Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T17:26:54.306Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of an open window and conspecifics within view on the welfare of stabled horses, estimated on the basis of positive and negative behavioural indicators

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2023

S Ninomiya ,
R Kusunose ,
Y Obara  and
S Sato
S Ninomiya*
Affiliation:
Graduate School of Agricultural Science, Tohoku University, 232-3 Yomogita, Naruko-Onsen, Osaki, Miyagi 989-6711, Japan
R Kusunose
Affiliation:
Equine Research Institute, Japan Racing Association, 321-4 Tokami, Utsunomiya, Tochigi 320-0856, Japan
Y Obara
Affiliation:
Department of Veterinary and Medicine Science, Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, 3-5-8 Saiwai, Fuchu, Tokyo 183-8509, Japan
S Sato
Affiliation:
Graduate School of Agricultural Science, Tohoku University, 232-3 Yomogita, Naruko-Onsen, Osaki, Miyagi 989-6711, Japan
*
* Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The effect of environmental enrichment on the welfare of stabled horses was estimated on the basis of positive and negative behavioural indicators. Six stabled horses were exposed for seven days to each of two conditions in early spring: i) a window at the back of the loose box was opened, but no horses were within the view of the subject horses (OW) and ii) the window in the loose box was opened and two horses that had been in the same stable as the subject horses were turned out to the paddock next to the stable and were within view of the subject horses (OWH). The window in the loose box had been closed prior to the start of the study for protection against the cold during winter months (CW condition) but horses could see outside the loose box through the grille door. The behaviour of the subject horses was recorded by video camera from 1300 to 1530h, firstly, in the CW condition for the three days prior to treatment as the control condition, and then for the last three days of each week in the OW and OWH conditions. The behaviour was focal- and instantaneous-sampled at 30-s intervals. Significant differences between the effects of the loose box conditions on the mean percentage of time spent in standing behaviour, looking behaviour, and bedding investigation behaviour (which may be an indicator of frustration) were observed but no significant difference in the mean percentage of time spent in standing-sleep behaviour (which may be an indicator of behavioural satisfaction) was observed. When the window was opened, bedding investigation and standing behaviour decreased and, when the conspecifics were within view, bedding investigation behaviour decreased and looking behaviour increased. The results suggested that the OW and OWH treatments suppressed the frustration of stabled horses which did not perform any abnormal behaviour, but may not increase the behavioural satisfaction of stabled horses.

Keywords

animal welfarebedding investigationenvironmental enrichmentfrustrationsleepstabled horses
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 17 , Issue 4 , November 2008 , pp. 351 - 354
Copyright
© 2008 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

References

Cooper, JJ and Mason, GJ 1998 The identification of abnormal behaviour and behavioural problems in stabled horses and their relationship to horse welfare: a comparative review. Equine Veterinary Journal Supplement 27: 5–9Google Scholar
Cooper, JJ, McDonald, L and Mills, DS 2000 The effect of increasing visual horizons on stereotypic weaving: implications for the social housing of stabled horses. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 69: 67–83CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cooper, JJ, McCall, N, Johnson, S and Davidson, HPB 2005 The short-term effects of increasing meal frequency on stereotypic behaviour of stabled horses. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 90: 351–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farm Animal Welfare Council 1992 FAWC updates the five freedoms. The Veterinary Record 131: 357Google Scholar
Goodwin, D, Davidson, HPB and Harris, P 2002 Foraging enrichment for stabled horses: effects on behaviour and selection. Equine Veterinary Journal 34: 686–691CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hausberger, M, Gautier, E, Müller, C and Jego, P 2007 Lower learning abilities in stereotypic horses. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 107: 299–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hemmings, A, McBride, SD and Hale, CE 2007 Perseverative responding and the aetiology of equine oral stereotypy. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 104: 143–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, BO and Duncan, IJH 1988 The notion of ethological ‘need’, models of motivation and animal welfare. Animal Behaviour 36: 1696–1707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, G, Clubb, R, Latham, N and Vickery, S 2007 Why and how should we use environmental enrichment to tackle stereotypic behaviour? AppliedAnimalBehaviourScience 102: 163–188Google Scholar
McAfee, LM, Mills, DS and Cooper, JJ 2002 The use of mirrors for the control of stereotypic weaving behaviour in the stabled horse. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 78: 159–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mench, JA and Mason, GJ 1997 Behaviour. In: Appleby, MC and Hughes, BO (eds) Animal Welfare pp 127–141. CABI Publishing: Wallingford, UKGoogle Scholar
Mills, DS and Clarke, A 2002 Housing, management and welfare. In: Waran, N (ed) The Welfare of Horses pp 77–97. Kluwer Academic Press: Dordrecht, The NetherlandsCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mills, DS and Davenport, K 2002 The effect of a neighbouring conspecific versus the use of a mirror for the control of stereotypic weaving behaviour in the stabled horse. Animal Science 74: 95–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mills, DS and Riezebos, M 2005 The role of the image of a conspecific in the regulation of stereotypic head movements in the horse. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 91: 155–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, KN and Tromborg, CT 2007 Sources of stress in captivity. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 102: 262–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicol, CJ, Davidson, HPD, Harris, PA, Waters, AJ and Wilson, AD 2002 Study of crib-biting and gastric inflammation and ulceration in young horses. The Veterinary Record 151: 658–662CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ninomiya, S, Kusunose, R, Sato, S, Terada, M and Sugawara, K 2004 Effects of feeding methods on eating frustration in horses. Animal Science Journal 75: 465–469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ninomiya, S, Sato, S and Sugawara, K 2007a Weaving in stabled horses and its relationship to other behavioural traits. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 106: 134–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ninomiya, S, Sato, S, Kusunose, R, Mitumasu, T and Obara, Y 2007b A note on a behavioural indicator of satisfaction in stabled horses. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 106: 184–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorne, JB, Goodwin, D, Kennedy, MJ, Davidson, HPB and Harris, P 2005 Foraging enrichment for individually housed horses: Practicality and effects on behaviour. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 94: 149–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waring, HG 2003 Horse Behavior, 2nd Edition pp 117-123, 272, 372. Noyes and William Andrew: New York, USAGoogle Scholar
Webster, J 2005 Challenge and Response. In: Webster, J (ed) Animal Welfare: Limping Toward Eden pp 24–45. Blackwell Publishing: Oxford, UKCrossRefGoogle Scholar