Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T21:48:42.447Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evaluation of Welfare State Based on Interpretation of Multiple Indices

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2023

E M Scott ,
J L Fitzpatrick ,
A M Nolan ,
J Reid  and
M L Wiseman
E M Scott*
Affiliation:
Department of Statistics, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QW, UK
J L Fitzpatrick
Affiliation:
Institute of Comparative Studies (Department of Veterinary Clinical Studies), University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QW, UK
A M Nolan
Affiliation:
Institute of Comparative Studies (Department of Veterinary Pre-Clinical Studies), University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QW, UK
J Reid
Affiliation:
Institute of Comparative Studies (Department of Veterinary Clinical Studies), University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QW, UK
M L Wiseman
Affiliation:
Institute of Comparative Studies (Department of Veterinary Clinical Studies), University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QW, UK
*
* Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Welfare is a multidimensional construct and its quantification is of major scientific, societal and economic importance in veterinary medicine. The construction of indices that measure welfare validly and reliably remains a considerable challenge. A general methodology for constructing welfare indices can be adapted from human medicine (in particular, from methodologies to assess Quality of Life [QoL]) and modified to reflect the fact that all assessments of animal welfare must be observer-based. The methodology is based on the creation of individual, composite indices for distinct dimensions/domains of welfare such as pain, disease, or stress. The domains include behavioural, physiological and biochemical markers. We have established QoL methodologies in the assessment of acute and chronic pain in dogs and generalised this approach to farm animal welfare. We describe the development of a questionnaire with seven behavioural categories which are used to create a single pain score to assess acute pain in dogs. For chronic pain in dogs, a structured questionnaire with over 100 items has been devised, which the owner completes by indicating degree of agreement with each item using a seven-point Likert scale. The welfare measure includes pain as an integral component as well as husbandry, behavioural and physiological/biological measures. In each case, a profile of the individual indices can be studied and compared over time or among observers. These indices may also be combined to form a single composite welfare measure, should this be appropriate, using scaling models. In the welfare setting, we have both causal and indicator variables — and indeed, for farm animals, the causal variables may be sufficient cause for poor welfare (eg the presence of disease or inadequate husbandry).

Keywords

animal welfareanimal welfare assessmenthealth-related quality of lifepsychometric theoryscaling models
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 12 , Issue 4: Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on the Assessment of Animal Welfare at Farm and Group Level , November 2003 , pp. 457 - 468
Copyright
© 2003 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

References

Armstrong, F D, Toledano, S R, Miloslavich, K, Lackman-Zeman, L, Levy, J D, Gay, C L, Schuman, W B and Fishkin, P E 1999 The Miami pediatric quality of life questionnaire: parent scale. International Journal of Cancer 83(S12): 11–173.0.CO;2-8>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bech, P 1999 Health-related quality of life measurements in the assessment of pain clinic results. Acta Anaesthesiologia Scandinavica 43(9): 893–896CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bowling, A 1991 Measuring Health: A Review of Quality of Life Measurement Scales. Open University Press: Open University, UKGoogle Scholar
Clark, W C, Yang, J C, Tsui, S-L and Clark, S B 2002 Unidimensional pain rating scales: a multidimensional affect and pain survey (MAPS) analysis of what they really measure. Pain 98: 241–247Google Scholar
Clarkson, M J, Downham, D Y, Faull, W B, Hughes, J W, Manson, F J, Merritt, J B, Murray, R D, Russell, W B, Sutherst, J E and Ward, W R 1996 Incidence and prevalence of lameness in dairy cattle. Veterinary Record 138: 563–567CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coste, J, Fermanian, J and Venot, A 1995 Methodological and statistical problems in the construction of composite measurement scales: a survey of six medical and epidemiological journals. Statistics in Medicine 14: 331–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dolan, S and Nolan, A M 2000 Behavioural evidence supporting a differential role for group I and group II metabotropic glutamate receptors in spinal nociceptive transmission. Neuropharmacology 39: 1132–1138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farm Animal Welfare Council 2001 Interim report on the animal welfare implications of Farm Assurance Schemes. FAWC: London, UKCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitzpatrick, J L, Young, F J, Eckersall, P D, Logue, D N, Knight, C H and Nolan, A 1999 Mastitis — a painful problem. Cattle Practice 7(2): 225–226Google Scholar
Guyatt, G H 1999 Measuring health-related quality of life in childhood: lessons from the workshop (discussion). International Journal of Cancer 83(S12): 143–1463.0.CO;2-V>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holton, L, Scott, E M, Nolan, A and Reid, J 1997 Comparison of three methods of pain measurement when used to assess clinical pain in dogs. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 212: 61–66Google Scholar
Holton, L, Scott, E M, Nolan, A, Welsh, E, Reid, J and Pawson, P 1998 Relationship between physiological factors and clinical pain. Journal of Small Animal Practice 39: 469–474CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holton, L, Reid, J, Scott, E M and Nolan, A 2001 Development of a behaviour based scale to measure acute pain in dogs. Veterinary Record 148: 525–531CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jensen, M P and Karoly, P 1992 Self-report scales and procedures for assessing pain in adults. In: Turk, D C and Melzack, R (eds) Handbook of Pain Assessment. The Guildford Press: New York, USAGoogle Scholar
Johnston, C C 1998 Psychometric issues in the measurement of pain. In: Finley, G A and McGrath, P J (eds) Measurement of Pain in Infants and Children: Progress in Pain Research and Management, Vol 10 pp 5–20. IASP Press: Seattle, USAGoogle Scholar
Juniper, E F, Guyatt, G H and Jaeschke, R 1996 How to develop and validate a new health-related quality of life instrument. In: Spilker, B (ed) Quality of Life and Pharmacoeconomics, Edn 2 pp 49–56. Lippincott-Raven: Philadelphia, USAGoogle Scholar
Juniper, E F, Guyatt, G H, Streiner, D L and King, D R 1997 Clinical impact versus factor analysis for quality of life questionnaire construction. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 50: 233–238CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kent, J E, Jackson, R E, Molony, V and Hosie, B D 2000 Effects of acute pain reduction methods on the chronic inflammatory lesions and behaviour of lambs castrated and tail docked with rubber rings at less than two days of age. Veterinary Journal 160(1): 33–41CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kent, J E, Molony, V and Graham, M J 1998 Comparison of methods for the reduction of acute pain produced by rubber ring castration or tail docking of week-old lambs. Veterinary Journal 155(1): 39–51CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kent, J E, Thrusfield, M V, Robertson, I S and Molony, V 1996 Castration of calves: a study of methods used by farmers in the United Kingdom. Veterinary Record 138: 384–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kossaibati, M A, Hovi, M and Esslemont, R J 1998 Incidence of clinical mastitis in dairy herds in England. Veterinary Record 143: 649–653CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Landgraf, J M and Abetz, L N 1996 Measuring health outcomes in pediatric populations: issues in psychometrics and application. In: Spilker, B (ed) Quality of Life and Pharmacoeconomics in Clinical Trials, Edn 2 pp 793–802. Lippincott-Raven: Philadelphia, USAGoogle Scholar
Ley, S J, Livingston, A and Waterman, A E 1995 A field study of the effect of lameness on mechanical nociceptive thresholds in sheep. Veterinary Record 137: 85–87CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McArthur, D L, Cohen, M J and Schandler, S L 1989 A philosophy for measurement of pain. In: Chapman, C R and Loeser, J D (eds) Advances in Pain Research and Therapy, Vol 12: Issues in Pain Measurement. Raven Press: New York, USAGoogle Scholar
Melzack, R 1975 The McGill Pain Questionnaire: major properties and scoring methods. Pain 1: 277–299CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moloney, V and Kent, J E 1997 Assessment of acute pain in farm animals using behavioral and physiological measurements. Journal of Animal Science 75(1): 266–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moloney, V, Kent, J E and Robertson, I S 1993 Behavioural responses of lambs of three ages in the first three hours after three methods of castration and tail docking. Research in Veterinary Science 55(2): 236–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moloney, V, Kent, J E and Robertson, I S 1995 Assessment of acute and chronic pain after different methods of castration of calves. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 46(1-2): 33–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naughton, M J, Shumaker, S A, Anderson, R T and Czajkowski, S M 1996 Psychological aspects of health-related quality of life measurement: tests and scales. In: Spilker, B (ed) Quality of Life and Pharmacoeconomics in Clinical Trials, Edn 2. Lippincott-Raven: Philadelphia, USAGoogle Scholar
Nunnally, J C and Bernstein, I H 1994 Psychometric Theory. McGraw Hill Series in Psychology: New York, USAGoogle Scholar
Price, J and Nolan, A M 2001 Analgesia of newborn lambs before castration and tail docking with rubber rings. Veterinary Record 149(11): 321–324CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schipper, H 1990 Quality of life: meaning and measurement. In: Foley, K M (ed) Advances in Pain Research and Therapy. Raven Press: New York, USAGoogle Scholar
Scott, E M, Nolan, A M and Fitzpatrick, J L 2001 Conceptual and methodological issues related to welfare assessment: a framework for measurement. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica (Section A — Animal Science) 30: 5–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skevington, S M 1998 Investigating the relationship between pain and discomfort and quality of life, using the WHOQoL. Pain 76: 395–406CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Streiner, D L and Norman, G R 1995 Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to their Development and Use. Oxford Medical Publications: Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
Thornton, P D and Waterman-Pearson, A E 1997 Castration in young lambs produces changes in mechanical nociceptive threshold responses and behaviour as assessed by a dynamic and interactive visual analogue scale. Journal of Veterinary Anaesthesia 24: 1–41Google Scholar
Thurstone, L L 1927 A law of comparative judgement. Psychological Reviews 76: 31–48Google Scholar
Vlaeyen, J W S, Pernot, D F M, Kole-Snijders, A M J, Schuerman, J A, Van Eek, H and Groenman, N H 1990 Assessment of the components of observed chronic pain behaviour: the Checklist for Interpersonal Pain Behaviour (CHIP). Pain 43: 337–347CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Watts, S A 2000 A survey of bovine practitioners attitudes to pain and analgesia in cattle. Cattle Practice 8: 361–362Google Scholar
Welsh, E M and Nolan, A M 1995 Effect of flunixin meglumine on the thresholds to mechanical stimulation in healthy and lame sheep. Research in Veterinary Science 58: 61–66CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whay, H R, Waterman, A E, Webster, A J F and O'Brien, J K 1998 The influence of lesion type on the duration of hyperalgesia associated with hindlimb lameness in dairy cattle. Veterinary Journal 156(1): 23–29CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Williams, A C, Davies, H T O and Chadury, Y 2000 Simple pain rating scales hide complex idiosyncratic meanings. Pain 85: 457–463CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wiseman, M L, Nolan, A M, Reid, J and Scott, E M 2001 Preliminary study on owner-reported behaviour changes associated with chronic pain in dogs. Veterinary Record 149: 423–424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Health Organisation 1948 Constitution of the World Health Organisation. WHO Basic Documents: Geneva, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
Wright, J G and Feinstein, A R 1992 A comparative contrast of clinimetric and psychometric methods for constructing indexes and rating scales. Clinical Epidemiology 45: 1201–1218CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed