Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T17:23:07.764Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of Lighting on the Welfare of Domestic Poultry: A Review

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2023

C E Manser
C E Manser*
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 OES, UK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Four aspects of lighting which may influence the behaviour and physiology of housed poultry are light intensity, photoperiod, light source and wavelength. These factors are frequently manipulated in an attempt to improve productivity and to facilitate management practices. This review examines the effects of such manipulation upon the welfare of the birds. The majority of papers on lighting in poultry houses deal with their effects upon performance, rather than on factors associated with behaviour and health which may impinge upon welfare. Data about the preferences of birds for different lighting conditions are almost entirely lacking, but the practice of housing birds in relatively low light intensity is considered likely to lead to sensory deprivation in species where vision is important. Tentative recommendations are given pending the results of future research as to appropriate light intensity, photoperiod and light sources for domestic poultry.

Keywords

animal welfarebehaviourhenslightingphysiologyturkeys
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 5 , Issue 4 , November 1996 , pp. 341 - 360
Copyright
© 1996 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

References

Appleby, M C, Hughes, B O and Elson, H A 1992 Poultry Production Systems: Behaviour, Management and Welfare. CAB International: Wallingford, UK.Google Scholar
Appleby, M C, McRac, H E and Peitz, B E 1983 The effect of light on the choice of nests by domestic hens. Applied Animal Ethology 11: 249–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashton, W L G, Pattison, M and Barnett, K C 1973 Light-induced eye abnormalities in turkeys and the turkey blindness syndrome. Research in Veterinary Science 14: 42–46CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bacon, W L and Touchbarn, S P 1976 Effect of light intensity on confinement rearing of male turkeys. Poultry Science 55: 999–1007CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blokhuis, H J 1983 The relevance of sleep in poultry. World’s Poultry Science Journal 39: 33–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boshouwers, F M G and Nicaise, E 1987 Physical activity and energy expenditure of laying hens as affected by light intensity. British Poultry Science 28: 155–163CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boshouwers, F M G and Nicaise, E 1992 Responses of broiler chickens to high-frequency and low-frequency fluorescent light. British Poultry Science 33: 711–717CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boshouwers, F M G and Nicaise, E 1993 Artificial light sources and their influence on physical activity and energy expenditure of laying hens. British Poultry Science 34: 11–19CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bryant, S L 1987 A case for dawn and dusk for housed livestock. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 18: 379–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buckland, R B, Bernon, D E and Goldrosen, A 1976 Effect of four lighting regimes on broiler performance, leg abnormalities and plasma corticoid levels. Poultry Science 55: 1072–1076CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cave, N A 1990 Effects of feeding level during pullet-layer transition and of pre-transition lighting on performance of broiler breeders. Poultry Science 69: 1141–1146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cherry, P and Barwick, M W 1962 The effect of light on broiler growth 1. Light intensity and colour. British Poultry Science 3: 31–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Classen, H L and Riddell, C 1989 Photoperiodic effects on performance and leg abnormalities in chickens. Poultry Science 68: 873–879CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Classen, H L 1991 Increasing photoperiod length provides better broiler health. Poultry Digest 50: 14–28Google Scholar
Classen, H L, Riddell, C and Robinson, F E 1991 Effects of increasing photoperiod length on performance and health of broiler chickens. British Poultry Science 32: 21–29CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Classen, H L, Riddell, C, Robinson, F E, Shand, P J and McCurdy, A R 1994 Effect of lighting treatment on the productivity, health, behaviour and sexual maturity of heavy male turkeys. British Poultry Science 35: 215–225CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coenen, A M L, Wolters, E M T J, van Luijteleer, E L J M and Blokhuis, H J 1988 Effects of intermittent lighting on sleep and activity in the domestic hen. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 20: 309–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, M A and Minear, L R 1981 A comparison of the effects of fluorescent versus incandescent lighting on the reproductive performance of two strains of broiler breeders. Poultry Science 60: 1642Google Scholar
Davis, G S and Siopes, T D 1985 The effect of light duration on turkey poult performance and adrenal function. Poultry Science 64: 995–1001CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davis, G S, Siopes, T D, Peiffer, R L and Cook, C 1986 Morphologic changes induced by photoperiod in eyes of turkey poults. American Journal of Veterinary Research 47: 953–955Google ScholarPubMed
Deaton, J W, Reece, F N, McNaughton, J L and Lott, B D 1981 Effect of light intensity and low-level intermittent lighting on broiler performance, during a high density limited-area brooding period. Poultry Science 60: 2385–2387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denbow, D M, Leighton, A T and Hulet, R M 1990 Effect of light sources and light intensity on growth, performance and behaviour of female turkeys. British Poultry Science 31: 439–443CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Farm Animal Welfare Council 1995 Report on the Welfare of Turkeys. Paragraphs 35 to 40. FAWC: Surbiton, UKGoogle Scholar
Felts, J V, Leighton, A T, Denbow, D M and Hulet, R M 1990 Influence of light sources on the growth and reproduction of large white turkeys. Poultry Science 69: 576–583CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fox, M W 1984 Farm Animals. Husbandry, Behavior and Veterinary Practice. University Park: Baltimore, USAGoogle Scholar
Freeman, B M, Manning, A C C and Flack, I H 1981 Photoperiod and its effect on the responses of the immature fowl to stressors. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology 68A: 411–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, S W, Innes, J and Hughes, B O 1985 Aggregation behaviour of laying fowls in a covcred strawyard. In: Wegner, R-M (ed) Second European Symposium on Poultry Welfare pp 296–298. German branch of the World’s Poultry Science Association (WPSA): Celle, GermanyGoogle Scholar
Gill, D J and Leighton, A T 1984 Effects of light environment and population density on growth performance of male turkeys. Poultry Science 63: 1314–1321CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gordon, S 1989 Quality broiler production - Part 1 Gleadthorpe overview. Agricultural Development Advisory Service (ADAS) Poultry Journal 3: 33–45Google Scholar
Gregory, N G, Wilkins, L J, Alvey, D M and Tucker, S A 1993 Effect of catching method and lighting intensity on the prevalence of broken bones and on the ease of handling of end-of-lay hens. Veterinary Record 132: 127–129CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Griffin, J F T 1989 Stress and immunity: a unifying concept. Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology 20: 263–312CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gross, W B and Siegel, H S 1985 Evaluation of the heterophil/lymphocyte ratio as a measure of stress in chickens. Avian Diseases 27: 972–979CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, PC and McGinnis, J 1967 Light-induced exophthalmos in the domestic fowl. Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine 126: 308–312CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hester, P Y, Elkin, R G and Klingensmith, P M 1983 Effects of high intensity step up and low intensity step down lighting programs on the incidence of leg abnormalities in turkeys. Poultry Science 62: 887–896CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hester, P Y, Sutton, A L and Elkin, R G 1987 Effect of light intensity, litter source, and litter management on the incidence of leg abnormalities and performance of male turkeys. Poultry Science 66: 666–675CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hester, P Y, Sutton, AL, Elkin, R G and Klingensmith, P M 1985 The effect of lighting, dietary amino acids, and litter on the incidence of leg abnormalities and performance of turkey toms. Poultry Science 64: 2062–2075CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, H-U and Fölsch, D W 1985 The hens’ need for light In: Wegner, R-M (ed) Second European Symposium on Poultry Welfare pp 292–293. German branch of the World’s Poultry Science Association (WPSA): Celle, GermanyGoogle Scholar
