Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T05:04:13.378Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of housing and handling practices on the welfare, behaviour and selection of domestic cats (Felis sylvestris catus) by adopters in an animal shelter

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2023

N Gourkow  and
D Fraser
N Gourkow*
Affiliation:
Animal Welfare Program, Faculty of Land and Food Systems, University of British Columbia, Vancouver V6T 1Z4, Canada
D Fraser
Affiliation:
Animal Welfare Program, Faculty of Land and Food Systems, University of British Columbia, Vancouver V6T 1Z4, Canada
*
* Contact for correspondence and request for reprints: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

As adult cats can often be difficult to re-home, they may spend long periods in rescue shelters where barren housing and inconsistent handling can reduce their welfare. In this study, 165 adult cats in an animal shelter in Vancouver, Canada, were assigned to four treatments. The Basic Single treatment reflected typical conditions in that particular shelter, with cats handled in an inconsistent manner by various staff and housed singly in relatively barren cages. Three alternative treatments involved more consistent, positive handling by only the experimenter and research assistants, plus three housing conditions: Enriched Single (individual cages with opportunities to perch and hide), Basic Communal (group housing with opportunity for each cat to have personal space), and Enriched Communal (group housing enriched to encourage play and cat – cat interaction). The Basic Single treatment had the lowest percentage adopted in 21 days (45% versus 69-76% for other treatment, and higher stress scores than other treatments. The three alternative treatments did not differ significantly on any measure. Cats euthanised for poor health showed higher stress levels when alive than other cats. In a questionnaire, most adopters cited certain behavioural/emotional traits (‘friendly’, ‘playful’, ‘happy’) as reasons for selecting cats; these were generally associated with lower stress scores. The results suggest that consistent handling combined with a range of improved housing options can improve the chances of adoption for adult cats, perhaps by reducing fear-related behaviours that make cats less attractive to adopters.

Keywords

adoptionanimal shelteranimal welfareenrichmenthandlingshelter stress
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 15 , Issue 4 , November 2006 , pp. 371 - 377
Copyright
© 2006 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

References

Albert, A 1998 Life course and motives for adopting pets: a preliminary analysis. ISAZ Newsletter 16: 5–9Google Scholar
Beaver, BV 1981 Behavioral considerations for laboratory dogs and cats. Animal Health Technology 2: 212–215Google Scholar
Broom, DM and Johnson, KG 1993 Stress and Animal Welfare. Chapman & Hall: London, UKCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlstead, K, Brown, JL and Strawn, W 1993 Behavioral and physiological correlates of stress in laboratory cats. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 38: 143–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casey, RA 2003 Reasons of relinquishment of cats to shelters in the UK. In: Proceedings of the British Small Animal Veterinary Association Congress. 3-6 April 2003. Birmingham, UKGoogle Scholar
Endenburg, N, Hart, H and Bouw, J 1994 Motives for acquiring companion animals. Journal of Economic Psychology 1: 191–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hemsworth, PH and Gonyou, HW 1997 Human contact. In: Appleby, MC and Hughes, BO (eds) Animal Welfare pp 205–217. CAB International: Wallingford, UKGoogle Scholar
Hennessy, B, Williams, MT, Miller, DD, Douglas, CW and Voith, VL 1998 Influence of male and female petters on plasma cortisol and behaviour: can human interaction reduce stress of dogs in a public shelter? Applied Animal Behaviour Science 61: 63–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humane Society of the United States 1995 Cat housing: more than just shelter. Shelter Sense 1: 13–20Google Scholar
Karsh, EB and Turner, DC 1988 The human-cat relationship. In: Turner, DC and Bateson, P (eds) The Domestic Cat: The Biology of its Behaviour pp 159–177. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
Kessler, MR and Turner, DC 1997 Stress and adaptation of cats (Felis silvestris catus) housed singly in pairs and in groups in boarding catteries. Animal Welfare 6: 243–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kessler, MR and Turner, DC 1999 Effects of density and cage size on stress in domestic cats (Felis sylvestris catus) housed in animal shelters and boarding catteries. Animal Welfare 8: 259–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCune, S 1992 Temperament and Welfare of Caged Cats. PhD Thesis, University of Cambridge: Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
McCune, S 1994 Caged cats: avoiding problems and providing solutions. Companion Animal Behaviour Therapy Study Group Newsletter 7: 33–40Google Scholar
Mertens, PA and Unshelm, J 1996 Effects of group and individual housing on the behavior of kennelled dogs in animal shelters. Anthrozoös 9: 40–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller-Dowling, J and Stitely, C 1997 Killing ourselves over the euthanasia debate. Shelter Sense 2: 4–15Google Scholar
O'Farrell, V and Neville, P 1994 The BSAVA Manual of Feline Behaviour. British Small Animal Veterinary Association: Cheltenham, UKGoogle Scholar
Ottway, DS and Hawkins, DM 2003 Cat housing in rescue shelters: A welfare comparison between communal and discrete-unit housing. Animal Welfare 12: 173–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patronek, GJ, Glickman, LT, Beck, AM, McCabe, GP and Ecker, C 1996 Risk factors for relinquishment of cats to an animal shelter. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 209: 582–588Google Scholar
Podberscek, AL and Blackshaw, JK 1988 Reasons for liking and choosing a cat as a pet. Australian Veterinary Journal 65: 332–333CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rochlitz, I 1997 The Welfare of Cats kept in Confined Environments. PhD Thesis, University of Cambridge: Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
Rochlitz, I, Podberscek, AL and Broom, DM 1996 A questionnaire survey on aspects of cat adoption from an animal rescue shelter. Proceedings, Society for Companion Animal Studies, Glasgow: pp 65-66 (Abstract)Google Scholar
Rochlitz, I, Podberscek, AL and Broom, DM 1998a Welfare of cats in a quarantine cattery. Veterinary Record 143: 35–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rochlitz, I, Podberscek, AL and Broom, DM 1998b Effect of quarantine on cats and their owners. Veterinary Record 143: 181–185CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Salman, MD, New, JG Jr, Scarlet, JM and Kass, PH 1998 Human and animal factors related to relinquishment of dogs and cats in 12 selected animal shelters in the United States. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science 1: 207–226CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sapolsky, RM 1992 Neuroendocrinology of the stress-response. In: Becker, JB, Breedlove, SM and Crews, D (eds) Behavioral Endocrinology pp 287–324. MIT Press: Cambridge, USAGoogle Scholar
SAS Institute 1994 SAS User's Guide (Version 5). SAS Institute Inc: Cary, USAGoogle Scholar
Siegel, S and Castellan, NJ 1988 Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences, Second Edition. McGraw Hill: New York, USAGoogle Scholar
Smith, DFE, Durman, KJ, Roy, DB and Bradshaw, JWS 1994 Behavioural aspects of the welfare of rescued cats. Journal of Feline Advisory Bureau 31: 25–28, 39Google Scholar
Voith, VL and Borchelt, PL 1996 Social behavior of the domestic cat. In: Voith, VL and Borchelt, PL (eds) Readings in Companion Animal Behavior pp 248–257. Veterinary Learning Systems: Trenton, USAGoogle Scholar
Wells, DL and Hepper, PG 1992 The behaviour of dogs in a rescue shelter. Animal Welfare 1: 171–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar