Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T17:13:08.888Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Effects of Elevated Platforms and Concealment Screens on the Welfare of Blue Foxes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2023

J Mononen ,
S Kasanen ,
M Harri ,
J Sepponen  and
T Rekilä
S Kasanen
Affiliation:
University of Kuopio, Institute of Applied Biotechnology, PO Box 1627, FIN-70211 Kuopio, Finland
M Harri
Affiliation:
University of Kuopio, Institute of Applied Biotechnology, PO Box 1627, FIN-70211 Kuopio, Finland
J Sepponen
Affiliation:
University of Kuopio, Institute of Applied Biotechnology, PO Box 1627, FIN-70211 Kuopio, Finland
T Rekilä
Affiliation:
University of Kuopio, Institute of Applied Biotechnology, PO Box 1627, FIN-70211 Kuopio, Finland
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Nowadays in Europe, farmed blue foxes are kept for most of the year in wire-mesh cages furnished with a platform for resting and observing the environment but without any opportunity for hiding from other foxes or from man. We studied the welfare effects of providing an elevated platform and two types of concealment screens in singly housed juvenile male blue foxes (n = 46) from August to December. The foxes were allocated to four experimental groups: group C had no furnishing in the cage, group P had a platform in the cage, group U had a platform and a concealment screen in the cage, and group O had a platform and a concealment screen on the outer wall of the cage. The blue foxes with platforms (groups P, U and O) spent the majority of their time on the platforms both when their cages were approached by man and as revealed by 24 h video recording. The 24 h recordings revealed that the foxes tended to avoid those locations in the cage where the screens obstructed their view (groups U and O); however, when the screens allowed the foxes to hide from an approaching man (group U), they were used for that purpose to some extent. There were no differences between the four groups in terms of growth, increase in rectal temperature after an acutely stressing situation, adrenal size, or fearfulness. The urinary cortisol: creatinine ratio showed that foxes in group U may have been less stressed than those in groups P and O in September, but no differences were observed in October. The concealment screens of group U may have improved the welfare of these blue foxes.

Keywords

animal welfareblue foxconcealment screenelevated platformfearfur farmingresting platform
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 10 , Issue 4 , November 2001 , pp. 373 - 385
Copyright
© 2001 UfAW, The Old School, Brewhouse Hill, Wheathampstead, Herts ALA 8AN, UK

