Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T17:34:18.108Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Connecting farmer mental health with cow health and welfare on dairy farms using robotic milking systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

MTM King ,
RD Matson  and
TJ DeVries
MTM King*
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Biosciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1, Canada
RD Matson
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Biosciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1, Canada
TJ DeVries*
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Biosciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1, Canada
*
* Contact for correspondence: [email protected]/[email protected]
* Contact for correspondence: [email protected]/[email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The objective of this exploratory, preliminary study was to survey dairy farmers using robotic milking systems to better understand their mental health and potential connections to their cow health and welfare. Only farms using robotic milking systems in Ontario, Canada were visited for collection of data on management practices, cow welfare, and milk production and quality. Those farmers also completed an online survey that included validated psychometric scales used to assess resilience, stress, anxiety, and depression; results from 28 farms were analysed. Thirty cows per farm (or 30% for herds > 100 milking cows) were scored for body condition (five-point scale: 1 = thin to 5 = over-conditioned) and lameness (five-point scale: 1 = sound to 5 = lame); cows with a Body Condition Score ≤ 2.5 and lameness score ≥ 4 were defined as under-conditioned and severely lame, respectively. Farmer stress was positively associated with severe lameness prevalence, was greater for females vs males, and was greater for those feeding manually vs using an automated feeder. Anxiety and depression were greater for females vs males, and for those working alone, feeding manually, and with lesser milk protein percentage. Anxiety was also positively associated with the prevalence of severe lameness. Resilience was greater for those with automated feeding systems, but tended to be negatively associated with milk yield per robot and positively associated with milk somatic cell count. This is the first study to identify associations between farmer well-being and cow lameness, udder health, and milk yield. With future research, we can better understand this relationship to improve the well-being of both agricultural animals and their caretakers.

Keywords

animal welfareautomationdairy cow welfarelamenessmental healthOne Welfare
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 30 , Issue 1 , February 2021 , pp. 25 - 38
Copyright
© 2021 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