Hughes, B O and Black, A J 1974 The effect of environmental factors on activity, selected behaviour patterns and “fear” of fowls in cages and pens. British Poultry Science 15: 375–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, B O and Duncan, I J H 1972 The influence of strain and environmental factors upon feather pecking and cannibalism in the fowl. British Poultry Science 13: 525–547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hulan, H W and Proudfoot, F G 1987 Effects of light source, ambient temperature and dietary energy source on the general performance and incidence of leg abnormalities of roaster chickens. Poultry Science 66: 645–661CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jenkins, R L, Ivey, W D, McDaniel, G R and Albert, R A 1979 A darkness induced eye abnormality in the domestic chicken. Poultry Science 58: 55–59CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
King-Smith, P E 1971 Special senses In: Bell D J and Freeman B M (eds) Physiology and Biochemistry of the Domestic Fowl pp 1040–1060. Academic Press: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Kirby, J D and Froman, D P 1991 Evaluation of humoral and delayed hypersensitivity responses in cockerels reared under constant light or a twelve hour light: twelve hour dark photoperiod. Poultry Science 70: 2375–2378CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klingensmith, P M, Hester, P Y, Elkin, R G and Ward, C R 1986 Relationship of high intensity step up lighting to bone ash and growth plate closure of the tarso-metatarsus in turkeys. British Poultry Science 27: 487–492CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kristensen, F, Kristensen, B and Lazary, S 1982 The lymphocyte stimulation test in veterinary immunology. Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology 3: 203–277CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lauber, J K and McGinnis, J 1966 Eye lesions in domestic fowl reared under continuous light. Vision Research 6: 619–626CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leighton, A T, Hulet, R M and Denbow, D M 1989 Effect of light sources and light intensity on growth performance and behaviour of male turkeys. British Poultry Science 30: 563–574CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Le Menee, M and Launay, M 1988 A comparison of three lighting methods in the production of broiler fowls. Bulletin d’Information, Station Experimentale d’Aviculture de Ploufragan, France 28: 119–127Google Scholar
Levenick, C K and Leighton, A T 1988 Effect of photoperiod and filtered light on growth, reproduction and mating behavior of turkeys. 1. Growth performance of two lines of males and females. Poultry Science 67: 1505–1513CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lewis, P D and Perry, G C 1990 Glossary of avian photoperiodic terminology and methods of expressing lighting regimens. British Poultry Science 31: 677–684CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lewis, P D, Perry, G C, Morris, T R and Midgley, M M 1992 Intermittent lighting regimes and mortality rates in laying hens. World’s Poultry Science Journal 48: 113–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
March, T I, Thompson, L J, Lewis, P D and Perry, G C 1990 Sleep and activity behaviour of layers subjected to interrupted lighting schedules. British Poultry Science 31: 895–896Google Scholar
Martin, D, Taylor, J, Harrison, D and Pearson, J (eds) 1980 Lighting. In: Specification 80. Building Methods and Products, Volume 3 pp 59–81. The Architectural Press Ltd: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Martin, G 1989 Federpickhaufigkeit in Abhangigkeit von Draht- und Einstreuboden sowie von der Lichtintensitat. Kuratorium fur Technik und Bauwesen in der Landwirtschaft Schrift 342: 108–133Google Scholar
Mashaly, M M, Trout, J M, Sieminski-Brodzina, L M and Siegel, H S 1988 Effect of exposure to different light regimes on the immune response of immature female chickens. Poultry Science 67 (Supplement 1): 114Google Scholar
McFarlane, J M and Curtis, S E 1989 Multiple concurrent stressors in chicks. 3. Effects on plasma corticosterone and the heterophil:lymphocyte ratio. Poultry Science 68: 510–521CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Millam, J R 1987 Preference of turkey hens for nest-boxes of different levels of interior illumination. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 18: 341–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food 1988 Codes of Recommendations for the Welfare of Livestock: Turkeys. MAFF Publications: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food 1990 Codes of Recommendations for the Welfare of Livestock: Domestic Fowls. MAFF Publications: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Newberry, R C and Blair, R 1993 Behavioral responses of broiler chickens to handling - effects of dietary tryptophan and two lighting regimens. Poultry Science 72: 1237–1244CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Newberry, R C, Hunt, J R and Gardiner, E E 1986 Light intensity effects on performance, activity, leg disorders and sudden death syndrome of roaster chickens. Poultry Science 65: 2232–2238CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Newberry, R C, Hunt, J R and Gardiner, E E 1988 Influence of light intensity on behaviour and performance of broiler chickens. Poultry Science 67: 1020–1025CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nuboer, J F W 1993 Visual ecology in poultry houses. In: Savory, C J and Hughes, B O (eds) Fourth European Symposium on Poultry Welfare pp 39–44. Universities Federation for Animal Welfare: Potters Bar, UKGoogle Scholar
