Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T10:36:56.625Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Emergency procedures in the field: a report of wound treatment and fast healing in the giant ditch frog (Leptodactylus fallax)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

GM Rosa  and
A Fernández-Loras
GM Rosa*
Affiliation:
Durrell Institute of Conservation and Ecology, School of Anthropology and Conservation, University of Kent, Canterbury, Kent CT2 7NR, UK Centro de Biologia Ambiental, Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade de Lisboa, Bloco C2 Campo Grande, 1749-016, Lisbon, Portugal Durrell Wildlife Conservation Trust, Les Augrés Manor, La Profonde Rue, Trinity, Jersey, Channel Islands, UK
A Fernández-Loras
Affiliation:
Durrell Wildlife Conservation Trust, Les Augrés Manor, La Profonde Rue, Trinity, Jersey, Channel Islands, UK Departamento de Biodiversidad y Biología Evolutiva, Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales-CSIC, José Gutiérrez Abascal 2, 28006, Madrid, Spain
*
* Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A sub-adult, female, giant ditch frog (Leptodactylus fallax) (known locally as a mountain chicken) presented with a puncture of the coelomic cavity with partial intestinal evisceration. Improvised field treatment included replacement of the eviscerated intestines and closure of the wound using cotton-tipped applicator swabs. After seven days, the animal's injury appeared to be healed. During the rapid progression of the healing process, the animal showed no adverse effects. This report demonstrates a novel and successful field technique for wound treatment of a serious penetrating injury in an amphibian. It also shows a practical, feasible, and beneficial procedure that improved this animal's welfare and that might be appropriate under field conditions or if standard medical procedures cannot be followed.

Keywords

amphibian medicineanimal welfarefield surgeryLeptodactylus fallaxminor surgerywound healing
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 21 , Issue 4 , November 2012 , pp. 559 - 562
Copyright
© 2012 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

References

Anderson, CD and Talcott, M 2006 Clinical practice versus field surgery: a discussion of the regulations and logistics of implanting radiotransmitters in snakes. Wildlife Society Bulletin 34: 1470–1471. http://dx.doi.org/10.2193/0091-7648(2006)34[1470:CPVFSA]2.0.CO;2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, GL, Curtsinger, L, Brightwell, JR, Ackerman, DM, Tobin, GR, Polk, HC, George-Nascimento, C, Valenzuela, P and Schultz, GS 1986 Enhancement of epidermal regeneration by biosynthetic epidermal growth factor. Journal of Experimental Medicine 163: 1319–1324. http://dx.doi.org/10.1084/jem.163.5.1319CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clayton, LA and Gore, SR 2007 Amphibian emergency medicine. Veterinary Clinics of North America. Exotic Animal Practice 10: 587–620. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cvex.2007.02.004CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Corn, PS 1992 Laboratory and field evaluation of effects of PIT tags. Froglog 4: 2Google Scholar
Daltry, JC and Gray, G 1999 Effects of volcanic activity on the endangered mountain chicken frog (Leptodactylus fallax). Froglog 32: 1–2Google Scholar
Fa, J, Hedges, B, Ibéné, B, Breuil, M, Powell, R and Magin, C 2010 Leptodactylus fallax. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2011.2. http://www.iucnredlist.orgGoogle Scholar
Garcia, G, Cunningham, AA, Horton, DL, Garner, TWJ, Hyatt, A, Hengstberger, S, Lopez, J, Ogrodowczyk, A, Fenton, C and Fa, JE 2007 Mountain chickens Leptodactylus fallax and sympatric amphibians appear to be disease free on Montserrat. Oryx 41: 398–401. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0030605307001012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gentz, EJ 2007 Medicine and surgery of amphibians. ILAR Journal 48(3): 255–259CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hedges, SB 1993 Global amphibian declines: a perspective from the Caribbean. Biodiversity and Conservation 2: 290–303. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00056674CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hedges, SB and Heinicke, MP 2007 Molecular phylogeny and biogeography of West Indian frogs of the genus Leptodactylus (Anura, Leptodactylidae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 44: 308–314. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2006.11.011CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holliday, SH 2009 Montserrat: A Guide to the Centre Hills: West Indies Publishing: St John's, AntiguaGoogle Scholar
Kaiser, H 1994 Leptodactylus fallax. Catalogue of American Amphibians and Reptiles. Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles 583: 1–3Google Scholar
Kirkwood, JKK and Sainsbury, AW 1996 Ethics of interventions for the welfare of free-living wild animals. Animal Welfare 5: 235–243Google Scholar
Kriger, KM, Hines, HB, Hyatt, AD, Boyle, DG and Hero, JM 2006 Techniques for detecting chytridiomycosis in wild frogs. Comparing histology with real-time Taqman PCR. Diseases of Aquatic Organisms 71: 141–148. http://dx.doi.org/10.3354/dao071141CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lescure, J 1979 Étude taxonomique et éco-éthologique d'un Amphibien des petites Antilles: Leptodactylus fallax Müller, 1926 (Leptodactylidae). Bulletin du Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Paris 1: 757–774. [Title translation: Taxonomic and eco ethologic study of an amphibian of the lesser antilles Leptodactylus fallax (Leptodactylidae)]Google Scholar
Martin, P 1997 Wound healing: aiming for perfect skin regeneration. Science 276: 75–81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.276.5309.75CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Philo, LM, Follmann, EH and Reynolds, HV 1981 Field surgical techniques for implanting temperature-sensitive radio transmitters in Grizzly bears. Journal of Wildlife Management 45: 772–775. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3808719CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poll, CP 2009 Wound management in amphibians: etiology and treatment of cutaneous lesions. Journal of Exotic Pet Medicine 18: 20–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.jepm.2008.10.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rollins-Smith, LA, King, JD, Nielsen, PF, Sonnevend, A and Conlon, JM 2005 An antimicrobial peptide from the skin secretions of the mountain chicken frog Leptodactylus fallax (Anura: Leptodactylidae). Regulatory Peptides 124: 173–178. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.regpep.2004.07.013CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schwartz, A and Henderson, RW 1991 Amphibians and Reptiles of the West Indies: Descriptions, Distributions, and Natural History. University of Florida Press: Gainesville, USAGoogle Scholar
Sinsch, U 1988 Temporal spacing of breeding activity in the natterjack toad, Bufo calamita. Oecologia 76: 399–407CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Speare, R, Berger, L, Skerratt, LF, Alford, R, Mendez, D, Cashins, S, Kenyon, N, Hauselberger, K and Rowley, J 2004 Hygiene Protocol for Handling Amphibians in Field Studies. http://www.jcu.edu.au/school/phtm/PHTM/frogs/field-hygiene.pdfGoogle Scholar
Stevens, M and Waldmann, G 2001 Animal biodiversity of the Lesser Antillean island of Montserrat (British West Indies): an annotated checklist of terrestrial and freshwater animals. Archiv Zoologischer Publikationen Band 6: i–viii, 1-145Google Scholar
Wright, KM 2001 Surgical techniques. In: Wright, KM and Whitaker, BR (eds) Amphibian Medicine and Captive Husbandry pp 273–283. Kerala Krieger: Malabar, FloridaGoogle Scholar
Young, RP 2008 A Biodiversity Assessment of the Centre Hills, Montserrat. Durrell Conservation Monograph No 1. Durrell Wildlife Conservation Trust: Jersey, Channel IslandsGoogle Scholar