Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T17:53:06.309Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Exploring the potential for on-animal sensors to detect adverse welfare events: A case study of detecting ewe behaviour prior to vaginal prolapse

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

ES Fogarty ,
GM Cronin  and
M Trotter
ES Fogarty*
Affiliation:
Institute for Future Farming Systems, Central Queensland Innovation and Research Precinct, CQUniversity, 630 Ibis Ave, Rockhampton, QLD 4701, Australia
GM Cronin
Affiliation:
The University of Sydney, Faculty of Science - SOLES, Camden, NSW, Australia
M Trotter
Affiliation:
Institute for Future Farming Systems, Central Queensland Innovation and Research Precinct, CQUniversity, 630 Ibis Ave, Rockhampton, QLD 4701, Australia
*
* Contact for correspondence: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Parturition is a critical period for the ewe and lamb, and the incidence of dystocia has known impacts on lamb and ewe welfare and productivity. Current methods of dystocia monitoring are mostly conducted through visual observation. Novel approaches for monitoring have also been suggested, including the application of on-animal sensor technologies for remote surveillance of parturition success. This short communication explores how the use of sensor-based parturition detection models can be applied for detection of adverse and successful parturition events, respectively, in pasture-based sheep (Ovis aries). Specifically, the alert profile of a single ewe that experienced vaginal prolapse is reported and compared with the alert profiles of 13 ewes that experienced typical birth events. Although the ewe that experienced vaginal prolapse exhibited some common precursor alerts similar to ewes that progressed through a typical birth event, the overall alert profile was markedly different for the prolapsed animal, with an increased number of alerts occurring from five days prior to the prolapse event. As successful parturition has significant welfare and productivity outcomes, application and validation of these research findings in a commercial system could greatly improve current methods of welfare monitoring at lambing.

Keywords

accelerometersanimal welfareGNSS loggersmachine learningon-animal sensorssheep
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 31 , Issue 3 , August 2022 , pp. 355 - 359
Copyright
© 2022 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

References

Alexander, G 1980 Husbandry practices in relation to maternal offspring behaviour. Reviews in Rural Science 4: 99–107Google Scholar
Alexander, G 1988 What makes a good mother? Components and comparative aspects of maternal behaviour in ungulates. Proceedings of Australian Society of Animal Production 17: 25–41Google Scholar
Brien, FD and Hinch, GN 2010 Improving lamb survival and reproductive efficiency in sheep. Third Australian Veterinary Association (AVA) and New Zealand Veterinary Association Pan Pacific Veterinary Conference. June 2010, Brisbane, QLD, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
Dawkins, MS 2017 Animal welfare and efficient farming: is conflict inevitable? Animal Production Science 57: 201–208. https://doi.org/10.1071/AN15383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doyle, RE 2017 Sheep cognition and its implications for welfare. In: Ferguson, DM, Lee, C and Fisher, A (eds) Advances in Sheep Welfare pp 55–71. Woodhead Publishing: Sawston, UK. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-100718-1.00004-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fogarty, ES, Swain, D, Cronin, GM, Moraes, LE, Bailey, DW and Trotter, M 2020a Potential for autonomous detection of lambing using Global Navigation Satellite System technology. Animal Production Science 60(9): 1217–1226. https://doi.org/10.1071/AN18654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fogarty, ES, Swain, D, Cronin, GM, Moraes, LE and Trotter, M 2020b Can accelerometer ear tags identify behavioural changes in sheep associated with parturition? Animal Reproduction Science 216: 106345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2020.106345CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fogarty, ES, Swain, DL, Cronin, GM, Moraes, LE, Bailey, DW and Trotter, M 2021 Developing a simulated online model that integrates GNSS, accelerometer and weather data to detect par-turition events in grazing sheep: A machine learning approach. Animals 11(2): 303. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11020303CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gurule, SC, Tobin, CT, Bailey, DW and Hernandez Gifford, JA 2021 Evaluation of the tri-axial accelerometer to identify and predict parturition-related activities of Debouillet ewes in an intensive setting. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 237: 105296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2021.105296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinch, GN and Brien, F 2014 Lamb survival in Australian flocks: a review. Animal Production Science 54: 656–666. https://doi.org/10.1071/AN13236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manning, J, Power, D and Cosby, A 2021 Legal complexities of animal welfare in Australia: Do on-animal sensors offer a future option? Animals 11(1): 91. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11010091CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nathan, R, Spiegel, O, Fortmann-Roe, S, Harel, R, Wikelski, M and Getz, WM 2012 Using tri-axial acceleration data to identify behavioral modes of free-ranging animals: general concepts and tools illustrated for griffon vultures. Journal of Experimental Biology 215: 986–996. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.058602CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Refshauge, G, Brien, FD, Hinch, GN and van de Ven, R 2016 Neonatal lamb mortality: factors associated with the death of Australian lambs. Animal Production Science 56: 726–735. https://doi.org/10.1071/AN15121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, PR 2015 Sheep Medicine Second Edition Edition pp 21–61. CRC Press: Boca Raton, Florida, USAGoogle Scholar
Smith, D, Lyle, S, Berry, A and Manning, N 2015 Case study report the internet of animal health things: Opportunities and challenges, In: Zaki, M and Neely, A (eds) Centre for Digital Innovation, Zoetis. University of Cambridge: UKGoogle Scholar
Trotter, M 2013 PA Innovations in livestock, grazing systems and rangeland management to improve landscape productivity and sustainability. Agricultural Science 25: 27–31Google Scholar
Trotter, M, Cosby, A, Manning, JK, Thomson, M, Trotter, T, Graz, P, Fogarty, ES, Lobb, A and Smart, A 2018 Demonstrating the value of animal location and behaviour data in the red meat value chain P.PSH.0835. Meat & Livestock Australia Ltd: North Sydney, NSW, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
Waterhouse, A 1996 Animal welfare and sustainability of production under extensive conditions—A European perspective. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 49: 29–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1591(95)00665-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waterhouse, A 2019 PLF technology and real-time monitoring should improve welfare in extensive systems, but does it change the duty of care and require modification of welfare guidelines for livestock keepers? In: O’Brien, B, Hennessy, D and Shalloo, L (eds) Proceedings of the European Conference of Precision Livestock Farming pp 256–261. 26-29 August 2019, Cork, Republic of IrelandGoogle Scholar
Welch, RAS and Kilgour, R 1970 Mis-mothering among Romneys. New Zealand Journal of Agriculture 121: 26–27Google Scholar
ZQ Natural Fibre 2019 ZQ Natural Fibre. https://www.discov-erzq.com/Google Scholar