References

Adler, F, Christley, R and Campe, A 2019 Invited review: Examining farmers’ personalities and attitudes as possible risk fac-tors for dairy cattle health, welfare, productivity, and farm man-agement: A systematic scoping review. Journal of Dairy Science 102:3805–3824. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2018-15037CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Améndola, L, Solorio, FJ, Ku-Vera, JC, Améndola-Massiotti, RD, Zarza, H and Galindo, F 2016 Social behaviour of cattle in tropical silvopastoral and monoculture systems. Animal 10: 863–867. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731115002475CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Andrade, SB and Anneberg, I 2014 Farmers under pressure. Analysis of the Social Conditions of Cases of Animal Neglect 27: 103–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-013-9456-9Google Scholar
Barnes, AP, Rutherford, KMD, Langford, FM and Haskell, MJ 2011 The effect of lameness prevalence on technical efficien-cy at the dairy farm level: An adjusted data envelopment analysis approach. Journal of Dairy Science 94: 5449–5457. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2011-4262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartram, DJ, Yadegarfar, G and Baldwin, DS 2009 A cross-sectional study of mental health and well-being and their associations in the UK veterinary profession. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology 44: 1075–1085. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-009-0030-8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bauman, CA, Barkema, HW, Dubuc, J, Keefe, GP and Kelton, DF 2016 Identifying management and disease priorities of Canadian dairy industry stakeholders. Journal of Dairy Science 99:10194–10202. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2016-11057CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bicalho, RC, Machado, VS and Caixeta, LS 2009 Lameness in dairy cattle: A debilitating disease or a disease of debilitated cat-tle? A cross-sectional study of lameness prevalence and thickness of the digital cushion. Journal of Dairy Science 92: 3175–3184. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2008-1827CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Booth, NJ and Lloyd, K 1999 Stress in Farmers. International Journal of Psychiatry 46: 67–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/002076400004600108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell-Sills, L and Stein, MB 2007 Psychometric analysis and refinement of the Connor Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC): Validation of a 10-Item measure of resilience. Journal of Traumatic Stress 20: 1019–1028. https://doi.org/10.1002/jts.20271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canadian Council on Animal Care (CCAC) 2009 Guidelines on: The care and use of farm animals in research, teaching and testing. Canadian Council on Animal Care: Ottawa, ON, CanadaGoogle Scholar
Cohen, S, Kamarck, T and Mermelstein, R 1983 A global measure of perceived stress. Journal of Health and Social Behavior 24: 385–396. https://doi.org/10.2307/2136404CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Connor, KM and Davidson, JRT 2003 Development of a new resilience scale: Depression and Anxiety 82: 76–82. https://doi.org/10.1002/da.10113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dembelle, I, Špinka, M, Stehulova, I, Panama, J and Firla, P 2006 Factors contributing to the incidence and prevalence of lameness on Czech dairy farms. Czech Journal of Animal Science 51:102–109. https://doi.org/10.17221/3916-CJASCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devitt, C, Kelly, P, Blake, M, Hanlon, A and More S, J 2014 An investigation into the human element of on-farm animal wel-fare incidents in Ireland. Sociologia Ruralis 55: 400–416. https://doi.org/10.1111/soru.12069CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeVries, TJ, Aarnoudse, MG, Barkema, HW, Leslie, KE and von Keyserlingk, MAG 2012 Associations of dairy cow behav-ior, barn hygiene, cow hygiene, and risk of elevated somatic cell count. Journal of Dairy Science 95: 5730–5739. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2012-5375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dohoo, I, Martin, W and Stryhn, H 2012 Sampling. Methods in Epidemiologic Research pp 48–50. VER Inc: Charlottetown, PEI, CanadaGoogle Scholar
Endres, MI, Lobeck-Luchterhand, KM, Espejo, LA and Tucker, CB 2014 Evaluation of the sample needed to accurately estimate outcome-based measurements of dairy welfare on farm. Journal of Dairy Science 97: 3523–3530. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2013-7464CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flower, FC and Weary, DM 2006 Effect of hoof pathologies on subjective assessments of dairy cow gait. Journal of Dairy Science 89: 139–146. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(06)72077-XCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fraser, D 2008 Understanding animal welfare. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica 7: S1. https://doi.org/10.1186/1751-0147-50-S1-S1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galindo, F, Huertas, SM and Gallo, C 2017 ‘One Welfare’: towards sustainable livestock production systems. OIE Bulletin 1:8–13. https://doi.org/10.20506/bull.2017.1.2589CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregoire, A 2002 The mental health of farmers. Occupational Medicine 52: 471–476. https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/52.8.471CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hanna, D, Sneddon, IA and Beattie, VE 2009 The relationship between the stockperson's personality and attitudes and the pro-ductivity of dairy cows. Animal 3: 737–743. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731109003991CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hounsome, B and Edwards, RT 2006 A note on the effect of farmer mental health on adoption: The case of agri-environment schemes. Agricultural Systems 91: 229–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2006.09.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hounsome, B, Edwards, RT, Hounsome, N and Edwards-Jones, G 2012 Psychological morbidity of farmers and non-farming population: Results from a UK Survey. Community Mental Health Journal 48: 503–510. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-011-9415-8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jones-Bitton, A, Best, C, Mactavish, J, Fleming, S and Hoy, S 2019 Stress, anxiety, depression, and resilience in Canadian farm-ers. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology 55: 229–236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-019-01738-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kauppinen, T, Mikko, K and Valros, A 2012 Farmer attitude toward improvement of animal welfare is correlated with piglet production parameters. Livestock Science 143: 142–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2011.09.011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kauppinen, T, Vainio, A, Valros, A, Rita, H and Vesala, KM 2010 Improving animal welfare: qualitative and quantitative methodology in the study of farmers’ attitudes. Animal Welfare 19: 523–536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kearney, GD, Rafferty, AP, Hendricks, LR, Landon Allen, D and Tutor-Marcom, R 2014 A cross-sectional survey of stres-sors among farmers in Easter North Carolina. North Carolina Medical Journal 75: 384–392. https://doi.org/10.18043/ncm.75.6.384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, PC, More, SJ, Blake, M and Hanlon, AJ 2011 Identification of key performance indicators for on-farm animal welfare incidents: possible tools for early warning and prevention. Irish Veterinary Journal 64: 13. https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-0481-64-13CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kerby, J 1992 How stressed are rural people? Rural Society 2: 15–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/10371656.1992.11005060CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, MTM, Crossley, RE and DeVries, TJ 2016 Impact of timing of feed delivery on the behavior and productivity of dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 99: 1471–1482. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2015-9790CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lim, PY, Huxley, JN, Willshire, JA, Green, MJ, Othman, AR and Kaler, J 2015 Unravelling the temporal association between lameness and body condition score in dairy cattle using a multi-state modelling approach. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 118: 370–377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2014.12.015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mancera, KF, Zarza, H, Lopéz de Buen, L, García, AAC, Palazios, FM and Galindo, F 2018 Integrating links between tree coverage and cattle welfare in silvopastoral systems evaluation. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 38: 19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-018-0517-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matson, RD, King, MTM, Duffield, TF, Santschi, DE, Orsel, K, Pajor, EA, Penner, GB, Mustvangwa, T and DeVries, TJ 2020 Identifying factors associated with lameness and its impact on productivity in automated milking herds. Journal of Dairy Science. E-Supplement 1(103): 10Google Scholar
Milner, A, Spittal, MJ, Pirkis, J and LaMontagne, AD 2013 Suicide by occupation: Systematic review and meta-analysis. British Journal of Psychiatry 203: 409–416. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.113.128405CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nathanson, JN 2009 Animal hoarding: Slipping into the darkness of co-morbid animal and self-neglect. Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect 21: 307–324. https://doi.org/10.1080/08946560903004839CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peel, D, Berry, HL and Schirmer, J 2015 Perceived profitabili-ty and well-being in Australian dryland farmers and irrigators. Australian Journal of Rural Health 23: 207–214. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajr.12176CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pinillos, G, Appleby, M, Manteca, X, Scott-Park, F, Smith, C and Velarde, A 2016 One Welfare: a platform for improving human and animal welfare. Veterinary Record 179: 412–413. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.i5470CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pinillos, RG 2018 The path to developing a One Welfare framework. In One Welfare: a framework to improve animal welfare and human well-being. CAB International: Oxford, UK. https://doi.org/10.1079/9781786393845.0000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ritter, C, Adams, CL, Kelton, DF and Barkema, HW 2019 Factors associated with dairy farmers’ satisfaction and prepared-ness to adopt recommendations after veterinary herd health vis-its. Journal of Dairy Science 102: 4280–4293. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2018-15825CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rouha-Mülleder, C, Iben, C, Wagner, E, Laaha, G, Troxler, J and Waiblinger, S 2009 Relative importance of factors influencing the prevalence of lameness in Austrian cubicle loose-housed dairy cows. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 92: 123–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2009.07.008CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
SAS Institute 2013 SAS version 9.4. SAS Institute Inc: Cary, NC, USAGoogle Scholar
Thobaben, M 2006 Understanding compulsive hoarding. Psychosocial Perspectives 18: 152–154. https://doi.org/10.1177/1084822305281539Google Scholar
Tse, C, Barkema, HW, DeVries, TJ, Rushen, J, Vasseur, E and Pajor, EA 2018 Producer experience with transitioning to automatic milking: Cow training, challenges, and effect on quality of life. Journal of Dairy Science 101: 9599–9607. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2018-14662CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Villettaz Robichaud, M, Rushen, J, de Passillé, AM, Vasseur, E, Haley, D, Orsel, K and Pellerin, D 2018 Is the profitability of Canadian freestall farms associated with their performance on an animal welfare assessment? Journal of Dairy Science 101: 2350–2358. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2017-13315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westin, R, Vaughan, A, de Passillé, AM, DeVries, TJ, Pajor, EA, Pellerin, D, Siegford, JM, Witaifi, A, Vasseur, E and Rushen, J 2016 Cow- and farm-level risk factors for lameness on dairy farms with automated milking systems. Journal of Dairy Science 99: 3732–3743. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2015-10414CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wildman, EE, Jones, GM, Wagner, PE, Boman, RL, Troutt, HF and Lesch, TN 1982 A dairy cow body condition scoring system and its relationship to selected production characteristics. Journal of Dairy Science 65: 495–501. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(82)82223-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yazd, SD, Wheeler, SA and Zuo, A 2019 Key risk factors affecting farmers’ mental health: A systematic review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 16: 4849. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16234849CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zigmond, AS and Snaith, RP 1983 The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 67: 361–370. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: File

King et al. supplementary material
Download undefined(File)
File 81.5 KB