References

Alasuutari, S and Korhonen, H 1992 Environmental enrichment in relation to behaviour in farmbred blue foxes. Norwegian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, Suppl 9: 569–573Google Scholar
Broom, D M and Johnson, K G 1993 Stress and Animal Welfare pp 76–86. Chapman & Hall: London, UKCrossRefGoogle Scholar
CEC 1990 Commission of the European Communities Study into legal, technical and animal welfare aspects offur farming. Contract no. 3814/12, July 1990. C & Τ Services: Sussex, UKGoogle Scholar
Dalsgaard, T M S and Pedersen, V 1999 Long-term effects of handling the blue fox during the post-weaning period, In: Bøe, K E, Bakken, M and Braastad, B O (eds) Proceedings of the 33rd International Congress of the International Society for Applied Ethology p 44. Agricultural University of Norway: Ås, NorwayGoogle Scholar
European Convention 1998 Standing Committee of the European Convention for the protection of animals kept for farming purposes. Recommendation concerning fur animals T-AP (96) 19Google Scholar
Frafjord, K, Becker, D and Angerbjörn, A 1989 Interactions between arctic and red foxes in Scandinavia — prédation and aggression. Arctic 42: 354–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harri, M, Rekilä, T and Mononen, J 1995 Factor analysis of behavioural tests in farmed silver foxes and blue foxes. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 42: 217–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harri, M, Mononen, J, Rekilä, T, Korhonen, H and Niemelä, P 1998 Effects of top nest boxes on growth, fur quality and behaviour of blue foxes during their growing season. Acta Agriculturæ: Scandinavica (Section A: Animal Science) 48: 184–191Google Scholar
Jeppesen, L L and Pedersen, V 1990 Improvement of management routines and cage systems in fox production. Scientifur 14: 237–242Google Scholar
Korhonen, H and Niemelä, P 1995 Comparison of production results between blue foxes housed with and without platforms. Agricultural Science in Finland 4: 351–361Google Scholar
Korhonen, H and Niemelä, P 1996 Comparison between the use of open and walled platforms by juvenile blue foxes (Alopex lagopus). Agricultural and Food Science in Finland 5: 177–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korhonen, H, Alasuutari, S and Niemelä, P 1994 Use of various resting platforms by group-housed blue foxes. Scientifur 18: 89–94Google Scholar
Korhonen, H, Ketoja, E and Niemelä, P 1995 Comparison of daytime use between platform types, materials, ceilings and experiences in juvenile blue foxes (Alopex lagopus). Applied Animal Behaviour Science 45: 125–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, P and Bateson, P 1993 Measuring Behaviour: An Introductory Guide, Edn 2 pp 84–100. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UKCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moe, R O 1996 Investigation of methods to assess stress in farmed silver foxes (Vulpes vulpes): PhD thesis, Norwegian College of Veterinary Medicine, Oslo, NorwayGoogle Scholar
Mononen, J 1996 Resting platforms and nest boxes for farmed blue foxes (Alopex lagopus): and silver foxes (Vulpes vulpes): the extent of use, reasons for use and welfare effects. PhD thesis, Kuopio University Printing Office, Kuopio, FinlandGoogle Scholar
Mononen, J, Rekilä, T and Harri, M 1993 Young blue foxes (Alopex lagopus) prefer resting platforms with an unobstructed view. In: Nichelman, M, Wierenga, H and Braun, S (eds) Proceedings of the International Congress on Applied Ethology, 26-30 July, Berlin, Germany pp 532–534. Humboldt Universität: Berlin, GermanyGoogle Scholar
Mononen, J, Harri, M and Rekilä, T 1996a Comparison of preferences of farmed silver and blue foxes for cages with and without a nest box. Acta Agriculturæ: Scandinavica (Section A: Animal Science) 46: 117–124Google Scholar
Mononen, J, Harri, M and Rekilä, T 1996b Farmed foxes prefer a cage with an unobstructed view. Scandinavian Journal of Laboratory Animal Science 23: 43–48Google Scholar
Mononen, J, Harri, M, Sepponen, J and Ahola, L 1999a A note on the effects of an obstructed view on cage choices in farmed foxes. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 61: 79–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mononen, J, Harri, M, Rekilä, T, Kasanen, S, Nurminen, L and Ahola, L 1999b Some correlations between behaviour, physiology and growth in juvenile male blue foxes. Polish Society of Animal Production: Applied Science Reports 42: 233–243Google Scholar
Norusis, M J 1990 SPSS/PC Statistics 4.0 for the IBM PC/XT/A T and PS/2. SPSS Inc: Chicago, USAGoogle Scholar
Nowak, R M and Paradiso, J L 1983 Walker’s Mammals of the World Vol II, Edn 4 pp 940–942. Johns Hopkins University Press: Baltimore, USAGoogle Scholar
Pedersen, V and Jeppesen, L L 1993 Daytime use of various types of whole-year shelters in farmed silver foxes (Vulpes vulpes) and blue foxes (Alopex lagopus). Applied Animal Behaviour Science 36: 259–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rekilä, T 1999 Behavioural tests in welfare research of foxes. PhD thesis, Kuopio University Printing Office, Kuopio, FinlandGoogle Scholar
Rekilä, T, Mononen, J and Harri, M 1996 Effects of inside cage and outside cage environment on behaviour test performance of blue foxes. Acta Agriculturœ Scandinavica (Section A: Animal Science) 46: 247–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rekilä, T, Harri, M and Ahola, L 1997a Validation of the feeding test as an index of fear in farmed blue (Alopex lagopus) and silver foxes (Vulpes vulpes). Physiology and Behavior 62: 805–810CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rekilä, T, Jalkanen, L, Pyykönen, T and Harri, M 1997b Årlig variation i blårävens serum kortisolnivå. Nordiska Jordbruksforskares Förening, Utredning/Rapport 116: 153–156 [Title translation: Seasonal variation in serum Cortisol level in blue foxes]Google Scholar
Siegel, S and Castellan, N J 1988 Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioural Sciences, Edn 2 pp 206–216. McGraw-Hill: New York, USAGoogle Scholar
Underwood, L and Mosher, J A 1982 Arctic fox. In: Chapman, J A and Feldhamer, G A (eds) Wild Mammals of North America pp 491–503. Johns Hopkins University Press: Baltimore, USAGoogle Scholar