Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T10:25:13.128Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ethics of feeding: the omnivore dilemma

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

IHE Kasanen ,
DB S⊘rensen ,
B Forkman  and
P Sand⊘e
IHE Kasanen*
Affiliation:
National Laboratory Animal Centre, University of Kuopio, PO Box 1627, FI-70211 Kuopio, Finland
DB S⊘rensen
Affiliation:
Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
B Forkman
Affiliation:
Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
P Sand⊘e
Affiliation:
Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
*
* Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The way in which animals are fed is an important aspect of their welfare. Not only does food provide the energy and nutrients vital for survival, but feeding is also associated with a number of other factors contributing to the well-being of animals. The feeding method can determine the animals’ abilities to fulfil basic behavioural needs, such as foraging. The aim of this paper is to review and discuss the dilemma of choosing between ad libitum feeding (AL) and dietary restriction (DR). AL can produce obese individuals with severe health problems, though it does appear to be compatible with welfare-friendly management systems. On the other hand, DR is often associated with improved physical health and longevity but can leave animals suffering from hunger, frustration or aggression. The species discussed are the laboratory rat, pigs and poultry all of which are omnivores sharing many characteristics in their eating habits. The welfare implications of different feeding methods depend upon the definition of welfare used. Based on a definition of welfare in terms of functioning, DR could be considered the best way to feed animals, because it results in improved physical health and longevity. If welfare is defined in terms of natural living, it is also a requirement for the animal to be able to engage in natural foraging behaviours. From the feelings-based approach, DR can be viewed as preferable only in circumstances when animals are anticipated to live so long that they would otherwise suffer from the negative long-term consequences of AL. It is argued that incentives are needed to make farmers spend resources to ensure that farm animals are allowed to have their foraging-related needs fulfilled. Feeding of laboratory animals creates special dilemmas when it is important either to under- or over-nourish the animals for experimental purposes, in such instances there is a need for Refinement.

Keywords

ad libitumanimal welfaredietary restrictionethicsratsow
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 19 , Issue 1 , February 2010 , pp. 37 - 44
Copyright
© 2010 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

References

Adams, DB, Cowan, CW, Marshall, ME and Stark, J 1994 Competitive and territorial fighting: Two types of offense in the rats. Physiology & Behavior 55: 247–254Google Scholar
Appleby, MC and Lawrence, AB 1987 Food restriction as a cause of stereotypic behaviour in tethered gilts. Animal Production 45: 103–110Google Scholar
Balcombe, JP 2006a Laboratory environments and rodents’ behavioural needs: a review. Laboratory Animals 40: 217–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balcombe, JP 2006b Pleasurable Kingdom, First Edition. Macmillan: New York, USAGoogle Scholar
Barnett, SA 1951 Feeding, social behaviour and interspecific competition in wild rats. Behaviour 3: 229–243Google Scholar
Barnett, SA 1963 The Rat: A Study in Behaviour, First Edition. Aldine Publishing Company: Chicago, USAGoogle Scholar
Berridge, KC 2007 The debate over dopamine's role in reward: the case for incentive salience. Psychopharmacology 191(3): 391–431CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bessei, W 2006 Welfare of broilers: a review. Worlds Poultry Science Journal 62(3): 455–466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradshaw, JW 2006 The evolutionary basis for the feeding behavior of domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) and cats (Felis catus). The Journal of Nutrition 136(7): 1927S–1931SCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brenes, JC, Rodríguez, O and Fornaguera, J 2008 Differential effect of environment enrichment and social isolation on depressive-like behavior, spontaneous activity and serotonin and norepinephrine concentration in prefrontal cortex and ventral striatum. Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior 89(1): 85–93Google ScholarPubMed
Brillard, JP 2001 Future strategies for broiler breeders: an international perspective. Worlds Poultry Science Journal 57(3): 243–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buckner, LJ, Edwards, SA and Bruce, JM 1998 Behaviour and shelter use by outdoor sows. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 57(1-2): 69–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calhoun, JB 1962 The Ecology and Sociology of the Norway Rat, First Edition. Public Health Services: Bethesda, Maryland, USAGoogle Scholar
Carney, EW, Zablotny, CL, Marty, MS, Crissman, JW, Anderson, P, Woolhiser, M and Holsapple, M 2004 The Effects of feed restriction during in utero and postnatal development in rats. Toxicological Sciences 82(1): 237–249CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, H, Luo, L, Liu, J, Brown, T and Zirkin, BR 2005 Aging and caloric restriction: effects on Leydig cell steroidogenesis. Experimental Gerontology 40(6): 498–505CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Colliard, L, Paragon, BM, Lemuet, B, Benet, JJ and Blanchard, G 2009 Prevalence and risk factors of obesity in an urban population of healthy cats. Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery 11(2): 135–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Danbury, TC, Weeks, CA, Chambers, JP, Waterman-Pearson, AE and Kestin, SC 2000 Self-selection of the analgesic drug carprofen by lame broiler chickens. Veterinary Record 146(11): 307–311CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dawkins, MS 1989 Time budgets in red junglefowl as a baseline for the assessment of welfare in domestic-Fowl. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 24(1): 77–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Jong, IC and Jones, B 2006 Feed restriction and welfare in domestic birds. In: Bels, V (ed) Feeding in Domestic Vertebrates. From Structure to Behaviour, First Edition pp 120–135. CABI: Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
de Jonge, FH, Tilly, S, Baars, AM and Spruijt, BM 2008 On the rewarding nature of appetitive feeding behaviour in pigs (Sus scrofa): Do domesticated pigs contrafreeload? Applied Animal Behaviour Science 114(3-4): 359–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de la Fuente-Fernandez, R, Phillips, AG, Zamburlini, M, Sossi, V, Calne, DB, Ruth, TJ and Stoessl, AJ 2002 Dopamine release in human ventral striatum and expectation of reward. Behavioural Brain Research 136(2): 359–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Leeuw, JA and Ekkel, ED 2004 Effects of feeding level and the presence of a foraging substrate on the behaviour and stress physiological response of individually housed gilts. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 86(1-2): 15–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Decuypere, E, Hocking, PM, Tona, K, Onagbesan, O, Bruggeman, V, Jones, EKM, Cassy, S, Rideau, N, Metayer, S, Jego, Y, Putterflam, J, Tesseraud, S, Collin, A, Duclos, M, Trevidy, JJ and Williams, J 2006 Broiler breeder paradox: a project report. Worlds Poultry Science Journal 62(3): 443–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deeb, N, Shlosberg, A and Cahaner, A 2002 Genotype-by-environment interaction with broiler genotypes differing in growth rate 4. Association between responses to heat stress and to cold-induced ascites. Poultry Science 81(10): 1454–1462CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dudink, S, Simonse, H, Marks, I, de Jonge, FH and Spruijt, BM 2006 Announcing the arrival of enrichment increases play behaviour and reduces weaning-stress-induced behaviours of piglets directly after weaning. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 101(1-2): 86–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duffy, PH, Seng, JE, Lewis, SM, Mayhugh, MA, Aidoo, A, Hattan, DG, Casciano, DA and Feuers, RJ 2001 The effects of different levels of dietary restriction on aging and survival in the Sprague-Dawley rat: implications for chronic studies. Aging (Milan, Italy) 13(4): 263–272Google ScholarPubMed
Duffy, PH, Lewis, SM, Mayhugh, MA, Trotter, RW, Latendresse, JR, Thorn, BT and Feuers, RJ 2004a The effects of different levels of dietary restriction on neoplastic pathology in the male Sprague-Dawley rat. Aging Clinical and Experimental Research 16(6): 448–456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duffy, PH, Lewis, SM, Mayhugh, MA, Trotter, RW, Thorn, BT, Feuers, RJ and Turturro, A 2004b The effects of different levels of dietary restriction on non-neoplastic diseases in male Sprague-Dawley rats. Aging Clinical and Experimental Research 16(1): 68–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
EC 2001 2001/93/EU 1993, Commission Directive 2001/93/EC of 9 November 2001 amending Directive 91/630/EEC laying down minimum standards for the protection of pigs. Brussels, BelgiumGoogle Scholar
EC 2007 ETS No 123 Appendix A of the European Convention for the Protection of Vertebrate Animals used for Experimental and Other Scientific Purposes (ETS No. 123) Guidelines for accommodation and care of animals. Strasbourg, France. http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/EN/Treaties/Html/123-A.htmGoogle Scholar
Forkman, B 1996 The foraging behaviour of Mongolian gerbils: A behavioural need or a need to know? Behaviour 133: 129–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, D 1997 Science in a value-laden world: keeping our thinking straight. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 54(1): 29–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hocking, PM, Bernard, R and Robertson, GW 2002 Effects of low dietary protein and different allocations of food during rearing and restricted feeding after peak rate of lay on egg production, fertility and hatchability in female broiler breeders. British Poultry Science 43(1): 94–103CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hubert, M, Laroque, P, Gillet, J and Keenan, KP 2000 The effects of diet, ad libitum feeding, and moderate and severe dietary restriction on body weight, survival, clinical pathology parameters, and cause of death in control Sprague-Dawley Rats. Toxicological Sciences 58(1): 195–207CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Inglis, IR, Forkman, B and Lazarus, J 1997 Free food or earned food? A review and fuzzy model of contrafreeloading. Animal Behaviour 53(6): 1171–1191CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Inglis, IR, Langton, S, Forkman, B and Lazarus, J 2001 An information primacy model of exploratory and foraging behaviour. Animal Behaviour 62: 543–557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Julian, RJ, Friars, GW, French, H and Quinton, M 1987 The relationship of right ventricular hypertrophy, right ventricular failure, and ascites to weight-gain in broiler and roaster chickens. Avian Diseases 31(1): 130–135CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kasanen, IH, Inhila, KJ, Nevalainen, JI, Vaisanen, SB, Mertanen, AM, Mering, SM and Nevalainen, TO 2009a A novel dietary restriction method for group-housed rats: weight gain and clinical chemistry characterization. Laboratory Animals 43(2): 138–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kasanen, IH, Inhila, KJ, Vainio, OM, Kiviniemi, VV, Hau, J, Scheinin, M, Mering, SM and Nevalainen, TO 2009b The diet board: welfare impacts of a novel method of dietary restriction in laboratory rats. Laboratory Animals 43: 215–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keenan, KP and Soper, KA 1995 The effects of ad libitum overfeeding and moderate dietary restriction on Sprague-Dawley rat survival, spontaneous carcinogenesis, chronic disease, and the toxicologic response to pharmaceuticals. In: Hart, RW, Neumann, DA and Robertson, RT (eds) Dietary Restriction: Implications for the Design and Interpretation of Toxicity and Carcinogenicity Studies, First Edition pp 99–126. ILSI Press: Washington DC, USAGoogle Scholar
Keenan, KP, Laroque, P, Ballam, GC, Soper, KA, Dixit, R, Mattson, BA, Adams, SP and Coleman, JB 1996 The effects of diet, ad libitum overfeeding, and moderate dietary restriction on the rodent bioassay: the uncontrolled variable in safety assessment. Toxicologic Pathology 24(6): 757–768Google ScholarPubMed
Keenan, KP, Laroque, P and Dixit, R 1998 Need for dietary control by caloric restriction in rodent toxicology and carcinogenicity studies. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health. Part B, Critical Reviews 1(2): 135–148Google ScholarPubMed
Kemppinen, N, Meller, A, Mauranen, K, Kohila, T and Nevalainen, T 2008 Work for food, a solution to restricting food intake in group housed rats? Scandinavian Journal of Laboratory Animal Science 35(2): 81–90Google Scholar
Krohn, TC, S⊘rensen, DB, Ottesen, JL and Hansen, AK 2006 The effects of individual housing on mice and rats: a review. Animal Welfare 15: 343–352Google Scholar
Leakey, JEA, Seng, JE and Allaben, WT 2003a Body weight considerations in the B6C3F1 mouse and the use of dietary control to standardize background tumor incidence in chronic bioassays. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology 193: 237–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leakey, JEA, Seng, JE, Latendresse, JR, Hussain, N, Allen, LJ and Allaben, WT 2003b Dietary controlled carcinogenicity study of chloral hydrate in male B6C3F1 mice. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology 193: 266–280Google Scholar
Leyhausen, P 1979 Cat Behaviour. The Predatory and Social Behavior of Domestic and Wild Cats, First Edition. Garland Press: New York, USAGoogle Scholar
Lund, RM, Armstrong, PJ, Kirk, CA and Klausner, JS 2006 Prevalence and risk factors for obesity in adult dogs from private US veterinary practices. International Journal of Applied Research in Veterinary Medicine 4: 177–186Google Scholar
Martin, B, Pearson, M, Kebejian, L, Golden, E, Keselman, A, Bender, M, Carlson, O, Egan, J, Ladenheim, B, Cadet, JL, Becker, KG, Wood, W, Duffy, K, Vinayakumar, P, Maudsley, S and Mattson, MP 2007 Sex-dependent metabolic, neuroendocrine, and cognitive responses to dietary energy restriction and excess. Endocrinology 148: 4318–4333CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mason, GJ, Cooper, J and Clarebrough, C 2001 Frustrations of fur-farmed mink. Nature 410: 35–36Google ScholarPubMed
Masoro, EJ 2006 Dietary restriction-induced life extension: a broadly based biological phenomenon. Biogerontology 7: 153–155Google ScholarPubMed
Mench, JA 2002 Broiler breeders: feed restriction and welfare. Worlds Poultry Science Journal 58: 23–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meunier-Salaun, MC, Edwards, SA and Robert, S 2001 Effect of dietary fibre on the behaviour and health of the restricted fed sow. Animal Feed Science and Technology 90: 53–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, JF, Karelus, K, Bergman, MD and Felicio, LS 1995 Neuroendocrine involvement in aging: evidence from studies of reproductive aging and caloric restriction. Neurobiology of Aging 16: 837–856CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nielsen, BL, Thodberg, K, Dybkjaer, L and Vestergaard, EM 2006 Feeding behaviour of pigs. In: Bels, V (ed) Feeding in Domestic Vertebrates. From Structure to Behaviour, First Edition pp 156–178. CABI: Cambridge, UKCrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Doherty, JP, Deichmann, R, Critchley, HD and Dolan, RJ 2002 Neural responses during anticipation of a primary taste reward. Neuron 33: 815–826CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pahlavani, MA and Vargas, DA 2001 Aging but not dietary restriction alters the activation-induced apoptosis in rat T cells. FEBS Letters 491: 114–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perello, M, Chacon, F, Cardinali, DP, Esquifino, AI and Spinedi, E 2006 Effect of social isolation on 24-h pattern of stress hormones and leptin in rats. Life Sciences 78: 1857–1862Google ScholarPubMed
Petherick, JC and Blackshaw, JK 1987 A review of the factors influencing the aggressive and agonistic behavior of the domestic pig. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 27: 605–611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pugh, TD, Klopp, RG and Weindruch, R 1999 Controlling caloric consumption: protocols for rodents and rhesus monkeys. Neurobiology of Aging 20: 157–165CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rasmussen, DK, Weber, R and Wechsler, B 2006 Effects of animal/feeding-place ratio on the behaviour and performance of fattening pigs fed via sensor-controlled liquid feeding. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 98: 45–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raun, K, von Voss, P and Knudsen, LB 2007 Liraglutide, a once-daily human glucagon-like peptide-1 analogue, minimizes food intake in severely obese minipigs. Obesity 15: 1710–1716CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redbo, S and Nordblad, A 1997 Stereotypies in heifers are affected by feeding regime. Applied Animal Behavioural Science 53: 193–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rehm, S, White, TE, Zahalka, EA, Stanislaus, DJ, Boyce, RW and Wier, PJ 2008 Effects of food restriction on testis and accessory sex glands in maturing rats. Toxicologic Pathology 36: 687–694Google ScholarPubMed
Robert, S, Rushen, J and Farmer, C 1997 Both energy content and bulk of food affect stereotypic behaviour, heart rate and feeding motivation of female pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 54: 161–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, WMS and Burch, RL 1959 The Principles of Humane Experimental Technique, First Edition. Methuen: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Rutten, M, Leterrier, C, Constantin, P, Reiter, K and Bessei, W 2002 Bone development and activity in chickens in response to reduced weight-load on legs. Animal Research 51: 327–336Google Scholar
Sandilands, V, Tolkamp, BJ, Savory, CJ and Kyriazakis, I 2006 Behaviour and welfare of broiler breeders fed qualitatively restricted diets during rearing: are there viable alternatives to quantitative restriction? Applied Animal Behaviour Science 96: 53–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sand⊘e, P and Christiansen, S 2008 Ethics of Animal Use. Blackwell Publishing: Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
Selesniemi, K, Lee, HJ and Tilly, JL 2008 Moderate caloric restriction initiated in rodents during adulthood sustains function of the female reproductive axis into advanced chronological age. Aging Cell 5: 622–629CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Serra, M, Pisu, MG, Floris, I and Biggio, G 2005 Social isolation-induced changes in the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis in the rat. Stress 8: 259–264CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sharov, AA, Falco, G, Piao, Y, Poosala, S, Becker, KG, Zonderman, AB, Longo, DL, Schlessinger, D and Ko, MS 2008 Effects of aging and calorie restriction on the global gene expression profiles of mouse testis and ovary. BMC Biology 6: 24CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sherwin, CM 2007 The motivation of group-housed laboratory mice to leave an enriched laboratory cage. Animal Behaviour 73: 29–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spruijt, BM, van den Bos, R and Pijlman, FTA 2001 A concept of welfare based on reward evaluating mechanisms in the brain: anticipatory behaviour as an indicator for the state of reward systems. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 72: 145–171CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stolba, A and Woodgush, DGM 1989 The behavior of pigs in a semi-natural environment. Animal Production 48: 419–425Google Scholar
Thorp, BH and Duff, SRI 1988 Effect of exercise on the vascular pattern in the bone extremities of broiler fowl. Research in Veterinary Science 45: 72–77CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Der Harst, JE, Fermont, PCJ, Bilstra, AE and Spruijt, BM 2003 Access to enriched housing is rewarding to rats as reflected by their anticipatory behaviour. Animal Behaviour 66: 493–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vitousek, KM, Manke, FP, Gray, JA and Vitousek, MN 2004 Caloric restriction for longevity: II, The systematic neglect of behavioural and psychological outcomes in animal research. European Eating Disorders Review 12: 38–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar