heat Loss from Animals and Man pp 173–203. Butterworths: London, UK. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-408-70652-0.50015-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldock, NM and Sibley, RM 1990 Effects of handling and trans-portation on the heart rate and behaviour of sheep. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 28: 15–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1591(90)90044-ECrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boivin, X, Lensink, J, Tallet, C and Veissier, I 2003 Stockmanship and farm animal welfare. Animal Welfare 12: 479–492Google Scholar
Boivin, X, Nowak, R, Despres, G, Tournadre, H and LeNeindre, P 1997 Discrimination between shepherds by lambs reared under artificial conditions. Journal of Animal Science 75:2892–2898. https://doi.org/10.2527/1997.75112892xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cockram, MS 2004 A review of behavioural and physiological responses of sheep to stressors to identify potential behavioural signs of distress. Animal Welfare 13: 283–291Google Scholar
Cockram, MS, Baxter, EM, Smith, LA, Bell, S, Howard, CM, Prescott, RJ and Mitchell, MA 2004 Effect of driver behaviour, driving events and road type on the stability and resting behaviour of sheep in transit. Animal Science 79: 165–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cockram, MS, Imlah, P, Goddard, PJ, Harkiss, GD and Waran, NK 1993 The behavioural, endocrine and leucocyte response of ewes to repeated removal of lambs before the age of natural weaning. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 38: 127–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1591(93)90061-SCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cockram, MS, Kent, JE, Waran, NK, Muwanga, GM, Prytherch, S, Jackson, RE and Goddard, PJ 1996 Effect of space allowance during transport on the physiological and behav-ioural responses of sheep. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 49: 98. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1591(96)87690-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cockram, MS, Ranson, M, Imlah, P, Goddard, PJ, Burrells, C and Harkiss, GD 1994 The behavioral, endocrine and immune-responses of sheep to isolation. Animal Production 58: 389–399Google Scholar
de Paula Vieira, A, Guesdon, V, de Passillé, AM, Grafin von Keyserlingk, MA and Weary, DM 2008 Behavioural indicators of hunger in dairy calves. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 109:180–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2007.03.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Defra 2011a Rapid Analysis and Detection of Animal-related Risks (RADAR). http://www.defra.gov.uk/foodfarm/farmanimal/diseases/vet-surveillance/radar/index.htmGoogle Scholar
Defra 2011b Welfare of animals during transport. www.defra.gov.uk/publications/2011/06/13/pb13550-animal-wel-fare-transport/Google Scholar
Defra 2012 Welfare of animals during transport: advice for trans-porters of sheep. http://adlib.everysite.co.uk/resources/000/263/163/PB12544f.pdfGoogle Scholar
FAWC 2003 Report on the Welfare of Farmed Animals at Slaughter or Killing Part 1: Red Meat Animals. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/325241/F AWC_report_on_the_welfare_of_farmed_animals_at_slaughter_or _killing_part_one_red_meat_animals.pdfGoogle Scholar
Gonzalez, M, Averos, X, de Heredia, IB, Ruiz, R, Arranz, J and Estevez, I 2013 The effects of social buffering on fear responses in sheep (Ovis aries). Applied Animal Behaviour Science 149: 13–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2013.09.011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hales, JRS 1973 Effects of exposure to hot environments on regional distribution of blood-flow and on cardiorespiratory function in sheep. Pflugers Archiv-European Journal of Physiology 344:133–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00586547CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jung, J and Lidifors, L 2001 Effects of amount of milk, milk flow and access to a rubber teat on cross-sucking and non-nutritive sucking in dairy calves. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 72: 201–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(01)00110-1CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kim, FB, Jackson, RE, Gordon, GDH and Cockram, MS 1994 Resting behavior of sheep in a slaughterhouse lairage. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 40: 45–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1591(94)90086-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knowles, TG, Brouwer, A, Lambton, SL, Statham, PTE and Weeks, CA 2013 Final report for Defra: Study to identify risk factors associated with welfare outcomes for sheep during and after journeys of short duration. http://sciencesearch.defra.gov.uk/Default.aspx? Menu=Menu&Module=More&Location=None&Completed=0&Pr ojectID=17258Google Scholar
Leme, TMD, Titto, EAL, Titto, CG, Pereira, AMF and Neto, MC 2013 Influence of stocking density on weight gain and behav-ior of feedlot lambs. Small Ruminant Research 115: 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2013.07.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyons, DM, Price, EO and Moberg, GP 1993 Social grouping tendencies and separation-induced distress in juvenile sheep and goats. Developmental Psychobiology 26: 251–259. https://doi.org/10.1002/dev.420260503CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paranhos Da Costa, MJR, Silva, RGD and Souza, RCD 1992 Effect of air temperature and humidity on ingestive behaviour of sheep. International Journal of Biometeorology 36: 218–222. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02726401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poindron, P, Soto, R and Romeyer, A 1997 Decrease of response to social separation in preparturient ewes. Behavioural Processes 40: 45–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-6357(96)00767-XCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Romeyer, A and Bouissou, MF 1992 Assessment of fear reactions in domestic sheep, and influence of breed and rearing con-ditions. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 34: 93–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(05)80060-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silanikove, N 2000 Effects of heat stress on the welfare of exten-sively managed domestic ruminants. Livestock Production Science 67: 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-6226(00)00162-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
UK Met Office 2014 UK mapped climate averages. http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/public/weather/climateGoogle Scholar
You have
Access