Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T04:46:30.034Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Economics and animal welfare in small animal veterinary practice: the case of genetic welfare problems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

J Yeates
J Yeates*
Affiliation:
RSPCA, Wilberforce Way, Southwater, Horsham, West Sussex RH13 9RS, UK
*
email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Veterinary practice is subject to veterinary surgeons’ professional ethics, which ensure that patients’ welfare is considered paramount and clients’ interests are considered important. The provision of veterinary services is also subject to market forces that can affect transactions between clients and veterinarians. Veterinary markets could encourage or permit welfare harms due to potential market variations, imperfections and limitations, for example where financial constraints limit owners’ willingness to pay for treatment or veterinarians’ abilities to provide pro bono treatment. Consequently, economic factors could lead to potential welfare compromises through animals being undertreated, overtreated or mistreated. Fortunately there are possible solutions to these problems. Some are supplier-driven, for example improved the market functioning through transparency and honesty, strategically disrupting it through co-ordinating clinical standards and protocols or using veterinary authority to influence clients. Others are consumer-driven, for example improving consumer decision-making through the actions of insurance companies.

Keywords

animal welfaredogeconomicsovertreatmentundertreatmentveterinary practice
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 21 , Issue S1: Proceedings of the UFAW International Symposium ‘Making animal improvements: Economic and other incentives and constraints’ Historic Dockyard, Portsmouth, UK, 2011 , May 2012 , pp. 155 - 160
Copyright
© 2012 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

References

Albert, A and Bulcroft, K 1987 Pets and Urban Life. Anthrozoös 1(1): 9–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.2752/089279388787058740CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anon 2011 Where now for pet insurance? Veterinary Practice 43(4): 1–3Google Scholar
Bateson, P 2010 Independent Inquiry into Dog Breeding. Available at www.dogbreedinginquiry.com. (Accessed 1 November 2011)Google Scholar
Bones, VC and Yeates, J 2012 The emergence of veterinary oaths: social, historical and ethical considerations. Journal of Animal Ethics 2(1): 20–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Endenberg, N, Hart, H and de Vries, HW 1992 Differences between owners and non-owners of companion animals. Anthrozoos 4(2): 120–126. http://dx.doi.org/10.2752/089279391787057242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freidson, RG 1980 Medicine under Capitalism. Clarendon Press: Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
Goldman, AH 1980 The Moral Foundations of Professional Ethics. Rowman & Littlefield: Totowa, USGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, RD 1975 Trends in the ownership of domestic pets in Great Britain. In: Anderson, RS (ed) Pet Animals & Society pp 96-102. Balliere Tindall: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Havighurst, CC 1988 The questionable cost-containment record of commercial health insurers. In: Frech, HE (ed) Health Care in America: the Political Economy of Hospitals and Health Insurance pp 221–257. Pacific Institute for Public Policy: San Francisco, USAGoogle Scholar
Higgins, A and Nicholas, FW 2008 The breeding of pedigree dogs: time for strong leadership. The Veterinary Journal 178: 157–158. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2008.10.004CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, N 1995 Private Markets in Health & Welfare. Berg Publishers Ltd: Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
Laing, W 1985 Private Health Care. Office of Health Economics: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Main, DCJ 2006 Offering the best to patients: ethical issues associated with the provision of veterinary services. Veterinary Record 158: 62–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/vr.158.2.62CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Milgrom, P 1993 Is sympathy an economic value? Philosophy, economics and the contingent valuation method. In: Hausman, JA (ed) Contingent Valuation: A Critical Assessment. North-Holland: Amsterdam, The Netherlands. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/S0573-8555(1993)0000220014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, D 1990 Market, State & Community: Theoretical Foundations of Market Socialism. Clarendon Press: Oxford, UKCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, JK, Browne, WJ, Roberts, MA, Whitmarsh, A and Gruffydd-Jones, TJ 2010 Number and ownership profiles of cats and dogs in the UK. Veterinary Record 166: 163–168. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/vr.b4712CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nicholas, FW and Wade, CM 2010 Disorders in pedigree dogs: assembling the evidence. The Veterinary Journal 183: 8–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2009.11.008CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reisman, D 1993 The Political Economy of Health Care. St Martin's Press: New York, USACrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rollin, BE 2002 The use and abuse of Aesculapian authority in veterinary medicine. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 220: 1144–1149. http://dx.doi.org/10.2460/javma.2002.220.1144CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Triplett, JE 1999 Measuring the Prices of Medical Treatments. Brookings International Press: Washington, USAGoogle Scholar
Westgarth, C, Pinchbeck, GL, Bradshaw, JWS, Dawson, S, Gaskell, RM and Christley, RM 2007 Factors associated with dog ownership and contact with dogs in a UK Community. BMC Veterinary Research 3: 5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-6148-3-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, DJ 2001 Information, incentives and insurer behaviour: an analysis of selection in the health insurance market. PhD Thesis, University of Bristol, UKGoogle Scholar
Yeates, J 2009 Response and responsibility: an analysis of veterinary ethical conflicts. The Veterinary Journal 182(1): 3–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2009.05.018CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yeates, J 2010a The application of veterinary stem cell technologies to dogs and horses. In: Campbell, AV and Capps, BC (eds) Bioethics and the Global Politics of Stem Cell Science: Medical Applications in a Pluralistic World. Imperial College Press/World Scientific Publishing Co: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Yeates, J 2010b When to euthanase. Veterinary Record 166: 370–371. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/vr.c226CrossRefGoogle Scholar