Nuboer, J F W, Coemans, M A J M and Vos, J J 1992 Artificial lighting in poultry houses: do hens perceive the modulation of fluorescent lamps as flicker ? British Poultry Science 33: 123–133CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oishi, T and Murakami, N 1985 Effects of duration and intensity of illumination on several parameters of the chick eye. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology 81A: 319–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, C J C and Weiguo, L 1991 Brightness discrimination abilities of calves relative to those of humans. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 31: 25–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prayitno, D S 1994 Effects of Light on Broiler Behaviour and Performance. PhD Thesis, University of Wales, Bangor, WalesGoogle Scholar
Prayitno, D S, Phillips, C J C and Omed, H M 1993 The initial and longterm preference of broilers for red, blue or green light after being reared in red, blue, green or white light. Animal Production 56: 438Google Scholar
Prayitno, D S, Phillips, C J C, Omed, H M and Piggins, D 1994 The effect of colour of lighting on the performance and behaviour of broilers. British Poultry Science 35: 173–175Google Scholar
Renden, J A, Bilgili, S F, Lien, R J and Kincaid, S A 1991 Live performance and yield of broilers provided various lighting schedules. Poultry Science 70: 2055–2062CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Savory, C J and Duncan, I J H 1982 Voluntary regulation of lighting by domestic fowls in Skinner boxes. Applied Animal Ethology 9: 73–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheideler, S E 1990 Effect of various light sources on broiler performance and efficiency of production under commercial conditions. Poultry Science 69: 1030–1033CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shutze, J V, Jensen, L S and Matson, W E 1959 Effect of lighting regimes on growth and subsequent egg production of chickens. Poultry Science 38: 1246Google Scholar
Simmons, PCM 1982 Effect of lighting regimes on twisted legs, feed conversion and growth of broiler chickens. Poultry Science 61: 1546Google Scholar
Siopes, T D, Timmons, M B, Baughman, G R and Parkhurst, C R 1983 The effect of light intensity on the growth performance of male turkeys. Poultry Science 62: 2336–2342CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Siopes, T D, Timmons, M B, Baughman, G R and Parkhurst, C R 1984 The effects of light intensity on turkey poult performance, eye morphology and adrenal weight. Poultry Science 63: 904–909CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sykes, A H 1988 Laying hens. In: Management & Welfare of Farm Animals: The UFAW Handbook, 3rd edition pp 197–219. Baillière Tindall: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Tanaka, T and Hurnik, J F 1991 Behavioral responses of hens to simulated dawn and dusk periods. Poultry Science 70: 483–488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wathes, C M, Spechter, H H and Bray, T S 1982 The effect of light illuminance and wavelength on the growth of broiler chickens. Journal of Agricultural Science 98: 195–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wells, R G 1971 A comparison of red and white light and high and low protein regimes for growing pullets. British Poultry Science 12: 313–325Google ScholarPubMed
Whitley, R D, Albert, R A, McDaniel, G R, Brewer, R N, Mora, E C and Henderson, R A 1984 Photo-induced buphthalmic eyes 1. Continuous fluorescent light. Poultry Science 63: 1537–1542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Widowski, T M and Duncan, I J H In press. The absence of preference for high-frequency versus low-frequency compact fluorescent light sources by laying hens. Canadian Journal of Animal ScienceGoogle Scholar
Widowski, T M, Keeling, L J and Duncan, I J H 1992 The preferences of hens for compact fluorescent over incandescent lighting. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 72: 203–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, J L, Weaver, W D, Beane, W L and Cherry, J A 1984 Effects of light and feeding space on leg abnormalities in broilers. Poultry Science 63: 565–567CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zimmermann, N G 1988 Broiler performance when reared under various light sources. Poultry Science 67: 43–51CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed